Misleading hepatitis B testing in the setting of intravenous immunoglobulin

Christelle M Ilboudo; Erin M Guest; Angela M Ferguson; Uttam Garg; Mary Anne Jackson

doi:10.12688/f1000research.2-249.v1

Home Browse Misleading hepatitis B testing in the setting of intravenous immunoglobulin

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Case Report

Misleading hepatitis B testing in the setting of intravenous immunoglobulin

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Christelle M Ilboudo¹, Erin M Guest², Angela M Ferguson³, Uttam Garg³, Mary Anne Jackson¹

Christelle M Ilboudo¹, Erin M Guest², [...] Angela M Ferguson³, Uttam Garg³, Mary Anne Jackson¹

PUBLISHED 18 Nov 2013

Author details Author details

¹ Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Division of Infectious Diseases and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
² Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology Oncology and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
³ Children’s Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Laboratory Medicine and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is commonly used for a wide range of diagnoses, by multiple pediatric subspecialists. We report two cases of hepatitis B screening results post IVIG infusion, where positive anti-Hepatitis B core antigen serology tests indicated possible occult hepatitis infection, leading to a delay in care. However, serial antibody testing showed results consistent with the passive transfer of antibodies.

Keywords

Viral serologies, Blood product, Hepatitis B, Intravenous Immunoglobulin

Corresponding author: Christelle M Ilboudo

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2013 Ilboudo CM et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

How to cite: Ilboudo CM, Guest EM, Ferguson AM et al. Misleading hepatitis B testing in the setting of intravenous immunoglobulin [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2013, 2:249 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-249.v1) First published: 18 Nov 2013, 2:249 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-249.v1) Latest published: 18 Nov 2013, 2:249 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-249.v1)

Introduction

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a blood product prepared by pooling plasma from 3000–10,000 healthy blood donors. Adverse events are reported in 1–15% of treated patients, and most clinicians are aware of common events such as infusion reactions, and more serious reactions that follow IVIG infusion including renal dysfunction (a US Boxed warning), thrombotic events, anti-globulin hemolysis, and aseptic meningitis syndrome¹.

Since IVIG is a passive antibody transfer, it can result in transiently positive anti-viral serology tests. We report two cases where screening hepatitis B testing resulted in an unusual pattern of immunoglobulin positivity after IVIG therapy prompting additional laboratory testing and delayed treatment in one of the children. Based on the known half-life of IVIG products of 21 days, we used serial testing of sera to confirm degradation of antibody over time. Clinicians should be aware that passive transfer of antibodies is expected and serologic screening should be performed pre-treatment if IVIG therapy is anticipated.

Case reports

Patient 1

A 6 year old African-American female presented with several weeks of bruising and epistaxis. A diagnosis of Evans syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus was confirmed and she received IVIG in the form of Gamunex™ on days 1, 9, 10 and 18 at doses of 1 gram/kg each time. On day 19, hepatitis screening (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics VITROS 5600 system Raritan, NJ) was performed in anticipation of possible initiation of rituximab therapy. The results were positive for anti-Hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and negative for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (Table 1). She had received 3 doses of Hepatitis B vaccine as an infant, had no prior transfusions and her liver function testing was normal. She was born in the US, had never traveled outside of the US and had no other exposures or risk factors for hepatitis B. Specific hepatitis B testing consisting of HBsAg, anti-HBc which is the total immunoglobulin level against the core antigen, anti-Hepatitis B core antigen specific IgM (IgM anti-HBc), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe) was performed on day 23 post-IVIG. The testing was positive for anti-HBc and anti-Hepatitis B e-antigen (anti-HBe), but negative for IgM anti-HBc. The IgM anti-HBc is important to determine whether the total anti-HBc result is consistent with an acute infection or reflective of a chronic or resolved infection (Table 2). The combination of positive anti-HBc and anti-HBe raised the concern of acute, resolved or chronic hepatitis B infection. As a result of the misleading results, the initiation of rituximab therapy was delayed, until further evaluation was completed showing antibody degradation consistent with the passive transfer of antibodies (Table 1). The same hepatitis B specific testing was repeated a month later, since the half-life of IVIG is 21 days. The repeated testing was negative for both anti-HBc and anti-HBe which confirmed the suspicion that her initial positive screen and specific hepatitis B testing were the results of IVIG infusion. Interestingly, her anti-HBs decreased as well over time, further evidence of the IVIG being the source of the immunoglobulins detected.

