Keywords
Joubert syndrome, Cep290, cilia, modifier, cystic kidney, nephronophthisis
Joubert syndrome, Cep290, cilia, modifier, cystic kidney, nephronophthisis
The role of cilia and the diseases associated with aberrant cilial formation and function, termed ciliopathies, have in the last ten years become a major area of study1. Within the field of human genetics, the understanding of the importance of these organelles has given rise to a profound shift in the way that the study and treatment of a range of diseases is undertaken. Many syndromes, although known to be pleiotropic in their manifestation, were previously considered to be discrete entities requiring specific individualised treatment. The discovery that many of these syndromes appear to have a large degree of commonality in their disease mechanism via the malformation or mis-localisation of cilia, has lead to the thinking that they may indeed exist within a spectrum, and subsequently that they may respond to similar treatments.
Joubert syndrome (JBTS) is an autosomal recessive ciliopathy which gives rise to cerebellar vermis aplasia, hypotonia, ataxia and developmental delay. It is often associated with retinal degeneration, leading to blindness. It may also be associated with a cystic renal phenotype known as nephronophthisis (NPHP). The most common genetic lesion among patients with JBTS who present with the cerebello-oculo-renal phenotype is CEP290 (OMIM 610142)2. Mutations in the CEP290 gene are associated with numerous disorders including Leber congenital amaurosis3, Senior-Loken syndrome, JBTS4,5 and Meckel syndrome6. There have been over 100 different mutation sites reported in human patients7. Work attempting to understand genotype-phenotype correlations of CEP290 mutations based on total amount of protein has recently been reported8. A lack of correlation between genotype and phenotype may also be dependent on oligogenic inheritance and a mutational load in ciliary genes9. While this diversity has been suggested to contribute to these differential outcomes, recent work utilising mouse models of JBTS has indicated that there may be underlying mechanisms that modify the disease phenotype, even when the exact Cep290 mutation site is conserved.
In early 2015, Rachel et al. described a Cep290KO mouse model of JBTS, which exhibits retinal degeneration and hydrocephalus in juvenile mice, with a slowly progressive renal pathology resulting in cysts in adult mice10. While the retinal degeneration and cerebral phenotypes broadly reflect those observed in JBTS patients, the murine kidney phenotype is unusual, as in humans it typically presents in teenage years and young adults as opposed to being of late onset. This lack of a significant renal aspect in the pathology may simply reflect the diversity in the JBTS phenotype. It should be noted however that while a renal phenotype in JBTS is not universal, patients with mutations in CEP290, as opposed to other JBTS genes, do more commonly have renal disease (nephronophthisis)11.
Rachel et al. report that a significant number (80%) of Cep290KO mice do not survive past weaning, suggesting that the reported phenotype is that of less affected individuals. Additionally, to obtain viable mice, the authors propagated the mutation within a mixed background of C57BL/6 and 129/SvJ; mice could not be bred purely on either line past the N3 generation. While this genetic diversity in the population may echo that of a human scenario, it can be difficult to interpret data with the lack of experimental control that this diversity introduces. Furthermore it is likely that to fully ascertain an accurate picture of the disease model, it is necessary to use a significantly greater number of animals, which is not desirable. To investigate a wider phenotypic spectrum of Cep290-related disorders, Rachel et al. also use a gene trap (gt) model of Cep290, in which the pGT0xfT2 gene trap vector is inserted in intron 25, resulting in the introduction of a premature stop codon10. This lesion is similar to that of a number of common mutation sites within human CEP290, and so potentially provides a good model of the human disease. Cep290gt were backcrossed onto 129SvJ and Rachel et al. reported a significant level of lethality, as was reported for the Cep290KO model, with the vast majority of Cep290gt mice dying in utero between E12 and E14. Surviving mice displayed massively dilated kidneys, with loss of tubules and the formation of large cysts, a phenotype more similar to that of infantile nephronophthisis. As with the Cep290KO model however, the large mortality rate within the population needs to be considered, as those mice that do survive may not be fully representative.
This gene trap model (Cep290gt) is similar to a murine model reported in 2014, described as Cep290LacZ12. In this study, a similarly high level of in utero mortality was reported when Cep290LacZ mice were backcrossed on to a C57BL/6 background. On the 129/Ola background however mice were fertile and viable beyond 12 months12. Although the two studies generated mice from the same embryonic gene trap cell line (CC0582 [SIGTR, http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/mouse/sigtr/]), differences in the phenotype can be observed. While the retinal degeneration and ventriculomegaly were broadly similar between the two studies, kidneys of Cep290LacZ mice were not massively dilated as described by Rachel et al., but had progressive formation of cysts reminiscent of human nephronophthisis12. Cysts were observed in newborn mice, and became progressively larger over the first 4 weeks, instead of developing after 12 months. This disparity in the viability and phenotype of mice containing the same genetic alteration indicates that there are significant genetic modifiers specific to each strain of mice which can adversely affect the way in which this disease presents. The genetic diversity present between human populations therefore may provide some answers as to the broad range of phenotypes seen in JBTS patients. In the case of mutations such as those in Cep290 which do have pleiotropic effects, the difference between the outcomes in different mouse strains provides an opportunity to study how genetic variability affects the disease phenotype. By utilising strains with known discrete polymorphisms it should be possible to identify variants that correlate with specific outcomes, allowing for a much greater understanding of the role that specific genetic modifiers play in human disease and allowing therapies to be directed at these genetic modifiers.
SAR prepared the first draft. SAR, CMG and JAS were involved in the revision of the draft manuscript and have agreed to the final content.
Work was funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/M012212/1), support to all authors.
I confirm that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 20 Aug 15 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)