ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

The potential role of microbiota for controlling the spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) in neonatal population

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 25 Jul 2017
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

The spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) in the hospital and also the community is worrisome. Neonates particularly are exposed to the risk of ESBL-PE acquisition and, owing to the immaturity of their immune system, to a higher secondary risk of ESBL-PE-related infection. Reducing the risk of acquisition in the hospital is usually based on a bundle of measures, including screening policies at admission, improving hand hygiene compliance, and decreasing antibiotic consumption. However, recent scientific data suggest new prevention opportunities based on microbiota modifications.

Keywords

Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase – Producing Enterobacteriaceae, ESBL-PE, neonatal infections,

Introduction

One of the most worrisome challenges of the last few years is the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in the community and the hospital. The rise of MDROs most frequently concerns Enterobacteriaceae isolates and is driven by the spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE)1,2. The unfortunate spread of ESBL-producing bacteria can occur either by emerging clones or by horizontal transfer of ESBL plasmids between bacteria of the same or different species. This family of enzymes hydrolyzes the beta-lactam ring, rendering most beta-lactam antibiotics ineffective3. As options for treatment are limited and due to the high risk of mortality related to inadequate antibiotic therapy, the clinical impact of ESBL-PE spreading is important. Neonates, specifically those hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), are at high risk of ESBL-PE acquisition and are highly susceptible to ESBL-PE infection due to the immaturity of their immune systems4,5. Indeed, ESBL colonization rates in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) range up to 12% for Escherichia coli and 39% for Klebsiella spp.6. ESBL rates as high as 60% for Klebsiella spp. and 75% for E. coli have been reported from blood cultures from infected infants in some NICUs7. Also, as Enterobacteriaceae are recognized as serious pathogens in the NICU and rates of E. coli early-onset sepsis have increased along with infection in infants with very low birth weight, the spread of ESBL-PE presents major challenges in managing neonatal sepsis. According to the literature, two main factors seem to be associated with the risk of acquisition/transmission: antibiotic consumption and compliance to hand hygiene8.

Bacterial acquisition and route of transmission

Unlike adults, the newborn is exposed at birth and during the first weeks of life to multiple possible sources of MDRO acquisition. Recent studies9,10 suggested that bacterial acquisition may commence in utero long before delivery but that bacterial acquisition will continue during labor and within the first weeks of life. At birth, the intestinal tract becomes progressively colonized with potentially pathogenic isolates11. Outside the hospital, sources of microbial colonization for newborns are parents and even other relatives12,13. In NICUs, MDRO acquisition will occur from health-care workers (as reservoirs or vectors) but also from parents and visitors.

Determining the route of MDRO acquisition in and outside the hospital seems to be very important to understand the best way to limit and control the risk of outbreaks. During NICU stay, infants are exposed to specific and non-specific factors that increase the risk of MDRO acquisition, including invasive procedures and the frequent use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial drugs7. Also, transmission of ESBL-PE (and other MDRO isolates) may occur in the NICU via either medical staff or equipment; however, other sources of MDRO bacterial acquisition in infants could be the mother, and specific practices such as skin-to-skin care that, despite positive effects in the care of premature babies14, could expose infants to a higher risk of acquisition13.

How to control the risk of transmission

Until now, most of the data have not allowed us to identify the modes of acquisition and to consider the best control policies. Indeed, the most frequent published reports regarding the risk factors of infection or colonization by ESBL-PE bacteria were from NICUs9,1519, and little is known about factors associated with spreading in the community. Most reports often describe single-unit outbreaks16,17,20 and health care-related risk factors. Several risk factors have been identified, such as younger gestational age, low birth weight, length of hospital stay, invasive devices, antibiotic use, and hand hygiene compliance2124. However, these different studies did not take into account several other risk factors.

Indeed, one of the most important risk factors neglected in several studies is related to colonization pressure. Nowadays, ESBL-PE colonization is considered an endemic situation, and investigators estimate that 5% to 70% of inhabitants of different countries are colonized25. Analyzing risk factors of ESBL-PE acquisition in neonates without taking into account mother or family carriage (or both) may be the cause of major bias. Several studies suggested that the main route of transmission was the maternal-neonatal one11,2629. In a multivariate analysis in a first study conducted at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin hospital, Denkel and colleagues11 identified ESBL-PE-positive mothers as the main risk factor of ESBL-PE acquisition in newborns, suggesting maternal-neonatal as the main source of acquisition27. In a recent prospective study conducted in Israel28 aiming to determine whether the route of ESBL-PE transmission to hospitalized newborns was from the mother, the authors found that mothers of 13 out of 14 positive newborns were colonized by ESBL-producing E. coli. However, in a cross-sectional study conducted in Tanzania29, the prevalence of carriage of ESBL-PE was 25.4% in neonates, and the authors suggested that neonates acquire these strains from sources other than post-delivery women, such as transmission from the environment or relatives.

Several studies conducted in adult and pediatric populations have identified the measures needed to control the spread of ESBL-PE into the hospital during outbreaks30,31. Controlling the spread during outbreaks needs screening policies, decreasing antibiotic consumption, and improving hand hygiene. Indeed, surveillance may help to identify sources of infection and can be a powerful tool in the elimination of ESBL bacteria from the NICU, and the surveillance of maternal ESBL carriage can help in the prevention of neonatal colonization32,33. Moreover, prevention can occur through implementation of strict infection control guidelines, effective hand washing, minimization and safety in the use of invasive devices, and judicious use of antimicrobials such as third-generation cephalosporins34,35.

Also, little is known about how to control the spread in the community setting. Antibiotic courses seem to be a major risk factor related to the spread and acquisition in community onset36.

The role of microbiota in the acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms

Recent clinical data has highlighted the protective role of the human microbiome in MDRO and specifically ESBL-PE acquisition. As is well known, the human microbiome plays an important role in protecting the host from de novo colonization with exogenous pathogenic bacteria37. This colonization resistance is disrupted by exposure to antimicrobials and is one of the major risks for MDRO acquisition38. In a prospective study conducted in a tertiary care center in Boston39, the authors compared the fecal microbiota of healthy and hospitalized subjects and made special reference to those who acquired MDROs during their hospital stay. The fecal microbiota of the hospitalized patients had abnormal community composition, and Lactobacillus spp. was associated with lack of MDRO acquisition, consistent with a protective role. In a study that addressed the role of certain changes in the composition of the microbiota as a risk factor of ESBL-PE colonization, Gosalbes and colleagues highlighted a similar richness of taxa but a significant difference in species of four genera between carriers and non-carriers40.

These two recent reports suggest the role of microbiome as a risk factor associated with a higher risk of MDRO acquisition. As is well known, the intestinal microbiome during infancy plays a major role in human health. Several factors influence the establishment of the microbiome in neonates, such as mode of delivery, antibiotic administration during pregnancy or after birth, and also type of feeding. For example, breast milk seems to influence initial bacterial colonization and can reduce the risk of intestinal inflammation41 and has a major role in the prevention of colonization and late-onset sepsis42,43. Indeed, recent studies demonstrate the presence of a necrotizing enterocolitis-associated gut microbiome and the presence of Clostridium perfringens in the meconium44.

These data make it possible to revive the protective role of certain bacterial species. Indeed, recent data suggested that Lactobacillus plantarum had antagonistic properties against both Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains45; also, Bifidobacterium breve seems to have antimicrobial activity against several enteropathogenic strains46. Moreover, oral administration of a mix of probiotics for 1 week to children on broad-spectrum antibiotics in a PICU decreased intestinal colonization by Candida and led to a 50% reduction in candiduria47. However, further studies are needed to address the optimal probiotic organisms, dosing, timing, and duration48.

In conclusion, several factors are associated with acquisition and transmission of ESBL-PE in infants, and our understanding of risk factors needs new studies, including the protective role of the microbiome, the impact of antibiotic consumption, and the role of maternal-neonatal transmission. The recently published studies suggesting a protective role of the microbiome for MDRO acquisition open a large field of investigation and could help us to better understand this phenomenon and to adapt our infection control measures.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 25 Jul 2017
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Delerue T, de Pontual L, Carbonnelle E and Zahar JR. The potential role of microbiota for controlling the spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) in neonatal population [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1217 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10713.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 25 Jul 2017
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Jul 2017
Colum P Dunne, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Dunne CP. Reviewer Report For: The potential role of microbiota for controlling the spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) in neonatal population [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1217 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11552.r24475)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Jul 2017
Gyula Tálosi, Department of Pediatrics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Tálosi G. Reviewer Report For: The potential role of microbiota for controlling the spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) in neonatal population [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):1217 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11552.r24474)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 25 Jul 2017
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.