Rapid coral mortality following unusually calm and hot conditions on Iriomote, Japan

Andrew H Baird; Sally A. Keith; Erika Woolsey; Ryuta Yoshida; Tohru Naruse

doi:10.12688/f1000research.12660.2

Home Browse Rapid coral mortality following unusually calm and hot conditions...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Brief Report

Revised

Rapid coral mortality following unusually calm and hot conditions on Iriomote, Japan

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Previously titled: Rapid coral mortality following doldrums-like conditions on Iriomote, Japan

Andrew H Baird ¹, Sally A. Keith^2,3, Erika Woolsey⁴, Ryuta Yoshida⁵, Tohru Naruse⁶

Andrew H Baird ¹, Sally A. Keith^2,3, [...] Erika Woolsey⁴, Ryuta Yoshida⁵, Tohru Naruse⁶

PUBLISHED 12 Mar 2018

Author details Author details

¹ ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reefs Studies, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
² Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
³ Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
⁴ The Hydrous, San Francisco, CA, USA
⁵ Tateyama Marine Laboratory, Marine and Coastal Research Center, Ochanomizu University, Tateyama, Chiba, 294-0301, Japan
⁶ Iriomote Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Taketomi, Okinawa, Japan

Andrew H Baird
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Sally A. Keith
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Erika Woolsey
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Ryuta Yoshida
Roles: Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing

Tohru Naruse
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Ecology and Global Change gateway.

Abstract

Coral bleaching can be induced by many different stressors, however, the most common cause of mass bleaching in the field is higher than average sea surface temperatures (SST). Here, we describe an unusual bleaching event that followed very calm sea conditions combined with higher than average SST. Patterns of mortality differed from typical bleaching in four ways: 1) mortality was very rapid; 2) a different suite of species were most affected; 3) tissue mortality in Acropora spp. was often restricted to the center of the colony; 4) the event occurred early in summer. The two weeks prior to the event included 8 days where the average wind speed was less than 3 ms^-1. In addition, SSTs in the weeks preceding and during the event were 1.0-1.5°C higher than the mean for the last 30 years. We hypothesize that this unusual bleaching event was caused by anoxia resulting from a lack of water movement induced by low wind speeds combined with high SST.

Keywords

climate change, coral bleaching, coral reefs, disturbance

Corresponding author: Andrew H Baird

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: This work was funded by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (CE140100020) and VILLUM FONDEN (10114).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2018 Baird AH et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Baird AH, Keith SA, Woolsey E et al. Rapid coral mortality following unusually calm and hot conditions on Iriomote, Japan [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 6:1728 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12660.2) First published: 22 Sep 2017, 6:1728 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12660.1) Latest published: 12 Mar 2018, 6:1728 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12660.2)

Revised Amendments from Version 1

In response to the comments of Robert van Woesik we have removed all reference to the doldrums, the table has been rearranged so the species are ranked from most to least impacted, we have specified the aspect of the site and addressed all the grammatical and typological errors identified. In response to the comments of Misha Matz we now included sea surface temperatures and wind speeds for the year preceding the bleaching event. These data suggest it was both hotter and calmer in the week prior to the bleaching than at the same time of year in 2015. However, as Misha points out, it is not possible to prove that this bleaching was a result of hypoxia driven by calm or hot conditions. To do this we would need to have placed oxygen electrodes in the centre of colonies during the event. We have, however, added comments to the effect that wind speeds less than 3 m/s are generally regarded as the cut-off below which calm weather bleaching can occur and cited the NOAA website in support of this statement. Absolute values of wind speed are the correct metric to present – this is what affects wave and water movement. Unfortunately, we can find no literature in support of the statement that “Tissue mortality beginning in the center of the colony typically indicates anoxia..”. Therefore, we have reworded the sentence to make it clear that this statement is based on personal observation alone. We have kept the BMI index in Table 1 because this is now used to rank the taxa as requested by Robert van Woesik.

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

Introduction

Coral bleaching is a generalized response that can be induced by many different stressors^1–3. Whilst the most common cause of large scale bleaching on coral reefs is unusually high sea surface temperatures (SSTs)^4,5, prolonged periods of calm weather have also been associated with mass bleaching events in the Caribbean^6,7 and the Indo-Pacific^8–10. Experimental work has also confirmed that low water flow can exacerbate thermal bleaching^11,12.