Table 1. Patient 1 and 2 hepatitis B diagnostic tests.

	Patient 1			Patient 2
Testing^≠	Day 19	Day 23	Day 57	Pre-IVIG	Day 7	Day 8	Day 105
Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)	Negative	Negative	-	Negative	Negative	Negative	Negative
Antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs)*	-	>1000	187.00	-	-	404.00	110.00
Hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg)	-	-	Negative	-	-	Negative	Negative
Antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe)	-	Reactive	Negative	-	-	Negative	-
Total antibody to Hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)	Reactive	Reactive	Negative	Negative	Reactive	Reactive	Negative
IgM antibody to Hepatitis B core antigen (IgM anti-HBc)	-	Negative	-	-	-	Negative	Negative

^≠Number of days post IVIG infusion

*Values are in milliInternational Units/ml: > 12 is adequate immunity either from previous infection or vaccines

-Testing not done

Table 2. Diagnostic Tests for HBV*.

Factors being tested	HBV antigen or antibody	Interpretation
HBsAg	Hepatitis B surface antigen	Detection of acutely or chronically infected people
Anti-HBs	Antibody to HBsAg	Identification of people who have resolved infections; determination of immunity after immunization
HBeAg	Hepatitis e antigen	Identification of infected people at increased risk of transmitting HBV
Anti-HBe	Antibody to HBeAg	Identification of infected people with lower risk of transmitting HBV
Anti-HBc (total)	Antibody to HBcAg	Identification of people with acute, resolved or chronic HBV infection (not present after immunization)
IgM anti-HBc	IgM antibody to HBcAg	Identification of people with acute or recent HBV infections (including HBsAg-negative people during the “window” phase of infection)

*Adapted from: Committee on Infectious Diseases et al. Red Book Online 369–390⁷. HBV: hepatitis B virus

Patient 2

An 11 year old Caucasian female with high risk pre B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia failed to enter into remission with standard chemotherapy regimens and was enrolled in the National Cancer Institute study, Anti-CD19 White Blood Cells for Children and Young Adults with B Cell Leukemia or Lymphoma (NCI identifier NCT01593696). In preparation for the cellular therapy, she was given IVIG in the form of Gamunex™ at 0.5 gram/kg once on day 1. Hepatitis B screening (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics VITROS 5600 system Raritan, NJ) performed in anticipation of bone marrow transplantation, 7 days following IVIG therapy showed a positive anti-HBc with a negative HBsAg, raising the possibility of acute, resolved or chronic hepatitis B infection (Table 1). She had normal liver function at the time of the reactive results. This child was born in the US and had received 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine as an infant. She had not traveled outside of the US and had no other risk factors for Hepatitis B infection. She had previously received multiple packed red blood cells and platelet transfusions. Additional data confirmed that hepatitis screening had been conducted at another facility, 2 months prior to the IVIG administration and that test result was negative. Table 1 shows serial results of antibody testing consistent with passive antibody degradation. The serial testing consisted of specific hepatitis B testing, using the same laboratory system, on day 8 post-IVIG and 3 months later which revealed a negative IgM anti-HBc. Interestingly, her anti-HBs decreased as well over time as further evidence of IVIG being the source of the immunoglobulins detected. In this case, given her negative prior screening test and her negative IgM anti-HBc, her transplantation was delayed until the results of the testing on day 8 post–IVIG was available. She did receive her transplantation a month prior to the last hepatitis B specific testing.

