Introduction
Due to the concerted efforts to reduce malaria morbidity and mortality, it is estimated that since 2000, more than 663 million clinical cases and 6.2 million deaths have been averted in sub-Saharan Africa1. The drastic reduction in malaria burden is largely due to the implementation of infection control measures, including the adoption of the highly effective artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). In Africa alone, ACTs save approximately 100,000 lives each year2. Despite these successes, malaria remains a major threat to public health. Annually, 3.2 billion people are at risk of infection and more than 400,000 die, with young children and pregnant women being disproportionately affected3. While ACTs remain the cornerstone for global malaria treatment, recent reports indicate that current regimens are failing4–8. Thus, new classes of antimalarial compounds are desperately needed to combat emerging and existing drug-resistant parasites, if the progress made in the last decade is not to be undone9.
To this end, over 6 million compounds have been screened against Plasmodium falciparum, the etiological agent responsible for the bulk of malaria deaths10. Initially, high-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns concentrated on the intraerythrocytic stage of P. falciparum, which resulted in an unprecedented number of hits with the potential to treat the symptomatic stage of the disease11–17. Antimalarials that target the liver stages and the asymptomatic gametocyte stages will be critical as priorities shift from treatment towards local elimination. Thus, recent endeavors have focused on screening agents against these more tenacious stages of the P. falciparum life cycle18–26. As a result of the collaborative efforts between academia and the pharmaceutical industry, more than 25,000 compounds with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) activity ≤1 μM against P. falciparum now await target identification and further characterization10.
Estimates suggest that 7% of drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lack a defined target, and approximately 18% lack a definitive mechanism of action (MOA)27–29. While assigning the target and MOA of a compound are clearly not essential for its development, this information is often crucial in hit-to-lead optimization. For example, target identification informs medicinal chemistry to improve selectivity and/or pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles, without sacrificing potency30. A molecular understanding of compound action may also direct dosing, aid in partner drug selection, and assist with drug resistance surveillance31,32. Finally, once a target has been identified and validated, inhibitors may be instrumental in probing essential parasite biology32.
Elucidating the molecular targets responsible for the phenotypic effects observed in cell-based assays is often one of the most challenging and time-consuming steps in drug discovery. For P. falciparum, MOA assignment for first-in-class drugs has traditionally been quite difficult, as almost 50% of the genome lacks annotation, transcriptional profiling has had varying results, and heterologous protein expression remains problematic32–35. Moreover, the majority of known antimalarial agents have pleiotropic effects and exhibit polypharmacology, a likely outcome for many of the identified hits that will further complicate target assignment36–38. Often, tedious biochemical, genetic, and cellular studies are needed to deeply understand the MOA of a compound, as demonstrated by many attempts to identify the targets and biological effects of the elusive antimalarials atovaquone and artemisinin39–41. To overcome these barriers, a number of target deconvolution strategies have been developed, including resistance screening, transcriptional profiling, proteomic analysis, and metabolic analysis32,42. In this brief review, we describe the recent advances in experimental target identification in P. falciparum and present examples that exemplify each method. Of note, in silico approaches of target assignment have been covered separately in recent reviews43–45.
Genetic approaches of target identification
Resistance screening
To discern the target and the MOA of a novel antimalarial agent, one method that has been commonly employed is in vitro evolution of resistant parasites. Drug pressure is applied to cloned P. falciparum cultures either at a single concentration or in a stepwise fashion. In a recent large study to develop resistant mutants against many novel antimalarials, de novo resistance appears to occur rapidly in more than half of such attempts9,32,46. Resistant parasites are then cloned, and the genomic DNA is isolated and analyzed by next-generation sequencing to identify genetic changes associated with resistance46. The genomes of the parental and mutant parasite lines are compared to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variants (CNVs)46. Propagation of drug-resistant P. falciparum has successfully assigned a number of known and proposed antimalarial targets, including 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase47, cytochrome bc148–50, apicoplast-localized and cytoplasmic isoleucyl tRNA synthetase51, signal peptide peptidase52, lysyl-tRNA synthetase53, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase54, prolyl-tRNA synthetase55, and the P-type ATPase 4 (PfATP4)9,56–61. Remarkably, genetic changes in PfATP4 have been found to associate with resistance to multiple antimalarial chemotypes (spiroindolones, pyrazoles, dihydroisoquinolones, MMV722, MMV011567, and MMV007275)9,56–61. Currently, the reason for this commonly observed, PfATP4-associated resistance is unclear, but several mechanisms have been proposed61.
Caution is required when assigning compound MOA based on in vitro resistance selection and associated genetic changes. Multiple examples in malaria parasites and other organisms have shown that mutations in genes distinct from the molecular target may yet confer resistance. For example, mutations in the P. falciparum multi-drug resistance transporters, such as MDR1, mediate resistance to multiple classes of antimalarials due to compound transport. Resistance alleles may reveal related parasite biology, as in work by Guggisberg et al., which demonstrated that a mutation in a metabolic regulator, HAD1, confers resistance to fosmidomycin (FSM) due to changes in intracellular metabolite levels62. These genetic changes would arguably have been far more difficult to interpret if the target of FSM (PfDXR) had not already been well established. While the generation of resistant mutants has been instrumental for target validation in P. falciparum, neither genetic nor chemical methods alone can definitively conclude that an enzyme, metabolic pathway, or cellular function is indeed the target; thus, complementary approaches must be utilized63.
