ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: A large congenital epulis in a neonate following maternal hydroxyprogesterone therapy: a case report and literature review

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 06 Apr 2026
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Background

Congenital epulis (CE), is a rare benign lesion of the oral cavity that presents at birth. The lesion most commonly originates from the anterior maxillary alveolar ridge and demonstrates a marked female predominance. Although its etiology remains uncertain, hormonal influence is often assumed. Large lesions may interfere with feeding or respiration and therefore require prompt management. This report documents a rare case of a large congenital epulis from Yemen and provides a brief review of the literature.

Methods

We describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome of a term female neonate presenting with a large oral mass. Clinical examination and surgical excision were performed, followed by histopathological evaluation. Additionally, a targeted literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to identify previously reported cases of congenital epulis published between 1871 and November 2025.

Results

The case presented with a pedunculated 4 × 3 cm mass arising from the anterior maxillary alveolar ridge and protruding from the oral cavity, preventing effective breastfeeding and leading to neonatal hypoglycemia. The mother received weekly intramuscular hydroxyprogesterone caproate injections during pregnancy for threatened abortion. Surgical excision of the lesion was performed under local anesthesia. Histopathological examination confirming the diagnosis of congenital epulis. The postoperative course was uneventful, feeding was successfully established, and no recurrence was observed during six months of follow-up. The literature review identified 32 reported cases, demonstrating a strong female predominance and frequent maxillary involvement. Surgical excision was the most reported treatment with excellent outcomes.

Conclusions

Large congenital epulis can lead to critical neonatal complications, such as feeding obstruction and hypoglycemia, necessitating prompt surgical excision. While the link between maternal hydroxyprogesterone therapy and tumor development remains speculative, this case highlights the importance of early diagnosis and intervention to ensure excellent long-term outcomes without recurrence.

Keywords

Congenital epulis, Congenital granular cell tumor, Neumann's tumor, Hydroxyprogesterone, Case report

Background

Congenital epulis (CE), also known as a congenital granular cell tumor (CGCT) or Neumann's tumor, is a rare benign oral soft tissue tumor that is present at birth.1 The condition was first described by Neumann in 1871.2 Its incidence is very low, with fewer than 250 reported cases in the literature.16 It has a dramatic and well-documented female predilection, with a female-to-male ratio reported between 8:1 and 10:1.17 To our knowledge, this is the first case reported from Yemen in the available literature.

Congenital epulis typically presents as a solitary, smooth-surfaced, pedunculated, or sessile mass, which can vary in size from a few millimeters to several centimeters.4,12 It most commonly arises from the anterior maxillary alveolar ridge, with mandibular occurrences being less frequent.3,15 The exact cause of congenital epulis is unclear. The higher incidence of tumors in females hints at a potential hormonal influence.5 However, this hypothesis has been difficult to confirm, as studies have consistently failed to identify estrogen or progesterone receptors within the tumor cells.12,13

While smaller lesions may be asymptomatic and can even regress spontaneously,6 a larger tumor can cause significant feeding difficulties and, rarely, airway obstruction.9 Surgical excision is usually recommended as it can interfere with the newborn's feeding and respiration, with a marked psychological impact on parents.7 The prognosis following simple excision is excellent, with no reported cases of malignant transformation or recurrence, even after incomplete removal.8 To our knowledge, this report presents the first documented case of a large congenital epulis from Yemen, distinguished by its anterior alveolar origin and a maternal history of hydroxyprogesterone therapy during pregnancy.

Case presentation

A 5-hour-old female neonate was referred from the maternity department to our emergency department for the evaluation of a large mass protruding from her mouth. The baby was born at 40 weeks of gestation via spontaneous vaginal delivery with episiotomy to a 30-year-old primiparous mother. The birth weight was 2.5 kg, and APGAR scores were 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min, respectively.

