Keywords
bilateral adrenal hemorrhage, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, HIT, partial nephrectomy
bilateral adrenal hemorrhage, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, HIT, partial nephrectomy
A 48-year-old Caucasian female with a past medical history of hypothyroidism presented to us with an incidentally discovered 3 cm enhancing right renal mass. Her home medications included levothyroxine and oral contraceptives. She underwent an uncomplicated robotic-assisted laparoscopic right partial nephrectomy. The patient received routine perioperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis with sequential compression devices, (SCD). On postoperative day (POD) 2, she developed new-onset sinus tachycardia and showed depressed pulse-oximetry readings. As subsequent chest computed tomography (CT) scans demonstrated multiple large pulmonary emboli, she was started immediately on a continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin infusion, titrated to target an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 64–97 seconds. The patient was transitioned to therapeutic anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) at 1mg/Kg q12hrs on POD 3 and discharged the next day.
On postoperative day 6, she developed syncope and hypotension and was admitted to the hospital. Work up in the emergency room was remarkable for a hematocrit (HCT) of 19%, and a CT scan demonstrated a bleeding pseudoaneurysm in the nephrectomy bed. She responded to red blood cell transfusion (4 units) and embolization of the pseudoaneurysm, becoming normotensive with a HCT of 26.2%. Anticoagulation with LMWH at 1mg/Kg was resumed the next day. She was discharged from the hospital on POD 10.
The patient presented to the surgeon’s office on postoperative day 13 with progressive lethargy and subjective fevers. She was normotensive but tachycardic, and was admitted with concern for recurrent hemorrhage. Laboratory analysis at that time was remarkable for a leukocytosis to (16,000/µL), thrombocytopenia of 49,000/µL (from a pre-operative value of 234,000/µL), hyponatremia to 125mEq/L (baseline of 139mEq/L) and a relatively normal HCT of 31.7%. CT scan of the adrenal glands demonstrated bilateral adrenal gland enlargement and hyperdensity, consistent with BAH (Figure 1). Within 2 hours of initiating 50 mg intravenous hydrocortisone every 8 hours, her pulse decreased from 128 beats per minute (bpm) to 107bpm, and her blood pressure increase from 89/54mmHg 115/63mmHg. A percutaneous supra-renal inferior-vena-cava filter (IVCF) was placed by interventional radiology and an argatroban infusion started. The patient underwent careful titration to an outpatient regimen of fludrocortisone, hydrocortisone, and fondaparinux. She was discharged with a platelet count of 141,000/µL and serum sodium of 139mEq/L. After 12 months follow-up, the patient remains on non-heparin anticoagulation and steroid supplementation.
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immune-mediated complication occurring infrequently following exposure to unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin. HIT occurs when a complex between IgG antibodies and heparin-platelet-factor-4 forms. The antibodies activate platelets by binding to the FcɣIIa receptor, which results in systemic thrombosis and consumptive thrombocytopenia1.
With their rich arterial supply and single central vein, the adrenal glands are particularly susceptible to congestive hemorrhage following venous thrombosis. Adrenal hemorrhage associated with HIT tends to be bilateral, resulting in severe clinical manifestations from abdominal pain, fever and lethargy, to catastrophic hemodynamic collapse2. In the post-surgical patient, these symptoms can be confused with more common complications, such as sepsis or hemorrhage. As undiagnosed cases tend to be fatal, a prompt recognition is crucial2.
Few cases of HIT-associated BAH have been previously described in the literature2–4. Approximately 90% of the patients are post-surgical, with the most common operations being orthopedic. HIT may be an important cause of BAH, accounting for up to 10% of the cases4. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HIT-associated BAH following partial nephrectomy in particular, or urologic surgery in general. Our case highlights two critical points; 1) the diagnostic complexity of HIT-associated BAH, and 2) the possibility of a successful clinical outcome when rapid diagnosis is made.
Written informed consent for publication of clinical details was obtained from the patient.
Ashley Winter performed the case research and wrote the initial manuscript draft.
Ranjith Ramasamy performed manuscript edits and review.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 23 Jan 14 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)