Keywords
CHEK2, familial breast and ovarian cancer, Colombia, CHEK2 c.1100delC, moderate-penetrance
CHEK2, familial breast and ovarian cancer, Colombia, CHEK2 c.1100delC, moderate-penetrance
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among women1, and in Colombia, it is the main cause of death by cancer in women1. Of all cases of BC, approximately 5–10% have a strong inherited component, of which 25% is explained by germline mutations in the genes BRCA12 and BRCA23,4. To explain the BRCA1/2-negative cases, a polygenic model in which a large number of low- to moderate-penetrance genes as collectively responsible for the disease has been proposed5–7.
CHEK2 has been proposed as a moderate penetrance BC susceptibility gene8. This gene controls cell cycle and apoptosis and is activated in response to DNA double-strand breakage8. Several mutations in the CHEK2 gene have been found, being the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation the most studied; this is a truncating mutation in exon 10 that abolishes kinase activity of the protein9. The role of this mutation in breast cancer was confirmed by Meijers-Heijboer et al8. and in several other studies10–22. The mutation CHEK2 c.1100delC was identified in approximately 5% of families with BC that did not have mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 and was estimated to confer moderate risk (20–25%) of developing breast cancer for female mutation carriers23.
Data on the contribution of moderate- or low-penetrance alleles to BC in South American populations are scarce. In this study, using a case-control design, we studied the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation in order to investigate the potential influence of this variant on familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer (BOC) susceptibility in a Colombian cohort.
This was a case-control study conducted from 2009 to 2013 with 131 cases and 131 controls, which was carried out to determine the–association between the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation and increased risk of developing breast cancer. This study was approved by the Ethical Board of the School of Medicine of the University of Valle. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants.
Cases. Our study cohort was composed of 131 Colombian familial breast/ovarian cancer (BOC) cases (BRCA1/BRCA2 negative). The patients were selected from the files of different health/Cancer centers after obtaining permission from each Center to participate in this study. These centers were located in the cities of Cali (Hospital Universitario del Valle, FUNCANCER, Clínica Rafael Uribe Uribe, Hematooncologos), Armenia (Oncólogos de Occidente), Cartagena (Fundación Hospital Infantil Napoleón Franco Pareja, Fundación mujeres por tus senos) and Bucaramanga (Insuasty Oncologia e Investigación). The selected cases met, at least, one of the following criteria: at least three family members with breast or ovarian cancer at any age; two first degree family members affected, at least one, with breast cancer before 41 years of age or with ovarian cancer at any age; one breast cancer case diagnosed before 35 years or less; one ovarian cancer case diagnosed before age 31. For all index cases, breast and ovarian cancers were verified by the original pathology report. After the selection of the patients based in the inclusion criteria (Dataset 1), they were asked to give a blood sample collected by a nurse or technician from each health/Cancer center and then sent to our laboratory.
Controls. The sample of healthy Colombian controls (n=131) consisted of unrelated individuals, with no personal or familial history of cancer, these individuals were interviewed and informed as to the aims of the study and who gave their informed written consent for anonymous testing. This control cohort was recruited in the same cities where the study cases were collected and also matched by age, sex and socioeconomic strata.
Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood samples of 131 the BC cases and the 131 healthy controls, for both groups the blood samples were collected specifically for this study. Samples were analyzed using allele-specific PCR (ASPCR)24 to detect the presence of CHEK2 c.1100delC, using the primers reported by Rashid et al25. The products of the ASPCR were visualized by electrophoresis on an 8% polyacrylamide gel. The expected results were a band of 200 base pairs (bp) for the deletion of cytosine 1100 or a band 534 bp when the deletion is not present; if the sample showed both bands, it meant the presence of a heterozygote.
A total of 262 samples (131 study cases and 131 matched-controls) were analyzed for the presence of the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation. The clinical characteristics of the families included in this study are listed in Table 1 (Also see Dataset 1). After allele-specific PCR analysis, none of the cases or controls showed the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation. All the samples showed only the heavier band (534bp) (Supplementary Figure 1). This indicates that the all the samples were homozygotes for the normal allele.
This is the first study conducted in the Colombian population for CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation. Our results have shown that none of the 262 analyzed samples carried the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation, suggesting that the frequency of this mutation is extremely low (or not present) in the Colombian population.
Similar results have been reported for populations in other South American countries. Although studies are scarce, in the few populations that have been evaluated for the presence of this variant, it has not been found in Chile26 and Mexico27, or has been found at very low frequencies in Brazilian population10,22,28,29.
Worldwide, CHEK2 c.1100delC is absent in Spain30–31 and all Asian populations studied to date, including those in India32, Japan33, China34, Korea35, Singapore36, the Philippines22, Pakistan37 and Malaysia38. The mutation is present in populations of Galicia (northwest Spain)39–41, 1.4% of the Northern European countries including Finland, the UK and the Netherlands8,11,42 and the United States43–45.
An explanation for this variability, proposes CHEK2 c.1100delC as an allele whose frequency is distributed along a population-gradient, which would have originated in populations of Northern Europe (with high frequencies) and decreasing towards the regions of Southern Europe (Basque Country, Spain and Italy)39. This may explain the absence of the allele in the Colombian population., which is a mixture, in different proportions, of European-Spanish, African and Native American ancestry46. Hence, the probability that the allele would have reached our population is low. As reported in several studies, it is evident that the contribution of CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation to the burden of cancer varies according to the ethnic group, and from country to country47.
We found that the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation is not present or is present at an extremely low frequency in familial BOC cases and controls in our Colombian cohort.
Based on our findings, we suggest that genotyping of the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in the Colombian population should not be recommended. However, further studies are required to confirm the contribution of this variant in the Colombian population.
The study of CHEK2 mutations in the Latin American population has been focused mainly in the c.1100delC mutation. However, databases like ExAC (Exome Aggregation Consortium) showed the presence of other germline mutations in the CHEK2 gene in Latin American samples that could generate cancer susceptibility48. Accordingly, it would be important to examine other mutations in the Colombian population and its association with the development of familial BOC.
Dataset 1: Raw data for “Genotype and type of cancer present in the studied patients and their families” 10.5256/f1000research.13368.d20708449
BG received funding by COLCIENCIAS (Grant ID 1106-519-29134) and Universidad del Valle (Grant ID CI7830). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors thank the families and institutions who participated in the research studies described in this article, Hospital Universitario del Valle, FUNCANCER, Clínica Rafael Uribe Uribe, Hematooncologos, Oncólogos de Occidente, Fundación Hospital Infantil Napoleón Franco Pareja, Fundación mujeres por tus senos and Insuasty Oncologia e Investigación.
Supplementary Figure 1: Allele specific PCR products for the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 8% (29:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide) of allele specific PCR products for the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant for cases and controls. Lanes 1 - 5 show the amplified product of Colombian patients with breast and/or familial ovarian cancer; lanes 7-11 show the amplified product of healthy controls; Lane 6: molecular weight marker of 100 base pairs. all individuals show an amplified product of 537 bp which corresponds to the normal genotype. The letters “p.b.” in the picture are the spanish initials for base pairs (“pares de bases”).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
References
1. Couch FJ, Shimelis H, Hu C, Hart SN, et al.: Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer.JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3 (9): 1190-1196 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Diagnostic laboratory, genes sequencing
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No source data required
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
References
1. Couch FJ, Shimelis H, Hu C, Hart SN, et al.: Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer.JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3 (9): 1190-1196 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Cancer genetics, breast cancer
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 09 Jul 18 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)