ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review
Revised

Drosophila's contribution to stem cell research

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 02 Aug 2016
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

The discovery of Drosophila stem cells with striking similarities to mammalian stem cells has brought new hope for stem cell research. Recent developments in Drosophila stem cell research is bringing wider opportunities for contemporary stem cell biologists. In this regard, Drosophila germ cells are becoming a popular model of stem cell research. In several cases, genes that controlled Drosophila stem cells were later discovered to have functional homologs in mammalian stem cells. Like mammals, Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs) are controlled by both intrinsic as well as external signals. Inside the Drosophila testes, germline and somatic stem cells form a cluster of cells (the hub). Hub cells depend on JAK-STAT signaling, and, in absence of this signal, they do not self-renew. In Drosophila, significant changes occur within the stem cell niche that contributes to a decline in stem cell number over time. In case of aging Drosophila, somatic niche cells show reduced DE-cadherin and unpaired (Upd) proteins. Unpaired proteins are known to directly decrease stem cell number within the niches, and, overexpression of upd within niche cells restored GSCs in older males also . Stem cells in the midgut of Drosophila are also very promising. Reduced Notch signaling was found to increase the number of midgut progenitor cells. On the other hand, activation of the Notch pathway decreased proliferation of these cells. Further research in this area should lead to the discovery of additional factors that regulate stem and progenitor cells in Drosophila.

Keywords

Stem cell, Drosophila, Invertebrate stem cell

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The following changes were made, as suggested by the reviewers;

  1. References 12 and 13 were changed, and two new references (22, 23) have been added.
     
  2. The Conclusion has been improved.
     
  3. The word “female” has been inserted between the “elimination of ” and “germinal stem cells”.
     
  4. "pMad is a indirect indicator" has been changed to "pMad is a direct indicator".
     
  5. In the abstract, “A recent development” has been changed to “Recent developments”

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

Introduction

The fundamental property of stem cells that they can not only differentiate into various types of cells, but can also renew the stem cell population, is the basis of progressive regenerative medicine1. It is normal for some tissues like blood, skin, gut and germ cells to be regularly maintained by stem cell precursors. Stem cell niches control important properties of stem cells including self-renewing potential2. Currently, Drosophila germ cells are established as a crucial model of stem cells.

Analysis of the recent literature

Drosophila ovary contains both germline and somatic stem cells that reside within the anterior region of each ovariole3. In an interesting experiment, where individual germaria, free of developing eggs and sheath tissue, were transplanted into the abdominal cavity of a host Drosophila, they not only regenerated ovariole-like structures but also maintained oogenesis4. Drosophila ovariole usually contains two somatic stem cells (called cystocysts) near the wall of the germarium. Interestingly, somatic stem cells, in this case, not only divide independently of surrounding cells, but also continue to divide in the absence of germline cells5. As asymmetric stem cell division is an important property that enables stem cells to self-renew and differentiate, the balance between symmetry and asymmetry is a tool that enables stem cells to maintain required numbers of progeny cells. An enormous amount of research effort has been directed towards understanding the basis of this asymmetry. Ablation of presumptive germline stem cells (GSCs) near the apical tip blocked the production of new germline cysts, however, previously initiated cysts were able to complete development in this case6. This indicated that development of cysts does not require continued cyst production. More importantly, ablation of a distinct group of somatic cells around GSCs leads to higher egg production7. It has been reported that stem cells adjust their proliferation rate in response to nutrition without changing the number of active stem cells e.g. a protein-rich diet increases the rate of egg production, in this case8.