Chemogenomic profiling
To date, global chemical-genetic methods for drug target identification have been relatively underutilized in P. falciparum. Chemogenomic profiling represents a powerful tool that deduces MOA by comparing alterations in drug fitness profiles within a panel of mutants64,65. In 2015, the first chemogenomic screen of P. falciparum was performed with a library of 71 random piggyBac transposon insertion mutants and 53 antimalarial drugs and metabolic inhibitors64. The antimalarial drug sensitivities were monitored in the mutant parasite lines, and thus the chemogenomic interactions and the relationships between drug pairs were discerned64. Interestingly, a cluster of seven mutants were identified that were sensitive to artemisinin, including one with a mutation in the K13-propeller gene that is associated with resistance64,66,67. In a second study by Aroonsri et al., reverse-genetic chemogenomic profiling was used to uncover novel antimalarial agents that target dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (DHFR-TS)65. By screening a small compound library, two novel DHFR-TS inhibitors (MMV667486 and MMV667487) were identified with activity against blood-stage P. falciparum. Presumably, additional DHFR-TS inhibitors could be discovered by screening larger, more diverse chemical libraries65. Together, the aforementioned studies demonstrate the utility of chemical-genetic approaches in target assignment and pave the way for additional chemogenomic profiling in P. falciparum.
Target predictions via transcriptional analysis
Monitoring the global changes in gene expression may reveal regulatory and metabolic networks affected by drug treatment68. Thus, expression data may help elucidate the MOA of a drug and facilitate the characterization of unannotated genes68. Unfortunately, transcriptional profiling of drug-treated P. falciparum has been met with mixed results69. Several studies reported that expression changes are limited following antimalarial treatment, suggesting that malaria parasites are transcriptionally hard-wired33–35. Conversely, other studies have shown that chemical perturbations produce transcriptional responses in the expected target biological pathways70–73.
Recent work from Siwo et al. profiled the effect of 31 chemically and functionally diverse small molecules on P. falciparum74. By building a series of controls into their study design and by incorporating several normalization steps into their analysis, the transcriptional responses induced by each drug were successfully disentangled74. This novel approach not only identified transcriptional changes in expected target pathways but also provided evidence that artemisinin targets cell cycle and lipid metabolism, consistent with previous data74–84. Further, the MOA were predicted for several HTS-selected compounds by correlating the connections identified in the small molecule-Gene Ontology (GO) network with the functions of genes located in their quantitative trait locus (QTL)13,74. Importantly, the study explains why previous gene expression studies failed to tease out drug-specific responses and demonstrates that transcriptional profiling can capture the complexity of drug effects and accurately assign drug targets.
Proteomic approaches of target assignment
Despite the trove of information that can be gleaned from using DNA and RNA analyses to identify drug targets, genomic methods alone are insufficient to capture the total cellular effects of a given antimalarial85. P. falciparum has approximately 5,300 protein-encoding genes86,87. In theory, monitoring the global proteomic changes following drug treatment may inform on the function, expression, localization, interacting partners, and regulation of every protein, thus providing clues to compound MOA85. Conventional proteomic methods have been used for drug target identification in P. falciparum. For example, mass spectrometry (MS) was used to analyze alterations in the parasite proteome following chloroquine or artemisinin treatment88, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and tandem MS were used to identify protein changes in chloroquine-treated P. falciparum89, and finally isobaric tags for absolute and relative quantification (iTRAQ) and two-dimensional fluorescence gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) were used to monitor protein expression in doxycycline-treated parasites90. More recently, 2-DE and tandem MS identified proteins differentially expressed following treatment with quinine, mefloquine, or the natural product diosgenone91. While these traditional methods can provide useful information regarding global proteomic changes, it should be mentioned that a major limitation of these techniques is that low-abundance proteins may be outside the detection limits.
Chemical proteomics
The emerging field of chemical proteomics uses synthetic chemistry to design and generate probes to identify small-molecule–protein interactions92,93. This global proteomic approach detects interacting partners via MS-based affinity chromatography, and interactions are then mapped to signaling and metabolic pathways92. Applications include characterizing drug targets, deducing protein function, and uncovering off-target effects92,93. Chemical proteomic techniques are separated into two classifications: (1) activity-based protein profiling (ABPP), which monitors enzyme activities, or (2) compound-centric approaches, which reveal direct molecular interactions between compounds and targets92,94. Both methods provide broad, unbiased analyses and have been successfully applied to antimalarial discovery research.
