ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Correspondence

From disease modelling to personalised therapy in patients with CEP290 mutations

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 12 May 2017
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Rare diseases collection.

Abstract

Mutations that give rise to premature termination codons are a common cause of inherited genetic diseases. When transcripts containing these changes are generated, they are usually rapidly removed by the cell through the process of nonsense-mediated decay. Here we discuss observed changes in transcripts of the centrosomal protein CEP290 resulting not from degradation, but from changes in exon usage. We also comment on a landmark paper (Drivas et al. Sci Transl Med. 2015) where modelling this process of exon usage may be used to predict disease severity in CEP290 ciliopathies, and how understanding this process may potentially be used for therapeutic benefit in the future.

Keywords

Cep290, splicing, genetic pleiotropy, exon-skipping, Leber congential amaurosis, Joubert syndrome, nephronophthisis

Mechanisms of aberrant transcript removal

Nonsense mutations are changes to the coding sequence of a gene, which lead to a termination (stop) codon being coded for in place of an amino acid, giving rise to a truncated protein. These types of mutations are common in human disease and account for around a third of inherited genetic disorders1. The resultant abnormally truncated proteins can have significant deleterious effects on the cell. A truncated protein may display a loss-of-function or in some cases a dominant-negative function that can seriously impact on normal biological processes. Two mechanisms have been identified by which cells remove unwanted transcripts, thereby avoiding production of abnormal protein. The first of these is nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), whereby transcripts containing a nonsense mutation are targeted for degradation giving rise to a reduction in transcript2,3. The second method that has been described is that of nonsense-associated altered splicing (NAS), a mechanism that promotes the increase in transcripts that are missing the exon containing the deleterious mutation4.

Many genes are alternately spliced in order to generate proteins with unique properties and functions5. However, NAS, triggered by the presence of a premature stop codon, leads to splicing of an exon that may not normally be spliced. Evidence of NAS has been shown following mutation of CEP2906, a gene that, when mutated, is associated with a spectrum of inherited genetic disorders, including Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), Senior Løken syndrome (SLS), Joubert syndrome (JBTS) and Meckel-Gruber syndrome710. The compound heterozygous mutations described in a family with LCA by Littink et al. included a novel premature termination codon in exon 7 (c.451C>T, p.Arg151*). When mRNA transcripts were sequenced, skipping of either exon 7 alone, or exon 7 and exon 8 was revealed, which was never seen in controls6. The authors concluded that the LCA phenotype seen in the patient, which was less severe than expected, was due to a functional CEP290 protein being produced due to NAS. The genetic pleiotropy exhibited in patients with CEP290 mutations may therefore be explained in part by the differential ability of NAS to give rise to a functional protein in the event of a premature termination codon being generated. One can surmise that the greater the level of near-normal (wild-type) protein that can be generated, the lower the disease burden and the milder the phenotype.

Predicting disease severity using alternate splicing models

The recent landmark article by Drivas et al. has provided some novel insights into the potential modelling of CE290 mutations, based around the idea that genetic pleiotropy may arise as a result of differences in protein levels11. Known mutations in CEP290 were classified into categories based on the premise that the severity of disease correlates with the impact on the overall level of functional protein that may be generated. Missense mutations were classified as mild, as they should impact less on the level of transcript, whereas nonsense mutations were either moderate or severe depending on whether or not they occur in a codon that begins and ends in the same frame and can therefore be spliced out with no change in reading frame. In theory, transcripts containing nonsense mutations would be removed by NMD, so the overall level of CEP290 transcript would be lower in those patients harbouring mutations in exons that may not be easily skipped by NAS. Using this simple model, it was shown that the disease severity does correlate fairly well with the predicted level of CEP290 protein. The authors then modified the model to take into account skipping of regions of known functional importance. Mutations that map to these regions have more severe phenotypes than can be explained by the original model, due to the fact that skipping out these exons gives rise to a protein with reduced functionality.

When the model was tested against genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with varying symptoms, it did appear to accurately predict the phenotype from the given genotype11. Furthermore, the authors showed that for mutations that give rise to a premature termination codon, the exon in which the mutation has occurred is indeed spliced out, as would be expected if NAS were activated. However, what was unexpected was that in control samples these exons were also shown to be spliced out. Perhaps even more surprisingly, the spliced levels observed in control samples were a similar level to that of the patient samples. The fact that the levels observed in controls are the same as seen in patients suggests that it is in fact not NAS that is leading to splicing of these exons; splicing is simply happening at a basal level and is not in any way increased due to the presence of the mutation.

Importantly, while it was shown by PCR that small amounts of these transcripts existed, the authors were unable to detect transcripts arising from basal exon skipping via direct RNA-sequencing, which suggests the infrequent nature of these alternative splicing events and so brings into question the biological relevance of this mechanism. It must also be noted that there are patients who have the same or similar mutations, but present with symptoms of differing severity. One reported CEP290 mutation (c.21G>T; p.Trp7Cys) gives rise to both SLS and JBTS phenotypes8,9. This mutation is in exon 2, which contains the start codon, and so may not be spliced out. In this case, the genotype alone is unable to be used to predict how the transcript level will impact on the severity of the disease and is therefore no use as a proxy measure for phenotype. Similarly, there have been several patients reported with a nonsense mutation in exon 36 (c.4723A>T; p.1575*), who present with LCA and not JBTS1214, even though this mutation is only a few bases upstream of the c.4732G>T; p.Glu1578* mutation with JBTS phenotypes8. It must therefore be acknowledged that exon skipping is not the sole source of genetic pleiotropy.

Manipulation of splicing for therapeutic benefit

Patients suffering from non-syndromic LCA commonly have a mutation within the CEP290 gene (c.2991+1655A>G), which creates a cryptic splice site, resulting in the inclusion of an aberrant exon of 128 bp that contains a premature stop codon (p.Cys998*). Alternative splicing of the cryptic exon occurs in some, but not all, mRNA transcripts15,16. Collin et al. successfully exploited the use of antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) to boost an efficient skipping of the mutant cryptic exon: by transfecting AONs in patient-derived lymphoblastoid cells, they were able to redirect normal splicing of CEP29017. As a proof of principle for the feasibility of altering the splicing pattern of Cep290 in vivo in the affected tissue, intravitreal injection of wild type mice with naked splice-switching AON led to the modification of Cep290 splicing in retinal cells18. Similarly, naked AONs and adeno-associated virus-packaged AONs were administered to a humanized mouse model (Cep290lca/lca) that contains intron 26 of the human CEP290 gene carrying the c.2991+1655A>G mutation. Delivery by intraocular injection caused a statistically significant reduction of aberrantly spliced Cep290 up to 1 month after injection, without compromising the retinal structure19. However, humanized Cep290lca/lca mouse fails to recapitulate the human clinical features, making it impossible to understand the actual impact of AON-directed restoration of wild type Cep290 transcript on the retinal phenotype1820. Nevertheless, the ability of splice-switching AONs not only to cause an upregulation of wild type CEP290 mRNA to normal levels, but also to restore otherwise impaired ciliogenesis in patient-derived fibroblast cells, demonstrates, although only in a limited way, that an increase of correctly spliced transcript can indeed result in a phenotypical rescue21.

Using a similar approach, AONs can be exploited to promote skipping of exons carrying nonsense mutations to increase the abundance of slightly shortened transcripts and near-full length functional protein, as in the case of mutated dystrophin in Duchenne muscular dystrophy22.

The majority of CEP290 mutations are nonsense mutations that introduce a premature stop codon in the mRNA9. In addition to retinal degeneration, these mutations cause a wide spectrum of multisystemic ciliopathies, such as the cystic kidney disease nephronophthisis, which results in end stage renal failure at a median age of 13 years. Due to the relatively slow progression of this disease, there is a potential time for therapeutic intervention. If CEP290 protein levels could be restored by inducing exon skipping, disease progression may be significantly slowed or even halted. As we move closer to personalised medicine, especially in the arena of rare disease, it is likely that therapeutic strategies such as this may become routine, with unique therapies being designed based on the patient’s genotype. Understanding the way in which deleterious mutations are dealt with in vivo will have a significant impact on how successfully these therapies can be implemented.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 12 May 2017
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Molinari E, Srivastava S, Sayer JA and Ramsbottom SA. From disease modelling to personalised therapy in patients with CEP290 mutations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:669 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11553.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 12 May 2017
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Jun 2017
Ruxandra Bachmann-Gagescu, Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Institute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland 
Approved
VIEWS 12
The correspondence article by Molinari and colleagues discusses potential therapeutic options through manipulation of splicing for patients harbouring CEP290 mutations. This represents an important topic given the role of CEP290 in human disease and the intense research focusing on understanding ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Bachmann-Gagescu R. Reviewer Report For: From disease modelling to personalised therapy in patients with CEP290 mutations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:669 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.12479.r23067)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Jun 2017
Patricia D. Wilson, Centre for Nephrology, UCL Medical School, University College London, London, UK 
Approved
VIEWS 11
This clearly-written and well-argued manuscript highlights recent pertinent findings concerning mechanisms underlying exon skipping and splicing in determination of disease severity in patients with CEP290 mutations. Evidence cited is consistent with the notion that the severity of disease is inversely ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Wilson PD. Reviewer Report For: From disease modelling to personalised therapy in patients with CEP290 mutations [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:669 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.12479.r23066)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 12 May 2017
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.