Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses

Cristiane C Thompson; Vanessa E Emmel; Erica L Fonseca; Michel A Marin; Ana Carolina P Vicente

doi:10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1

Home Browse Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Cristiane C Thompson¹^*, Vanessa E Emmel¹^*, Erica L Fonseca¹, Michel A Marin¹, Ana Carolina P Vicente¹

Cristiane C Thompson¹^*, Vanessa E Emmel¹^*, [...] Erica L Fonseca¹, Michel A Marin¹, Ana Carolina P Vicente¹

^* Equal contributors

PUBLISHED 01 Mar 2013

Author details Author details

¹ Laboratory of Molecular Genetics of Microorganisms, Oswaldo Cruz Institute (IOC - FIOCRUZ) Avenida Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, P. O. Box 926, Zip Code 21040-360, Brazil

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Phylogenetics collection.

Abstract

The identification of the clinically relevant viridans streptococci group, at species level, is still problematic. The aim of this study was to extract taxonomic information from the complete genome sequences of 67 streptococci, comprising 19 species, by means of genomic analyses, multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), average amino acid identity (AAI), genomic signatures, genome-to-genome distances (GGD) and codon usage bias. We then attempted to determine the usefulness of these genomic tools for species identification in streptococci. Our results showed that MLSA, AAI and GGD analyses are robust markers to identify streptococci at the species level, for instance, S. pneumoniae, S. mitis, and S. oralis. A Streptococcus species can be defined as a group of strains that share ≥ 95% DNA similarity in MLSA and AAI, and > 70% DNA identity in GGD. This approach allows an advanced understanding of bacterial diversity.

Keywords

Comparative Genomic, Genomic Taxonomy, Streptococci species

Corresponding author: Cristiane C Thompson

Competing interests: No relevant competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2013 Thompson CC et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

How to cite: Thompson CC, Emmel VE, Fonseca EL et al. Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2013, 2:67 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1) First published: 01 Mar 2013, 2:67 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1) Latest published: 01 Mar 2013, 2:67 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1)

Introduction

Bacteria are subjected to numerous forces driving their diversification. As a consequence, different strains of a single bacterial species sometimes have the ability to explore distinct niches, to be pathogenic or non-pathogenic and to present different metabolic pathways^1,2. In such a scenario, the identification of bacteria isolates to the species level is a hard task^1,2.

Currently, the genus Streptococcus comprises 99 recognized species, many of which are associated with disease in humans and animals (http://www.bacterio.net/s/streptococcus.html). The viridans group streptococci (VGS) encompass four phylogenetic clusters: Mitis, Mutans, Salivarius and Anginosus, which are part of the human microbiota, being isolated mainly from the oral cavity, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts³. The Mitis group currently includes the important pathogen S. pneumoniae and 12 other recognized species, S. australis, S. cristatus (formerly S. crista), S. gordonii, S. infantis, S.mitis, S. oligofermentans, S. oralis, S. parasanguinis (formerly S. parasanguis), S. peroris, S. pseudopneumoniae, S. sanguinis (formerly S. sanguis) and S. sinensis. The Anginosus group includes three recognized species, S. anginosus, S. constellatus (including two subspecies S. constellatus subsp. constellatus and S. constellatus pharyngis) and S. intermedius, and the Salivarius group includes S. salivarius, S. vestibularis, and S. thermophilus.

Currently, bacterial species are considered to be a group of strains (including the type strain) that are characterized by a certain degree of phenotypic consistency, showing > 70% DNA-DNA hybridization values and over 97% 16S rRNA sequence similarity^4,5. Identification of streptococci is based on the current taxonomic standards using a combination of 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses, DNA-DNA hybridization, serologic and phenotypic data; however, they have been strikingly resistant to satisfactory classification, reflected in frequently changing nomenclature^6,7. For instance, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of S. mitis and S. oralis are almost identical (> 99%) to S. pneumoniae, making the use of this information alone insufficient to distinguish these species⁸.

Recent studies have used whole genome analysis to determine the taxonomic relationships among bacterial species^9–14. In order to determine the robustness of genomic markers in streptococci species delineation, we analyzed a collection of 67 complete genomes. The availability of whole genome sequences of several closely related species, for instance, S. mitis - S. oralis - S. pneumoniae, and S. salivarius - S. thermophilus - S. vestibularis, formed an ideal test case for the establishment of the genomic taxonomy of streptococci.