The mother’s antenatal history was significant for a threatened abortion diagnosed in the early second trimester, which was managed with complete bed rest and weekly intramuscular injections of hydroxyprogesterone caproate at a dose of 250 mg, which was continued until 37 weeks of gestation. The mother attended only two specific antenatal care visits during the entire pregnancy, a factor that likely contributed to the lack of prenatal diagnosis. Consequently, routine prenatal ultrasound screening was limited, and the oral anomaly was not detected in utero, leading to a surprising diagnosis at delivery. The patient had no family history of congenital or hereditary anomalies.

On presentation, the neonate was afebrile and showed signs of mild dehydration, with no signs of respiratory distress. The random blood sugar level was 46 mg/dL due to an inability to breastfeed, which was managed immediately with intravenous dextrose correction, and a nasogastric (NG) tube was inserted to ensure nutritional support while awaiting definitive treatment.

On examination, there was a large pedunculated fleshy mass approximately 4×3 cm in size in the anterior aspect of the upper alveolar ridge (maxillary gingiva) protruding extra orally, preventing complete mouth closure and separating the upper lips from the alveolar ridge ( Figure 1).

ed4a7887-5ba1-4e9d-8bb6-4ebd427bd8b2_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Clinical Presentation: Large, 4×3 cm pedunculated, pink, fleshy mass seen protruding from the oral cavity of the 5-hour-old neonate, originating from the anterior upper alveolar ridge.

Based on clinical presentation, a provisional diagnosis of congenital epulis was made. The differential diagnoses included teratoma, hemangioma, and rhabdomyosarcoma.

As the mass was large and interfered with breast feeding, the patient's parents were counseled regarding surgical excision of the lesion. On the 3rd day, the patient was referred to a pediatric maxillofacial surgeon, and the mass was excised at the base using electrocautery under local anesthesia. The excised mass was subjected to histopathological examination. The report described the presence of sheets of large polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm and eccentrically placed small round nuclei ( Figure 2). These findings are pathognomonic for congenital granular cell tumors (congenital epulis).

ed4a7887-5ba1-4e9d-8bb6-4ebd427bd8b2_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Histopathology (H&E Stain): showing classic features of congenital epulis. Note the unencapsulated, dense sheets of large polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm and small, eccentric nuclei.

The postoperative course was uneventful. The nasogastric tube was removed, and breastfeeding was successfully started on the second postoperative day to resolve primary morbidity ( Figure 3). The neonate was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. Regular Follow-up examinations at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months showed excellent healing, with no evidence of recurrence, and normal development.

ed4a7887-5ba1-4e9d-8bb6-4ebd427bd8b2_figure3.gif

Figure 3. postoperative View: neonate after Surgical excision of the mass from the maxillary gingiva.

Discussion

Congenital epulis is a rare, benign neoplasm of the newborn oral cavity.1 A targeted literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate for reports published between 1871 and November 2025 using the keywords ‘congenital epulis’, ‘congenital granular cell tumor’, and ‘Neumann’s tumor’. After screening relevant publications, 32 cases were included in the analysis. ( Table 2)

Table 1. Synthesized epidemiological and clinical characteristics of CGCT (n=32 cases).

CharacteristicSynthesized finding (n=32) Percentage/Detail
Epidemiology
Female Predilection28 Female: 3 Male (n=31)90.3% Female (Ratio 9.3:1)
Maxillary Involvement25 cases75.8% (Ratio 2.3:1 vs. Mandible)
Mandibular Involvement11 cases33.3%
Clinical presentation
Pedunculated15 cases45.5% (Explicitly mentioned)
Sessile2 cases6.1% (Explicitly mentioned)
Multiple Lesions7 cases21.2%
Size Range (Max. Dimension)2 mm to 5 cmSmallest: 2 mm (Case 27)
Largest: 5 cm (Case 5)
Management & Outcome
Surgical Intervention31 cases93.9% (Excision, Cautery, Laser)
Observation (Partial/Total)2 cases6.1% (Cases 23, 27)
Spontaneous Regression1 caseDocumented in Case 23
Reported Recurrence0 cases0% (Of 15 cases with explicit follow-up)

Table 2. Comprehensive literature review of congenital epulis (CGCT) cases (1871–2025).

