ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Sciatic nerve schwannoma - a rare cause of sciatica

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 14 Mar 2017
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Herein we report a rare case of a sciatic nerve schwannoma causing sciatica in a 69-year-old female. Sciatic nerve schwannoma is a rare entity. It should always be considered as a possible cause of sciatica in patients that present with symptoms of sciatica with no prolapsed disc in the lumbar spine and a negative crossed straight leg raise test. Timely diagnosis and complete excision of the lesion leads to complete resolution of the symptoms of such patients.

Keywords

sciatica, sciatic nerve, schwannoma,

Introduction

Sciatic nerve schwannoma is a rare cause of sciatica13. However, it remains a probable diagnosis in patients that present with symptoms of sciatica with no prolapsed disc in the lumbar spine and a negative crossed straight leg raise test, suggesting the presence of a far lateral disc. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) along the course of the sciatic nerve is the cornerstone for coming to a correct diagnosis and thereafter implementing a right therapeutic decision1. This case report highlights the need to consider sciatic nerve schwannoma as a possible cause of a sciatica in patients that have a negative lumbar spine MRI, so that the correct therapeutic decision can be made.

Case report

A 69-year-old female from eastern Nepal presented to our outpatient clinic with a history suggestive of right sided sciatica for the last 2 years. She had been evaluated before for the same, but without any positive diagnosis. The patient denied any history of trauma or any alteration in her bladder and bowel habits, or of any symptoms which is suggestive of intermittent claudication. Upon neurological examination, the power in all the muscle groups in her lower limbs was normal - 5/5 as per the MRC Muscle scale (used with the permission of the Medical Research Council). Her ankle and the knee reflexes were normal and she had no sensory indifference in any of the dermatomes in the affected limb, as compared to the normal limb. There was no wasting of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle. Straight leg raise test and a crossed straight leg raise test were both negative. Her stance was also normal. While sitting in a squatting position, the patient complained of an exaggeration of her symptoms. We thereafter made a differential diagnosis of either a sciatic nerve tumor or a Pyriformis syndrome. Radio imaging with help of an MRI scan revealed the presence of a sciatic tumor alongside the sciatic nerve, near the ischial tuberosity on the right side (Figure 1). The unusual location of the lesion was in favor of a schwannoma rather than a neurofibroma (Figure 2).

df09b025-a8a2-4a81-b470-74689bf497e3_figure1.gif

Figure 1. MRI scan showing an oval, well circumscribed and homogenous lesion lying near the ischial tuberosity.

df09b025-a8a2-4a81-b470-74689bf497e3_figure2.gif

Figure 2. MRI scan revealing the unusual location of the tumor with a hypo-intense rim along the course of the sciatic nerve.

The patient was counseled for the operative intervention that would remedy her persistent symptoms. A subgluteal approach was taken for the surgical corridor. Intra-operatively, a 3×3 cm2 well circumscribed lesion was seen lying within the sciatic nerve. It was carefully dissected off the nerve fascicles and fully removed (Figure 3). The sciatic nerve was confirmed to be intact intra-operatively with the aid of an intra-operative nerve monitor.

df09b025-a8a2-4a81-b470-74689bf497e3_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Gross image of the excised lesion.

Postoperatively, the patient was completely free of her previous symptoms. She made a full recovery with no adverse events and was discharged on the fifth day. The histopathological report confirmed the diagnosis of a sciatic nerve schwannoma, owing to the presence of Antoni A and B areas and Verocay bodies (Figure 4). The patient returned to her follow up visit at 1 month completely asymptomatic.

df09b025-a8a2-4a81-b470-74689bf497e3_figure4.gif

Figure 4. Photomicrograph of tissue taken from the lesion excised from the patient showing cells within Antoni A and Antoni B regions that are characteristic of schwannoma.

Discussion

Sciatic nerve schwannoma is a rare cause of sciatica, occurring only in 1 of every 100 cases1. It should be suspected in a patient who presents with a typical history of sciatica but with MRI scans that fail to reveal any inter-vertebral disc prolapse in the lumbar spine1. Other differential diagnoses included sciatic nerve tumors, a far lateral disc or Pyriformis syndrome. The main imaging modality for the diagnosis of sciatic nerve schwannoma was MRI imaging of the affected sciatic nerve.

Neurofibromas are intrinsic lesions that cause fusiform dilatation of the nerve, since the lesions are intermixed with the nerve1. On the other hand, schwannomas are placed in such a way that nerve fascicles are being pushed to the periphery, allowing their safe preservation following excision of the schwannoma2,46. Intra-operative nerve monitoring helps immensely to outline the course of the nerve and define the boundary of the tumor during its removal. Definitive diagnosis however is only possible after the histopathological studies.

For the excision of such lesions, both a transgluteal or a subgluteal approach can be taken7,8. In both these approaches, the patient is placed in a prone position. The sciatic nerve invariably lies midway between the ischial tuberosity, medially, and the greater trochanter, laterally. A subgluteal approach may lead to prolonged discomfort due to retraction of the soft tissues and the gluteal muscles9. A transgluteal approach may sometimes lead to disastrous consequences due to retraction of the muscle arteries within the pelvis. However it provides a wider surgical corridor up to the sciatic notch9.

Histopathology is the mainstay for differentiating the type of tumor involved, with only an occasional need for immunohistochemical markers like S1002,5,6.

Recurrence is uncommon following complete excision6. Malignant transformation of such lesion is rare1,2. Good outcome is expected following its complete excision because of its benign nature2.

Conclusion

Though rare, sciatic nerve schwannoma should be taken into account for the differential diagnosis in a patient presenting with long standing sciatica without positive findings of a disc in the lumbar spine. MRI imaging of the nerve is prudent for the diagnosis of the lesion. It is imperative to outline the course of the nerve and to define the boundary of the lesion to preserve the nerve fascicles. This can be facilitated with the aid of an intraoperative nerve monitor.

Consent

Both written and verbal informed consent for publication of images and clinical data related to this case was sought and obtained from the patient.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Mar 2017
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Munakomi S and Shrestha P. Case Report: Sciatic nerve schwannoma - a rare cause of sciatica [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:267 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11108.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 14 Mar 2017
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 20 Mar 2017
Guru Dutta Satyarthee, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Delhi, India 
Approved
VIEWS 8
Microsurgical excision of sciatic nerve schwannoma with good outcome
 
The authors reported an interesting case of sciatic nerve  schwannoma in a 69-year old female, who was symptomatic for two-years, magnetic resonance imaging revealed  presence of a mass ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Satyarthee GD. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Sciatic nerve schwannoma - a rare cause of sciatica [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:267 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11983.r21114)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 15 Mar 2017
Ravi Dadlani, Department of Neurosurgery, Apollo Speciality Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India 
Approved
VIEWS 16
I congratulate the authors on an interesting case report.

It is a well written report but I would like to suggest a few additional points. 

Since several such case reports have been published earlier, ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Dadlani R. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Sciatic nerve schwannoma - a rare cause of sciatica [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:267 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11983.r20984)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Mar 2017
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.