Keywords
Giant, benign, silent, pheochromocytoma
Giant, benign, silent, pheochromocytoma
Giant pheochromocytomas (> 7 cm in size) are rare entities with around 20 cases reported in the literature1–6. They do not present with the classical symptoms of pheochromocytomas6. Most patients present with vague discomfort while others may complain of a palpable abdominal mass. Operative surgery is the ideal management option7. There needs to be a multidisciplinary approach while managing such cases. Stringent preparation to combat crisis due to catecholamine surge (during tumor manipulation) and sudden decrease in peripheral vascular resistance (following lesional excision) need to be emphasized8,9. Presence of chromaffin cells in the extra-adrenal tissue is the only confirmative method of distinguishing the malignant variant from its benign counterpart10. Herein we highlight and discuss the management algorithm taken while managing one such case.
A fifty-year-old male from Dhahran, Nepal presented to the surgical outpatient clinic with a vague symptom of abdominal discomfort. He had no history of trauma, persistent vomiting, altered bowel habits, change in the color of the stool or abdominal distension. There were no significant past medical or surgical illnesses. Family history of similar symptoms was also absent. Examination of the abdomen was normal except for slight discomfort during palpation in his left upper quadrant. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen revealed a huge left suprarenal mass. Computerised tomogram (CT) of the abdomen confirmed a giant mass of approximately 12×8 cm2 in the left suprarenal region showing rim enhancement and areas of low attenuation within it. The left renal vein was normal and the lesion was slightly abutting the spleen (Figure 1).
The patient denied attacks of headache, cheat pain, palpitation and sweating. The serum and urinary catecholamine levels were within normal range. The patient was kept for observation with 24 hour electrocardiography (ECG) and blood pressure monitoring (BP) which was normal.
The patient and his relatives were explained of the disease entity and were advised for surgery. With written consent, he was prepared for surgery. The anesthesiologists prepared medication (Intravenous (i.v.) Phentolamine (1 mg injection), Nitroprusside (4 mg drip) and Esmolol (30 mg injection) for potential intra-operative crisis pertaining to catecholamine surge during surgical manipulation. Vasoactive agents were also made available for combating sudden loss of peripheral vascular resistance following tumor removal. Early vascular control was secured. There was a well demarcated plane to dissect the tumor from the surrounding structures (Figure 2).
The patient was extubated and was kept in the intensive care unit (ICU) for 48 hours. There were no untoward events in the post-operative period and the patient was discharged home on the 10th day. Histopathological study revealed zellballen nests of chromaffin cells with no invasion of the capsule (Figure 3), which is highly suggestive of a benign pheochromocytoma.
The patient is asymptomatic 4 years following surgery, and has been advised to follow up periodically in order to rule out early recurrence.
Pheochromocytomas typically present with the characteristic triad of paroxysmal attacks of headache, sweating and palpitation11. However giant lesions paradoxically may lack these symptoms6. The reasons for the same can be due of the presence of tumoral necrosis, high loads of interstitial tissue compared to chromaffin cells or the paucity of the release of the catecholamines due to encapsulation by the connective tissues6. This may also cause normal catecholamine values during their serum and urinary assays2.
CT scan is the image modality of choice to diagnose the condition4. However, in cases of giant lesions, there may be difficulties indetermining the organ of origin o leading to mis-diagnosis of the entity2.
Open surgical removal is the therapeutic target7. Laparoscopic removal is reserved only for smaller lesions12,13. Some authors have suggested preoperative embolisation of theses lesion14. However, it may be tenacious due to major arterio-venous connections within the lesion6. The key to a successful outcome is the fine tuning between the surgeons and the anesthesist in the peri-operative period8,9. There needs to be minimal handling of the lesion and an early control of the adrenal vein so as to limit crisis due catecholamine surge6.
Pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland scaled score (PASS) score has been described to differentiate between the benign and the malignant lesions15. But the hallmark of the malignant counterpart is the presence of the ectopic chromaffin cells in the extra-adrenal sites10.
The patients need to be on a periodic follow up so as to exclude the risk of recurrence16. There are still no set therapeutic guidelines in the management of the malignant lesions due to paucity of cases. Long term prognosis is dismal with five year survival of around 50% only17.
Though benign, surgery is advocated for giant pheochromocytomas. Early vascular control, minimal handling of the tumor and a multidisciplinary approach to combat potential intra-operative crisis are the cornerstones in managing such cases. Malignant counterparts need to be excluded histologically. Patients require regular follow up to rule out recurrence.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images and/or other details that could potentially reveal the patient’s identity.
Dr Sunil prepared the manuscript and obtained the pictures. Dr Saroj and Prof Shailesh revised and confirmed the final manuscript. All authors have seen and agreed to the final content of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 07 Mar 16 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)