Keywords
Microcephaly, ASPM, Exome Sequencing, MCPH5, MCPH
Microcephaly, ASPM, Exome Sequencing, MCPH5, MCPH
Microcephaly with no other anomalies in the brain structure is termed as true microcephaly or autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH), where the pathology of brain is generally congenital and static with mild to moderate intellectual disability (ID) (http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?Expert=2512). Microcephaly is seen in numerous syndromes1 and even in true microcephaly, there is possibility of more than one gene implicated2,3, thus screening for a single gene may not be very fruitful in this population. Recently, whole exome sequencing (WES) has emerged as a potential approach to delineate the molecular pathology in the microcephaly population with ID1. Using WES, we report a de novo frame shift (insertion) mutation in the calponin-homology domain of ASPM (Abnormal Spindle-Like, Microcephaly-Associated) gene which is a candidate for MCPH5 (Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive) in a client with true microcephaly.
The client sequenced was under the research project cerebral palsy and spectrum conditions (seizures, mental retardation, microcephaly and other neurodevelopmental disorders), which aims to find disease causing mutations in a sample of 100 clients recruited from our Motor Speech Disorders Clinic at Department of Clinical Services, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing. This is a research project and hence ethical clearance was obtained, reference was mentioned in Methods. The client is a 15 year old female born out of a consanguineous union (parents were first cousins) diagnosed with microcephaly (occipitofrontal head circumference was 40 centimetres) and developmental delay. The mother had a history of one miscarriage at the third month of gestation and a still birth (female) at the eighth month (Figure 1A). An ultra sound scan of the foetus (client) at the eight month of pregnancy revealed delayed development. The client was born at term through normal delivery with no birth trauma. Her younger brother was clinically normal. The client had a squint at birth and had mild ID. At age 12 years, her developmental age was between 66 to 78 months as assessed by the Developmental Screening Test (DST)4. Her Receptive Language Age (RLA) and Expressive Language Age (ELA) was 18–20 months as revealed by Receptive Expressive Emergent Language Scale (REELS)5. She had a vocabulary of around 50 words and was able to comprehend commands, would recognize family members and common objects. She expressed herself through single word utterances, gestures and pointing.
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Body, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing [Ethical clearance reference number: SH/CDN/ARF-40/2016-17]. After obtaining written informed consent from the parents of the client, 5 ml of blood was collected from all family members (mother, father and brother) into EDTA coated vacutainers and DNA was isolated using Pure Link Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 100ng of genomic DNA was used to construct Exome libraries using Ion Ampliseq Exome RDY Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as per the manufacturer’s protocol and these were quantified using High Sensitivity genomic DNA Assay on Qubit 3.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Approximately 25 Pico moles of the library was used with the Ion Chef Instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for template generation followed by, enrichment of templated ion sphere particles. Sequencing was performed using Hi-Q chemistry on Ion Proton system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at our facility. Two samples were sequenced per chip and run generated 10.98 GB. The sample in question yielded 28,105,510 reads with 185 mean base pair length.
QC filtered reads were aligned to reference genome GRCh37/hg19. Of the 28.1 million reads, 99.27% reads were on target with a mean genomic coverage of 91.83%. Mean depth was 81.32x with 89.87% mean uniformity. Variants were called from raw data using inbuilt variant caller plug-in present in Torrent suite (Version 5.2.2). Ion Reporter (version 5.4) annotated 38,085 variants from 13,013 genes to hg19 from the VCF file generated by variant caller plug-in. Variant prioritization was performed as shown in Figure 1B.
From the pedigree chart, we assumed autosomal recessive inheritance and filtered out heterozygous variants. This resulted in 75 homozygous variants from 67 genes. We found a novel frame shift insertion in exon 13 of the ASPM gene [(NM_018136.4), c.3384_3385 Insertion T], which induces a termination codon (p.Lys1129Ter) leading to non functional ASPM protein. Insertion was verified by Sanger sequencing using BDTv3 on 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Homozygous insertion was confirmed in the client. Both parents and unaffected sibling were found to be heterozygous carriers (Figure 1A).
ASPM protein determines cerebral cortical size. During initial stages of corticogenesis, the ASPM protein is essential in facilitating the proliferation of neural progenitors6. This process determines the cerebral cortical volume7 which has tripled over the last ~ 2 million years, leading to exceptionally big brain in humans compared to their primate counterparts8. This increase in the human brain size is believed to be one contributing factor for the emergence of higher cognitive function and language ability that are restricted to humans8. So far, 17 genes have been reported in which, mutations lead to the development of MCPH3,4,9–26. The phenotype(s) arising from pathogenic variants in these 17 genes are each named from MCPH 1 – MCPH 17 (there are 17 genes identified so far that cause autosomal recessive primary microcephaly, MCPH arising from these 17 genes are termed from MCPH 1 to MCPH 17) and the majority of the genetic load in MCPH is contributed by the ASPM gene, making MPCH5 the most prevalent of all the types of MCPH. Frame shift and protein truncating mutations in ASPM cause MCPH5 and these mutations are restricted to be seen in homozygous state only in the MCPH5 population27,28 (i.e., heterozygous mutations does not have any effect and only homozygous mutations will cause the MCPH).
The novel insertion mutation found in the ASPM gene in the present study segregated with the phenotype in the family, establishes the role of the novel frame shift mutation identifiedin the development of MCPH5 in the case studied. Candidate gene study by Sanger sequencing is time consuming and not economical when compared to WES. Given its higher diagnostic yield as evident by published studies on neurodevelopmental disorders2 and also from the present work, we support the findings reported by Rump et al. (2016) which states that WES in microcephaly population will end unnecessary further evaluations and aid in early appropriate interventions2.
Written informed consent to carry out the study and for the publication of the client’s and client’s sibling’s clinical details were obtained from the parents. Clinical details were obtained from the parents of the client.
Sequence data for the insertion mutation (client sample) was deposited in Genbank under accession number MG063723.
SBD performed Exome Sequencing and Sanger sequencing, NS, NS and SK conceived the study, SV collected the data and its curation, SBD, SK performed data analysis and prepared manuscript, NS, NS supervised the work and corrected the draft, all the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Grants to carry out the present project were provided by All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, an autonomous Institute under Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, India.
The authors thank the participants for their cooperation. Our sincere thanks to Dr. S.R.Savithri, Director, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore for permitting us to undertake the work.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Memon MM, Raza SI, Basit S, Kousar R, et al.: A novel WDR62 mutation causes primary microcephaly in a Pakistani family.Mol Biol Rep. 2013; 40 (1): 591-5 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Monogenic disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, hemoglobinopathies
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 21 Dec 17 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)