A typical chemical strategy is synthesis of compound analogs to incorporate a “click” handle to facilitate drug target identification and validation in P. falciparum95. For example, a bifunctional compound based on the clinical candidate albitiazolium was synthesized that was photoactivatable and taggable96. MS identified a discrete list of potential drug targets in P. falciparum, while bioinformatic and interactome analyses were used to predict protein functions96. As albitiazolium inhibits phospholipid metabolism, most of the target proteins are involved in lipid metabolic activities96. A number of surprising targets were also uncovered, such as proteins involved in vesicular budding and transport functions, thereby demonstrating the utility of the method96. Further, in work by Wang et al., an artemisinin analog was engineered with a “clickable” alkyne tag that was coupled with either a biotin moiety for protein target identification or a fluorescent dye that would enable the activation mechanism of the drug to be monitored36. This dual chemical proteomics approach identified 124 putative direct targets of artemisinin, 33 of which had been proposed previously as antimalarial drug targets36. In a subsequent study, a panel of activity-based probes was generated that incorporated the endoperoxide scaffold of artemisinin as a warhead to alkylate the molecular targets in P. falciparum97. Tagged proteins were then isolated and identified by liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS97. Importantly, alkylated targets were identified in glycolytic, hemoglobin degradation, antioxidant defense, and protein synthesis pathways, supporting the promiscuous activity of artemisinin36,74,97.
Methods of target identification have been developed that do not rely on chemical modification of the investigative compound, including the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA), drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS), stability of proteins from rates of oxidation (SPROX), and thermal proteome profiling (TPP)98. While successful identification is largely dependent on the abundance of the drug target, these methods are less time consuming, avoid diminishing or altering drug activity, and can capture both the on- and off-target proteomic effects on a global scale98. Recently, a DARTS assay was conducted to identify targets for Torin 2, a lead compound with low nM activity against P. falciparum gametocytes99. Three gametocyte proteins (phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase, PF3D7_1325100; aspartate carbamoyltransferase, PF3D7_1344800; and a transporter, PF3D7_0914700) were identified as putative targets for Torin 2, demonstrating the utility of label-free, chemical proteomic approaches in P. falciparum99. We anticipate that due to their unbiased nature and versatility, future antimalarial drug discovery ventures will incorporate comparable technologies into the pipeline, thereby accelerating target assignment.
Target identification through metabolite analysis
Small metabolic perturbations can have a dramatic impact on critical cellular processes such as cell division, differentiation, and stress response pathways. Accordingly, a number of antimalarial agents in clinical development target metabolic enzymes, including the enzymes of the electron transport chain (ELQ-300, GSK932121, DSM265)100–102, the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway (FSM, MMV008138)103–106, the folate biosynthetic pathway (P218)107, and phosphoinositide metabolism (MMV390048)108. It is predicted that many of the active compounds uncovered by HTS projects will also have metabolic targets. To expedite target assignment of the novel drugs and drug scaffolds identified via HTS projects, metabolomic strategies are increasingly being incorporated into the drug-screening pipeline.
Targeted metabolite profiling
When candidate targets are known, researchers may focus their efforts by analyzing only a subset of metabolites; however, this requires prior knowledge of the enzymes, their kinetics and end products, and the established pathways in which they participate109. Targeted methodologies facilitate the enrichment of low-abundance analytes and incorporate the use of internal standards to permit quantitative metabolite analysis109. Such metabolite profiling has been successfully employed to identify and validate a number of antimalarial drug targets. Notable examples include identification of targets for the novel quinolone CK-2-68 (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase and cytochrome bc1), eflornithine (ornithine decarboxylase), MDL73811 (AdoMetDC), and a second target for the MEP pathway inhibitor FSM70,104,110,111.
More recently, targeted metabolite analysis was also used to characterize the enzymes of the NAD+ salvage pathway in P. falciparum112. By tracing 13C-labeled compounds via mass spectrometry, O’Hara et al. demonstrated that parasites scavenge exogenous niacin from their host112. Nicotinate mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (PfNMNAT) enzyme within the pathway was required for NAD+ metabolism and, further, the P. falciparum enzyme was similar to bacterial NMNATs112. Parasites were then screened against a panel of bacterial NMNAT inhibitors and a compound with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <1 μM against ring-stage P. falciparum was identified, validating NMNATs as an inhibitable drug target112.
Metabolomics
In contrast, untargeted metabolite analysis may be used to perform a global survey of the metabolic fluctuations induced by drug treatment. Metabolomic-based technologies measure the small molecule repertoire of the cell in response to a stimulus, such as drug treatment111,113. The resulting metabolic signature reveals the metabolites and pathways that are perturbed and, accordingly, assists with target identification30. Moreover, metabolomic strategies are especially useful in characterizing drugs that impact multiple targets and identifying any off-target drug effects114. It is important to note that extraction efficiencies, separation methods, and sample degradation can greatly influence the chemical diversity and concentrations of the metabolites present114,115. In addition, many metabolite features within a sample will remain unassigned, as current databases contain a small number of identified compounds114,115. While experimental techniques and metabolite identification methods have greatly advanced in recent years, untargeted metabolomic approaches for determining MOA remain limited.
Metabolomics in P. falciparum is arguably in its infancy. However, two new studies have demonstrated the utility of unbiased metabolite analysis in drug discovery. First, a dual gas chromatography (GC)-MS and LC-MS approach was used to map the metabolic changes induced by known antimalarial agents in blood-stage parasites31. Although the MOA was confirmed for a number of clinical agents, metabolomics data uncovered that dihydroartemisinin (DHA) not only disrupts hemoglobin catabolism but also perturbs pyrimidine biosynthesis31. The authors then used their untargeted MS approach to characterize a novel antimalarial, Torin 2, as an inhibitor of hemoglobin catabolism31.