The ecology of thermal coral bleaching in response to high SSTs is reasonably well documented. For example, colonies affected by high temperatures typically take between two to six weeks to bleach and bleached tissue can take another two to twenty weeks to die¹³. In addition, species vary in their susceptibility to thermal bleaching^14,15, resulting in a predicable hierarchy of response^16,17. Temporal patterns are also apparent with most high temperature induced mass bleaching events generally occurring towards the end of the summer months^18,19. Any change in this predictable bleaching ecology suggests an alternative cause (i.e., not thermal stress) for a given bleaching event.

Here, we describe an atypical bleaching event that we hypothesize was caused by an interaction of temperature with very calm sea conditions caused by an extended period of low winds. We identify a number of characteristic features of this calm weather bleaching that allow it to be distinguished from thermal bleaching in the field. Establishing the cause of specific bleaching events is vital in order to correctly attribute damage caused by climate change and other potential stressors.

Methods

The study site was on the reef crest (1 m depth) at Nata Reef, Iriomote, Japan (24.4282°N, 123.7955°E). Initial observations at the site were made between 26 and 29 May, 2016 at which point in time no bleached corals were noted. Surveys to quantify bleaching and mortality were conducted on 12 June, 2016. Twenty replicate 1m² quadrats were placed haphazardly on the reef crest, and the condition and species identity of all hard coral colonies with a maximum diameter greater than 5cm were recorded. Species were identified in the field following²⁰ and the names updated to the currently accepted names following²¹ Colonies were placed in one of six bleaching categories following²²: (1) unbleached, (2) the entire colony pale, (3) 1–50% of the colony white, (4) 51–99% of the colony white, (5) 100% of colony white or fluorescent, or (6) recently dead. The data from the quadrats was pooled as the data was collected. The bleaching mortality index was calculated following¹⁶. Data on environmental conditions leading up to the bleaching episode and for a similar time frame in 2015 were obtained from the Japan Meteorological Agency, which allows for these data to be used as long as due credit is given.

Results

Bleaching and mortality was rapid. No colonies were bleached at the time of the first surveys (26 May, 2016) yet two weeks later (12 June, 2016), 5% of colonies were dead and a further 31% were bleached (Table 1).

Table 1. Bleaching categories of hard corals at Nata Reef on 12 June 2016.

BMI = Bleaching Mortality Index.

taxa	unbleached	moderate	severe	dead	BMI	n
Acropora selago	0	0	0	100	100	1
Montipora aequituberculata	0	0	0	100	100	3
Montipora efflorescens	0	27	27	45	73	11
Goniastrea pectinata	0	50	50	0	50	2
Milleporidae	17	33	50	0	44	6
Dipsastraea rotumana	0	100	0	0	33	1
Montipora turgescens	0	100	0	0	33	1
Platygyra ryukyuensis	25	50	25	0	33	4
Platygyra verweyi	67	0	0	33	33	3
Dipsastrea pallida	30	50	20	0	30	10
Montipora crassituberculata	46	32	18	4	26	28
Montipora digitata	71	0	29	0	19	7
Acropora nasuta	50	50	0	0	17	2
Pocillopora damicornis	67	22	11	0	15	9
Pavona venosa	57	43	0	0	14	7
Porites annae	60	40	0	0	13	5
Acropora hyacinthus	71	29	0	0	10	7
Platygyra pini	75	25	0	0	8	4
Porites cylindrica	77	23	0	0	8	13
Acropora digitifera	81	19	0	0	6	32
Galaxea fascicularis	82	18	0	0	6	11
Favites halicora	86	14	0	0	5	7
Goniastrea retiformis	86	14	0	0	5	14
Acropora aspera	100	0	0	0	0	1
Acropora gemmifera	100	0	0	0	0	1
Astrea annuligera	100	0	0	0	0	1
Cyphastrea serailia	100	0	0	0	0	3
Favites abdita	100	0	0	0	0	3
Favites magnistellata	100	0	0	0	0	2
Montipora monasteriata	100	0	0	0	0	4
Pavona decussata	100	0	0	0	0	2
Porites lichen	100	0	0	0	0	3
Porites lutea	100	0	0	0	0	1
Porites rus	100	0	0	0	0	6
Psammocora contigua	100	0	0	0	0	1
total	64	23	8	5	216	18

Mortality was highest in Montipora aequituberculata and M. efflorescens (Figure 1A), and in an additional three species of the family Merulinidae, that were also badly affected (Table 1). Bleaching and tissue mortality were generally restricted to the center of colonies in the locally abundant species Acropora digitifera and A. hyacinthus (Figure 1B, C, D).

Figure 1.

(a) Dead and dying Montipora aequituberculata colonies (b) Acropora hyacinthus colony with bleached and dying tissue in the middle of the colony (c) a second A. hyacinthus colony (d) close up of the colony in (c). Images were captured using a Canon S100 digital camera in waterproof housing.

The bleaching event occurred early in June, the first month of the northern summer, following a period of low wind and higher than average sea surface temperature (SST). Eight days in the previous two weeks had average wind speeds of under 3 ms^-1 (Table 2). Winds were also mostly from the south, which is offshore at the study site and therefore likely to further reduce wave size and water motion (Table 2). Mean daily SSTs in the month preceding the second survey were 0.0–1.5°C higher than the mean for the previous 30 years (Table 3). Wind speeds were higher and SST lower during the same time interval in 2015 (Table 2 & Table 3).

Table 2. Mean daily wind speeds in the 12 days prior to the first observations of bleaching on 12 June 2016 and for the same dates in 2015.

Data from Japan Meteorological Agency.

Date	2015 wind speed (m/s)	2015 wind direction	2016 wind speed (m/s)	2016 wind direction
30 May	2.2	SSE	2.1	ENE
31 May	3.1	ENE	1.8	SE
1 June	2.6	NE	3.4	W
2 June	4.8	SSW	3	NE
3 June	4.6	SSW	2.1	SW
4 June	2.3	S	2.1	ENE
5 June	5.5	SSW	3.2	NE
6 June	3.8	S	2.5	NE
7 June	4.2	SSW	1.6	SE
8 June	3.3	SW	1.9	ESE
9 June	3	SSW	2	ENE
10 June	4.2	SSW	3	SSW
11 June	5.3	S	6.4	SSW
12 June	4	S	8.2	SSW

Table 3. Sea surface temperature anomalies in the weeks preceding the bleaching event on Nata Reef and a similar time interval in 2015.

Values are the degrees in centigrade above the 30 year average for this site in each time interval. Data from the Japan Meteorological Agency.

10 day period ending	2015 SST anomaly °C	2016 SST anomaly °C
10 April	0	0
20 April	-0.5	1
30 April	0	1.5
10 May	0.5	1.5
20 May	0.5	1
30 May	0.5	1
10 June	0.5	1

Discussion

This bleaching event was different to typical thermal bleaching in a number of important ways. In particular, rapid tissue mortality, an atypical hierarchy of susceptibility, and the occurrence of the event in early summer, all distinguish this event from typical thermal bleaching. We hypothesize that unusually high SST combined with a lack of water flow due to low winds speeds resulted in anoxic stress to these colonies. This hypothesis is supported by very low wind speeds (Table 2) combined with higher than average mean daily SST (Table 3) in the weeks prior to the event.

In contrast to the typical thermal response, bleaching and mortality were very rapid, with a high proportion of colonies bleached and some dying within the two week period between the surveys (Table 1). Bleaching and, in particular, mortality typically take between 4–6 weeks to present in corals following thermal stress¹³. In addition, the hierarchy of susceptibility was very different to that following thermal bleaching. Here, the worst affected species included two Montipora spp. and a number of merulinids (Table 1), when typically Acropora spp. and Pocillopora spp. are the most severely affected following thermal bleaching^5,15,22.

The pattern of tissue bleaching and mortality was also unusual. In Acropora colonies the typical pattern following thermal stress is for the whole colony to bleach¹³. In contrast, mortality was restricted to the center of most Acropora colonies in this event (Figure 1a, b, c). Tissue mortality beginning in the center of the colony is suggestive of anoxia, which often occurs in aquaria with inadequate flow or oxygenation (pers obs). This pattern of mortality is also superficially similar to feeding scars caused by Acanthaster planci or Drupella spp.²³ and a naïve observer might well have attributed this mortality to either of these corallivores²⁴. A thorough search of the site, including underneath these and adjacent colonies, indicated that neither of these corallivores were present.

The timing of the bleaching event in early summer is also unusual. Thermal bleaching typically occurs much later in the summer. For example, recurrent seasonal bleaching on Magnetic Island, Australia, occurs in the last month of the austral summer i.e., February¹⁸. Similarly, the 1998 mass bleaching event in Japan was first noticed in the latter part of the summer i.e., late July²⁵. In contrast, this calm weather event occurred early in June, the first month of the northern summer.

Doldrums-like conditions (defined by NOAA as days with average wind speeds of less than 3 ms^-1) have previously been linked to mass bleaching events^6–9. However, the capacity of calm weather to cause more localized damage outside of the typical thermal bleaching window in late summer has not previously been recognized. In addition, the potential link to anoxia, while tested in the laboratory²⁶, has not been made in the field. This observation is especially important in the context of the continuing increase in the scale and frequency of mass bleaching events²⁷ because it would generally be assumed that this small-scale phenomenon might presage a larger mass bleaching event. Determining the cause of specific bleaching events is vital in order to accurately distinguish the effects of climate change versus other causes of degradation on coral reefs.

Data availability

The pooled raw bleaching data is provided in Table 1.

Source data for Table 2 are available from the Japan Meteorological Agency, at:

http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/daily_s1.php?prec_no=91&block_no=47917&year=2015&month=05&day=30&view=a3

http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/daily_s1.php?prec_no=91&block_no=47917&year=2015&month=06&day=30&view=a3

http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/daily_s1.php?prec_no=91&block_no=47917&year=2016&month=05&day=30&view=a3

http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/daily_s1.php?prec_no=91&block_no=47917&year=2016&month=06&day=30&view=a3

Source data to generate the values in Table 3 are available from the Japan Meteorological Agency, at: http://bit.ly/2y8qlBw.

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This work was funded by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (CE140100020) and VILLUM FONDEN (10114).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff at the Iriomote Tropical Biosphere Research Station, University of the Ryukyus, for their assistance.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Glynn PW: Coral reef bleaching in the 1980s and possible connections with global warming. Trends Ecol Evol. 1991; 6(6): 175–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Brown BE: Coral bleaching: causes and consequences. Coral Reefs. 1997; 16: S129–S38. Publisher Full Text
3. Baird AH, Bhagooli R, Ralph PJ, et al.: Coral bleaching: the role of the host. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 24(1): 16–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
4. Glynn PW: Coral reef bleaching: Ecological perspectives. Coral Reefs. 1993; 12(1): 1–17. Publisher Full Text
5. Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Álvarez-Noriega M, et al.: Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature. 2017; 543(7645): 373–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
6. Jiménez C: Bleaching and mortality of reef organisms during a warming event in 1995 on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop. 2001; 49(Suppl 2): 233–8. PubMed Abstract
7. Miller J, Muller E, Rogers C, et al.: Coral disease following massive bleaching in 2005 causes 60% decline in coral cover on reefs in the US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs. 2009; 28(4): 925–37. Publisher Full Text
8. Fisk DA, Done TJ: Taxonomic and bathymetric patterns of bleaching in corals, Myrimidon Reef (Queensland). Proc Fifth Inter Coral Reef Congress. 1985; 6: 149–54. Reference Source
9. DeCarlo TM, Cohen AL, Wong GT, et al.: Mass coral mortality under local amplification of 2 °C ocean warming. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 44586. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
10. Raymundo LJ, Burdick D, Lapacek VA, et al.: Anomalous temperatures and extreme tides: Guam staghorn Acropora succumb to a double threat. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017; 564: 47–55. Publisher Full Text
11. Nakamura T, van Woesik R: Water-flow rates and passive diffusion partially explain differential survival of corals during the 1998 bleaching event. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2001; 212: 301–4. Publisher Full Text
12. Nakamura T, Yamasaki H, van Woesik R: Water flow facilitates recovery from bleaching in the coral Stylophora pistillata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003; 256: 287–91. Publisher Full Text
13. Baird AH, Marshall PA: Mortality, growth and reproduction in scleractinian corals following bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002; 237: 133–41. Publisher Full Text
14. Jokiel PL, Coles SL: Response of Hawaiian and other Indo-Pacific reef corals to elevated temperature. Coral Reefs. 1990; 8(4): 155–62. Publisher Full Text
15. Loya Y, Sakai K, Yamazato K, et al.: Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecol Lett. 2001; 4(2): 122–31. Publisher Full Text
16. McClanahan TR, Baird AH, Marshall PA, et al.: Comparing bleaching and mortality responses of hard corals between southern Kenya and the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull. 2004; 48(3–4): 327–35. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
17. Swain TD, Vega-Perkins JB, Oestreich WK, et al.: Coral bleaching response index: a new tool to standardize and compare susceptibility to thermal bleaching. Glob Chang Biol. 2016; 22(7): 2475–88. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
18. Jones RJ, Berkelmans R, Oliver JK: Recurrent bleaching of corals at Magnetic Island (Australia) relative to air and seawater temperature. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1997; 158: 289–92. Publisher Full Text
19. Fitt WK, McFarland FK, Warner ME, et al.: Seasonal patterns of tissue biomass and densities of symbiotic dinoflagellates in reef corals and relation to coral bleaching. Limnol Oceanogr. 2000; 45(3): 677–85. Publisher Full Text
20. Veron JE: Corals of the World. The Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, 2000. Reference Source
21. Hoeksema BW: Scleractinia. Bourne, 1900. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species. Reference Source
22. Marshall PA, Baird AH: Bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef: differential susceptibilities among taxa. Coral Reefs. 2000; 19(2): 155–63. Publisher Full Text
23. Pratchett MS, Schenk TJ, Baine M, et al.: Selective coral mortality associated with outbreaks of Acanthaster planci L. in Bootless Bay, Papua New Guinea. Mar Environ Res. 2009; 67(4–5): 230–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
24. Baird AH, Pratchett MS, Hoey AS, et al.: Acanthaster planci is a major cause of coral mortality in Indonesia. Coral Reefs. 2013; 32(3): 803–12. Publisher Full Text
25. Kayanne H, Harii S, Ide Y, et al.: Recovery of coral populations after the 1998 bleaching on Shiraho Reef, in the southern Ryukyus, NW Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002; 239: 93–103. Publisher Full Text
26. Ulstrup KE, Hill R, Ralph PJ: Photosynthetic impact of hypoxia on in hospite zooxanthellae in the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005; 286: 125–32. Publisher Full Text
27. Hughes TP, Barnes ML, Bellwood DR, et al.: Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature. 2017; 546(7656): 82–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 22 Sep 2017

Author details Author details

¹ ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reefs Studies, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
² Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
³ Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
⁴ The Hydrous, San Francisco, CA, USA
⁵ Tateyama Marine Laboratory, Marine and Coastal Research Center, Ochanomizu University, Tateyama, Chiba, 294-0301, Japan
⁶ Iriomote Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Taketomi, Okinawa, Japan

Andrew H Baird
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Sally A. Keith
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Erika Woolsey
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Ryuta Yoshida
Roles: Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing

Tohru Naruse
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This work was funded by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (CE140100020) and VILLUM FONDEN (10114).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 12 Mar 2018, 6:1728

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12660.2

version 1

Published: 22 Sep 2017, 6:1728

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12660.1

Copyright

© 2018 Baird AH et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Baird AH, Keith SA, Woolsey E et al. Rapid coral mortality following unusually calm and hot conditions on Iriomote, Japan [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 6:1728 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12660.2)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 12 Mar 2018

Revised

Views

11

Reviewer Report 05 Apr 2018

Mikhail V. Matz, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15488.r31834

I’m generally satisfied with the authors' response, although I really hoped to see more previous-years data than just one year before the event - in my opinion the case for the “doldrums effect” becomes progressively more convincing the better you can ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 22 Sep 2017

Views

24

Reviewer Report 04 Dec 2017

Robert van Woesik, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.13707.r26305

The manuscript by Baird and colleagues is a useful contribution to the literature. There are however a few minor edits that are necessary to make this short contribution publishable.

Firstly, the title is inaccurate, or at least ... Continue reading

The manuscript by Baird and colleagues is a useful contribution to the literature. There are however a few minor edits that are necessary to make this short contribution publishable.

Firstly, the title is inaccurate, or at least misleading. Doldrums is a maritime term that refers to the low-pressure area affected by the Intertropical Convergence Zone, where the prevailing winds are generally calm. The doldrums are considered to lie between 10^oN and 10^oS. Using the term doldrum-like conditions, instead of calm conditions, for a reef that is located at latitude 24 north confuses the terminology. I understand that NOAA, the US agency, has been using the term to refer to atypically calm periods irrespective of latitude, but again that doesn’t make it correct because they are also misusing the term. Change the title to reflect a short, atypically calm period.

Table 1 should not simply have the corals in alphabetical order, but instead sort the table from most to least impacted.

Introduction
Again, revise the use of the term doldrums.

Methods
Several periods are missing at the ends of sentences in the Methods section.
Specify the aspect of the site. Which direction is the site facing?
Data were pooled and were collected, not data was.

Results
Delete the word “who” in the sentence “who were also badly affected (Table 1)”

Discussion
“was different from…”, not different to
Revise doldrums-like conditions in several places.
Again, different from, not different to.
Periods are missing from the ends of sentences in several places of the Discussion.
Split infinitive: change to : has not been previously…

Data availability
Data are provided, not, data is provided

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

30

Reviewer Report 05 Oct 2017

Mikhail V. Matz, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.13707.r26307

This is a compact report of an unusual bleaching episode, presenting an interesting hypothesis that it could have been caused by anoxia during atypical doldrums conditions. Both are valuable for improving our understanding of factors affecting coral survival in times ... Continue reading

This is a compact report of an unusual bleaching episode, presenting an interesting hypothesis that it could have been caused by anoxia during atypical doldrums conditions. Both are valuable for improving our understanding of factors affecting coral survival in times of changing climate.
While there is no way to rigorously prove that the doldrums hypothesis is true, it certainly seems reasonable (and the wording throughout the paper is appropriate – there is never a claim that doldrums actually caused the observed bleaching).

That said, the paper would greatly benefit from expanded characterization of the doldrums episode, beyond tables 1 and 2. Is it possible to make wind speed and temperature graphs for broader range of dates (start in April) and compare that to conditions in the same time in previous years? This might show what was actually the most unusual – early temperature anomaly, low wind anomaly (by the way absolute values in Table 2 are not very informative without knowing how much below typical they are), or a combination of the two? Come to think of it, wave height could be a better proxy of water movement on the reef than wind speed, if it is possible to get that data (from satellite?).

Minor things:

“Tissue mortality beginning in the center of the colony typically indicates anoxia, which often occurs in aquaria with inade- quate ow or oxygenation (pers obs)” – I am not quite happy with the word “typically” used in a statement supported by nothing but personal observation… Can you please try once more to look up literature on this? (this is why my answer in "partly" to the literature citing question). This would also strengthen the doldrums case.

“The bleaching mortality index was calculated following [16]” – as far as I can see, this index is not actually used for anything in the paper, so maybe it is not necessary? If keeping it, please expand a little: “The bleaching mortality index was calculated by [doing this and that], following [16].”

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 22 Sep 2017

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 2 (revision) 12 Mar 18	read
Version 1 22 Sep 17	read	read

Mikhail V. Matz, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
Robert van Woesik, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, USA

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

11 Views

05 Apr 2018 | for Version 2

Mikhail V. Matz, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

11 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

I’m generally satisfied with the authors' response, although I really hoped to see more previous-years data than just one year before the event - in my opinion the case for the “doldrums effect” becomes progressively more convincing the better you can show that these conditions were indeed really unusual. Also, next time, please consider using some form of graphs rather than tables to illustrate this type of data (perhaps a scatterplot of wind speed vs temperature, points colored by month?... Or, overlaid temperature and wind speed line graphs for the event time vs previous years?)

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

24 Views

04 Dec 2017 | for Version 1

Robert van Woesik, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA

24 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The manuscript by Baird and colleagues is a useful contribution to the literature. There are however a few minor edits that are necessary to make this short contribution publishable.

Firstly, the title is inaccurate, or at least misleading. Doldrums is a maritime term that refers to the low-pressure area affected by the Intertropical Convergence Zone, where the prevailing winds are generally calm. The doldrums are considered to lie between 10^oN and 10^oS. Using the term doldrum-like conditions, instead of calm conditions, for a reef that is located at latitude 24 north confuses the terminology. I understand that NOAA, the US agency, has been using the term to refer to atypically calm periods irrespective of latitude, but again that doesn’t make it correct because they are also misusing the term. Change the title to reflect a short, atypically calm period.

Table 1 should not simply have the corals in alphabetical order, but instead sort the table from most to least impacted.

Introduction
Again, revise the use of the term doldrums.

Methods
Several periods are missing at the ends of sentences in the Methods section.
Specify the aspect of the site. Which direction is the site facing?
Data were pooled and were collected, not data was.

Results
Delete the word “who” in the sentence “who were also badly affected (Table 1)”

Discussion
“was different from…”, not different to
Revise doldrums-like conditions in several places.
Again, different from, not different to.
Periods are missing from the ends of sentences in several places of the Discussion.
Split infinitive: change to : has not been previously…

Data availability
Data are provided, not, data is provided

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

30 Views

05 Oct 2017 | for Version 1

Mikhail V. Matz, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

30 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

This is a compact report of an unusual bleaching episode, presenting an interesting hypothesis that it could have been caused by anoxia during atypical doldrums conditions. Both are valuable for improving our understanding of factors affecting coral survival in times of changing climate.
While there is no way to rigorously prove that the doldrums hypothesis is true, it certainly seems reasonable (and the wording throughout the paper is appropriate – there is never a claim that doldrums actually caused the observed bleaching).

That said, the paper would greatly benefit from expanded characterization of the doldrums episode, beyond tables 1 and 2. Is it possible to make wind speed and temperature graphs for broader range of dates (start in April) and compare that to conditions in the same time in previous years? This might show what was actually the most unusual – early temperature anomaly, low wind anomaly (by the way absolute values in Table 2 are not very informative without knowing how much below typical they are), or a combination of the two? Come to think of it, wave height could be a better proxy of water movement on the reef than wind speed, if it is possible to get that data (from satellite?).

Minor things:

“Tissue mortality beginning in the center of the colony typically indicates anoxia, which often occurs in aquaria with inade- quate ow or oxygenation (pers obs)” – I am not quite happy with the word “typically” used in a statement supported by nothing but personal observation… Can you please try once more to look up literature on this? (this is why my answer in "partly" to the literature citing question). This would also strengthen the doldrums case.

“The bleaching mortality index was calculated following [16]” – as far as I can see, this index is not actually used for anything in the paper, so maybe it is not necessary? If keeping it, please expand a little: “The bleaching mortality index was calculated by [doing this and that], following [16].”

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Glynn PW: Coral reef bleaching in the 1980s and possible connections with global warming. Trends Ecol Evol. 1991; 6(6): 175–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Brown BE: Coral bleaching: causes and consequences. Coral Reefs. 1997; 16: S129–S38. Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Baird AH, Bhagooli R, Ralph PJ, et al.: Coral bleaching: the role of the host. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 24(1): 16–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Glynn PW: Coral reef bleaching: Ecological perspectives. Coral Reefs. 1993; 12(1): 1–17. Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Álvarez-Noriega M, et al.: Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature. 2017; 543(7645): 373–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Jiménez C: Bleaching and mortality of reef organisms during a warming event in 1995 on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop. 2001; 49(Suppl 2): 233–8. PubMed Abstract

[7] 7. Miller J, Muller E, Rogers C, et al.: Coral disease following massive bleaching in 2005 causes 60% decline in coral cover on reefs in the US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs. 2009; 28(4): 925–37. Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Fisk DA, Done TJ: Taxonomic and bathymetric patterns of bleaching in corals, Myrimidon Reef (Queensland). Proc Fifth Inter Coral Reef Congress. 1985; 6: 149–54. Reference Source

[9] 9. DeCarlo TM, Cohen AL, Wong GT, et al.: Mass coral mortality under local amplification of 2 °C ocean warming. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 44586. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[10] 10. Raymundo LJ, Burdick D, Lapacek VA, et al.: Anomalous temperatures and extreme tides: Guam staghorn Acropora succumb to a double threat. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017; 564: 47–55. Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Nakamura T, van Woesik R: Water-flow rates and passive diffusion partially explain differential survival of corals during the 1998 bleaching event. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2001; 212: 301–4. Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Nakamura T, Yamasaki H, van Woesik R: Water flow facilitates recovery from bleaching in the coral Stylophora pistillata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003; 256: 287–91. Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Baird AH, Marshall PA: Mortality, growth and reproduction in scleractinian corals following bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002; 237: 133–41. Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Jokiel PL, Coles SL: Response of Hawaiian and other Indo-Pacific reef corals to elevated temperature. Coral Reefs. 1990; 8(4): 155–62. Publisher Full Text

[15] 15. Loya Y, Sakai K, Yamazato K, et al.: Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecol Lett. 2001; 4(2): 122–31. Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. McClanahan TR, Baird AH, Marshall PA, et al.: Comparing bleaching and mortality responses of hard corals between southern Kenya and the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull. 2004; 48(3–4): 327–35. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Swain TD, Vega-Perkins JB, Oestreich WK, et al.: Coral bleaching response index: a new tool to standardize and compare susceptibility to thermal bleaching. Glob Chang Biol. 2016; 22(7): 2475–88. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[18] 18. Jones RJ, Berkelmans R, Oliver JK: Recurrent bleaching of corals at Magnetic Island (Australia) relative to air and seawater temperature. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1997; 158: 289–92. Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Fitt WK, McFarland FK, Warner ME, et al.: Seasonal patterns of tissue biomass and densities of symbiotic dinoflagellates in reef corals and relation to coral bleaching. Limnol Oceanogr. 2000; 45(3): 677–85. Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Veron JE: Corals of the World. The Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, 2000. Reference Source

[21] 21. Hoeksema BW: Scleractinia. Bourne, 1900. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species. Reference Source

[22] 22. Marshall PA, Baird AH: Bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef: differential susceptibilities among taxa. Coral Reefs. 2000; 19(2): 155–63. Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Pratchett MS, Schenk TJ, Baine M, et al.: Selective coral mortality associated with outbreaks of Acanthaster planci L. in Bootless Bay, Papua New Guinea. Mar Environ Res. 2009; 67(4–5): 230–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Baird AH, Pratchett MS, Hoey AS, et al.: Acanthaster planci is a major cause of coral mortality in Indonesia. Coral Reefs. 2013; 32(3): 803–12. Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Kayanne H, Harii S, Ide Y, et al.: Recovery of coral populations after the 1998 bleaching on Shiraho Reef, in the southern Ryukyus, NW Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002; 239: 93–103. Publisher Full Text

[26] 26. Ulstrup KE, Hill R, Ralph PJ: Photosynthetic impact of hypoxia on in hospite zooxanthellae in the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005; 286: 125–32. Publisher Full Text

[27] 27. Hughes TP, Barnes ML, Bellwood DR, et al.: Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature. 2017; 546(7656): 82–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Rapid coral mortality following unusually calm and hot conditions on Iriomote, Japan

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Introduction

Methods

Results

Table 1. Bleaching categories of hard corals at Nata Reef on 12 June 2016.

Figure 1.

Table 2. Mean daily wind speeds in the 12 days prior to the first observations of bleaching on 12 June 2016 and for the same dates in 2015.

Table 3. Sea surface temperature anomalies in the weeks preceding the bleaching event on Nata Reef and a similar time interval in 2015.

Discussion

Data availability

Competing interests

Grant information

Acknowledgements

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated