Home Browse Advances in the understanding of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined...
ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
▬
✚
Review

Advances in the understanding of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Jonas Paludo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-5531
1, Stephen M Ansell1
Jonas Paludo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-5531
1, Stephen M Ansell1
PUBLISHED 18 Dec 2017
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Among monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUSs), the immunoglobulin M (IgM) MGUS subtype stands as a unique entity and plays a pivotal role as a pre-malignant condition for multiple B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, most notably Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). A relationship between IgM MGUS and WM has been proposed for decades. However, insight regarding the pathobiology of these two conditions improved significantly in recent years, strengthening the hypothesis that WM and IgM MGUS are different stages of the same disease. Therefore, the understanding of IgM MGUS and that of WM are interconnected and advances in one will likely impact the other. Furthermore, IgM MGUS has been more commonly recognized as the underlying etiology of IgM-related disorders. In this review, we explore recent advances in the understanding of the pathobiology of IgM MGUS and WM and the treatment of common IgM-related disorders.

Keywords

IgM gammopathy, MGUS, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia

Corresponding author: Jonas Paludo
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Copyright:  © 2017 Paludo J and Ansell SM. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite: Paludo J and Ansell SM. Advances in the understanding of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):2142 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12880.1) First published: 18 Dec 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):2142 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12880.1) Latest published: 18 Dec 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):2142 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12880.1)

Introduction

Even though multiple myeloma (MM), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) are unique diseases with distinct presentations, prognoses, and treatment strategies, they all originate from B cells in the late stages of differentiation1. CLL arises from a pre- or post-germinal center CD5+ B cell2. WM arises from a post-germinal center B cell that has undergone somatic hypermutation but not heavy-chain class switch3. The cell of origin in MM is a B cell that has fully differentiated into a plasma cell4.

Along with the closely related cells of origin, these diseases also seem to be preceded by pre-malignant conditions. CLL and MM are always preceded by monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), respectively5,6. Although immunoglobulin M (IgM) MGUS is the probable precursor condition for WM, the relationship between these two entities is not as well stablished as in CLL and MM. Moreover, IgM MGUS has been shown to be a distinct entity from non-IgM or light-chain MGUS7.

This review explores recent advances in the understanding of IgM MGUS and its relationship with WM and focuses on the pathobiology and management of IgM MGUS.

IgM MGUS

The definition of IgM MGUS is not universally agreed upon. The Mayo Clinic criteria characterize IgM MGUS as a serum IgM monoclonal protein of less than 3 g/dL, bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) involvement of less than 10%, and no evidence of signs or symptoms secondary to the lymphoplasmacytic infiltrative process8. In contrast, the Second International Workshop on WM consensus defined IgM MGUS as a serum IgM monoclonal protein of any size without bone marrow involvement by an LPL9. A monoclonal IgM paraprotein can be detected in a number of diseases, and a differential diagnosis of IgM monoclonal gammopathies is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Primary differential diagnoses of IgM monoclonal gammopathies.

IgM
MGUS		Smoldering/
asymptomatic WM		WMIgM multiple
myeloma		IgM
amyloidosis		Splenic marginal zone
lymphoma
Serum IgM
gammopathy		<3 g/dL≥3 g/dLAny levelAny levelAny levelLow level
Bone marrow LPL
infiltrate, percentage		<10%≥10%≥10%≥10%;
predominantly
plasmacytic PCs		Normal
or slight
increase of
PC or LPL		Intertrabecular and
intrasinusoidal infiltrate
End-organ damage/
Symptoms		NoNoYesaYesbYescYesd
HyperviscosityNoNoYesUncommonUncommonUncommon
Differentiating genetic
features and markers		6q deletion
absent,
MYD88
L265P
(up to 80%)		6q deletion, MYD88
L265P (90%),
CD56−		6q deletion
(30–50%), IgH
translocations
absent, MYD88
L265P (90%),
CD56−,
CD25+ (88%),
CD103− 		May have t(11;14)
or other IgH
translocations,
MYD88 L265P-
negative
CD56+, CD138+
CD19−, CD 45−		May have
t(11;14)		+3q (19%) and +5q (10%);
MYD88 L265P-negative
CD 22+, CD11c+, CD25−,
Del 7q (19%),
CD25+ (44%),
CD103+ (40%)

The table lists a few important differential diagnoses of immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathies. IgM paraprotein can be present in virtually all B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. aConstitutional symptoms: hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, anemia, hyperviscosity, solid organ involvement, and rarely lytic lesions. bCRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, and bone lesions) features. cOrgans typically involved are kidneys, heart, nerves, tongue, gastrointestinal tract, and liver. Patients with IgM amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis have higher frequency of pulmonary, lymph node, peripheral nerve, and lower cardiac involvement. Concentration of free light-chain tends to be lower compared with non-IgM AL amyloidosis. dPrimarily involves spleen; lymphadenopathy is rare.

LPL, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma; MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; PC, plasma cell; WM, Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Reprinted from Blood Reviews, Vol 29/Issue 5, Prashant Kapoor,Jonas Paludo,Nishanth Vallumsetla,Philip R. Greipp, Waldenström macroglobulinemia: What a hematologist needs to know, page 301-319, DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.03.001, Copyright (2015), with permission from Elsevier42.

The prevalence of MGUS, based on large population studies, is estimated at 2 to 3% in adults over the age of 50 years, and the median age at diagnosis is about 70 years. The incidence of MGUS increases with age and is more common in males than females. IgM MGUS represents only 15 to 17% of all MGUS cases10,11. Whereas the prevalence of MGUS seems higher in African-Americans (3.7%) and African blacks (5.8%) compared with Caucasians (2.3%), the prevalence of the IgM subtype is fivefold higher in Caucasians compared with African-Americans11,12. This racial disparity is consistent with the reported higher incidence of WM in Caucasians13.

Patients with IgM MGUS are at increased risk of progression to a hematologic malignancy. Long-term follow-up of 213 patients with IgM MGUS showed the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in 17 patients, WM in six patients, CLL in three patients, and light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in three patients. The risk of developing any lymphoid neoplasm or related disorder compared with the expected incidence was 16-fold higher in patients with IgM MGUS. The risk of developing WM was 262-fold higher. The probability of progression was estimated at 1.5% per year and the risk continued to increase even 20 years after the initial diagnosis8. The initial concentration of M-protein at IgM MGUS diagnosis is a strong predictor for progression. Patients with an M-protein of more than 2.5 g/dL had a 3.1-fold greater risk for progression than those with an M-protein of less than 0.5 g/dL, likely reflecting the impact of a higher tumor burden on the risk of progression14. Early studies have also suggested that IgM MGUS patients harboring the MYD88L265P mutation have an increased risk of progression to WM15,16. However, the pathogenic role of the MYD88L265P mutation in the transformation to WM has not been established yet. The relevance of IgM MGUS lies not only in the increased risk of progression to a hematologic malignancy but also in the risk of developing end-organ damage secondary to autoimmune properties or deposition of the IgM paraprotein9.

Pathobiology of IgM MGUS and Waldenström macroglobulinemia

The understanding of the pathobiology of IgM MGUS and WM has grown significantly over the last few years as technological advances, such as multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC), gene expression profiling (GEP), and next-generation sequencing (NGS), provided valuable insight into the unique relationship between these two entities. LPL, an indolent NHL, is characterized by bone marrow infiltration with malignant cells ranging from small mature-appearing B cells to lymphoplasmocytes and plasma cells17. Presence of LPL is a requirement for the diagnosis of WM but can also be identified in patients with IgM MGUS depending on the diagnostic criteria used9,14. A large cohort of IgM MGUS patients with long-term follow-up seen at Mayo Clinic demonstrated less than 10% bone marrow involvement by an LPL in all assessed patients and influenced the current Mayo Clinic diagnostic criteria for IgM MGUS14. Additionally, bone marrow evaluation by MFC of patients with IgM MGUS showed less than 10% bone marrow infiltration by clonal B cells in 99% of the cases18.

Quantification of tumor mass and clonality by MFC showed increasing bone marrow involvement by clonal B cells from IgM MGUS to smoldering WM and symptomatic WM patients. Additionally, a progressive increase in the proportion of clonal B cells with cytoplasmic expression of the patient-specific light-chain isotype was seen from IgM MGUS to smoldering and symptomatic WM patients. However, despite the progressively higher degree of patient-specific light-chain isotype clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow from IgM MGUS to symptomatic WM, the proportion of bone marrow involvement by clonal plasma cells was similar in all three stages of disease18. IgM levels correlated with the degree of plasma cell clonality but not with the proportion of bone marrow involvement. Clonal B-cell bone marrow infiltration (>10%) and degree of clonality (100%) were highly specific to exclude the diagnosis of IgM MGUS but not to identify patients with WM. The phenotype of clonal plasma cells seen in WM was unrelated to the clonal plasma cells seen in MM18.

Among the cytogenetic findings, chromosome 6q deletion is the most common structural abnormality and is seen in about half of patients with WM, followed by trisomy of chromosome 5 and monosomy 819. Fluorescent in situ hybridization directed at chromosome 6 confirmed the 6q deletion in 55% of patients with WM but in none of the patients with IgM MGUS20. A genome-wide study of copy number abnormalities (CNAs) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using microarray technology identified deletion 6q(23.3–25.3) and +18q(22.1) as the most common structural abnormalities (detected in 16% and 14% of all patients, respectively). Genomic imbalances typically observed in WM (del6q, +18q, trisomy 4 and trisomy 12) were rarely seen in patients with IgM MGUS. The frequency of patients displaying CNAs progressively increased from IgM MGUS (36%) to smoldering (73%) and symptomatic (82%, P = 0.03) WM but a similar frequency of LOH was noted in all three disease stages21.

Targeted NGS evaluating the presence of somatic mutations in 11 selected genes (MYD88, CXCR4, ARID1A, KMT2D, TP53, NOTCH2, PRDM1, CD79b, TRAF3, TNFAIP3, and MYDBBP1A) in patients with IgM MGUS (n = 56) or WM (n = 63) demonstrated 151 mutations in 74% of the patients. Patients with IgM MGUS harbored a significantly lower number of mutations than patients with WM, conceivably implying that multiple genetic hits are needed for the progression from IgM MGUS to WM. Somatic mutations in MYD88, CXCR4, and KMT2D were more frequently seen in patients with WM (86%, 24%, and 25%, respectively) than in patients with IgM MGUS (46%, 7%, and 5%, respectively), possibly suggesting that mutations in these genes are an earlier event in the pathobiology of IgM MGUS and WM22. A similar proportion of MYD88L265P mutation was detected in patients with IgM MGUS (42–54%) or WM (93–97%) when allele-specific polymerase chain reaction was used in an analysis of either bone marrow or peripheral blood samples23,24. However, no conclusion regarding a driver mutation in those genes can be made. Clonal B cells from bone marrow of patients with IgM MGUS, smoldering WM, and symptomatic WM were evaluated using immunophenotypic protein expression profile (iPEP) and GEP techniques. Early studies demonstrated a distinct molecular signature by GEP between patients with IgM MGUS and those with WM25. However, these findings were not confirmed in later studies involving larger cohorts and a more comprehensive microarray panel21,26. Virtually no differences were observed in the iPEP or GEP of patients with IgM MGUS compared with patients with WM, implying that the WM clone may already be present in patients with IgM MGUS21.

However, post-translational modifications and epigenetic changes between patients with IgM MGUS and those with WM were not assessed. The iPEP of clonal B cells harboring the MYD88L265P mutation was similar to that in MYD88 wild-type cells21. In a comparison of clonal B cells from IgM MGUS and WM with their normal B-cell counterpart (CD22+ and CD25−), GEP showed differentially expressed genes related to the interleukin-6 (IL-6), NF-κB, JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT, inositol tetrakisphosphate (IP4), and 3-phosphoinositide biosynthesis pathways, which are related to cell growth and survival21. The first step in the pathogenesis of MGUS and MM has been hypothesized to be an abnormal response to antigenic stimulation through Toll-like receptors with overexpression of IL 1R leading to increased levels of IL-6 and promotion of an IL-6 autocrine loop27. The next step would be acquisition of genetic abnormalities, probably in a stepwise fashion, leading to the malignant transformation and clonal expansion28. In an attempt to demonstrate common antigenic stimulation in the pathogenies of IgM MGUS and WM, Varettoni et al.29 studied the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) variable gene rearrangement repertoire in patients with these conditions. Immunoglobulins, including the monotypic IgM expressed by malignant cells in IgM MGUS and WM, are assembled by somatic recombination of a large number of gene segments in the IGH region and continuously shaped by exposure to exogenous antigens. Finding stereotyped IGH rearrangements could support the hypothesis of an antigenic stimulation as the early event in the development of these diseases. A remarkably biased IGH variable gene usage repertoire was seen in patients with IgM MGUS and WM. A predilection for the IGH variable gene 3 (seen in 83% of patients) in preference to IGH variable genes 1 and 4 was noted. No intra-disease stereotyped clusters were seen. These results imply that the cell of origin of IgM MGUS and WM is a heterogeneous B cell that may have responded to a diversified antigenic stimulation during a physiologic response before its malignant transformation29.

Finding a clear distinction between the malignant cell in patients with IgM MGUS and those with WM has been fundamentally challenging. Although the answer to this question could lie in the fact that these two conditions are merely different stages of the same entity, one cannot overlook a limitation of the studies investigating this question: variability of quality and representativeness of samples analyzed as well as the timing of sampling and handling methods.

Clinical manifestations of IgM MGUS

Although patients with IgM MGUS have minimal to no bone marrow involvement by LPL and usually low levels of circulating IgM, they may still have symptoms attributable to the IgM properties. Though infrequent, organ damage may result from an IgM paraprotein with autoimmune activity or altered structure prone to tissue deposition30. The term ‘IgM-related disorders’ has been proposed to describe this group of patients which encompass not only IgM MGUS and WM but any underlying condition associated with a monoclonal IgM paraprotein9. Among 377 patients with IgM-related disorders, the most common diagnoses were MGUS (42%), WM (28%), B-cell NHL such as CLL, extranodal marginal zone lymphoma, and splenic marginal zone lymphoma (18%), primary cold agglutinin disease (4%), AL amyloidosis (4%), cryoglobulinemia (2%), and IgM MGUS-associated neuropathy (1%)31.

The peripheral neuropathy associated with IgM MGUS usually presents as a distal, symmetric, and slowly progressive sensorimotor neuropathy with predominantly demyelinating features in the nerve conduction studies. A causal relationship between anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) IgM antibodies, identified in half of the patients, and neuropathy has been established. IgM paraprotein directed to other antigens such as GD1b ganglioside, sulphatide, and chondroitin sulphate has also been described, although the pathologic significance is not well understood32. Cold agglutinin disease, leading to extravascular hemolytic anemia after cold exposure caused by IgM binding to red blood cell surface antigens and subsequent complement cascade activation, has been described in patients with IgM MGUS33. Cryoglobulinemia, manifested by acrocyanosis, Raynaud phenomenon, urticaria, peripheral neuropathy, renal failure, or vasculitis resulting from IgM immune-complex precipitation in cold temperatures, has been associated with IgM MGUS as well34. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand disease are uncommonly seen in IgM MGUS35.

AL amyloidosis, caused by extracellular tissue deposition of misfolded immunoglobulins, is a rare but devastating complication of IgM MGUS31. IgM-related AL amyloidosis less frequently presents with cardiac involvement than non-IgM AL amyloidosis but has a higher prevalence of peripheral neuropathy secondary to the amyloid deposition. Renal failure, seen in up to 68% of the patients, is the most common manifestation36. Schnitzler syndrome is a rare entity characterized by the presence of an IgM paraprotein and a chronic urticarial rash in association with other inflammatory symptoms, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, or bone pain37. The pathophysiology of Schnitzler syndrome is not well understood, but upregulation of the IL-1 pathway plays a pivotal role38,39. Renal failure can also be seen in IgM MGUS patients as the result of monoclonal protein deposition disease, which includes light-chain, heavy-chain, or light- and heavy-chain deposition disease; proliferative glomerulonephritis; cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis; or direct LPL infiltration40,41.

Management of IgM MGUS

Owing to the lack of evidence suggesting a survival advantage or prevention/delay of progression to a hematologic malignancy and the concern of treatment-related toxicities, treatment is not recommended for asymptomatic patients with IgM MGUS42. Therefore, a ‘watch and wait’ approach is the preferred choice in asymptomatic patients.

Treatment is indicated for patients presenting with IgM-related disorders. The intensity of treatment should be balanced by the severity of symptoms and potential for short- and long-term sequelae. For minimally symptomatic patients, supportive care may suffice in most cases. For more significant symptoms or risk of irreversible organ damage, treatment directed toward the malignant clone should be considered.

For patients who present with peripheral neuropathy severe and progressive enough to warrant therapy and in whom AL amyloidosis was excluded, a trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) could be considered as the initial therapy43. Two randomized, double-blind clinical trials of IVIG versus placebo in patients with IgM-related peripheral neuropathy showed at least partial improvement of symptoms in 28 to 45% of patients. The clinical benefit with IVIG was, however, short-lived44,45. Rituximab monotherapy has also shown activity in the treatment of IgM-related neuropathy with sustained results. Multiple trials reported at least partial improvement of symptoms in 31 to 86% of patients, and responses lasting more than 36 months were reported in a small prospective single-arm study46–48. The Eighth International Workshop in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia consensus panel for the diagnosis and management of IgM-associated peripheral neuropathy in patients with MGUS recommends tailoring of the initial therapy on the basis of the presence (or not) of anti-MAG antibodies. For patients with a positive anti-MAG assay, rituximab monotherapy is the preferred first line of therapy, whereas immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy (that is, IVIG, steroids, and plasma exchange) is preferred for patients with a negative anti-MAG assay49. Treatment of patients presenting with IgM-related amyloidosis should follow the standard approach for patients with AL amyloidosis with combination therapy and consideration for autologous stem cell transplant50. Multidrug regimens may also be necessary for the treatment of severe or relapsed/refractory symptoms when an attempt to eradicate the malignant clone is warranted30.

The treatment of Schnitzler syndrome, in contrast, is not directed toward the malignant clone but toward the upregulated cytokine state. Anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, has been shown to be a very effective therapy in Schnitzler syndrome. In a French multicenter study, all patients (n = 29) treated with anakinra attained a response lasting as long as the patients were followed (median of 36 months)51. Rilonacept, an IL-1 neutralizing fusion protein, and canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-1 beta, have also demonstrated activity in Schnitzler syndrome52,53.

Future perspectives

The understanding of IgM MGUS, as a pre-malignant precursor condition to multiple subtypes of B-cell NHL, is pivotal to comprehend the development of related hematological malignancies, most importantly WM. Available data suggest an aberrant response to a normal antigenic stimulation as the potential initial step in the pathogenesis of IgM MGUS. Additional somatic mutations would be needed to allow the persistence of the abnormal clone, and a multi-hit hypothesis is proposed to explain the progression to WM.

Despite an increased mutation burden seen in patients with WM compared with IgM MGUS, the GEP of clonal B cells is virtually indistinguishable in these two conditions and no driver mutation has been clearly identified to explain why some patients with IgM MGUS progress to WM. Perhaps the answer to this question lies in post-translational or epigenetics changes not yet identified. It is also possible that changes in the bone marrow microenvironment are responsible in part for the progression of IgM MGUS to WM. An effort to prospectively collect samples and information from patients with a variety of pre-malignant conditions, including IgM MGUS, is under way (NCT02269592) and could provide valuable data for future studies.

The role of early treatment of patients with IgM MGUS to prevent or postpone transformation to WM is still unknown. It is unlikely that large clinical trials will be carried out to investigate this question given the rarity of this disease and need for long follow-up. A unique approach using anakinra to induce a chronic disease state in patients with smoldering MM showed promising results but has never been validated in large clinical trials54. One may wonder whether the same concept could be applied to IgM MGUS and WM given the suggested upregulation of the IL-6 pathway seen in these patients and the known association between IL-1 and IL-6.

Many impressive advances have occurred in recent years, shedding light on the pathobiology of IgM MGUS and WM. Our understanding of these conditions is poised to expand in the near future and is likely to favorably impact the outcome of this disease.

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

F1000 recommended

References

  • 1.  McMaster ML, Caporaso N: Waldenström macroglobulinaemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: emerging understanding of a potential precursor condition. Br J Haematol. 2007; 139(5): 663–71. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 2.  Fabbri G, Dalla-Favera R: The molecular pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016; 16(3): 145–62. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 3.  Sahota SS, Forconi F, Ottensmeier CH, et al.: Typical Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia is derived from a B-cell arrested after cessation of somatic mutation but prior to isotype switch events. Blood. 2002; 100(4): 1505–7. PubMed Abstract
  • 4.  Matsui W, Wang Q, Barber JP, et al.: Clonogenic multiple myeloma progenitors, stem cell properties, and drug resistance. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(1): 190–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 5.  Landgren O, Albitar M, Ma W, et al.: B-cell clones as early markers for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(7): 659–67. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 6.  Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, et al.: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009; 113(22): 5412–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 7.  International Myeloma Working Group: Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003; 121(5): 749–57. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 8.  Kyle RA, Benson J, Larson D, et al.: IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009; 9(1): 17–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 9.  Owen RG, Treon SP, Al-Katib A, et al.: Clinicopathological definition of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: consensus panel recommendations from the Second International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Semin Oncol. 2003; 30(2): 110–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 10.  Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al.: Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(13): 1362–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 11.  Landgren O, Graubard BI, Katzmann JA, et al.: Racial disparities in the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies: a population-based study of 12,482 persons from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. Leukemia. 2014; 28(7): 1537–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 12.  Landgren O, Katzmann JA, Hsing AW, et al.: Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among men in Ghana. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007; 82(12): 1468–73. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 13.  Wang H, Chen Y, Li F, et al.: Temporal and geographic variations of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia incidence: a large population-based study. Cancer. 2012; 118(15): 3793–800. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 14.  Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al.: Long-term follow-up of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2003; 102(10): 3759–64. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 15.  Varettoni M, Zibellini S, Arcaini L, et al.: MYD88 (L265P) mutation is an independent risk factor for progression in patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2013; 122(13): 2284–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 16.  Varettoni M, Arcaini L, Zibellini S, et al.: Prevalence and clinical significance of the MYD88 (l265p) somatic mutation in patients with waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, IgM-monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or other mature B-cell neoplasms. Blood. Conference: 54th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. ASH. 2012; 120: 2667. Reference Source
  • 17.  Naderi N, Yang DT: Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013; 137(4): 580–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 18.  Paiva B, Montes MC, García-Sanz R, et al.: Multiparameter flow cytometry for the identification of the Waldenström's clone in IgM-MGUS and Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: new criteria for differential diagnosis and risk stratification. Leukemia. 2014; 28(1): 166–73. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 19.  Mansoor A, Medeiros LJ, Weber DM, et al.: Cytogenetic findings in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Chromosomal abnormalities are associated with the polymorphous subtype and an aggressive clinical course. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001; 116(4): 543–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 20.  Schop RF, van Wier SA, Xu R, et al.: 6q deletion discriminates Waldenström macroglobulinemia from IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006; 169(2): 150–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 21.  Paiva B, Corchete LA, Vidriales MB, et al.: The cellular origin and malignant transformation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Blood. 2015; 125(15): 2370–80. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 22.  Varettoni M, Zibellini S, Rizzo E, et al.: Targeted next generation sequencing identifies novel genetic mutations in patients with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma or IgM monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Blood Conference: 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. ASH. 2016; 128: 2928. Reference Source
  • 23.  Xu L, Hunter ZR, Yang G, et al.: MYD88 L265P in Waldenström macroglobulinemia, immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy, and other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders using conventional and quantitative allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. Blood. 2013; 121(11): 2051–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 24.  Xu L, Hunter ZR, Yang G, et al.: Detection of MYD88 L265P in peripheral blood of patients with Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Leukemia. 2014; 28(8): 1698–704. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 25.  Trojani A, Greco A, Tedeschi A, et al.: Microarray demonstrates different gene expression profiling signatures between Waldenström macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013; 13: 208–10. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 26.  Trojani A, Greco A, Tedeschi A, et al.: Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of Bone Marrow CD19+ Cells As Well As Bone Marrow B Cell Clones of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) Vs. IgM Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (IgM-MGUS). Blood. 2014; 124: 5176–5176. Reference Source
  • 27.  Jego G, Bataille R, Geffroy-Luseau A, et al.: Pathogen-associated molecular patterns are growth and survival factors for human myeloma cells through Toll-like receptors. Leukemia. 2006; 20(6): 1130–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 28.  Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Buadi FK: Advances in the diagnosis, classification, risk stratification, and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: implications for recategorizing disease entities in the presence of evolving scientific evidence. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85(10): 945–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 29.  Varettoni M, Zibellini S, Capello D, et al.: Clues to pathogenesis of Waldenström macroglobulinemia and immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance provided by analysis of immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement and clustering of B-cell receptors. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013; 54(11): 2485–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 30.  van de Donk NW, Palumbo A, Johnsen HE, et al.: The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network. Haematologica. 2014; 99(6): 984–96. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 31.  Cao XX, Meng Q, Mao YY, et al.: The clinical spectrum of IgM monoclonal gammopathy: A single center retrospective study of 377 patients. Leuk Res. 2016; 46: 85–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 32.  Ramchandren S, Lewis RA: An update on monoclonal gammopathy and neuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012; 12(1): 102–10. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 33.  Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Langholm R, et al.: Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a population based clinical study of 86 patients. Haematologica. 2006; 91(4): 460–6. PubMed Abstract | F1000 Recommendation
  • 34.  Ramos-Casals M, Stone JH, Cid MC, et al.: The cryoglobulinaemias. Lancet. 2012; 379(9813): 348–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 35.  Rossi D, De Paoli L, Franceschetti S, et al.: Prevalence and clinical characteristics of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in a cohort of monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance. Br J Haematol 2007; 138(2): 249–52. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 36.  Sachchithanantham S, Roussel M, Palladini G, et al.: European Collaborative Study Defining Clinical Profile Outcomes and Novel Prognostic Criteria in Monoclonal Immunoglobulin M-Related Light Chain Amyloidosis. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(17): 2037–45. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 37.  Sokumbi O, Drage LA, Peters MS: Clinical and histopathologic review of Schnitzler syndrome: the Mayo Clinic experience (1972–2011). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012; 67(6): 1289–95. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 38.  Simon A, Asli B, Braun-Falco M, et al.: Schnitzler's syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Allergy. 2013; 68(5): 562–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 39.  Terpos E, Asli B, Christoulas D, et al.: Increased angiogenesis and enhanced bone formation in patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and urticarial skin rash: new insight into the biology of Schnitzler syndrome. Haematologica. 2012; 97(11): 1699–703. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 40.  Leung N, Bridoux F, Hutchison CA, et al.: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: when MGUS is no longer undetermined or insignificant. Blood. 2012; 120(22): 4292–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 41.  Vos JM, Gustine J, Rennke HG, et al.: Renal disease related to Waldenström macroglobulinaemia: incidence, pathology and clinical outcomes. Br J Haematol. 2016; 175(4): 623–30. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 42.  Kapoor P, Paludo J, Vallumsetla N, et al.: Waldenström macroglobulinemia: What a hematologist needs to know. Blood Rev. 2015; 29(5): 301–19. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 43.  Chaudhry HM, Mauermann ML, Rajkumar SV: Monoclonal Gammopathy-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy: Diagnosis and Management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017; 92(5): 838–50. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 44.  Dalakas MC, Quarles RH, Farrer RG, et al.: A controlled study of intravenous immunoglobulin in demyelinating neuropathy with IgM gammopathy. Ann Neurol. 1996; 40(5): 792–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 45.  Comi G, Roveri L, Swan A, et al.: A randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in IgM paraprotein associated demyelinating neuropathy. J Neurol. 2002; 249(10): 1370–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 46.  Benedetti L, Briani C, Franciotta D, et al.: Long-term effect of rituximab in anti-mag polyneuropathy. Neurology. 2008; 71(21): 1742–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 47.  Dalakas MC, Rakocevic G, Salajegheh M, et al.: Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2009; 65(3): 286–93. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 48.  Pestronk A, Florence J, Miller T, et al.: Treatment of IgM antibody associated polyneuropathies using rituximab. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2003; 74(4): 485–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
  • 49.  D'Sa S, Kersten MJ, Castillo JJ, et al.: Investigation and management of IgM and Waldenström-associated peripheral neuropathies: recommendations from the IWWM-8 consensus panel. Br J Haematol. 2017; 176(5): 728–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 50.  Muchtar E, Buadi FK, Dispenzieri A, et al.: Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis: From Basics to New Developments in Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy. Acta Haematol. 2016; 135(3): 172–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 51.  Néel A, Henry B, Barbarot S, et al.: Long-term effectiveness and safety of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) in Schnitzler's syndrome: a French multicenter study. Autoimmun Rev. 2014; 13(10): 1035–41. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 52.  de Koning HD, Schalkwijk J, van der Meer JW, et al.: Successful canakinumab treatment identifies IL-1β as a pivotal mediator in Schnitzler syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 128(6): 1352–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 53.  de Koning HD, Schalkwijk J, van der Ven-Jongekrijg J, et al.: Sustained efficacy of the monoclonal anti-interleukin-1 beta antibody canakinumab in a 9-month trial in Schnitzler's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72(10): 1634–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | F1000 Recommendation
  • 54.  Lust JA, Lacy MQ, Zeldenrust SR, et al.: Induction of a chronic disease state in patients with smoldering or indolent multiple myeloma by targeting interleukin 1{beta}-induced interleukin 6 production and the myeloma proliferative component. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009; 84(2): 114–22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Dec 2017
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Article Versions (1)
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
 - -
Citations
SEE MORE DETAILS
CITE
how to cite this article
Paludo J and Ansell SM. Advances in the understanding of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):2142 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12880.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 18 Dec 2017
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Dec 2017
Jorge J. Castillo, Bing Center for Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 0
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.13961.r28825
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Castillo JJ. Reviewer Report For: Advances in the understanding of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):2142 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.13961.r28825)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-2142/v1#referee-response-28825
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Dec 2017
Roman Hájek, Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic 
Approved
VIEWS 0
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.13961.r28824
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hájek R. Reviewer Report For: Advances in the understanding of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):2142 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.13961.r28824)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-2142/v1#referee-response-28824
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Dec 2017
Comment

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved
The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved
Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Reviewer Reports

Invited Reviewers
1 2
Version 1
18 Dec 17 		read read
  1. Roman Hájek, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
  2. Jorge J. Castillo, Bing Center for Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment
Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
    Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
    Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
    Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
    Sign In
    If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

    The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
    Email address not valid, please try again

    You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

    You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

    Code not correct, please try again
    Email us for further assistance.
    Server error, please try again.