Discussion

We report two instances where an unusual pattern of hepatitis B positivity related to IVIG infusion complicated the care of children with an underlying autoimmune or oncologic diagnosis.

A variety of serologic tests are available to confirm hepatitis B infection, and typically more than one marker is present in acute or chronic infection. The pattern of hepatitis B seropositivity noted in our two patients, where anti-HBc was present, while less common, is compatible with occult hepatitis infection.

The association of anti-HBc positivity with certain IVIG products was previously noted by Arnold et al. during a rituximab study of patients with refractory immune-mediated thrombocytopenia². Pre-treatment hepatitis screening was conducted on 24 study patients because of the known risk for hepatitis B reactivation following rituximab. Anti-HBc positivity was found in 45% of the cohort and the investigators noted that IVIG use was common in their patient group. They were able to show seroreversion over time in 10/11 of their IVIG-treated patients, consistent with degradation of passively transferred antibody. They tested five immune globulin preparations and confirmed anti-HBc presence in three, including Gamunex™, the preparation received by our patients. Benton et al. additionally described a patient being considered for rituximab therapy whose care was delayed secondary to misleading hepatitis B testing post IVIG infusion³. A false positive enzyme immunoassay and a Treponema pallidum haemagglutinin assay have also been reported following IVIG infusion^4,5. Positive human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) testing following IVIG infusion for chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy has also been reported in a leukemic patient resulting in a delay in his cord blood transplantation⁶. In all the above cases, repeated testing 4–8 weeks post IVIG revealed lower or negative antibody titers.

There are 11 immune globulin preparations available in the US and Canada, and specific diagnostic indications, FDA approved ages, dosing recommendations, infusion rates, IgA composition and routes of administration vary by product (Table 3). Based on the number of diagnoses for which IVIG is used, a wide range of subspecialists are involved in prescribing IVIG and education regarding passive antibody transfer therefore needs to be targeted to clinicians in those subspecialties such as neurology, immunology, hepatology, hematology and rheumatology as well as general practitioners.

Table 3. Immune globulin products available in the US.

Product brand name	IgA content mcg/mL	FDA approved diagnosis	Hepatitis core antibody evaluated/found²	Approved pediatric age/comments
Bivigam™ 10%	≤200	Primary immunodeficiency	Not done	≥ 6 years; FDA approved, but not available
Carimune^®NF² 3 and 12%	Trace	Primary immunodeficiency, Acute/chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)	Not done	Pediatric patients; intravenous (IV)
Fleebogamma^®DIF 5 and 10%	<50–100	Primary immunodeficiency	Not done	IV
GamaSTAN™ S/D	Not applicable	Passive immunoprophylaxis, prophylaxis in immunodeficiency	Not done	Pediatric patients for immunoprophylaxis measles, varicella, hepatitis A; IV
Gammagard S/D^® 5% and 10%	≤2.2–4.4	Primary immunodeficiency, B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), acute/chronic ITP, Kawasaki disease	Not done	IV and subcutaneous
Gammagard Liquid 10%	37	Primary immunodeficiency	YES	Pediatric patients 2–16 years; IV
Gammaked™ 10%	46	Primary immunodeficiency, Acute ITP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy	Not done	Pediatric patients; IV
Gammaplex^® 5%	<10	Primary immunodeficiency	Not done	Pediatric patients; IV
Gamunex^®-C	46	Primary immunodeficiency, acute/chronic ITP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy	YES	Pediatric patients; IV
Hizentra^®	≤50	Primary immunodeficiency	Not done	Pediatric patients ≥ 2 years; Subcutaneous only
Octagam^®	≤200	Primary immunodeficiency	Not done	Pediatric patients 6–16 years; IV
Privigen^®	≤25	Primary immunodeficiency, Acute ITP	YES	Pediatric patients ≥ 3 years; IV

Our cases serve to remind clinicians of the potential for passive antibody transfer with IVIG products and to define the potential clinical confusion that can arise in situations where infectious serologic screening is not performed pre-infusion. In all situations where IVIG is prescribed, the patient’s underlying diagnosis, clinical indication, the product brand and dose, lot number and specific infusion instructions should be explicitly outlined and all baseline serologic specimens, when indicated, obtained before infusion of the product.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details was obtained from the parent/guardians of the patients.

Author contributions

CI and MAJ conceived the study. CI drafted the first draft of the paper. EG provided patient information for the second case. AF and UG provided expertise in clinical laboratory testing as well as reviews of prior cases. All authors were involved in the revision of the draft manuscript and have agreed to the final content.

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

References

1. Bonilla FA: Intravenous immunoglobulin: adverse reactions and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 122(6): 1238–1239. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Arnold DM, Crowther MA, Meyer RM, et al.: Misleading hepatitis B test results due to intravenous immunoglobulin administration: implications for a clinical trial of rituximab in immune thrombocytopenia. Transfusion. 2010; 50(12): 2577–2581. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Benton E, Iqbal K, Wade P, et al.: False-positive hepatitis B serology following IVIG therapy: forgotten but not gone!! J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012; 66(3): e123–124. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
4. Constable SA, Parry CM, Enevoldson TP, et al.: Positive serological tests for syphilis and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin. Sex Transm Infect. 2007; 83(1): 57–58. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
5. Rossi KQ, Nickel JR, Wissel ME, et al.: Passively acquired treponemal antibody from intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in a pregnant patient. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 126(10): 1237–1238. PubMed Abstract
6. Belanger SS, Fish D, Kim J, et al.: False-positive human T-lymphotropic virus serology after intravenous immunoglobulin transfusion. CMAJ. 2012; 184(15): 1709–1712. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
7. Pediatrics AA: Red book: 2012 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. In. Edited by Pickering LK Baker, C.J., Kimberlin D.W., Long, S.S.: Elk Grove Village, IL American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012; 369–390. Reference Source

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Nov 2013

Author details Author details

¹ Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Division of Infectious Diseases and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
² Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology Oncology and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
³ Children’s Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Laboratory Medicine and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (1)

version 1

Published: 18 Nov 2013, 2:249

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-249.v1

Copyright

© 2013 Ilboudo CM et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Ilboudo CM, Guest EM, Ferguson AM et al. Misleading hepatitis B testing in the setting of intravenous immunoglobulin [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2013, 2:249 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-249.v1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 18 Nov 2013

Views

16

Reviewer Report 24 Mar 2014

Melvin Berger, Immunology Research & Development, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.2799.r4223

I cannot say this better than the authors have: 'Our cases serve to remind clinicians of the potential for passive antibody transfer with IVIG products and to define the potential clinical confusion that can arise in situations where infectious serologic ... Continue reading

I cannot say this better than the authors have: 'Our cases serve to remind clinicians of the potential for passive antibody transfer with IVIG products and to define the potential clinical confusion that can arise in situations where infectious serologic screening is not performed pre-infusion'. It is important to realize that this includes HBcAb, since it is not generally recognized that antibodies to hepatitis B antigens other than HBSAg (HBsAb) are present in US IgG products, as shown in Table 3. It is also important to recognize that passive transfer of antibodies also occurs with subcutaneous IgG treatment. The gold standard for identifying blood borne infection is detection of viral genomes in the patient's blood. Nucleic acid tests such as PCR are done to rule out the presence of infectious agents during the processing of plasma for products like IVIG, and are available in many hospital and commercial reference laboratories. Prompt confirmation of the absence of detectable hepatitis B virus DNA in the patient's blood could obviate the need to wait for catabolism and dropping of the titer of passively transferred antibody, and avoided the delays experienced by the patients described in this paper.

I have no conflicts of interest regarding this paper. For the purposes of complete disclosure, I am a salaried employee of CSL Behring, LLC, a manufacturer of fractionated plasma products like IVIG, and a stock-holder.