SerialAuthor (Year) Age/SexPresentation/SizeRegion affectedTreatment Follow-up/Outcome
Historical landmarks (1871–1996)
1.Neumann E. (1871)NewbornFirst historical descriptionAnterior alveolar ridgeExcisionEstablished as distinct entity.
2.Fuhr & Krogh (1973)ReviewEstablished demographicsMaxilla > Mandible (3:1)VariousNoted marked female predominance (8:1).
3.Jenkins HR et al (1989)NewbornCase documenting non-surgical managementAlveolar ridgeObservationSpontaneous regression documented.
Modern era review (1997–2021)
4.BL Koch et al. (1997)Newborn/NSPedunculated (2.9 cm)Maxillary & mandibularExcisionHealing uneventful.
5.Reinshagen K (2002)Newborn/FSoft tissue tumor (1.8 cm)Maxillary right ridgeCauterizationNo recurrence.
6.Merrett SJ (2003)Newborn/FPedunculated (1.5 cm)Maxillary left ridgeExcisionNo recurrence (2 wks).
7.Kanotra S (2005)5-day/FMass with ulceration (5 cm)Mandibular ridgeExcisionNo recurrence (2 yrs).
8.Silva GG (2007)3-day/FBilobed mass (2 cm)Maxillary anteriorCauterizationHealing uneventful.
9.Eghbalian F (2009)Newborn/FTwo lesions (4.5, 1.5 cm)Maxillary ridgeExcisionNo recurrence (6 mos).
10.M Al Ani (2010)Newborn/FPedunculated (2 cm)Maxillary anteriorCauterizationNo recurrence (10 days).
11.D Steckler Jr (2011)Newborn/NS2 masses (4 cm, 1 cm)Maxillary gingivaExcisionNo recurrence (6 mos).
12.B Sigdel (2011)Newborn/FAngiomatous mass (4 cm)Maxillary ridgeExcisionNo recurrence.
13.Aparna HG (2014)Newborn/FSolitary round mass (3.5 cm)Maxillary ridgeExcisionHealing uneventful.
14.Saki N et al. (2014)Newborn/FMultiple lesions (3 total)2 Maxillary, 1 MandibularExcisionHealing uneventful.
15.Liang Y et al. (2014)4-day/FMultiple (largest 3.5 cm)2 Maxillary, 4 MandibularExcisionNo recurrence (2 mos).
16.A Aresdahl (2015)Newborn/FLarge mass (2 cm)Right maxillary processExcisionNo recurrence (6 mos).
`RM Kumar (2015)3-day/FPink mass (4.3 cm)Maxillary ridgeCauterizationNo recurrence (4 mos).
18.Rech BO et al. (2017)Newborn/FSolitary firm mass (3 cm)Maxillary anteriorExcisionNo recurrence (9 yrs).
19.P Gardener (2018)Newborn/FPedunculated (1.5 cm)Anterior mandibularExcisionNo recurrence (3 wks).
20.BO Castano (2020)3-week/FSwelling mass (2 cm)Maxillary right anteriorExcisionNo recurrence (1 mo).
21.Gan J et al. (2021)2-day/FMultiple (largest 3 cm)1 Maxillary, 1 MandibularExcision (Mandible); Observation (Maxilla)Mandibular healed; Maxillary spontaneously regressed (6 mos).
22.Rattan A et al. (2021)Newborn/Male Solitary sessile (3.5 cm)Mandibular ridgeExcisionHealing uneventful. (Rare male case).
Recent cases (2022–2025)
23.Al Allah B (2022) #1Newborn/FLarge mass
3 x 2 x 3 cm,
Maxillary ridgeExcisionSuccessful.
24.Al Allah B (2022) #2Newborn/FMass
5 x 4 x 3 cm
Mandibular ridgeExcisionSuccessful.
25.Min-Jun Kang (2022)Newborn/F1x1 cm (main); 2mm (minor)Mandibular (main); Sublingual (minor)Excision (main); Observation (minor)Good healing (5 mos).
26.Wilber Edison Bernaola-Paredes (2022)Newborn/FSessile massLeft anterior maxillaryLaser surgeryNo recurrence (5 mos).
27.Mustafa Khawaja (2023)1-day/F3.5 × 2.5 × 2 cmRight maxillary ridgeLaser excisionHealing uneventful.
28.Chaudhry A (2024)2-day/F3x2x2 cm pedunculatedAnterior maxillaryExcisionNo recurrence (1 yr).
29.Kirubel Addisu Abera (2024)3-day/Male 2 × 2 × 1 cm roundRight maxillary ridgeExcisionNo recurrence. (Rare male case).
30.P. C. Guidone (2025)5-day/F1 cm multilobulatedRight maxillary ridgeSurgical excisionNo recurrence (1 mo).
31.Khalid Almutairi (2025)Newborn
4 days/F
1 × 1.2 cm pedunculatedright anterior maxillarySurgical excisionNo recurrence
32.Tareq Alhaddad (2025)0-day/F 4 ×3 cm pedunculatedMaxillary gingivaExcisionNo recurrence (6 mo)

