Keywords
Night-guard, Amalgam, Mercury, Elemental Analysis, leached Elements
Night-guard, Amalgam, Mercury, Elemental Analysis, leached Elements
Determination of leached-elements from dental restorations has been investigated as a result of exposure to oral conditions1. Several methods have been performed both in vitro and in vivo. Most of the in vitro techniques relied on storing specimens in surrounding media, such as distilled water or artificial saliva1–3. Various analytical means had been used to analyze the leached-elements, including inductively-coupled-plasma, atomic-absorption, Fourier-transform-Infrared spectroscopies and chromatographic methods1,2,4.
On the other hand, in vivo methods have been used to assess the actual situation intra-orally5. In vivo techniques have been performed either in animals or humans. Cavities are prepared in the teeth of animals, such as monkeys6, pigs7,8 or rats9, then filled by dental-restorations. The released-elements are either detected after sacrificing the animals7 or by analyzing secretory products, such as urine9 or fecal samples6.
Yet, measuring the released elements in humans may be best. Several studies quantified the excretion of mercury in urine, hair and nails of patients with dental amalgam-restorations and found a positive correlation10,11. In contrast, others did not find a correlation between mercury content in hair and amalgam-restoration, but mercury in hair has been correlated with fish consumption12. Thus, assessing the leached-elements in the oral-cavity may be more specific to eliminate other possible systemic sources. Thus, several studies examined released ions in patients’ saliva13,14. However, these ions may be affected by salivary secretions or washed out by swallowing. In addition, saliva collection and storage may be technique sensitive15. Thus, a new simple method was proposed in this study through using night-guards (polymeric occlusal-splints used to decrease bruxism and clenching teeth) in gathering leached-elements from dental-restorations.
Ten upper dental alginate impressions (Tropicalgin, Zhermack, Italy) were taken as part of routine treatment at the Dental Family Clinic (Cairo, Egypt), between February and December 2016, for ten patients suffering from bruxism, and who also had amalgam-restorations in their upper molars. This was performed after all the patients signed written informed consent forms agreeing to participate in the study. The participants were six females and four males with the following inclusion criteria: adult (>18 years), non-periodontal-affected patients suffering from bruxism, and had amalgam restoration. Medically-compromised patients were excluded. Custom-made night-guards (example shown in Figure 1) were fabricated for each patient from 2mm soft polymeric sheets (Easy-Vac-Gasket, 3A-Medes, Korea), using a vacuum forming machine (Pro-Form, Keystone, Germany). The night-guards were delivered to the patients in the clinic after one week from first visit and they were instructed to wear the night-guards when they were asleep (≈7 hours±2). Recall visits were given to the patients in the regular check-up schedule after six months. In this visit, the night-guards were taken from the patients to be analyzed. A new unused night-guard was fabricated from the same material to be used as a control.
Scanning-Electron-Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive-X-ray-Analysis (EDXA) were used to examine structural and elemental changes in the used night-guards, and compared to the unused one. In the used night-guards, two areas were studied: the fitting surfaces contacting amalgam-restorations and the fitting surfaces not contacting amalgam-restorations. The patients’ records were used to identify teeth that had restorations. Parts from these areas of interest were cut using a scissor (Singer, Germany), mounted on coded brass stubs and sputter coated with 10Å gold platinum and observed at 20000× magnification. The SEM and EDXA (Supra40, Carl-Zeiss-NTS-GmbH, Germany) were used with an accelerating voltage of 20.0–30.0kV.
The SEM of the unused night-guard revealed a homogenous structure (Figure 2), with its composition consisting of carbon and oxygen (C=88.9wt%±0.3 and O=11.1wt%±0.4; Figure 3). By contrast, the night guard surfaces contacting amalgam-restorations showed numerous lustrous particles (Figure 4). Elemental analysis of these areas showed the presence of mercury and sulfur, in addition to carbon and oxygen (Hg=21.2wt%±0.6, S=2.5wt%±0.5, C=67.1wt%±0.3 and O=9.2wt%±0.5; Figure 5). The surfaces not contacting amalgam-restorations under SEM showed slight cracking, but were still homogenous without lustrous particles (Figure 6). Their composition was carbon and oxygen (C=88.3wt%±0.6 and O=11.7wt%±0.6; Figure 7).
Magnification: 20000×. Image representative of 10 night guards.
Image representative of 10 night guards.
The oral-cavity is an aggressive environment, which may affect the integrity of dental restorations16–18. It is essential to examine the resultant leached-elements to assess the degradation products of the filling materials in the oral-cavity and investigate if these materials could provoke an adverse systemic effect19.
Several studies have examined released elements by in vitro testing through fabricating specimens and soaking them in medium1,2,20. However, simulating the oral-cavity is difficult due to its complex nature with multifactorial variables17. Thus, some studies have analyzed patients’ saliva21–23. However, saliva is composed of various components and its analysis has shown variation in methodology. In addition, contamination of saliva may occur15.
Accordingly, in this study, a new technique was introduced via examining night guards contacting dental restorations. Night guards are polymeric materials designed to fit the occlusal-surfaces of patients to decrease signs and symptoms of bruxism and teeth clenching. Consequently, the study was performed by providing patients who suffered from bruxism with custom-made night guards. An additional inclusion criterion was the presence of amalgam fillings in their upper molars. Amalgam restorations were selected rather than any other dental restoration, as it has been well proven in the literature that mercury is released from such material19. Therefore, utilizing night guards in gathering leached-elements from amalgam-restorations intra-orally was evaluated in this study.
Both the unused night guard and the used surfaces not contacting amalgam-restorations were homogenous, yet the latter showed cracking, which may be due to bruxism. This consistent structure may be attributed to the following: these areas were not contacting dental restorations and no leached elements were deposited. This was confirmed by the EDXA results, which were only carbon and oxygen in both. The night-guards are polymeric materials, with their basic structure consisting of carbon, oxygen and hydrogen24. However, hydrogen was not detected as it did not have core electron, only one valence electron that enters in chemical bonding25. Analysis relied on excitation of electrons in lower shells, not the valence electron, which was shared in covalent bonding in the case of hydrogen25.
The night guard surfaces contacting amalgam restorations showed numerous lustrous particles, which were identified by EDXA as mercury. This is in agreement with numerous studies that have detected mercury released from amalgam restorations19,26. Sulfur was also detected, which may be due to tarnish and corrosion of the amalgam27.
Since leached elements detected by night guards matched with that reported in the literature, night-guards could be used as a simple method to detect released elements from dental restorations such as amalgam intra-orally.
Dataset 1. SEM images for night guard surfaces contacting and not contacting amalgam restorations. 10.5256/f1000research.12311.d17738328
Dataset 2. Raw EDXA data for night guard surfaces contacting and not contacting amalgam restorations. 10.5256/f1000research.12311.d17738429
It should be noted that all the work, including the clinical steps, was performed by the author.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No source data required
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 02 Oct 17 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)