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

21

Reviewer Report 12 Dec 2013

Adlette Inati, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.2799.r2483

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusions are widely used for various medical indications. Since these products are pooled from thousands of healthy blood donors, it is possible to have passive antibody transfer of certain donor-related infections to the IVIG recipient. In this ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Nov 2013

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 1 18 Nov 13	read	read

Adlette Inati, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
Melvin Berger, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

16 Views

24 Mar 2014 | for Version 1

Melvin Berger, Immunology Research & Development, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA

16 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

I cannot say this better than the authors have: 'Our cases serve to remind clinicians of the potential for passive antibody transfer with IVIG products and to define the potential clinical confusion that can arise in situations where infectious serologic screening is not performed pre-infusion'. It is important to realize that this includes HBcAb, since it is not generally recognized that antibodies to hepatitis B antigens other than HBSAg (HBsAb) are present in US IgG products, as shown in Table 3. It is also important to recognize that passive transfer of antibodies also occurs with subcutaneous IgG treatment. The gold standard for identifying blood borne infection is detection of viral genomes in the patient's blood. Nucleic acid tests such as PCR are done to rule out the presence of infectious agents during the processing of plasma for products like IVIG, and are available in many hospital and commercial reference laboratories. Prompt confirmation of the absence of detectable hepatitis B virus DNA in the patient's blood could obviate the need to wait for catabolism and dropping of the titer of passively transferred antibody, and avoided the delays experienced by the patients described in this paper.

I have no conflicts of interest regarding this paper. For the purposes of complete disclosure, I am a salaried employee of CSL Behring, LLC, a manufacturer of fractionated plasma products like IVIG, and a stock-holder.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

21 Views

12 Dec 2013 | for Version 1

Adlette Inati, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon

21 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusions are widely used for various medical indications. Since these products are pooled from thousands of healthy blood donors, it is possible to have passive antibody transfer of certain donor-related infections to the IVIG recipient. In this report Ilboudo et al. present two cases where IVIG infusions led to false positive transient hepatitis B titers and delayed the management of two critical patients. Previous reports have also indicated such an observation. Accordingly, this article serves as a reminder of possible positivity of hepatitis titers post IVIG that would resolve in few weeks. It also underscores the importance of screening for infections including hepatitis B pre IVIG infusion. This article is well written and lists the IVIG products available in the US with significant comments that can be used as a reference.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Bonilla FA: Intravenous immunoglobulin: adverse reactions and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 122(6): 1238–1239. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Arnold DM, Crowther MA, Meyer RM, et al.: Misleading hepatitis B test results due to intravenous immunoglobulin administration: implications for a clinical trial of rituximab in immune thrombocytopenia. Transfusion. 2010; 50(12): 2577–2581. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Benton E, Iqbal K, Wade P, et al.: False-positive hepatitis B serology following IVIG therapy: forgotten but not gone!! J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012; 66(3): e123–124. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Constable SA, Parry CM, Enevoldson TP, et al.: Positive serological tests for syphilis and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin. Sex Transm Infect. 2007; 83(1): 57–58. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[5] 5. Rossi KQ, Nickel JR, Wissel ME, et al.: Passively acquired treponemal antibody from intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in a pregnant patient. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 126(10): 1237–1238. PubMed Abstract

[6] 6. Belanger SS, Fish D, Kim J, et al.: False-positive human T-lymphotropic virus serology after intravenous immunoglobulin transfusion. CMAJ. 2012; 184(15): 1709–1712. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[7] 7. Pediatrics AA: Red book: 2012 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. In. Edited by Pickering LK Baker, C.J., Kimberlin D.W., Long, S.S.: Elk Grove Village, IL American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012; 369–390. Reference Source

Misleading hepatitis B testing in the setting of intravenous immunoglobulin

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Case reports

Patient 1

Table 1. Patient 1 and 2 hepatitis B diagnostic tests.

Table 2. Diagnostic Tests for HBV*.

Patient 2

Discussion

Table 3. Immune globulin products available in the US.

Consent

Author contributions

Competing interests

Grant information

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated