Keywords
interconversion, microbial carbon pump, carbon sequestration, refractory carbon, global carbon cycle
interconversion, microbial carbon pump, carbon sequestration, refractory carbon, global carbon cycle
The regulation of carbon in aquatic systems is a major biogeochemical process. The oceans’ surface takes up about 2% more CO2 gas than they release, a proportion of which dissolves into the water, forming carbonic acid. The increase in CO2 levels in oceans decreases the pH, resulting in acidification which affects the oceanic ecosystem1. Carbon also enters the seas through the food web via photosynthesis, but does not last for long periods and is either released into the atmosphere as CO2 or sinks to the ocean depths as dead organic matter. However, a significant amount of carbon is present in the water in the form of DOC2,4,5. The roles that ocean viruses play are very important in shaping microbial population sizes as well as in regenerating carbon and other nutrients6–8. It is estimated that every second, approximately 1023 viral infections occur in the ocean. Therefore, it should not be surprising that viruses are major influential forces behind biogeochemical cycles5–8.
A key element of the carbon cycle is the microbial conversion of dissolved organic carbon into inedible forms. Microbes play a dominant role in “pumping” bioavailable carbon into a pool of relatively inert compounds. The microbial carbon pump (MCP) “may act as one of the conveyor belts that transports and stores carbon in oceans.” The MCP also appears to function in deep waters, where bacteria adapted to the high-pressure environment may be able to degrade refractory DOC. Hiroshi Ogawa et al., showed that marine microbes are able to convert bioavailable DOC to refractory DOC2,4,5.
The present communication represents time studies of phage-host interactions under controlled conditions, in order to analyze their impact on the total carbon content of the source (nutrient broth) and their interconversion between organic and inorganic forms of carbon with respect to control samples. The control sample is just the nutrient broth without the inoculation of bacterium and their respective phage.
The experiment was designed to measure the inorganic carbon levels in three conditions: control (nutrient broth only), bacteria alone and bacteria with their specific phage. The bacterium used during our study was E. coli (ATCC, strain 13706) and the bacteriophage used was phi X174 (ATCC, strain 13706 B1). They represent a good model for carbon conversion and interconversion through phage-host interactions and their interaction can be easily determined by the instruments like TOC analyzer3,6,7.
All three experimental conditions were conducted in 1L of sterilized nutrient broth each as to have a defined composition of the nutrients available for our study (HiMedia Pvt. Ltd.). For the bacteria without phage condition, sterilized nutrient broth media was inoculated with 100 cfu/ml of E. coli (ATCC 13706) previously enriched and incubated at 37°C; for the bacteria with phage condition approximately 1 ml of 1000 pfu/ml of phage were added. All flasks were sealed and incubated at 37°C for 18 hours. For control condition, sterile uninoculated nutrient broth was kept at 4°C throughout the experiment.
The initial reading were analyzed by a total organic carbon (TOC) analyzer (Shimadzu, Japan Model: TOC-Vcph) after 18 hours of incubation for all three sets of samples were recorded as “0” hours reading and before inoculation of bacteria and phages (see Table 1 and Table 2). TOC analysis was further carried out after every 2 hours until a stationary state was achieved. The stationary phase for inorganic carbon was defined by no further increase or decrease in the reading of inorganic carbon.
Please refer Figure 1 and Figure 2 for understanding the principle of TOC analysis and different types of carbon compounds. The overall experiment was repeated for 10 times and their averages are represented in the Table 1 and Table 2.
The average results of the three sets are represented in Table 1 and Table 2, which show that the inorganic carbon content of the samples increased over time (except control) in both sets. The sample set with host-phage inoculation showed a increased reading of inorganic carbon levels compared to bacteria-only. There was an average 15–25 percent increase in inorganic carbon composition of sample set with host-phage inoculation. The result indicates that the phages may have role in regulation of carbon in aquatic systems through carbon sequestration or conversion in different biologically unavailable forms and can elevate inorganic carbon content levels in aqueous environments.
The increase in inorganic carbon content may be due to lysis of the host cell releasing its refractory carbon compounds and respiration produced CO2 during utilization of carbon constituent for phage assembly and development. These controlled experiment mimics the continuous viral infections occurring in the different aquatic environments2,4,5. The consistent rise in the inorganic content is an indicator that, viruses somehow, seems to regulate carbon cycle to a greater extent as observed from the increase in IC level. The analytical results as indicated from the TOC analyzer are sole representation of phage lyses event and are worth analyzing further. If we are able to understand the biochemical mechanism and the byproducts generated during this whole process we may be able to determine the carbon sequestration in a better way. Considerable research activity needs to be initiated involving different environments conditions, parameters, sources, etc to facilitate better understanding of viral life cycle involving carbon cycle as an important area of future research. It can be proposed that carbon conversation during these studies gives us the clear ideas of the possible fate of carbon cycle and the role of phages. Similarly, we can also try to elucidate the role of phages (viruses) influencing other biogeochemical cycles including Nitrogen and Sulphur by using CHNS analyzer for better understanding of this process. It is also known that the infection of microbes also alters host metabolism significantly. Carbon sequestering algae like cyanobacteria are infected by cyanophages, which complicates our understanding further and demanding further in-depth studies. Lysogenic condition established by viruses under nutrient depleted condition or harsh environment can regulate the carbon utilization processes differently. Hence, the effect of viral infection on host metabolism remains unknown5–8.
Future work is essential for understanding the cellular processes especially infected (Lysogenic) host species. It will also prove helpful in deciphering the role of phages in regulating the carbon flow in the aquatic systems like oceans where their concentration outnumbered other species.
All authors have contributed equally to this work. All authors have seen and agreed to the content of the final manuscript.
The work was carried out as an in-house activity and was supported by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, New Delhi.
I confirm that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
We would like to thank Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for providing support and Center for Science and Environment, New Delhi for invitation to present our work during Second National Research Conference on Climate Change held on 5–6 November 2011 at New Delhi.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 01 Jun 15 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)