Keywords
ocular tuberculosis, miliary tuberculosis, tubercles, ocular inflammation,
ocular tuberculosis, miliary tuberculosis, tubercles, ocular inflammation,
Tuberculosis is a significant cause of uveitis, with published literature describing a spectrum of ocular inflammation that includes anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis and posterior uveitis or even panuveitis in patients with different presentations of systemic tuberculosis. However, little data exists on the correlation between specific systemic presentations and any ocular inflammation that may co-exist.
Miliary tuberculosis is a specific systemic presentation that is commonly associated with ocular inflammation. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients admitted with a diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis, to assess the specific patterns of any associated ocular inflammation.
The study was conducted at Lilavati Hospital (Mumbai, India), which is a private tertiary healthcare facility. The Institutional Ethics Committee of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust Research Centre approved this study for publication (09/02/2017).
We defined miliary tuberculosis as “tiny, discrete, widespread and uniform-sized lung opacities 2 mm or less in diameter (millet grains) on X ray or CT scan”. We retrieved the records of matching patients from 2006–2016 and excluded records of patients with HIV infection, autoimmune disease or on immunosuppressive therapy.
As part of a regular protocol that recognizes the diagnostic value of fundoscopy, all patients with a probable diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis were referred for an ophthalmic evaluation. All patients or their next of kin provided written informed consent for an ocular evaluation. Following this consent, patients underwent assessment of best-corrected visual acuity, slit lamp examination, and dilated indirect fundus examination and intraocular pressure assessment with an applanation tonometer. Patients unable to undergo a full evaluation underwent dilated indirect fundus examination at the bedside but were scheduled to complete the evaluation once their systemic status had improved. All patients who gave their written informed consent underwent fundus photography or optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies for documentation. All patients underwent both tests.
The following additional data was retrieved from patient records: age, sex, findings of chest X rays, CT scans (chest, brain or abdominal) and laboratory data (complete and differential blood counts, mantoux testing, renal and liver function tests at the least). Microbiological data included blood cultures (aerobic, anaerobic, mycobacterial cultures) and cultures of sputum studies.
In total, 11 immunocompetent patients were identified. These included 5 males and 6 females with ages ranging from 4 to 73 years (mean 42.5). All were ethnically Indian and their socio-economic status varied from the indigent residing in high-density tenements/slums to the affluent. Sources of referral included transfer from neighborhood facilities or from family physicians.
The common modes of clinical presentation of miliary tuberculosis included persistent fever, (7 patients: 4 males and 3 females with ages ranging from 4–73 years) or sepsis (4 patients: 3 females and 1 male with ages ranging from 16–71 years). 6 patients underwent a detailed evaluation soon after admission. The remaining 5, who were significantly ill, underwent only dilated fundus examination at that time.
The eyes of all 11 patients were analyzed (22 eyes in total). All patients were visually asymptomatic. Visual acuity studies were available for 6 of the 11 patients and were normal with 6/6 best-corrected visual acuity. All 22 eyes gave normal findings (no cells/flare) on slit lamp examination. Dilated fundus examination showed single or multiple tubercles bilaterally in 7 patients and unilaterally in 4 patients. No vitritis or raised intraocular pressure was seen in any patient. (Table 1).
ARDS: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; CNS: Central Nervous System; RE: right eye; LE: left eye; BE: both eyes.
4 patients (3 females and 1 male, ages ranging from 16–71 years) gave consent for both fundus photography and OCT to be performed, and both tests were carried out.
Additionally, patients (2 females, 42 and 44 years old) had additional signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 4 patients (3 men and 1 women; ages ranging from 4–71) had central nervous system (CNS) granulomas found in the frontal, parietal or temporal regions.
A standard therapy of INH, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide was given. Systemic steroids were used at the discretion of the treating physician. Follow-up was available for 3–12 months for 4 patients (3 female and 1 male, ages ranging from 16 to 71, mean 30.5) until the choroidal tubercles were healed.
The clinical and ocular data of these patients is available in Dataset 11.
Of the 1.7 billion individuals infected with tuberculosis, only 10 % will develop an active infection in their lifetime, due to a protective immune response that can also be damaging to the tissues and is responsible for the clinical picture seen during active disease. The various clinical presentations are the result of a complex interaction between immune cells, secreted cytokines and varying combinations of systemic Th1 and/or Th2 responses.
Miliary tuberculosis accounts for 2% of all new cases of tuberculosis and approximately 20% of all extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases2. It is a potentially fatal form of disseminated TB that follows from massive hematogenous dissemination. Its etiopathogenesis involves immune responses skewed towards a Th2 response that inhibits protective responses (granuloma formation), and this may permit widespread dissemination3.
The ocular correlates of the systemic picture have been less well studied. Mehta analyzed the PET/CT scans of 27 patients in total; 13 with anterior uveitis, 7 with intermediate uveitis, 6 with pan-uveitis, 2 with vasculitis and 1 with multifocal serpiginous-like choroidopathy. 14 showed metabolically active, largely mediastinal, lymphadenopathy, and lung parenchymal disease was only rarely seen. The author postulated that a specific immune response to mycobacteria in the target tissues was responsible for this pattern of disease; i.e. systemic lymph node tuberculosis with its ocular correlate in the form of uveitis, with marked anterior and intermediate inflammation4.
In our cohorts, who differ significantly in their systemic presentation from the previously mentioned study, the ocular findings were exclusively in the form of choroidal tuberculosis, either unilaterally or bilaterally. Slit lamp examination revealed a marked absence of anterior or intermediate segment inflammation. All the patients had evidence of tubercles, thus confirming the diagnostic role of fundoscopy, but a larger cohort is needed to confirm the absence of anterior segment inflammation.
We suggest that this pattern of choroidal/retinal tuberculosis in the absence of anterior and intermediate segment inflammation is specific for miliary tuberculosis and may be due to a specific immune response. A larger study that assesses the CD4 and CD8 counts and the cytokine profile is needed to elucidate the exact nature of the immune response responsible.
Dataset 1: Clinical and ocular data of study patients.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Uveitis and ocular immunology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Sharma SK, Mohan A, Sharma A: Challenges in the diagnosis & treatment of miliary tuberculosis.Indian J Med Res. 2012; 135 (5): 703-30 PubMed AbstractCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Uveitis and Retinal diseases
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Biswas J, Badrinath SS: Ocular morbidity in patients with active systemic tuberculosis.Int Ophthalmol. 19 (5): 293-8 PubMed AbstractCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Version 1 03 Apr 17 |
read | read | read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)