In a second study, the total lipid landscape was surveyed during P. falciparum blood-stage development116. In addition to identifying ten new lipid classes and confirming the essentiality of the prominent lipid classes in the parasite, the authors tested a panel of compounds known to target lipid metabolisms116. Several inhibitors had low micromolar activity against asexual P. falciparum (CAY10499, Orlistat, DL-threo-1-phenyl-2-palmitoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol, GW4869, epoxyquinone, and N,N-dimethylsphingosine), suggesting that the lipid metabolic enzymes are possible drug targets116. Taken together, these two influential studies demonstrate that integration of metabolomics into the drug discovery pipeline will be crucial for accelerating target assignment.
Concluding remarks
In the past decade, the research and development portfolio of antimalarial agents has expanded, with approximately 20 new drugs now at various stages of development74. Considerable time, effort, and cooperation between academia and industry have led to the identification of 25,000 hit compounds, many of which may prove to be successful therapeutics10. Now, thousands of compounds lie in wait, as the more difficult and time-consuming task of hit-to-lead optimization must be launched, independently, for each potential candidate. Although not essential, target identification not only helps prioritize hits but also guides medicinal chemists in their quest to improve potency and pharmacokinetic properties32. Target assignment for a novel drug demands that innovative approaches are used to reveal clues of its MOA. Drug candidate attrition is inevitable and resistance development is expected10. As such, the drug discovery pipeline should be flooded with candidates that represent a broad spectrum of MOAs.
A collection of 400 diverse compounds with antimalarial activity was assembled by the Medicines for Malaria Venture into the Malaria Box, a resource that was made available free of charge in the hopes of catalyzing drug discovery research14. More than 250 Malaria Boxes were distributed between 2011 and 2015, and large amounts of data have been deposited into the public domain117. Recently, a meta-analysis was performed on the 291 Malaria Box screens conducted by 55 different research groups118. Aggregated data from all biochemical and cellular assays revealed likely MOA for only 135 (34%) of the compounds118. Therefore, we predict that a multi-pronged attack is almost certainly required for target assignment and MOA identification in the P. falciparum drug discovery pipeline.
Author contributions
All authors were involved in the drafting and revision of the manuscript and have agreed to the final content.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Grant information
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
F1000 recommendedReferences
- 1.
Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, et al.:
The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015.
Nature.
2015; 526(7572): 207–11. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 2.
Kong LY, Tan RX:
Artemisinin, a miracle of traditional Chinese medicine.
Nat Prod Rep.
2015; 32(12): 1617–21. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 3.
World Health Organization:
World malaria report. 2015. Reference Source
- 4.
Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, et al.:
Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia.
N Engl J Med.
2008; 359(24): 2619–20. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 5.
Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, et al.:
Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria.
N Engl J Med.
2009; 361(5): 455–67. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 6.
Roberts L:
Malaria wars.
Science.
2016; 352(6284): 398–402, 404–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 7.
Saunders DL, Vanachayangkul P, Lon C:
Dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine failure in Cambodia.
N Engl J Med.
2014; 371(5): 484–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 8.
World Health Organization:
Status report on artemisinin and ACT resistance. 2015. Reference Source
- 9.
Corey VC, Lukens AK, Istvan ES, et al.:
A broad analysis of resistance development in the malaria parasite.
Nat Commun.
2016; 7: 11901. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 10.
Wells TN, Hooft van Huijsduijnen R, van Voorhis WC:
Malaria medicines: a glass half full?
Nat Rev Drug Discov.
2015; 14(6): 424–42. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 11.
Plouffe D, Brinker A, McNamara C, et al.:
In silico activity profiling reveals the mechanism of action of antimalarials discovered in a high-throughput screen.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2008; 105(26): 9059–64. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 12.
Gamo FJ, Sanz LM, Vidal J, et al.:
Thousands of chemical starting points for antimalarial lead identification.
Nature.
2010; 465(7296): 305–10. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 13.
Guiguemde WA, Shelat AA, Bouck D, et al.:
Chemical genetics of Plasmodium falciparum.
Nature.
2010; 465(7296): 311–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 14.
Spangenberg T, Burrows JN, Kowalczyk P, et al.:
The open access malaria box: a drug discovery catalyst for neglected diseases.
PLoS One.
2013; 8(6): e62906. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 15.
Pérez-Moreno G, Cantizani J, Sánchez-Carrasco P, et al.:
Discovery of new compounds active against Plasmodium falciparum by high throughput screening of microbial natural products.
PLoS One.
2016; 11(1): e0145812. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 16.
Zhang J, Bowling JJ, Smithson D, et al.:
Diversity-oriented natural product platform identifies plant constituents targeting Plasmodium falciparum.
Malar J.
2016; 15(1): 270. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 17.
Avery VM, Bashyam S, Burrows JN, et al.:
Screening and hit evaluation of a chemical library against blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum.
Malar J.
2014; 13: 190. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 18.
Meister S, Plouffe DM, Kuhen KL, et al.:
Imaging of Plasmodium liver stages to drive next-generation antimalarial drug discovery.
Science.
2011; 334(6061): 1372–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 19.
Derbyshire ER, Prudêncio M, Mota MM, et al.:
Liver-stage malaria parasites vulnerable to diverse chemical scaffolds.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2012; 109(22): 8511–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 20.
Raphemot R, Lafuente-Monasterio MJ, Gamo-Benito FJ, et al.:
Discovery of dual-stage malaria inhibitors with new targets.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2015; 60(3): 1430–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 21.
Lucantoni L, Fidock DA, Avery VM:
Luciferase-based, high-throughput assay for screening and profiling transmission-blocking compounds against Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2016; 60(4): 2097–107. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 22.
Lucantoni L, Duffy S, Adjalley SH, et al.:
Identification of MMV malaria box inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum early-stage gametocytes using a luciferase-based high-throughput assay.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2013; 57(12): 6050–62. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 23.
Sanders NG, Sullivan DJ, Mlambo G, et al.:
Gametocytocidal screen identifies novel chemical classes with Plasmodium falciparum transmission blocking activity.
PLoS One.
2014; 9(8): e105817. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 24.
Lucantoni L, Silvestrini F, Signore M, et al.:
A simple and predictive phenotypic High Content Imaging assay for Plasmodium falciparum mature gametocytes to identify malaria transmission blocking compounds.
Sci Rep.
2015; 5: 16414. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 25.
Ruecker A, Mathias DK, Straschil U, et al.:
A male and female gametocyte functional viability assay to identify biologically relevant malaria transmission-blocking drugs.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2014; 58(12): 7292–302. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 26.
Duffy S, Avery VM:
Identification of inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte development.
Malar J.
2013; 12: 408. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 27.
Drews J:
Drug discovery: a historical perspective.
Science.
2000; 287(5460): 1960–4. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 28.
Overington JP, Al-Lazikani B, Hopkins AL:
How many drug targets are there?.
Nat Rev Drug Discov.
2006; 5(12): 993–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 29.
Gregori-Puigjane E, Setola V, Hert J, et al.:
Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and probes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2012; 109(28): 11178–83. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 30.
Creek DJ, Barrett MP:
Determination of antiprotozoal drug mechanisms by metabolomics approaches.
Parasitology.
2014; 141(1): 83–92. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 31.
Cobbold SA, Chua HH, Nijagal B, et al.:
Metabolic dysregulation induced in Plasmodium falciparum by dihydroartemisinin and other front-line antimalarial drugs.
J Infect Dis.
2016; 213(2): 276–86. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 32.
McNamara C, Winzeler EA:
Target identification and validation of novel antimalarials.
Future Microbiol.
2011; 6(6): 693–704. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 33.
Ganesan K, Ponmee N, Jiang L, et al.:
A genetically hard-wired metabolic transcriptome in Plasmodium falciparum fails to mount protective responses to lethal antifolates.
PLoS Pathog.
2008; 4(11): e1000214. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 34.
Gunasekera AM, Myrick A, Le Roch K, et al.:
Plasmodium falciparum: genome wide perturbations in transcript profiles among mixed stage cultures after chloroquine treatment.
Exp Parasitol.
2007; 117(1): 87–92. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 35.
Kritsiriwuthinan K, Chaotheing S, Shaw PJ, et al.:
Global gene expression profiling of Plasmodium falciparum in response to the anti-malarial drug pyronaridine.
Malar J.
2011; 10: 242. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 36.
Wang J, Zhang CJ, Chia WN, et al.:
Haem-activated promiscuous targeting of artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum.
Nat Commun.
2015; 6: 10111. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 37.
Al-Bari MA:
Chloroquine analogues in drug discovery: new directions of uses, mechanisms of actions and toxic manifestations from malaria to multifarious diseases.
J Antimicrob Chemother.
2015; 70(6): 1608–21. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 38.
Zhang Y, Xie L, Xie L, et al.:
The Plasmodium falciparum drugome and its polypharmacological implications.
bioRxiv.
2016. Publisher Full Text
- 39.
Mather MW, Darrouzet E, Valkova-Valchanova M, et al.:
Uncovering the molecular mode of action of the antimalarial drug atovaquone using a bacterial system.
J Biol Chem.
2005; 280(29): 27458–65. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 40.
Painter HJ, Morrisey JM, Mather MW, et al.:
Specific role of mitochondrial electron transport in blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum.
Nature.
2007; 446(7131): 88–91. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 41.
Xie SC, Dogovski C, Hanssen E, et al.:
Haemoglobin degradation underpins the sensitivity of early ring stage Plasmodium falciparum to artemisinins.
J Cell Sci.
2016; 129(2): 406–16. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 42.
Terstappen GC, Schlüpen C, Raggiaschi R, et al.:
Target deconvolution strategies in drug discovery.
Nat Rev Drug Discov.
2007; 6(11): 891–903. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 43.
Saïdani N, Grando D, Valadié H, et al.:
Potential and limits of in silico target discovery - Case study of the search for new antimalarial chemotherapeutic targets.
Infect Genet Evol.
2009; 9(3): 359–67. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 44.
Kandoi G, Acencio ML, Lemke N:
Prediction of druggable proteins using machine learning and systems biology: a mini-review.
Front Physiol.
2015; 6: 366. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 45.
Fairlamb AH:
Metabolic pathway analysis in trypanosomes and malaria parasites.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci.
2002; 357(1417): 101–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 46.
Flannery EL, Fidock DA, Winzeler EA:
Using genetic methods to define the targets of compounds with antimalarial activity.
J Med Chem.
2013; 56(20): 7761–71. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 47.
Dharia NV, Sidhu ABS, Cassera MB, et al.:
Use of high-density tiling microarrays to identify mutations globally and elucidate mechanisms of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum.
Genome Biol.
2009; 10(2): R21. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 48.
Nam TG, McNamara CW, Bopp S, et al.:
A chemical genomic analysis of decoquinate, a Plasmodium falciparum cytochrome b inhibitor.
ACS Chem Biol.
2011; 6(11): 1214–22. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 49.
Dong CK, Urgaonkar S, Cortese JF, et al.:
Identification and validation of tetracyclic benzothiazepines as Plasmodium falciparum cytochrome bc1 inhibitors.
Chem Biol.
2011; 18(12): 1602–10. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 50.
Bopp SE, Manary MJ, Bright AT, et al.:
Mitotic evolution of Plasmodium falciparum shows a stable core genome but recombination in antigen families.
PLoS Genet.
2013; 9(2): e1003293. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 51.
Istvan ES, Dharia NV, Bopp SE, et al.:
Validation of isoleucine utilization targets in Plasmodium falciparum.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2011; 108(4): 1627–32. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 52.
Harbut MB, Patel BA, Yeung BK, et al.:
Targeting the ERAD pathway via inhibition of signal peptide peptidase for antiparasitic therapeutic design.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2012; 109(52): 21486–91. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 53.
Hoepfner D, McNamara CW, Lim CS, et al.:
Selective and specific inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum lysyl-tRNA synthetase by the fungal secondary metabolite cladosporin.
Cell Host Microbe.
2012; 11(6): 654–63. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 54.
Lukens AK, Ross LS, Heidebrecht R, et al.:
Harnessing evolutionary fitness in Plasmodium falciparum for drug discovery and suppressing resistance.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2014; 111(2): 799–804. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 55.
Herman JD, Pepper LR, Cortese JF, et al.:
The cytoplasmic prolyl-tRNA synthetase of the malaria parasite is a dual-stage target of febrifugine and its analogs.
Sci Transl Med.
2015; 7(288): 288ra77. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 56.
Rottmann M, McNamara C, Yeung BK, et al.:
Spiroindolones, a potent compound class for the treatment of malaria.
Science.
2010; 329(5996): 1175–80. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 57.
Jiménez-Díaz MB, Ebert D, Salinas Y, et al.:
(+)-SJ733, a clinical candidate for malaria that acts through ATP4 to induce rapid host-mediated clearance of Plasmodium.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2014; 111(50): E5455-62. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 58.
Lehane AM, Ridgway MC, Baker E, et al.:
Diverse chemotypes disrupt ion homeostasis in the Malaria parasite.
Mol Microbiol.
2014; 94(2): 327–39. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 59.
Vaidya AB, Morrisey JM, Zhang Z, et al.:
Pyrazoleamide compounds are potent antimalarials that target Na+ homeostasis in intraerythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum.
Nat Commun.
2014; 5: 5521. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 60.
Flannery EL, McNamara CW, Kim SW, et al.:
Mutations in the P-type cation-transporter ATPase 4, PfATP4, mediate resistance to both aminopyrazole and spiroindolone antimalarials.
ACS Chem Biol.
2015; 10(2): 413–20. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 61.
Spillman NJ, Kirk K:
The malaria parasite cation ATPase PfATP4 and its role in the mechanism of action of a new arsenal of antimalarial drugs.
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist.
2015; 5(3): 149–62. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 62.
Guggisberg AM, Park J, Edwards RL, et al.:
A sugar phosphatase regulates the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway in malaria parasites.
Nat Commun.
2014; 5: 4467. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 63.
Frearson JA, Wyatt PG, Gilbert IH, et al.:
Target assessment for antiparasitic drug discovery.
Trends Parasitol.
2007; 23(12): 589–95. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 64.
Pradhan A, Siwo GH, Singh N, et al.:
Chemogenomic profiling of Plasmodium falciparum as a tool to aid antimalarial drug discovery.
Sci Rep.
2015; 5: 15930. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 65.
Aroonsri A, Akinola O, Posayapisit N, et al.:
Identifying antimalarial compounds targeting dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase (DHFR-TS) by chemogenomic profiling.
Int J Parasitol.
2016; 46(8): 527–35. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 66.
Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, et al.:
A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria.
Nature.
2014; 505(7481): 50–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 67.
Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, et al.:
Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria.
N Engl J Med.
2014; 371(5): 411–23. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 68.
Shaw KJ, Morrow BJ:
Transcriptional profiling and drug discovery.
Curr Opin Pharmacol.
2003; 3(5): 508–12. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 69.
Hu G, Cabrera A, Kono M, et al.:
Transcriptional profiling of growth perturbations of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.
Nat Biotechnol.
2010; 28(1): 91–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 70.
van Brummelen AC, Olszewski KL, Wilinski D, et al.:
Co-inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase/ornithine decarboxylase reveals perturbation-specific compensatory mechanisms by transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome analyses.
J Biol Chem.
2009; 284(7): 4635–46. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 71.
Mok S, Imwong M, Mackinnon MJ, et al.:
Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum is associated with an altered temporal pattern of transcription.
BMC Genomics.
2011; 12: 391. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 72.
Tamez PA, Bhattacharjee S, van Ooij C, et al.:
An erythrocyte vesicle protein exported by the malaria parasite promotes tubovesicular lipid import from the host cell surface.
PLoS Pathog.
2008; 4(8): e1000118. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 73.
Natalang O, Bischoff E, Deplaine G, et al.:
Dynamic RNA profiling in Plasmodium falciparum synchronized blood stages exposed to lethal doses of artesunate.
BMC Genomics.
2008; 9: 388. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 74.
Siwo GH, Smith RS, Tan A, et al.:
An integrative analysis of small molecule transcriptional responses in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.
BMC Genomics.
2015; 16: 1030. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 75.
Sibmooh N, Pipitaporn B, Wilairatana P, et al.:
Effect of artemisinin on lipid peroxidation and fluidity of the erythrocyte membrane in malaria.
Biol Pharm Bull.
2000; 23(11): 1275–80. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 76.
Berman PA, Adams PA:
Artemisinin enhances heme-catalysed oxidation of lipid membranes.
Free Radic Biol Med.
1997; 22(7): 1283–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 77.
Chen N, LaCrue AN, Teuscher F, et al.:
Fatty acid synthesis and pyruvate metabolism pathways remain active in dihydroartemisinin-induced dormant ring stages of Plasmodium falciparum.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2014; 58(8): 4773–81. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 78.
Tucker MS, Mutka T, Sparks K, et al.:
Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of in vitro-selected artemisinin-resistant progeny of Plasmodium falciparum.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2012; 56(1): 302–14. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 79.
Klonis N, Xie SC, McCaw JM, et al.:
Altered temporal response of malaria parasites determines differential sensitivity to artemisinin.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2013; 110(13): 5157–62. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 80.
Witkowski B, Lelièvre J, Barragán MJ, et al.:
Increased tolerance to artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum is mediated by a quiescence mechanism.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2010; 54(5): 1872–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 81.
Mok S, Ashley EA, Ferreira PE, et al.:
Drug resistance. Population transcriptomics of human malaria parasites reveals the mechanism of artemisinin resistance.
Science.
2015; 347(6220): 431–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 82.
Eichhorn T, Winter D, Büchele B, et al.:
Molecular interaction of artemisinin with translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) of Plasmodium falciparum.
Biochem Pharmacol.
2013; 85(1): 38–45. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 83.
Bhisutthibhan J, Pan XQ, Hossler PA, et al.:
The Plasmodium falciparum translationally controlled tumor protein homolog and its reaction with the antimalarial drug artemisinin.
J Biol Chem.
1998; 273(26): 16192–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 84.
Bhisutthibhan J, Philbert MA, Fujioka H, et al.:
The Plasmodium falciparum translationally controlled tumor protein: subcellular localization and calcium binding.
Eur J Cell Biol.
1999; 78(9): 665–70. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 85.
Jeffery DA, Bogyo M:
Chemical proteomics and its application to drug discovery.
Curr Opin Biotechnol.
2003; 14(1): 87–95. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 86.
Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, et al.:
Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.
Nature.
2002; 419(6906): 498–511. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 87.
Doerig C, Rayner JC, Scherf A, et al.:
Post-translational protein modifications in malaria parasites.
Nat Rev Microbiol.
2015; 13(3): 160–72. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 88.
Prieto JH, Koncarevic S, Park SK, et al.:
Large-scale differential proteome analysis in Plasmodium falciparum under drug treatment.
PLoS One.
2008; 3(12): e4098. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 89.
Radfar A, Diez A, Bautista JM:
Chloroquine mediates specific proteome oxidative damage across the erythrocytic cycle of resistant Plasmodium falciparum.
Free Radic Biol Med.
2008; 44(12): 2034–42. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 90.
Briolant S, Almeras L, Belghazi M, et al.:
Plasmodium falciparum proteome changes in response to doxycycline treatment.
Malar J.
2010; 9: 141. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 91.
Segura C, Cuesta-Astroz Y, Nunes-Batista C, et al.:
Partial characterization of Plasmodium falciparum trophozoite proteome under treatment with quinine, mefloquine and the natural antiplasmodial diosgenone.
Biomedica.
2014; 34(2): 237–49. PubMed Abstract
| F1000 Recommendation
- 92.
Huang F, Zhang B, Zhou S, et al.:
Chemical proteomics: terra incognita for novel drug target profiling.
Chin J Cancer.
2012; 31(11): 507–18. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 93.
Wright MH, Sieber SA:
Chemical proteomics approaches for identifying the cellular targets of natural products.
Nat Prod Rep.
2016; 33(5): 681–708. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 94.
Rix U, Superti-Furga G:
Target profiling of small molecules by chemical proteomics.
Nat Chem Biol.
2009; 5(9): 616–24. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 95.
Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB:
Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl.
2001; 40(11): 2004–21. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 96.
Penarete-Vargas DM, Boisson A, Urbach S, et al.:
A chemical proteomics approach for the search of pharmacological targets of the antimalarial clinical candidate albitiazolium in Plasmodium falciparum using photocrosslinking and click chemistry.
PLoS One.
2014; 9(12): e113918. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 97.
Ismail HM, Barton V, Phanchana M, et al.:
Artemisinin activity-based probes identify multiple molecular targets within the asexual stage of the malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum 3D7.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2016; 113(8): 2080–5. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 98.
Chang J, Kim Y, Kwon HJ:
Advances in identification and validation of protein targets of natural products without chemical modification.
Nat Prod Rep.
2016; 33(5): 719–30. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 99.
Sun W, Tanaka TQ, Magle CT, et al.:
Chemical signatures and new drug targets for gametocytocidal drug development.
Sci Rep.
2014; 4: 3743. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 100.
Nilsen A, LaCrue AN, White KL, et al.:
Quinolone-3-diarylethers: a new class of antimalarial drug.
Sci Transl Med.
2013; 5(117): 177ra37. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 101.
Capper MJ, O'Neill PM, Fisher N, et al.:
Antimalarial 4(1H)-pyridones bind to the Qi site of cytochrome bc1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2015; 112(3): 755–60. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 102.
Phillips MA, Lotharius J, Marsh K, et al.:
A long-duration dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor (DSM265) for prevention and treatment of malaria.
Sci Transl Med.
2015; 7(296): 296ra111. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 103.
Jomaa H, Wiesner J, Sanderbrand S, et al.:
Inhibitors of the nonmevalonate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis as antimalarial drugs.
Science.
1999; 285(5433): 1573–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 104.
Zhang B, Watts KM, Hodge D, et al.:
A second target of the antimalarial and antibacterial agent fosmidomycin revealed by cellular metabolic profiling.
Biochemistry.
2011; 50(17): 3570–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 105.
Imlay LS, Armstrong CM, Masters MC, et al.:
Plasmodium IspD (2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidyltransferase), an essential and druggable antimalarial target.
ACS Infect Dis.
2015; 1(4): 157–67. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 106.
Wu W, Herrera Z, Ebert D, et al.:
A chemical rescue screen identifies a Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast inhibitor targeting MEP isoprenoid precursor biosynthesis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2015; 59(1): 356–64. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 107.
Yuthavong Y, Tarnchompoo B, Vilaivan T, et al.:
Malarial dihydrofolate reductase as a paradigm for drug development against a resistance-compromised target.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2012; 109(42): 16823–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 108.
Ghidelli-Disse S, Lafuente-Monasterio M, Waterson D, et al.:
Identification of Plasmodium PI4 kinase as target of MMV390048 by chemoproteomics.
Malar J.
2014; 13(Suppl 1): P38. Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 109.
Roberts LD, Souza AL, Gerszten RE, et al.:
Targeted metabolomics.
Curr Protoc Mol Biol.
2012; Chapter 30: Unit 30.2.1–24. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 110.
Biagini GA, Fisher N, Shone AE, et al.:
Generation of quinolone antimalarials targeting the Plasmodium falciparum mitochondrial respiratory chain for the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2012; 109(21): 8298–303. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 111.
Vincent IM, Barrett MP:
Metabolomic-based strategies for anti-parasite drug discovery.
J Biomol Screen.
2015; 20(1): 44–55. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 112.
O'Hara JK, Kerwin LJ, Cobbold SA, et al.:
Targeting NAD+ metabolism in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.
PLoS One.
2014; 9(4): e94061. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 113.
Kumar B, Prakash A, Ruhela RK, et al.:
Potential of metabolomics in preclinical and clinical drug development.
Pharmacol Rep.
2014; 66(6): 956–63. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 114.
Cuperlovic-Culf M, Culf AS:
Applied metabolomics in drug discovery.
Expert Opin Drug Discov.
2016; 11(8): 759–70. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 115.
Aretz I, Meierhofer D:
Advantages and pitfalls of mass spectrometry based metabolome profiling in systems biology.
Int J Mol Sci.
2016; 17(5): pii: E632. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 116.
Gulati S, Ekland EH, Ruggles KV, et al.:
Profiling the essential nature of lipid metabolism in asexual blood and gametocyte stages of Plasmodium falciparum.
Cell Host Microbe.
2015; 18(3): 371–81. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
- 117.
Medicines for Malaria Venture:
Global portfolio of antimalarial medicines. 2016. Reference Source
- 118.
Van Voorhis WC, Adams JH, Adelfio R, et al.:
Open source drug discovery with the malaria box compound collection for neglected diseases and beyond.
PLoS Pathog.
2016; 12(7): e1005763. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
Comments on this article Comments (0)