Crowell SE. Biting the hand that feeds: current opinion on the interpersonal causes, correlates, and consequences of borderline personality disorder [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):2796 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9392.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 South 1530 East, Room 502, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex psychiatric diagnosis characterized by dysregulated behaviors, emotions, cognitions, and interpersonal relationships. In recent years, developmental psychopathologists have sought to identify early origins of BPD, with the ultimate goal of developing and providing effective preventative interventions for those at highest risk. In addition to heritable biological sensitivities, many scholars assert that environmental and interpersonal risk factors contribute to the emergence and maintenance of key borderline traits. Nonetheless, many BPD researchers examine only affected individuals, neglecting the family, peer, couple, and other dynamic contextual forces that impinge upon individual-level behavior. In the past decade, however, theoretical and empirical research has increasingly explored the interpersonal causes, correlates, and consequences of BPD. Such work has resulted in novel research and clinical theories intended to better understand and improve interpersonal dynamics among those with borderline traits. A major objective for the field is to better characterize how interpersonal dynamics affect (and are affected by) the behaviors, emotions, and thoughts of vulnerable individuals to either reduce or heighten risk for BPD.
Humans are a social species, and, as such, interpersonal relationships are critical to health, wellbeing, and survival1–4. Such connections begin in utero, continue with caregiver–child attachments, and are reinforced through peer relationships, sexual partnerships, and pair bonding. Accordingly, most conceptualizations of personality and psychopathology discuss social mechanisms of risk/resilience5–13, and interpersonal theories are central to several prominent psychotherapy models14–20. The biosocial theory of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is one example of an etiological model that highlights contextual risk factors as contributing to the emergence and maintenance of borderline traits14,21. According to this theory, impulsive and emotionally sensitive youth are at higher risk for BPD when exposed to social environments characterized by emotional invalidation and intermittent reinforcement/punishment of emotional volatility, overcontrol, or both22. Following from this model, early detection and prevention of BPD requires identifying emotionally sensitive youth who are living in environments characterized by high stress, emotional invalidation, and/or conflict. Once BPD traits emerge and begin to stabilize, interventions could potentially be enhanced by including friends, family members, and romantic partners in the conceptualization and treatment of BPD23–26.
The idea that interpersonal distress can be both cause and consequence of BPD is neither novel nor controversial27. In a landmark text on interpersonal aspects of BPD, Benjamin19 describes one type of patient as having “unpredictably invasive and traumatic abandonment experiences…[which] set the prototype for the interactional patterns so often seen between the [patient] and the health care provider” (page 9). Although trauma and abandonment are no longer considered to be central to the etiology of BPD, those with the diagnosis often have a distressing interpersonal history characterized by loss, socioeconomic disadvantage, or poor fit with the caregiving environment14. As a result, many individuals with BPD struggle to form healthy relationship patterns with important people in their lives, such as their therapist. Thus, it is well established that healthy relationships are foundational to emotional and physical health and they are highly disrupted in BPD, leading to further distress. In light of this, it is surprising that interpersonal contributors to borderline traits are still relatively neglected in a literature that clearly needs to examine relationships with more sophisticated research designs and statistical methods, such as daily diary studies and dynamical systems approaches28–34. Similarly, the next wave of prevention and intervention studies must (1) move some aspects of treatment out of the therapy room and into daily life, (2) incorporate friends and family members into treatment, and (3) increasingly integrate the science of relationships into psychiatric and other biological interventions.
Interpersonal causes of BPD
Psychopathology is complex, and there is no single causal process leading to BPD. Nonetheless, there are identifiable precursors and risk factors that contribute to the emergence and maintenance of borderline traits35–40. Above all, BPD is a disorder of instability—in self-concept, emotions, behaviors, and relationships41,42. Leading theorists hypothesize that this instability develops through inconsistency in early attachment relationships, leading to lack of trust in caregivers to serve as co-regulators of emotions and behaviors43–49. At one extreme, physical or sexual abuse by a trusted caregiver appears to be associated with BPD traits, especially self-harm and suicidality50–55 (however, see also 56,57). At the other extreme, a relatively benign mismatch between parenting style and child temperament may increase risk for BPD traits if the child has heritable vulnerabilities that render him/her uniquely sensitive to the caregiving environment6,12,26,58–60. Importantly, the parenting interventions for both extremes are highly similar: reduce blame, minimize stigma, and also provide support, skills coaching, and strategies for caregivers61,62. From a research perspective, there are still relatively few prospective studies that examine early parenting and the emergence of BPD63,64. In particular, there is very little research examining BPD-specific outcomes in longitudinal studies of parent–child play, parenting strengths, behavioral parenting interventions, early childhood education, and other factors that should reduce risk for BPD. Clinically, given that many BPD traits are partially heritable (e.g. impulsivity and emotional sensitivity), early interventions may have benefits for parents while also reducing intergenerational transmission of psychological distress.
Interpersonal correlates of BPD
There is a growing literature examining interpersonal correlates of BPD in adolescents and adults. Studies find that adults with borderline traits have disrupted social networks65, impaired couple relationships66, social anxiety67, and difficulties trusting others68 and also struggle to form attachments with and manage their own children69–75. Adolescents with borderline traits experience peer problems76, parent–child relationship struggles22,77, and sexual “compulsivity”78 and have problems with romantic partners79. In spite of this, there are no randomized controlled trials testing the effectiveness of adjunctive couple’s therapy among partnered adults with BPD80. Similarly, there are only a few clearly articulated protocols for parent/family involvement in the treatment of BPD or of youth with borderline traits81, leading practitioners to meet this need in a variety of ways that are often not yet empirically validated or covered by third-party payers (e.g. adolescent and family skills group, parent coaching, or individual parenting therapy for the parent). Basic science researchers also rarely bring friends or family members into the lab, even though relationship quality is known to affect prognosis82. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand dynamic interaction patterns between those with borderline traits and their loved ones83. For example, it is unknown which parent/friend/spouse behaviors are experienced as supportive or soothing to those with BPD. Similarly, it is unclear which interpersonal skills or strategies would be most helpful for fostering lasting resilience in relationships. The fact that most research is conducted at the individual level of analysis perpetuates treatment strategies targeted at the individual, rather than the system. This communicates a powerful message of blame, when in fact many problems may exist within dynamic interaction patterns between persons rather than within any one person.
Interpersonal consequences of BPD
There is little doubt that those with BPD have a powerful effect on those around them. Borderline traits are highly evocative, and these traits can be painful for friends and family members, although research exploring this topic is limited. For example, abandonment fears of those with BPD could lead loved ones to forego other activities, which could shrink the social networks of loved ones. Anger, fear, hopelessness, rejection sensitivity, reassurance seeking, experiential avoidance, interpersonal aggression, and emotional lability are correlates of borderline traits84–93, and these features could contribute to partner selection, relationship conflict, and increased interpersonal distress over time. Self-injury and suicide are behaviors that could also have a lasting effect on friends and family members94–96. Parents with BPD may also affect offspring, with lasting consequences for child emotion regulation capacity69,74. Unfortunately, the existing studies focus almost exclusively on negative interpersonal effects of those with BPD and, to my knowledge, there are no studies that ask what people love and enjoy about their family member with BPD. Few researchers have considered the potential adaptive features of the disorder97, in spite of theories that other diagnoses, such as depression98 and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, may actually have evolutionary advantages99. Thus, with few exceptions100, the existing literature is skewed heavily toward identifying areas of dysfunction within the individual and early caregiving environment while neglecting areas of strength among those with BPD and their interpersonal networks.
Summary and future directions
In sum, BPD is a complex psychiatric disorder with causes, correlates, and consequences that are multidetermined101. Although there is a rich theoretical literature on interpersonal factors and BPD, the empirical literature lags far behind the theorized contextual mechanisms of risk. For example, although there are some prospective studies linking childhood physical and sexual abuse with later BPD, relatively few studies examine why neglect or abuse predicts BPD in some cases. Thus, longitudinal mediation studies are needed to examine cumulative changes in the social (e.g. trust and co-regulation) and neurobiological (e.g. frontolimbic and neurotransmitter functioning) processes that link adverse childhood experiences with borderline pathology and other diagnoses43,86. There is a similarly small literature examining the question of for whom do these high-risk environments contribute to BPD and which children are relatively resilient even in the face of extreme adversity49,86. Researchers studying BPD could draw upon the research designs and methods within the broader developmental psychology and developmental psychopathology literatures. Extending research on risk and resilience to the development of BPD is an important future direction and will involve identifying both mediators and moderators of high-risk developmental trajectories. Based upon developmental research into other forms of psychopathology, it is likely that risk for BPD will not be tied to any single event or stressor. Rather, borderline traits are likely to emerge slowly owing to an accumulation of problematic interactions among vulnerable individuals, their caregivers/peers, and a risky developmental context.
There are many challenges facing BPD researchers and clinicians35,102. For example, there is a growing literature examining biological factors associated with BPD but the translation to validated medical or psychopharmacological approaches has been slow103–105. To date, there are no medications approved specifically for use in BPD, and intensive psychotherapy (usually lasting 12 months or more) is the treatment of choice for affected individuals106,107. Such interventions are expensive and time intensive and do not reduce all BPD symptoms for all affected individuals. Thus, even though there have been tremendous advances in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for those with BPD, it is increasingly clear that early intervention and prevention could be the most economical way to reduce the financial and emotional costs associated with a borderline diagnosis. As a first step, both researchers and clinicians need to extend their work outside of the laboratory/therapy room and into the daily lives of those with BPD. In dialectical behavior therapy, a leading treatment for BPD, the therapist provides phone-based coaching to enhance skills generalization from the therapy context into real world settings108. However, there is little research examining the incremental benefit of skills coaching over other elements of therapy or relative to multiple weekly therapy sessions. To my knowledge, there is no research examining coordination with schools, churches, or other community agencies as a regular component of BPD prevention or intervention.
As a second step, therapists should operate under the assumption that relationships are affected by and are affecting the person with BPD. Indeed, current work on the social neuroscience of emotion regulation suggests that humans are neurobiologically “wired” to be embedded in social networks and show emotional distress when social connection is lacking109–111. Following on from this assumption, it is unlikely for a person to attain full remission if the dynamic interaction patterns that shape problematic behaviors remain unchanged. Thus, it may be necessary for BPD treatments to involve parents, friends, significant others, and family members in treatment. Unfortunately, there are very few evidence-based models for how to structure these sessions, and structure is essential for work with a dysregulated individual who is being actively exposed to interpersonal cues for maladaptive behavior. Researchers could also extend work outside of the laboratory to better understand social regulation of emotion in daily life. Daily diary methods and wearable psychophysiological monitoring devices could provide useful information on the factors that maintain conflict, risk-taking behaviors, hopelessness, or suicidality.
Finally, medical providers and those providing pharmacological treatments should also consider the importance of relationships and stability in the lives of those with BPD27. There is enormous pressure on medication providers to help stabilize and resolve the intense emotional lability experienced by those with BPD. Often this pressure comes from patients, who may experience their medications as effective one day and ineffective another or who may misuse or discontinue medications when the benefits are unclear. Pressure may also come from family members or third-party payers who often hope for quicker or more lasting benefits from psychotropic medications. Research on the developmental neuroscience of BPD suggests that the emotional lability seen in BPD is partially shaped and maintained within social environments102. Thus, although there are clearly heritable biological vulnerabilities, especially for those that underlie impulsive behaviors, medications alone are unlikely to resolve BPD symptoms if there is ongoing instability in relationships, sleep, or eating or if there are a high number of daily stressors. Similar to most psychiatric disorders, the combination of medication and therapy will likely be essential for treatment success112.
In conclusion, current research on BPD suggests that interpersonal factors contribute to the emergence and maintenance of the disorder, but there are many unanswered questions. Specifically, most of the research examines a small number of stressors (e.g. reports of abuse) rather than intensive daily measurements of dynamic contextual forces in the lives of those with BPD. The data that do exist are skewed toward a negative perception of those with BPD and their loved ones. Meanwhile protective factors that promote resiliency and healing are underexplored, both in research and in treatment. Treatments focused on skills for validation and enhancing positive relationship factors could represent a novel direction for treatment development. Unfortunately, in spite of a large and growing body of research articulating the importance of social relationships for promoting health and wellbeing, there is a lack of evidence-based protocols for involving friends and family members in BPD-focused interventions. The treatment of personality disorders is also neglected by many third-party payers, who rarely cover a full year of intensive treatment and almost never cover skills groups, couple’s therapy, or family therapy. Without additional research, treatment development, translation to clinical practice, and advocacy to insurance companies, individuals with BPD may continue to struggle in relationships—metaphorically “biting the hand that feeds them”—with few skills and supports for fostering the types of social connections that contribute to health and wellbeing.
Competing interests
The author declares that she has no competing interests.
Grant information
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge Jeremy L. Grove, Erin A. Kaufman, Megan E. Puzia, and Mona Yaptangco for ongoing dialogue and discussion related to the development and prevention of BPD.
F1000 recommended
References
1.
Buunk BP, Schaufeli WB:
Reciprocity in Interpersonal Relationships: An Evolutionary Perspective on Its Importance for Health and Well-being.
Eur Rev Soc Psychol.
1999; 10(1): 259–91. Publisher Full Text
2.
World Health Organization: The importance of caregiver-child interactions for the survival and healthy development of young children: A review.2004. Reference Source
4.
Strawbridge WJ, Shema SJ, Cohen RD, et al.:
Religious attendance increases survival by improving and maintaining good health behaviors, mental health, and social relationships.
Ann Behav Med.
2001; 23(1): 68–74. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
5.
Davies PT, Martin MJ, Sturge-Apple ML:
Emotional Security Theory and Developmental Psychopathology. In: Cicchetti D, editor. Developmental Psychopathology. Hoboken, NJ USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2016; 1–66. Publisher Full Text
6.
Belsky J, Pluess M:
Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: phenotypic plasticity and human development.
Dev Psychopathol.
2013; 25(4 Pt 2): 1243–61. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
7.
Masten AS:
Invited commentary: Resilience and positive youth development frameworks in developmental science.
J Youth Adolesc.
2014; 43(6): 1018–24. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
8.
Siegel DJ:
Toward an interpersonal neurobiology of the developing mind: Attachment relationships, “mindsight,” and neural integration.
Infant Ment Health J.
2001; 22(1–2): 67–94. Publisher Full Text
9.
Hammen C:
Cognitive, life stress, and interpersonal approaches to a developmental psychopathology model of depression.
Develop Psychopathol.
1992; 4(1): 189–206. Publisher Full Text
10.
Lieb K, Zanarini MC, Schmahl C, et al.:
Borderline personality disorder.
Lancet.
2004; 364(9432): 453–61. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
11.
Gunderson JG:
Disturbed relationships as a phenotype for borderline personality disorder.
Am J Psychiatry.
2007; 164(11): 1637–40. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
12.
Fruzzetti AE, Shenk C, Hoffman PD:
Family interaction and the development of borderline personality disorder: A transactional model.
Dev Psychopathol.
2005; 17(4): 1007–30. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
13.
Luyten P, Blatt SJ:
Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition in normal and disrupted personality development: retrospect and prospect.
Am Psychol.
2013; 68(3): 172–83. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
14.
Linehan MM:
Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press; 1993. Reference Source
15.
Bateman A, Fonagy P:
Mentalization-based treatment for borderline personality disorder: A practical guide. OUP Oxford, 2006. Reference Source
16.
Yeomans FE, Levy KN, Caligor E:
Transference-focused psychotherapy.
Psychotherapy (Chic).
2013; 50(3): 449–53. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
17.
Spinhoven P, Giesen-Bloo J, van Dyck R, et al.:
The therapeutic alliance in schema-focused therapy and transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.
J Consult Clin Psychol.
2007; 75(1): 104–15. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
18.
Chanen AM, Jackson HJ, McCutcheon LK, et al.:
Early intervention for adolescents with borderline personality disorder using cognitive analytic therapy: randomised controlled trial.
Br J Psychiatry.
2008; 193(6): 477–84. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
19.
Benjamin LS:
Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. Guilford Press; 1996. Reference Source
20.
Fonagy P, Luyten P:
A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder.
Dev Psychopathol.
2009; 21(4): 1355–81. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
22.
Crowell SE, Baucom BR, McCauley E, et al.:
Mechanisms of contextual risk for adolescent self-injury: invalidation and conflict escalation in mother-child interactions.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol.
2013; 42(4): 467–80. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
23.
American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines: Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Psychiatric Association.
Am J Psychiatry.
2001; 158(10 Suppl): 1–52. PubMed Abstract
24.
Lachkar J:
Narcissistic/borderline couples: A psychodynamic approach to conjoint treatment. The disordered couple. 1998; 259–284. Reference Source
25.
Bateman A, Fonagy P:
Effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Psychiatry.
1999; 156(10): 1563–9. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
26.
Hoffman PD, Fruzzetti AE, Buteau E, et al.:
Family Connections: A Program for Relatives of Persons With Borderline Personality Disorder.
Fam Process.
2005; 44(2): 217–25. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
28.
Wichers M, Wigman JT, Myin-Germeys I:
Micro-Level Affect Dynamics in Psychopathology Viewed From Complex Dynamical System Theory.
Emotion Review.
2015; 7(4): 362–7. Publisher Full Text
29.
Butler EA:
Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: the "TIES" that form relationships.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev.
2011; 15(4): 367–93. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
30.
Myin-Germeys I, Oorschot M, Collip D, et al.:
Experience sampling research in psychopathology: opening the black box of daily life.
Psychol Med.
2009; 39(9): 1533–47. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
31.
Victor SE, Klonsky ED:
Daily emotion in non-suicidal self-injury.
J Clin Psychol.
2014; 70(4): 364–75. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
32.
Kuppens P, Oravecz Z, Tuerlinckx F:
Feelings change: accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect.
J Pers Soc Psychol.
2010; 99(6): 1042–60. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
33.
Wright AG, Hallquist MN, Stepp SD, et al.:
Modeling Heterogeneity in Momentary Interpersonal and Affective Dynamic Processes in Borderline Personality Disorder.
Assessment.
2016; 23(4): 484–495, pii: 1073191116653829. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
34.
Sadler P, Woody E, McDonald K, et al.:
A Lot Can Happen in a Few Minutes: Examining Dynamic Patterns Within an Interaction to Illuminate the Interpersonal Nature of Personality Disorders.
J Pers Disord.
2015; 29(4): 526–46. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
35.
Crowell SE, Kaufman EA:
Development of self-inflicted injury: Comorbidities and continuities with borderline and antisocial personality traits.
Dev Psychopathol.
2016; 28(4pt1): 1071–88. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
36.
Crowell SE, Kaufman EA, Beauchaine TP:
A Biosocial Model of BPD: Theory and Empirical Evidence. In: Sharp C, Tackett JL, editors.
Handbook of Borderline Personality Disorder in Children and Adolescents.
New York, NY: Springer New York;
2014; 143–157. Publisher Full Text
37.
Paris J:
The development of impulsivity and suicidality in borderline personality disorder.
Dev Psychopathol.
2005; 17(4): 1091–1104. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
38.
Fonagy P, Luyten P, Strathearn L:
Borderline personality disorder, mentalization, and the neurobiology of attachment.
Infant Ment Health J.
2011; 32(1): 47–69. Publisher Full Text
39.
Miller AL, Muehlenkamp JJ, Jacobson CM:
Fact or fiction: diagnosing borderline personality disorder in adolescents.
Clin Psychol Rev.
2008; 28(6): 969–81. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
40.
Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Ridolfi ME, et al.:
Reported childhood onset of self-mutilation among borderline patients.
J Pers Disord.
2006; 20(1): 9–15. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
41.
Steele H, Siever L:
An attachment perspective on borderline personality disorder: advances in gene-environment considerations.
Curr Psychiatry Rep.
2010; 12(1): 61–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
42.
American Psychiatric Association:
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.2013. Publisher Full Text
43.
Hughes AE, Crowell SE, Uyeji L, et al.:
A developmental neuroscience of borderline pathology: emotion dysregulation and social baseline theory.
J Abnorm Child Psychol.
2012; 40(1): 21–33. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
44.
Zanarini MC:
Childhood experiences associated with the development of borderline personality disorder.
Psychiatr Clin North Am.
2000; 23(1): 89–101. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
45.
Sroufe LA, Duggal S, Weinfield N, et al.:
Relationships, Development, and Psychopathology. In: Sameroff AJ, Lewis M, Miller SM, editors.
Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology.
Boston, MA: Springer US.
2000; 75–91. Publisher Full Text
46.
Fogel A:
Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. University of Chicago Press;
1993. Reference Source
47.
Levy KN:
The implications of attachment theory and research for understanding borderline personality disorder.
Dev Psychopathol.
2005; 17(4): 959–86. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
48.
Nickell AD, Waudby CJ, Trull TJ:
Attachment, parental bonding and borderline personality disorder features in young adults.
J Pers Disord.
2002; 16(2): 148–59. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
49.
Beauchaine TP, Neuhaus E, Zalewski M, et al.:
The effects of allostatic load on neural systems subserving motivation, mood regulation, and social affiliation.
Dev Psychopathol.
2011; 23(4): 975–99. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
50.
Cicchetti D:
Socioemotional, Personality, and Biological Development: Illustrations from a Multilevel Developmental Psychopathology Perspective on Child Maltreatment.
Annu Rev Psychol.
2016; 67: 187–211. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
51.
Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Sturge-Apple M, et al.:
Interaction of child maltreatment and 5-HTT polymorphisms: suicidal ideation among children from low-SES backgrounds.
J Pediatr Psychol.
2010; 35(5): 536–46. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
52.
Widom CS, Czaja SJ, Paris J:
A prospective investigation of borderline personality disorder in abused and neglected children followed up into adulthood.
J Pers Disord.
2009; 23(5): 433–46. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
53.
Kuo JR, Khoury JE, Metcalfe R, et al.:
An examination of the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and borderline personality disorder features: the role of difficulties with emotion regulation.
Child Abuse Negl.
2015; 39: 147–55. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
54.
Wilson ST, Stanley B, Brent DA, et al.:
Interaction between tryptophan hydroxylase I polymorphisms and childhood abuse is associated with increased risk for borderline personality disorder in adulthood.
Psychiatr Genet.
2012; 22(1): 15–24. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
55.
Meaney MJ, Brake W, Gratton A:
Environmental regulation of the development of mesolimbic dopamine systems: A neurobiological mechanism for vulnerability to drug abuse?
Psychoneuroendocrinology.
2002; 27(1–2): 127–38. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
56.
Bornovalova MA, Huibregtse BM, Hicks BM, et al.:
Tests of a direct effect of childhood abuse on adult borderline personality disorder traits: a longitudinal discordant twin design.
J Abnorm Psychol.
2013; 122(1): 180–94. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
57.
Klonsky ED, Moyer A:
Childhood sexual abuse and non-suicidal self-injury: meta-analysis.
Br J Psychiatry.
2008; 192(3): 166–70. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
58.
Boyce WT, Ellis BJ:
Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity.
Dev Psychopathol.
2005; 17(2): 271–301. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
60.
Crowell SE, Yaptangco M, Turner SL:
Coercion, invalidation, and risk for self-injury and borderline personality traits. In: The Oxford Handbook of Coercive Relationship Dynamics. 2016; 182. Publisher Full Text
61.
Zalewski M, Stepp SD, Whalen DJ, et al.:
A Qualitative Assessment of the Parenting Challenges and Treatment Needs of Mothers with Borderline Personality Disorder.
J Psychother Integr.
2015; 25(2): 71–89. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
62.
Kirby JN:
The Role of Mindfulness and Compassion in Enhancing Nurturing Family Environments.
Clin Psychol Sci Pract.
2016; 23(2): 142–57. Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
63.
Winsper C, Zanarini M, Wolke D:
Prospective study of family adversity and maladaptive parenting in childhood and borderline personality disorder symptoms in a non-clinical population at 11 years.
Psychol Med.
2012; 42(11): 2405–20. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
64.
Carlson EA, Egeland B, Sroufe LA:
A prospective investigation of the development of borderline personality symptoms.
Dev Psychopathol.
2009; 21(4): 1311–34. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
65.
Lazarus SA, Southward MW, Cheavens JS:
Do borderline personality disorder features and rejection sensitivity predict social network outcomes over time?
Pers Individ Dif.
2016; 100: 62–7. Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
66.
Bouchard S, Sabourin S:
Borderline personality disorder and couple dysfunctions.
Curr Psychiatry Rep.
2009; 11(1): 55–62. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
67.
Turner BJ, Wakefield MA, Gratz KL, et al.:
Characterizing Interpersonal Difficulties Among Young Adults Who Engage in Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Using a Daily Diary.
Behav Ther.
2016. Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
69.
Stepp SD, Whalen DJ, Pilkonis PA, et al.:
Children of mothers with borderline personality disorder: identifying parenting behaviors as potential targets for intervention.
Personal Disord.
2012; 3(1): 76–91. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
70.
Macfie J, Swan SA:
Representations of the caregiver-child relationship and of the self, and emotion regulation in the narratives of young children whose mothers have borderline personality disorder.
Dev Psychopathol.
2009; 21(3): 993–1011. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
72.
Macfie J, Swan SA, Fitzpatrick KL, et al.:
Mothers with borderline personality and their young children: Adult Attachment Interviews, mother-child interactions, and children's narrative representations.
Dev Psychopathol.
2014; 26(2): 539–51. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
73.
Macfie J, Brumariu LE, Lyons-Ruth K:
Parent–child role-confusion: A critical review of an emerging concept.
Dev Rev.
2015; 36: 34–57. Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
74.
Eyden J, Winsper C, Wolke D, et al.:
A systematic review of the parenting and outcomes experienced by offspring of mothers with borderline personality pathology: Potential mechanisms and clinical implications.
Clin Psychol Rev.
2016; 47: 85–105. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
75.
Kaufman EA, Puzia ME, Mead HK, et al.:
Children's Emotion Regulation Difficulties Mediate the Association Between Maternal Borderline and Antisocial Symptoms and Youth Behavior Problems Over 1 Year.
J Pers Disord.
2016; 1–23. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
76.
Wolke D, Schreier A, Zanarini MC, et al.:
Bullied by peers in childhood and borderline personality symptoms at 11 years of age: a prospective study.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry.
2012; 53(8): 846–55. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
77.
Lyons-Ruth K, Choi-Kain L, Pechtel P, et al.:
Perceived parental protection and cortisol responses among young females with borderline personality disorder and controls.
Psychiatry Res.
2011; 189(3): 426–32. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
78.
Northey L, Dunkley CR, Klonsky ED, et al.:
Borderline personality disorder traits and sexuality: Bridging a gap in the literature.
Can J Hum Sex.
2016; 25(2): 158–68. Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
79.
Chen H, Cohen P, Johnson JG, et al.:
Adolescent personality disorders and conflict with romantic partners during the transition to adulthood.
J Pers Disord.
2004; 18(6): 507–25. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
81.
Fruzzetti A, Hoffman P:
Family Connections workbook and training manual. Rye, NY: National Education Alliance for Borderline Personality Disorder, 2004.
82.
Gunderson JG, Daversa MT, Grilo CM, et al.:
Predictors of 2-year outcome for patients with borderline personality disorder.
Am J Psychiatry.
2006; 163(5): 822–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
83.
Lis S, Bohus M:
Social interaction in borderline personality disorder.
Curr Psychiatry Rep.
2013; 15(2): 338. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
84.
Sharp C, Kalpakci A, Mellick W, et al.:
First evidence of a prospective relation between avoidance of internal states and borderline personality disorder features in adolescents.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry.
2015; 24(3): 283–90. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
85.
Cheavens JS, Lazarus SA, Herr NR:
Interpersonal partner choices by individuals with elevated features of borderline personality disorder.
J Pers Disord.
2014; 28(4): 594–606. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
86.
Beauchaine TP, Klein DN, Crowell SE, et al.:
Multifinality in the development of personality disorders: a Biology x Sex x Environment interaction model of antisocial and borderline traits.
Dev Psychopathol.
2009; 21(3): 735–70. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
87.
Crowell SE, Beauchaine TP, Hsiao RC, et al.:
Differentiating adolescent self-injury from adolescent depression: possible implications for borderline personality development.
J Abnorm Child Psychol.
2012; 40(1): 45–57. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
88.
Mancke F, Herpertz SC, Kleindienst N, et al.:
Emotion Dysregulation and Trait Anger Sequentially Mediate the Association Between Borderline Personality Disorder and Aggression.
J Pers Disord.
2016; 1–17. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
89.
Lazarus SA, Cheavens JS, Festa F, et al.:
Interpersonal functioning in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review of behavioral and laboratory-based assessments.
Clin Psychol Rev.
2014; 34(3): 193–205. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
90.
Wedig MM, Frankenburg FR, Bradford Reich D, et al.:
Predictors of suicide threats in patients with borderline personality disorder over 16 years of prospective follow-up.
Psychiatry Res.
2013; 208(3): 252–6. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
91.
Dixon-Gordon KL, Gratz KL, Breetz A, et al.:
A laboratory-based examination of responses to social rejection in borderline personality disorder: the mediating role of emotion dysregulation.
J Pers Disord.
2013; 27(2): 157–71. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
92.
Rogers ML, Joiner TE Jr:
Borderline Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria as Risk Factors for Suicidal Behavior Through the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide.
Arch Suicide Res.
2016; 20(4): 591–604. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
94.
Brent D:
What family studies teach us about suicidal behavior: implications for research, treatment, and prevention.
Eur Psychiatry.
2010; 25(5): 260–3. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
95.
Brent DA, Oquendo M, Birmaher B, et al.:
Familial pathways to early-onset suicide attempt: risk for suicidal behavior in offspring of mood-disordered suicide attempters.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
2002; 59(9): 801–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
97.
Svrakic DM, Lecic-Tosevski D, Divac-Jovanovic M:
DSM axis II: personality disorders or adaptation disorders?
Curr Opin Psychiatry.
2009; 22(1): 111–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
98.
Beck AT, Bredemeier K:
A Unified Model of Depression: Integrating Clinical, Cognitive, Biological, and Evolutionary Perspectives.
Clin Psychol Sci.
2016; 4(4): 596–619. Publisher Full Text
99.
Jensen PS, Mrazek D, Knapp PK, et al.:
Evolution and revolution in child psychiatry: ADHD as a disorder of adaptation.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.
1997; 36(12): 1672–9; discussion 1679–81. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
100.
Kim S, Sharp C, Carbone C:
The protective role of attachment security for adolescent borderline personality disorder features via enhanced positive emotion regulation strategies.
Personal Disord.
2014; 5(2): 125–36. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
101.
Fossati A, Gratz KL, Borroni S, et al.:
The relationship between childhood history of ADHD symptoms and DSM-IV borderline personality disorder features among personality disordered outpatients: the moderating role of gender and the mediating roles of emotion dysregulation and impulsivity.
Compr Psychiatry.
2015; 56: 121–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
102.
Crowell SE, Kaufman EA:
Borderline personality disorder and the emerging field of developmental neuroscience.
Personal Disord.
2016; 7(4): 324–33. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
103.
Lieb K, Völlm B, Rücker G, et al.:
Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials.
Br J Psychiatry.
2010; 196(1): 4–12. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
104.
Stoffers JM, Lieb K:
Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder--current evidence and recent trends.
Curr Psychiatry Rep.
2015; 17(1): 534. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
105.
Knappich M, Hörz-Sagstetter S, Schwerthöffer D, et al.:
Pharmacotherapy in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder: results of a survey among psychiatrists in private practices.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
2014; 29(4): 224–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
106.
Tohen M:
Pharmacologic treatments for borderline personality disorder.
Am J Psychiatry.
2014; 171(11): 1139–41. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
107.
Francois D, Roth SD, Klingman D:
The Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review of the Available Randomized Controlled Trials.
Psychiatr Ann.
2015; 45(8): 431–7. Publisher Full Text
108.
Rizvi SL, Dimeff LA, Skutch J, et al.:
A pilot study of the DBT coach: an interactive mobile phone application for individuals with borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder.
Behav Ther.
2011; 42(4): 589–600. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
109.
Coan JA:
Adult attachment and the brain.
J Soc Pers Relat.
2010; 27(2): 210–7. Publisher Full Text
111.
Coan JA:
Toward a neuroscience of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications. Second edition, 2008; 2. : 241–265. Reference Source
112.
Bellino S, Bozzatello P, Bogetto F:
Combined treatment of borderline personality disorder with interpersonal psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy: predictors of response.
Psychiatry Res.
2015; 226(1): 284–8. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| F1000 Recommendation
Crowell SE. Biting the hand that feeds: current opinion on the interpersonal causes, correlates, and consequences of borderline personality disorder [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):2796 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9392.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Share
Open Peer Review
Current Reviewer Status:
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses
VIEWHIDE
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Kirsch P. Reviewer Report For: Biting the hand that feeds: current opinion on the interpersonal causes, correlates, and consequences of borderline personality disorder [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):2796 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10116.r17898)
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an
... Continue reading
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Faculty Reviews are commissioned and written by members of the prestigious Faculty Opinions Faculty, and are edited as a service to our readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, we seek the reviewers’ input before publication. The reviewers’ names and any additional comments they may have are published alongside the review, as is usual on F1000Research.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
Kirsch P. Reviewer Report For: Biting the hand that feeds: current opinion on the interpersonal causes, correlates, and consequences of borderline personality disorder [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):2796 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10116.r17898)
Paris J. Reviewer Report For: Biting the hand that feeds: current opinion on the interpersonal causes, correlates, and consequences of borderline personality disorder [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):2796 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10116.r17896)
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an
... Continue reading
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Faculty Reviews are commissioned and written by members of the prestigious Faculty Opinions Faculty, and are edited as a service to our readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, we seek the reviewers’ input before publication. The reviewers’ names and any additional comments they may have are published alongside the review, as is usual on F1000Research.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
Paris J. Reviewer Report For: Biting the hand that feeds: current opinion on the interpersonal causes, correlates, and consequences of borderline personality disorder [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):2796 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.10116.r17896)
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations -
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Adjust parameters to alter display
View on desktop for interactive features
Includes Interactive Elements
View on desktop for interactive features
Competing Interests Policy
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Stay Updated
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Comments on this article Comments (0)