Germline and somatic stem cells attach to form a cluster of cells (the hub) in the Drosophila testes. The hub expresses a ligand that activates the JAK-STAT signaling cascade9. Without this signal, GSCs do not self-renew, but can differentiate. Drosophila bag of marbles (bam) gene is required for the differentiation of daughter cells (cystoblasts) from mother stem cells10. Instead of differentiation, bam mutant germ cells proliferated like stem cells. Heat-induced bam expression caused elimination of female germinal stem cells while somatic stem cell numbers were not changed11. Interestingly, ectopic bam expression had no such consequences on male germline cells indicating bam’s potential to regulate oogenesis and spermatogenesis in different ways11. Somatic cyst cells and hub cells express two bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) molecules: Gbb (Glass bottom boat) and Dpp (Decapentaplegic). The Dpp/BMP signal was found to be essential for GSC maintenance12. In absence of BMP signaling, bam is upregulated that can cause GSCs to be lost. Mutations in Dpp or its receptor (saxophone) increases stem cell loss and inhibits stem cell division. On the other hand, overexpression of Dpp blocks GSC differentiation13. Interestingly, BMP signaling reduces bam expression in ovarian GSCs. Phosphorylated Mad (pMad) is a direct indicator of BMP signaling as C-terminal phosphorylation of Mad by BMP receptor directs Mad toward BMP signaling14. Somatic inner germarium sheath cells failed to divide after removing GSC niches. Hedgehog (Hh) family signaling mediators are known for their important role during Drosophila development15. Hedgehog genes were also reported to be crucial for the proliferation of ovarian somatic cells in Drosophila. Drosophila neuroblasts regulate stem cell growth by separating the growth inhibitor Brat and the transcription factor Prospero into different daughter cells15. Interestingly, mutant Brat or Prospero caused both daughter cells to grow resulting into tumorigenesis16. High levels of Pumilio and Nanos proteins have also been observed in Drosophila GSCs17. Lack of zygotic activity of Nanos or Pumilio was found to have a dramatic effect on germline development in female flies. Pumilio mutant Drosophila not only failed to maintain stem cells but germline cells also17. Loqs protein was also found to be necessary for embryo survival and GSC sustenance in Drosophila. Decrease in stem cell functions could lead to the aging-related decline in tissue maintenance18,19. Somatic niche cells in testes from aging males show reduced DE-cadherin and unpaired (Upd) proteins20. Inside the Drosophila testes, Upd production in hub cells controls stem cell number within the niches, and overexpression of upd within niche cells can rescue GSCs even in case of aged males.

The identification of stem cell lineages in the midgut of Drosophila is a recent discovery2123. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi screen identified 405 genes that regulate intestinal stem cell (ISC) maintenance and differentiation in Drosophila intestine24. By integrating these genes into functional networks, it was concluded that factors related to basic stem cell processes are commonly needed in all stem cells, and stem-cell-specific, niche-related signals are required only in the unique stem cell types. Analysis of genetic mosaics revealed that differentiated cells in the midgut epithelium come from a common lineage in Drosophila25. Notch signaling controls key events during development. Consistent with its role of regulation of various adult stem cells, diminished notch signaling has been reported to cause increase in the number of precursor cells in the midgut of Drosophila26.

Conclusions

For more than a century, Drosophila’s contribution to genetics and developmental biology has been enormous. With its increasing contribution to stem cell research, Drosophila consistently proves to be an invaluable model organism. Compared to mammalian model organisms, it is easy and inexpensive to work with Drosophila. Furthermore, shorter generation time, small size, and fewer ethical issues makes Drosophila an attractive animal model. Drosophila germline and midgut stem cells are currently being established as important models of stem cell research. Self-renewal of Drosophila GSCs requires both intracellular as well as extracellular signals. Several factors including BMP signals were found to be indispensable for sustaining GSCs in Drosophila. Asymmetric division of GSCs to produce and maintain a daughter GSC is regulated by gene expression in adjacent somatic cells also. In Drosophila, significant changes occur within the stem cell niche that contributes to a decline in stem cell number over time. These stem cell-related discoveries that were made in Drosophila, will surely be helpful for mammalian regenerative medicine, and more work is desperately needed in this area.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Jun 2015
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Singh G. Drosophila's contribution to stem cell research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:157 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6611.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 02 Aug 2016
Revised
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 09 Aug 2016
Surajit Sarkar, Department of Genetics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India 
Approved
VIEWS 10
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sarkar S. Reviewer Report For: Drosophila's contribution to stem cell research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:157 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10085.r15385)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 18 Jun 2015
Views
38
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Jun 2015
Surajit Sarkar, Department of Genetics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India 
Approved
VIEWS 38
In the manuscript entitled “Drosophila's contribution to stem cell research” by Gyanesh Singh; the author provides an overview of the stem cell research in Drosophila. The manuscript provide a brief survey of the recent findings and discuss about various signalling pathways ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sarkar S. Reviewer Report For: Drosophila's contribution to stem cell research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:157 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.7099.r9121)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
39
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 Jun 2015
Takashi Adachi-Yamada, Department of Life Science, Gakushuin University, Tokyo, Japan 
Approved
VIEWS 39
I would like to accept this short review after the author makes improvements described below.
 
For better contrast to the following sentence, the word “female” should be inserted between the “elimination of ” and “germinal stem cells” in the sentence “Heat-induced ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Adachi-Yamada T. Reviewer Report For: Drosophila's contribution to stem cell research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 4:157 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.7099.r9120)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Jun 2015
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.