A hallmark epidemiological feature of congenital epulis is its profound predilection for female newborns, consistently reported at a 9:1 or 10:1 ratio.18 Congenital epulis should also be differentiated from other neonatal oral masses, including teratoma, hemangioma, and rhabdomyosarcoma, based on clinical presentation and histopathological examination.19 Our review of 32 cases provides a robust validation of this finding. Of the 31 cases in which sex was specified, 28 were female (including this case) and two were male, yielding a ratio of 9.3:1.

A unique feature of this case was the maternal history of weekly hydroxyprogesterone injections. The dramatic female predilection of CGCT has long suggested a hormonal etiology.9,10 However, immunohistochemical studies have consistently demonstrated negative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in congenital epulis tumor cells, arguing against a direct receptor-mediated mechanism.13,14 In our case, IHC was not performed, so receptor status could not be verified. Therefore, while the clinical correlation with multiple exogenous hydroxyprogesterone levels is evident, it is possible that the hormonal effect is indirect or that the tumor arises from a hormone-sensitive precursor cell that loses receptor expression as it differentiates into the granular phenotype, suggesting that maternal hormonal status may be coincidental or related to a more complex, as-yet unknown, non-receptor-mediated mechanism.

In addition to sex, congenital epulis demonstrates a strong predilection for the anterior alveolar ridge, with the maxilla being the most common location.4,15 The literature often cites a maxillary-to-mandibular ratio of 3:1.18 The 32-case review (1871–2025) confirms this, showing maxillary involvement in 25 cases and mandibular involvement in 11 cases (with 5 cases showing lesions in both), for a ratio of approximately 2.3:1. Our case represents a common, well-documented maxillary presentation.

Historically, immediate surgical excision was the exclusive treatment choice.16,24,25 While excision remains the gold standard for large lesions causing functional impairment,17,20 as in our patient some reports demonstrate that smaller, non-obstructive lesions can be monitored and may even spontaneously regress.18,21,22 Furthermore, recent cases indicate an increasing reliance on prenatal ultrasound and MRI to diagnose these lesions in utero, allowing for better delivery planning.10,11,23 The synthesized findings from the literature review are summarized in Table 1.

Conclusions

Congenital epulis is a rare benign tumor of the newborn that requires prompt recognition and management, especially when it is large enough to impair feeding. While the etiology remains elusive, this report adds to the clinical data regarding the potential hormonal influence on this tumor. The diagnosis rests on a "gold standard" histopathological examination, which must include a definitive immunohistochemical panel. Management strategies are evolving, and surgical excision remains the standard of care (93.9% of cases) to resolve functional interference with feeding or respiration. Finally, the patient’s prognosis was excellent. This comprehensive review found a 0% recurrence rate after treatment.

Informed consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient parents.

Ethical statement

Ethical approval was waived according to institutional policy for publication of a single anonymized case report.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 06 Apr 2026
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Alhaddad T, Hameed A, Mohsen H and Mohammed A. Case Report: A large congenital epulis in a neonate following maternal hydroxyprogesterone therapy: a case report and literature review [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2026, 15:472 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177744.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 06 Apr 2026
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.