Keywords
sciatica, sciatic nerve, schwannoma,
sciatica, sciatic nerve, schwannoma,
Sciatic nerve schwannoma is a rare cause of sciatica1–3. However, it remains a probable diagnosis in patients that present with symptoms of sciatica with no prolapsed disc in the lumbar spine and a negative crossed straight leg raise test, suggesting the presence of a far lateral disc. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) along the course of the sciatic nerve is the cornerstone for coming to a correct diagnosis and thereafter implementing a right therapeutic decision1. This case report highlights the need to consider sciatic nerve schwannoma as a possible cause of a sciatica in patients that have a negative lumbar spine MRI, so that the correct therapeutic decision can be made.
A 69-year-old female from eastern Nepal presented to our outpatient clinic with a history suggestive of right sided sciatica for the last 2 years. She had been evaluated before for the same, but without any positive diagnosis. The patient denied any history of trauma or any alteration in her bladder and bowel habits, or of any symptoms which is suggestive of intermittent claudication. Upon neurological examination, the power in all the muscle groups in her lower limbs was normal - 5/5 as per the MRC Muscle scale (used with the permission of the Medical Research Council). Her ankle and the knee reflexes were normal and she had no sensory indifference in any of the dermatomes in the affected limb, as compared to the normal limb. There was no wasting of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle. Straight leg raise test and a crossed straight leg raise test were both negative. Her stance was also normal. While sitting in a squatting position, the patient complained of an exaggeration of her symptoms. We thereafter made a differential diagnosis of either a sciatic nerve tumor or a Pyriformis syndrome. Radio imaging with help of an MRI scan revealed the presence of a sciatic tumor alongside the sciatic nerve, near the ischial tuberosity on the right side (Figure 1). The unusual location of the lesion was in favor of a schwannoma rather than a neurofibroma (Figure 2).
The patient was counseled for the operative intervention that would remedy her persistent symptoms. A subgluteal approach was taken for the surgical corridor. Intra-operatively, a 3×3 cm2 well circumscribed lesion was seen lying within the sciatic nerve. It was carefully dissected off the nerve fascicles and fully removed (Figure 3). The sciatic nerve was confirmed to be intact intra-operatively with the aid of an intra-operative nerve monitor.
Postoperatively, the patient was completely free of her previous symptoms. She made a full recovery with no adverse events and was discharged on the fifth day. The histopathological report confirmed the diagnosis of a sciatic nerve schwannoma, owing to the presence of Antoni A and B areas and Verocay bodies (Figure 4). The patient returned to her follow up visit at 1 month completely asymptomatic.
Sciatic nerve schwannoma is a rare cause of sciatica, occurring only in 1 of every 100 cases1. It should be suspected in a patient who presents with a typical history of sciatica but with MRI scans that fail to reveal any inter-vertebral disc prolapse in the lumbar spine1. Other differential diagnoses included sciatic nerve tumors, a far lateral disc or Pyriformis syndrome. The main imaging modality for the diagnosis of sciatic nerve schwannoma was MRI imaging of the affected sciatic nerve.
Neurofibromas are intrinsic lesions that cause fusiform dilatation of the nerve, since the lesions are intermixed with the nerve1. On the other hand, schwannomas are placed in such a way that nerve fascicles are being pushed to the periphery, allowing their safe preservation following excision of the schwannoma2,4–6. Intra-operative nerve monitoring helps immensely to outline the course of the nerve and define the boundary of the tumor during its removal. Definitive diagnosis however is only possible after the histopathological studies.
For the excision of such lesions, both a transgluteal or a subgluteal approach can be taken7,8. In both these approaches, the patient is placed in a prone position. The sciatic nerve invariably lies midway between the ischial tuberosity, medially, and the greater trochanter, laterally. A subgluteal approach may lead to prolonged discomfort due to retraction of the soft tissues and the gluteal muscles9. A transgluteal approach may sometimes lead to disastrous consequences due to retraction of the muscle arteries within the pelvis. However it provides a wider surgical corridor up to the sciatic notch9.
Histopathology is the mainstay for differentiating the type of tumor involved, with only an occasional need for immunohistochemical markers like S1002,5,6.
Recurrence is uncommon following complete excision6. Malignant transformation of such lesion is rare1,2. Good outcome is expected following its complete excision because of its benign nature2.
Though rare, sciatic nerve schwannoma should be taken into account for the differential diagnosis in a patient presenting with long standing sciatica without positive findings of a disc in the lumbar spine. MRI imaging of the nerve is prudent for the diagnosis of the lesion. It is imperative to outline the course of the nerve and to define the boundary of the lesion to preserve the nerve fascicles. This can be facilitated with the aid of an intraoperative nerve monitor.
Both written and verbal informed consent for publication of images and clinical data related to this case was sought and obtained from the patient.
Both authors contributed equally in reviewing the literature, formatting the paper, revising and editing the final format.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
References
1. Munakomi S, Shrestha P: Case Report: Sciatic nerve schwannoma - a rare cause of sciatica. F1000Research. 2017; 6. Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 14 Mar 17 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)