Material and methods

Genome sequence data

The genomic sequences of 67 streptococci that were publicly available for download by June 2^nd, 2011 at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the project accession number indicated in Table 1 were used in this study. The following analyses were performed according to Thompson et al. (2009)¹³ and are briefly described below.

Table 1. Genomic features of the streptococci.

G+C content (%): guanine + cytosine content (%). No. of CDs: number of coding DNA sequence. Nc: effective number of codons.

Organism	GenBank accession no.	Genome size (nt)	G+C content (%)	No. of CDS	Nc
S. agalactiae A909	CP000114	2,127,839	35	1996	44.9
S. agalactiae NEM316	AL732656	2,211,485	35	2094	45.2
S. agalactiae 2603VR	AE009948	2,160,267	35	2124	45.1
S. anginosus F0211	AECT00000000	1,993,709	38	2035	50.6
S. bovis ATCC 700338	AEEL00000000	2,050,893	37	2088	44.5
S. downei F0415	AEKN00000000	2,239,421	43	2204	54.4
S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis GGS-124	AP010935	2,106,340	39	2094	50.3
S. equi subsp. equi 4047	FM204883	2,253,793	41	2001	52.6
**S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus**	FM204884	2,149,868	41	1869	52.4
S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus MGCS10565	CP001129	2,024,171	41	1893	52.3
S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus TX20005	AEEM00000000	2,214,091	37	2218	44.5
S. gallolyticus UCN34	FN597254	2,350,911	37	2223	44.4
S. gordonii str. Challis substr. CH1	CP000725	2,196,662	40	2051	52.4
S. infantis SK1302	AEDY00000000	1,792,252	39	2102	48.9
S. infantarius subsp. infantarius ATCC BAA-102	ABJK00000000	1,925,087	37	2051	44.0
S. mitis B6	FN568063	2,146,611	39	2004	50.4
S. mitis SK321	AEDT00000000	1,873,702	40	1757	49.8
S. mutans NN2025	AP010655	2,013,587	36	1895	46.4
S. mutans UA159	AE014133	2,030,921	36	1960	46.5
S. oralis ATCC 35037	AEDW00000000	1,884,712	41	1793	51.4
S. parasanguinis ATCC 15912	ADVN00000000	2,124,730	41	2035	52.8
S. parasanguinis F0405	AEKM00000000	2,050,302	41	1978	52.9
S. pneumoniae AP200	CP002121	2,130,580	39	2216	50.3
S. pneumoniae ATCC 700669	FM211187	2,221,315	39	1990	50.0
S. pneumoniae CGSP14	CP001033	2,209,198	39	2206	50.3
S. pneumoniae D39	CP000410	2,046,115	39	1914	49.8
S. pneumoniae G54	CP001015	2,078,953	39	2114	50.0
S. pneumoniae Hungary19A-6	CP000936	2,245,615	39	2155	50.2
S. pneumoniae INV104	FQ312030	2,142,122	39	1824	49.9
S. pneumoniae INV200	FQ312029	2,093,317	39	1930	50.0
S. pneumoniae JJA	CP000919	2,120,234	39	2123	50.2
S. pneumoniae OXC141	FQ312027	2,036,867	39	1824	49.9
S. pneumoniae P1031	CP000920	2,111,882	39	2073	50.1
S. pneumoniae R6	AE007317	2,038,615	39	2042	50.1
S. pneumoniae Taiwan19F-14	CP000921	2,112,148	39	2044	50.1
S. pneumoniae TCH843119A	CP001993	2,088,772	39	2275	50.4
S. pneumoniae TIGR4	AE005672	2,160,842	39	2105	50.0
S. pneumoniae 670-6B	CP002176	2,240,045	39	2352	50.4
S. pneumoniae 70585	CP000918	2,184,682	39	2202	50.1
S. pseudoporcinus SPIN 20026	AENS00000000	2,111,372	36	2030	48.6
S. pyogenes MGAS315	AE014074	1,900,521	38	1865	49.1
S. pyogenes MGAS2096	CP000261	1,860,355	38	1898	49.4
S. pyogenes MGAS5005	CP000017	1,838,554	38	1865	48.9
S. pyogenes MGAS6180	CP000056	1,897,573	38	1894	48.9
S. pyogenes MGAS8232	AE009949	1,895,017	38	1839	49.0
S. pyogenes MGAS9429	CP000259	1,836,467	38	1877	49.0
S. pyogenes MGAS10270	CP000260	1,928,252	38	1986	49.0
S. pyogenes MGAS10394	CP000003	1,899,877	38	1886	49.2
S. pyogenes MGAS10750	CP000262	1,937,111	38	1979	49.1
S. pyogenes M1 GAS	AE004092	1,852,441	38	1696	48.8
S. pyogenes NZ131	CP000829	1,815,785	38	1700	48.8
S. pyogenes SSI-1	BA000034	1,894,275	38	1859	49.1
**S. pyogenes str. Manfredo**	AM295007	1,841,271	38	1745	48.9
S. salivarius SK126	ACLO00000000	2,128,332	40	1992	47.0
S. sanguinis ATCC 49296	AEPO00000000	2,054,852	41	2013	51.7
S. sanguinis SK36	CP000387	2,388,435	43	2270	54.5
S. sanguinis VMC66	AEVH00000000	2,311,949	43	2260	54.5
S. suis BM407	FM252032	2,146,229	41	1932	52.0
S. suis GZ1	CP000837	2,038,034	41	1979	52.4
S. suis P17	AM946016	2,007,491	41	1824	51.9
S. suis SC84	FM252031	2,095,898	41	1898	52.0
S. thermophilus CNRZ1066	CP000024	1,796,226	39	1915	47.0
S. thermophilus LMD-9	CP000419	1,856,368	39	1709	46.8
S. thermophilus LMG 18311	CP000023	1,796,846	39	1888	46.9
S. thermophilus ND03	CP002340	1,831,949	39	1919	46.8
S. uberis 0140J	AM946015	1,852,352	36	1762	46.4
S. vestibularis F0396	AEKO00000000	2,022,289	39	1979	47.1

16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA)

The 16S rRNA gene sequences and the gene sequences used for MLSA were obtained from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The MLSA approach was based on the concatenated sequences of five house-keeping genes (aroE, ddl, gki, pheS and recA)^15,16. The concatenated sequences were aligned with ClustalX program¹⁷. The phylogenetic inference was based on the neighbour-joining genetic distance method (NJ)¹⁸ using MEGA5¹⁹. Distance estimations were obtained according to the Kimura-2-parameter²⁰ for 16S rRNA gene and MLSA. The reliability of each tree topology was checked by 2000 bootstrap replications²¹.

Average amino acid identity (AAI)

The AAI of all conserved protein-coding genes was calculated as described previously²². Conserved protein-coding genes between a pair of genomes were determined by whole-genome pairwise sequence comparisons using the BLASTp algorithm²³. For these comparisons, all protein-coding sequences (CDSs) from one genome were searched against the genomic sequence of the other genome. The genetic relatedness between a pair of genomes was measured by the AAI of all conserved genes between the two genomes as computed by the BLAST algorithm. By this approach, a value of < 95% AAI of protein-coding genes indicates separate species.

Codon usage

Codon usage bias was calculated for each genome. The effective number of codons used in a sequence (Nc)²⁴ was calculated using CHIPS (http://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/chips) with the default parameters.

Determination of dinucleotide relative abundance values and genomic dissimilarity

Mononucleotide and dinucleotide frequencies were calculated using COMPSEQ (http://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/compseq) with default parameters. Dinucleotide relative abundances (ρ*XY) were calculated using the equation ρ*XY = fXY/fXfY where fXY denotes the frequency of dinucleotide XY, and fX and fY denote the frequencies of X and Y, respectively. The difference in genome signature between two sequences is expressed by the genomic dissimilarity (δ*), which is the average absolute dinucleotide of relative abundance difference between two sequences, and were calculated using the equation: δ*(f,g) = 1/16Σ|ρ*XY (f) - ρ*XY (g)| (multiplied by 1000 for convenience), where the sum extends over all dinucleotides²⁵.

Genome-to-genome distances (GGD)

The genome distance was calculated using genome-to-genome distance calculator (GGDC)²⁶. Distances between a pair of genomes were determined by whole-genome pairwise sequence comparisons using BLAST²³. For these comparisons, algorithms were used to determine high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) for inferring intergenomic distances for species delimitation. The corresponding distance threshold can be used for species delimitation²⁶.

Results and discussion

In this work we compared complete genomes for 67 streptococci comprising 19 species to address their taxonomic position. A previous study with a small set of streptococci genomes (eight) and species (four), using a combination of several genomic analyses, showed the applicability of this approach in streptococci taxonomy⁹. Overall our analysis, using a large data set, showed that genomic taxonomy is an accurate approach to clearly define the streptococci species. The taxonomic resolution of the 16S rRNA, AAI, MLSA, GGD and codon usage analysis for streptococci species definition is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Taxonomic resolution of genomic analyses of streptococci species.

MLSA: multilocus sequence analysis. AAI: amino acid identity. GGD: genome to genome distance. Nc: effective number of codons.

	16S rRNA (%)	MLSA (%)	AAI (%)	GGD (%)	Codon usage (Nc)
Intraspecies	≥99	≥95	≥95	>70	-
S. pyogenes	≥99	≥98	>97	>70	49
S. agalactiae	99	100	98	>70	45
S. equi	99	98	>96	>70	52
S. suis	100	100	100	>70	52
S. pneumoniae	99	≥97	>97	>70	50
S.thermophilus	99	100	>97	>70	47
Interspecies	≤99	<95	<95	<70	44-54
S. thermophilus-salivarius-vestibularis	99	<94	<92	<70	47
S. pneumoniae-mitis-oralis	>99	<94	<93	<70	50–51

General genomic features

The complete genome of the streptococci comprised a single chromosome. The estimated size of the genomes ranged from 1.7 Mb (S. infantis) to 2.3 Mb (S. sanguinis). The number of CDS varied from 1,700 (S. pyogenes) to 2,352 (S. pneumoniae) (Table 1). The average G+C content of streptococci genomes ranged from 35% to 43%. These species presented a variable interspecies genome size and G+C content, indicating heterogeneity within the genus Streptococcus. One of the reasons for this variability could be associated with the frequent occurrence of horizontal gene transfer events^27–29.

Phylogenetic reconstructions by 16S rRNA and MLSA

MLSA and 16S rRNA phylogenetic trees showed similar topologies (Figure 1). The MLSA was performed using five instead of the seven genes applied in the pneumococcus multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme (http://spneumoniae.mlst.net/)^15,16. Three genes, aroE, ddl and gki, are from the MLST scheme, and pheS and recA were included in this work. The concatenation of these genes (7741 bp) allowed an accurate delineation of the streptococci species considered here. The nucleotide sequence similarities were much lower for MLSA than 16S rRNA gene. A pairwise comparison of MLSA among the species revealed sequence similarity between 67% and 100%, while the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities varied from 92% to 100%. At the intraspecies level, the similarity values ranged from 95% to 100% for MLSA, and 99% to 100% for the 16S rRNA gene sequences. The closest species within the Mitis (S. pneumoniae - S. oralis - S. mitis) and Salivarius groups (S. vestibulares - S. salivarius - S. thermophilus) were clearly placed apart from each other by MLSA, while these species had almost identical 16S rRNA gene sequences (≥ 99% sequence similarity). A previously study showed that recA analysis is a valuable tool for proper identification of pneumococci in routine diagnostics, but limitations on discrimination of other members of the Mitis group were observed³⁰. S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 showed a much closer relationship with S. oralis ATCC 35037T (95% similarity) than to other S. sanguinis strains (77% similarity), suggesting it belongs to the species S. oralis. In addition, S. bovis ATCC 700338 was placed in the S. gallolyticus cluster with 98% MLSA sequence similarity. This work showed that MLSA, using this new combination of five concatenated genes (aroE, ddl, gki, pheS and recA), distinct from the Streptococcus MLST scheme, allowed a proper identification of most streptococci species, even within the VGS group.

Figure 1. Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and MLSA concatenated sequences of Streptococcus.

The numbers at the nodes indicate the values of bootstrap statistics after 2000 replications, and values below 50% are not shown. Bars, 0.005% and 0.02% estimated sequence divergence.

Average amino acid identity (AAI)

The percentage of average amino acid identity (AAI) among streptococci species ranges from 68% to 94%, while within species it varies from 95% to 100%. The VGS species S. pneumoniae, S. mitis and S. oralis shared 89–93% AAI. The species S. salivarius, S. thermophilus and S. vestibularis showed a maximum AAI of 93%. S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 and S. oralis ATCC 35037 showed 96% identity and S. bovis ATCC 700338 and S. gallolyticus strains had 98% identity. These findings suggest that strains ATCC 49296 and ATCC 700338 belong to the species S. oralis and S. gallolyticus, respectively. According to our analyses the AAI and MLSA are the most useful genomic features for the elucidation of streptococci taxonomy.

Genome signature

The genomic dissimilarity values among streptococci were between 3 and 127, while the intraspecies values were between 0 and 17. Streptococci within the VGS group, for instance, S. salivarius, S. thermophilus and S. vestibularis species, showed dissimilarity values between 5 and 12 and S. pneumoniae, S. mitis and S. oralis species had dissimilarity values between 3 and 14. Thus, there was not a clear differentiation of these closely related species within the VGS group on the basis of the genomic dissimilarity values. This could be due to the extensive recombination and horizontal gene transfer events which occur between closely related streptococci species that share ecological niches^12,30.

On the other hand, species within the Pyogenic group had a distinct genomic signature, with values ranging from 13 to 85. However, genome signatures alone have significant limitations when used as phylogenetic markers for differentiating members of the VGS. The exact mechanisms that generate and maintain the genome signatures are complex, but possibly involve differences in species-specific compositional bias, i.e., G+C content, G+C and A+T skews, codon bias, and mutation bias^32,33.

Codon usage bias (Nc)

Nc values provide a meaningful measure of the extent of codon preference in a genome, values range between 20 (extremely biased genome where one codon is used per amino acid) and 61 (all synonymous codons are used). Within the set of 67 complete streptococci genomes examined in this study, the Nc ranged from 44.0 to 54.5 (Table 1). For instance, S. pneumoniae - S. oralis - S. mitis species had Nc values of 50, 51 and 50, respectively. The Salivarius group (S. vestibulares - S. salivarius - S. thermophilus), and S. bovis ATCC 700338- S. gallolyticus showed Nc values of 47 and 44.5, respectively. Overall, codon usage bias was very similar among the streptococci species investigated. However, S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 showed a much closer Nc value with the S. oralis ATCC 35037 (51.7 and 51.4, respectively) than other S. sanguinis strains (54.5), which was in agreement with the other analyses used in this study.

Genome distance analysis

The GGD was calculated only for closely related species that were not differentiated by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Figure 1). Based on GGD analysis the species within the Mitis and Salivarius groups were identified as separate species, showing GGD values analogous to the < 70% discriminatory value used for DNA-DNA hybridization. Conversely, S. bovis ATCC 700338 and S. gallolyticus were identified as belonging to the same species by GGD.

S. bovis ATCC 700338 (biotype II) and S. gallolyticus as well as S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 and S. oralis ATCC 35037T were not separated and, therefore, according to this analysis would be classified as the same species, respectively. It was shown that S. bovis biotype I and II/2 isolates were, in fact, S. gallolyticus³⁴, and S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 was placed into S. oralis species by GGD analysis. A misidentification of S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 has already been shown by means of biochemical and serological properties by Narikawa and colleagues³⁵.

Another interesting result is that the S. parasanguinis ATCC 15912 and F0405 strains were found to be at the upper limits for definition as members of the same species based on different genomic analyses. For instance, they shared 95% AAI, 94% identity by MLSA, a value of 17 on the basis of genomic signature and < 70% similarity in GGD. Therefore, based on these genomic markers, these S. parasanguinis strains could, in fact, be separate species. This data reflects the complexity of bacterial species delineation, since these organisms are all under a constant evolutionary process.

Conclusion

The delineation of closely related streptococci species was evident in this genomic study. Different methods produced different levels of taxonomic resolution. The methods with the higher resolution for species identification were MLSA and AAI, while closely related species had similar Nc values and genomic signatures. Based on the genomic analyses, a Streptococcus species can be defined as a group of strains that shares ≥ 95% identity in MLSA and AAI, and > 70% identity in GGD. This definition may be useful to advance the taxonomy of Streptococcus. This approach allows an advanced understanding of bacterial diversity and identification.

Author contributions

CCT and VEE carried out the computational and genomic analyses and analyzed the results. All authors (ACPV, CCT, ELF, MAM and VEE) participated in discussing and writing the manuscript. All authors have agreed to the final contents of the article.

Competing interests

No relevant competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

VEE had a PRODOC-CAPES fellowship. CCT has a PNPD-CAPES fellowship, ELF has a PNPD-FAPERJ fellowship and MAM has a CAPES fellowship.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Gevers D, Cohan FM, Lawrence JG, et al.: Opinion: Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005; 3(9): 733–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Cohan FM, Koeppel AF: The origins of ecological diversity in prokaryotes. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(21): R1024–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Alam S, Brailsford SR, Whiley RA, et al.: PCR-Based methods for genotyping viridans group streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37(9): 2772–6. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
4. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM: Taxonomic Note: A place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S ribosomal-RNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994; 44(4): 846–849. Publisher Full Text
5. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, et al.: Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987; 37(4): 463–464. Publisher Full Text
6. Hoshino T, Fujiwara T, Kilian M: Use of phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses to identify nonhemolytic streptococci isolated from bacteremic patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(12): 6073–85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
7. Kawamura Y, Hou XG, Sultana F, et al.: Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995; 45(2): 406–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
8. Suzuki N, Seki M, Nakano Y, et al.: Discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci by genomic subtractive hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(9): 4528–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
9. Coenye T, Vandamme P: Extracting phylogenetic information from whole-genome sequencing projects: the lactic acid bacteria as a test case. Microbiology. 2003; 149(pt 12): 3507–17. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
10. Coenye T, Gevers D, Van de Peer Y, et al.: Towards a prokaryotic genomic taxonomy. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005; 29(2): 147–67. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
11. Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, et al.: Accuracy of phenotypic methods for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates included in surveillance programs. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(7): 2184–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
12. Croucher NJ, Harris SR, Fraser C, et al.: Rapid pneumococcal evolution in response to clinical interventions. Science. 2011; 331(6016): 430–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
13. Thompson CC, Vicente ACP, Souza RC, et al.: Genomic taxonomy of Vibrios. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9: 258. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
14. Thompson CC, Vieira NM, Vicente AC, et al.: Towards a genome based taxonomy of Mycoplasmas. Infect Genet Evol. 2011; 11(7): 1798–804. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
15. Enright MC, Spratt BG: A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology. 1998; 144(Pt 11): 3049–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
16. Hanage WP, Fraser C, Spratt BG: Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 361(1475): 1917–27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
17. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, et al.: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(24): 4876–82. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
18. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4): 406–25. PubMed Abstract
19. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al.: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28(10): 2731–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
20. Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980; 16(2): 111–120. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
21. Felsenstein J: Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution. 1985; 39(4): 783–791. Publisher Full Text
22. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM: Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187(18): 6258–64. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
23. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(17): 3389–402. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
24. Wright F: The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene. 1990; 87(1): 23–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
25. Karlin S, Mrázek J, Campbell AM: Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179(12): 3899–913. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
26. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M: Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2(1): 142–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
27. Zhang A, Yang M, Hu P, et al.: Comparative genomic analysis of Streptococcus suis reveals significant genomic diversity among different serotypes. BMC genomics. 2011; 12: 523. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
28. Bellanger X, Roberts AP, Morel C, et al.: Conjugative transfer of the integrative conjugative elements ICESt1 and ICESt3 from Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol. 2009; 191(8): 2764–75. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
29. Harvey RM, Stroeher UH, Ogunniyi AD, et al.: A variable region within the genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae contributes to strain-strain variation in virulence. PloS One. 2011; 6(5): e19650. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
30. Zbinden A, Köhler N, Bloemberg GV: recA-based PCR assay for accurate differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from other viridans streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(2): 523–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
31. Donati C, Hiller NL, Tettelin H, et al.: Structure and dynamics of the pan-genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae and closely related species. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(10): R107. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
32. Karlin S: Global dinucleotide signatures and analysis of genomic heterogeneity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1998; 1(15): 598–610. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
33. Foerstner KU, von Mering C, Hooper SD, et al.: Environments shape the nucleotide composition of genomes. EMBO Rep. 2005; 6(12): 1208–13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
34. Devriese LA, Vandamme P, Pot B, et al.: Differentiation between Streptococcus gallolyticus strains of human clinical and veterinary origins and Streptococcus bovis strains from the intestinal tracts of ruminants. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36(12): 3520–3. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
35. Narikawa S, Suzuki Y, Takahashi M, et al.: Streptococcus oralis previously identified as uncommon "Streptococcus sanguis" in Behçet’s disease. Arch Oral Biol. 1995; 40(8): 685–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Mar 2013

