Keywords
Congenital dislocation of the radial head; Valgus deformity; Open reduction; Reconstruction; Two in one approach
Congenital dislocation of the radial head; Valgus deformity; Open reduction; Reconstruction; Two in one approach
An eight year old, otherwise healthy girl, born out of non consanguineous marriage presented in 2012 with swelling of her left elbow joint, valgus deformity, limitation of movement, and occasional pain. The patient had no previous history of trauma or significant illness. Her elbow was apparently normal until the age of 4 years. At this point her mother noticed swelling and progressing deformity. On physical examination the radial head was dislocated posterolaterally and was not reducible. There was cubitus valgus (30 degrees) and 15 degrees of fixed flexion deformity. She had full flexion at her elbow but no supination of her forearm.
An X-ray showed posterior dislocation of the radial head with a domed articular surface. McLaughlin’s line had not bisected the capitellum. The radius was bowed anteriorly and was relatively longer in relation to ulna. The capitulum was hypoplastic and flat. There was no evidence of any previous fracture (Figure 1). An MRI showed posterior dislocation of the radial head and formation of a pseudo-joint with the adjacent margin of the ulna (Figure 2). Due to relative radial lengthening and radial bow, it would have been difficult to reduce the radial head in the radiocapitellar joint. Hence we planned for reconstruction surgery by radial shortening and open reduction of the radiocapitellar joint through two incisions. Pre-operative templating was done to assess the amount of shortening required for the easy reduction and maintenance of adequate joint space.
The capitulum is hypoplastic.
The novel two incision/two-in-one technique described here involves one modification to the Sachar’s method1 of open reduction by adding a radial shortening step. Under tourniquet, we performed the surgery through a two incision approach. The first incision on the anterior aspect of the proximal forearm was for radial shortening (Henry approach) and the second incision on the lateral part of the elbow was for open reduction of the radiocapitellar joint (Kocher’s approach). The proximal radial shaft was osteotomised first before we performed the radial head relocation to facilitate the reduction, which reduces the risk of osteonecrosis2. Then the overlapping part of radial shaft was trimmed with a bone nibbler, similar to the procedure of femoral shortening in the treatment of a dysplastic dislocated hip joint3. The radial shaft was stabilized by a transradiocapitellar fixation with a 1.8 mm K wire with the elbow in flexed position.
Post-operatively, the elbow was immobilized with an above elbow plaster splint, in 90° of flexion, for six weeks at which point the K-wire was removed and the elbow was mobilized. The patient was further managed with controlled elbow movement exercises and physiotherapy for the next three months to improve the range of movement and muscle strength.
At one year follow up in 2013, the patient’s elbow was stable with no valgus or fixed flexion deformity. Supination had increased to 40 degrees from zero degrees. An X-ray showed reforming of the radial head articular surface with good congruity of the radiocapitellar joint with no deformity of the radial shaft (Figure 3).
Congenital dislocation of the radial head is the most common congenital elbow abnormality1 and usually occurs in association with other conditions (60% of the time), but can also occur in isolation4. The more common associated conditions include lower extremity anomalies, scoliosis, mental retardation, and nail-patella and Klippel-Feil syndromes5. The condition is usually bilateral, but some unilateral cases have been described5,6. When unaccompanied by other radial or systemic conditions, it is almost always bilateral. The majority of radial head dislocations are posterior (65% of cases), followed by anterior (~15%) and lateral (~15%)7. It is often not noted until the age of four or five at which time some limitation of motion or deformity becomes evident7. Our case is an isolated unilateral congenital dislocation of the radial head noted at the age of four years.
In our case, we anticipated difficulty in reducing the radial head to the radiocapitellar joint, due to relative radial lengthening and radial bow. Hence we planned for reconstruction surgery by radial shortening and open reduction of the radiocapitellar joint through two incisions. Pre-operative templating was done to assess the amount of shortening required for the easy reduction and maintenance of adequate joint space.
The dislocation of radial head and its associated features are now believed to be triggered by failure of development of a normal capitulum, which deprives the developing radial head of the contact pressure required for normal development and results in malformation of the radiocapitellar joint8. The symptoms are relatively benign, with only some limitation of motion and deformity9. Early radiographic findings are subtle due to the absence of the capitulum and radial head ossification centers9. Before radial head ossification (~ five years) a line drawn along the shaft of the radius should normally bisect the capitellum ossification center (McLaughlin’s line) but did not in this case10.
McFarland (1936)11 described the radiological signs which he believed distinguished the congenital from the traumatic in unilateral dislocations. However the convex radial head, flattening of the capitellum and anterior angulation of the ulna are regarded as characteristic of congenital dislocation are clearly seen as a result of the injury as well12.
Generally, patients become symptomatic by adolescence and are treated by radial head resection. Surgery at an earlier age with open reduction and ligament reconstruction may offer advantages over late radial head resection1. Early reconstruction may prevent the long term complication of pain, loss of motion, deformities and osteochondral loose bodies13. Ideally the care of congenital dislocation of the radial head would involve open reduction and restoration of normal anatomy. The logic is that if the radial head can be reduced early, the deformity of the capitellum and the forearm may not occur or remodel with growth13.
We agree with De Boeck14 that reconstruction of the annular ligament seems unnecessary, and that unreduced radial head dislocations, therefore, may be treated by simple open reduction and fixation for six weeks with a transarticular pin. This is why the annular ligament was not reconstructed in our case. Although much of the literature refers to the treatment of radial head dislocation by means of an ulnar osteotomy, as described by Hiramaya and coworkers15, the main indication of this procedure is the presence of residual deformity of the ulna or radius with a concave radial head articular surface16. In our case there was no deformity of the ulna, but there was lengthening of the radius with a domed radial head.
We were cautious not to excise the radial head in our case because of the risk of secondary subluxation of the distal radio-ulnar joint due to proximal migration of the radius17. We believe on the basis of our results that surgical correction is fully justified in irreducible dislocation of the radial head. We also believe that shortening of the radius would have been necessary to achieve reduction in cases where there is radial lengthening.
No reported case of congenital dislocation of the radial head treated by radial shortening and open reduction of the radiocapitellar joint through two incision approaches (two-in-one approach) has hitherto been available, as far as the authors are aware. This paper describes such a case, where we used this technique for the easy reduction of the radiocapitellar joint in order to maintain normal joint anatomy.
Consent was obtained from the patient and her mother for the novel technique to be conducted. We also obtained the consent from them for use of their information and images for publication in this article.
Raju Karuppal: Described the idea of this novel technique and performed the surgery, post operative evaluation, design, writing and editing of the case report. Anwar Marthya: Planning of the surgery, analysis and interpretation of the result, design and editing of the manuscript. Rajendran V. Raman: Interpretation of result and editing of manuscript. Sandhya Somasundaran: Interpretation of the results, writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript for publication.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 22 Jan 14 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)