Author details Author details

¹ Laboratory of Molecular Genetics of Microorganisms, Oswaldo Cruz Institute (IOC - FIOCRUZ) Avenida Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, P. O. Box 926, Zip Code 21040-360, Brazil

Competing interests

No relevant competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (1)

version 1

Published: 01 Mar 2013, 2:67

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1

Copyright

© 2013 Thompson CC et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Thompson CC, Emmel VE, Fonseca EL et al. Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2013, 2:67 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 01 Mar 2013

Views

26

Reviewer Report 03 Apr 2013

Bruno Gomez-Gil, CIAD, A.C., Mazatlán Unit for Aquaculture and Environmental Management, Mazatlán, Mexico

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.865.r872

The article is well written with an appropriate title and abstract. The methods are adequate for the aims of the study, but I would suggest that including the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis as suggested by Rosello-Mora et al. 2006, ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

26

Reviewer Report 03 Apr 2013

Tomoo Sawabe, Laboratory of Microbiology, Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.865.r818

Title and abstract are good enough to attract readers in the scientific community.
Genome based multi-gene sequence comparison is one of the promising tools to analyse bacterial populations. To achieve the analysis for Streptococcus, the authors carefully designed massive data genome

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Mar 2013

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 1 01 Mar 13	read	read

Tomoo Sawabe, Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan
Bruno Gomez-Gil, Mazatlán Unit for Aquaculture and Environmental Management, Mazatlán, Mexico

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

26 Views

03 Apr 2013 | for Version 1

Bruno Gomez-Gil, CIAD, A.C., Mazatlán Unit for Aquaculture and Environmental Management, Mazatlán, Mexico

26 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The article is well written with an appropriate title and abstract. The methods are adequate for the aims of the study, but I would suggest that including the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis as suggested by Rosello-Mora et al. 2006, would certainly improve the manuscript. The online analysis can be found here http://www.imedea.uib.es/jspecies/index.html.The conclusions are adequate and the data sufficient to replicate all the analyses.The data are openly accessible at GenBank.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

26 Views

03 Apr 2013 | for Version 1

Tomoo Sawabe, Laboratory of Microbiology, Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan

26 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Title and abstract are good enough to attract readers in the scientific community.
Genome based multi-gene sequence comparison is one of the promising tools to analyse bacterial populations. To achieve the analysis for Streptococcus, the authors carefully designed massive data genome analysis. The results are strong enough and supported by the results of the analysis.
The conclusion is clear that authors proposed a threshold value on the basis of genome-based MLSA in Streptococcus bacteria.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Gevers D, Cohan FM, Lawrence JG, et al.: Opinion: Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005; 3(9): 733–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Cohan FM, Koeppel AF: The origins of ecological diversity in prokaryotes. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(21): R1024–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Alam S, Brailsford SR, Whiley RA, et al.: PCR-Based methods for genotyping viridans group streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37(9): 2772–6. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[4] 4. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM: Taxonomic Note: A place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S ribosomal-RNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994; 44(4): 846–849. Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, et al.: Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987; 37(4): 463–464. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Hoshino T, Fujiwara T, Kilian M: Use of phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses to identify nonhemolytic streptococci isolated from bacteremic patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(12): 6073–85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[7] 7. Kawamura Y, Hou XG, Sultana F, et al.: Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995; 45(2): 406–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[8] 8. Suzuki N, Seki M, Nakano Y, et al.: Discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci by genomic subtractive hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(9): 4528–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[9] 9. Coenye T, Vandamme P: Extracting phylogenetic information from whole-genome sequencing projects: the lactic acid bacteria as a test case. Microbiology. 2003; 149(pt 12): 3507–17. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Coenye T, Gevers D, Van de Peer Y, et al.: Towards a prokaryotic genomic taxonomy. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005; 29(2): 147–67. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, et al.: Accuracy of phenotypic methods for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates included in surveillance programs. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(7): 2184–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[12] 12. Croucher NJ, Harris SR, Fraser C, et al.: Rapid pneumococcal evolution in response to clinical interventions. Science. 2011; 331(6016): 430–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[13] 13. Thompson CC, Vicente ACP, Souza RC, et al.: Genomic taxonomy of Vibrios. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9: 258. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[14] 14. Thompson CC, Vieira NM, Vicente AC, et al.: Towards a genome based taxonomy of Mycoplasmas. Infect Genet Evol. 2011; 11(7): 1798–804. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[15] 15. Enright MC, Spratt BG: A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology. 1998; 144(Pt 11): 3049–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Hanage WP, Fraser C, Spratt BG: Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 361(1475): 1917–27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[17] 17. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, et al.: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(24): 4876–82. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[18] 18. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4): 406–25. PubMed Abstract

[19] 19. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al.: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28(10): 2731–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[20] 20. Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980; 16(2): 111–120. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Felsenstein J: Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution. 1985; 39(4): 783–791. Publisher Full Text

[22] 22. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM: Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187(18): 6258–64. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[23] 23. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(17): 3389–402. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[24] 24. Wright F: The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene. 1990; 87(1): 23–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Karlin S, Mrázek J, Campbell AM: Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179(12): 3899–913. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[26] 26. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M: Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010; 2(1): 142–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[27] 27. Zhang A, Yang M, Hu P, et al.: Comparative genomic analysis of Streptococcus suis reveals significant genomic diversity among different serotypes. BMC genomics. 2011; 12: 523. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[28] 28. Bellanger X, Roberts AP, Morel C, et al.: Conjugative transfer of the integrative conjugative elements ICESt1 and ICESt3 from Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol. 2009; 191(8): 2764–75. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[29] 29. Harvey RM, Stroeher UH, Ogunniyi AD, et al.: A variable region within the genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae contributes to strain-strain variation in virulence. PloS One. 2011; 6(5): e19650. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[30] 30. Zbinden A, Köhler N, Bloemberg GV: recA-based PCR assay for accurate differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from other viridans streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(2): 523–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[31] 31. Donati C, Hiller NL, Tettelin H, et al.: Structure and dynamics of the pan-genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae and closely related species. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(10): R107. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[32] 32. Karlin S: Global dinucleotide signatures and analysis of genomic heterogeneity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1998; 1(15): 598–610. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[33] 33. Foerstner KU, von Mering C, Hooper SD, et al.: Environments shape the nucleotide composition of genomes. EMBO Rep. 2005; 6(12): 1208–13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[34] 34. Devriese LA, Vandamme P, Pot B, et al.: Differentiation between Streptococcus gallolyticus strains of human clinical and veterinary origins and Streptococcus bovis strains from the intestinal tracts of ruminants. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36(12): 3520–3. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[35] 35. Narikawa S, Suzuki Y, Takahashi M, et al.: Streptococcus oralis previously identified as uncommon "Streptococcus sanguis" in Behçet’s disease. Arch Oral Biol. 1995; 40(8): 685–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Material and methods

Genome sequence data

Table 1. Genomic features of the streptococci.

16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA)

Average amino acid identity (AAI)

Codon usage

Determination of dinucleotide relative abundance values and genomic dissimilarity

Genome-to-genome distances (GGD)

Results and discussion

Table 2. Taxonomic resolution of genomic analyses of streptococci species.

General genomic features

Phylogenetic reconstructions by 16S rRNA and MLSA

Figure 1. Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and MLSA concatenated sequences of Streptococcus.

Average amino acid identity (AAI)

Genome signature

Codon usage bias (Nc)

Genome distance analysis

Conclusion

Author contributions

Competing interests

Grant information

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated