ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

GSK-3β, a double-edged sword in Nrf2 regulation: Implications for neurological dysfunction and disease

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2018
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

In the past decade, it has become evident that glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) modulates the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) oxidative stress response. GSK-3β functions as an inhibitor, both directly in the activation and indirectly in the post-induction of Nrf2. The incidence of oxidative stress in neurological dysfunction and disease has made this signaling pathway an attractive therapeutic target. There is minimal evidence, however, to support a distinctive function for GSK-3β mediated Nrf2 inhibition in nervous system decline, apart from the typical oxidative stress response. In both Alzheimer’s disease and brain ischemia, this pathway has been explored for potential benefits on disease etiology and advancement. Presently, it is unclear whether GSK-3β mediated Nrf2 inhibition markedly influences these disease states. Furthermore, the potential that each has unique function in neurodegenerative decline is unsubstantiated.

Keywords

GSK-3β, Nrf2, oxidative stress

Abbreviations

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), β-amyloid (Aβ), glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), middle cerebral artery occlusion and reperfusion (MCAO/R), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2).

Introduction

Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) is a complex signaling molecule, involved in a variety of cellular processes1. In the past decade, GSK-3β has been extensively investigated, particularly in regard to its role in neurological dysfunction and disease2,3. It is now evident GSK-3β participates in the cellular response to oxidative stress, a hallmark of several nervous system disorders. GSK-3β modulates this response through its interaction with nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)4,5. Although the GSK-3β-Nrf2 association is well established, it has yet to be determined whether the dual regulatory nature of this interaction impacts disease advancement and potential therapies.

GSK-3β phosphorylates Nrf2, which results in its nuclear exclusion6 and degradation4,7,8. Interestingly, this was demonstrated to occur in a kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1)-independent manner4; however, active GSK-3β was induced by hydrogen peroxide6. Thus GSK-3β regulated Nrf2 activity possibly is oxidant-sensitive as well. GSK-3β has also been observed to indirectly modulate Nrf2 via Fyn phosphorylation. Fyn translocates to the nucleus resultant to GSK-3β phosphorylation, and in turn phosphorylates Nrf2, which stimulates its nuclear export5. It must be noted that none of the above-mentioned reports were conducted in neuronal models. Moreover, observed effects were in transiently transfected cells, and not on endogenous protein.

Despite limited evidence that GSK-3β regulates Nrf2 in a similar manner in the nervous system, this signaling pathway has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases. Oxidative stress is a well-established feature of several cognitive disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and brain ischemia. However, a possible mechanism by which neurological dysfunction and disease modify GSK-3β mediated Nrf2 activity is unknown. Furthermore, the potential that this signaling axis contributes to disease etiology and progression has not been extensively explored.

Here, current research in AD and brain ischemia is highlighted with particular focus on potentially unique mechanisms by which these disorders modulate GSK-3β regulated Nrf2 activity.

Alzheimer’s disease

GSK-3β is implicated in the advancement and potentially the etiology of AD. Extensive evidence corroborates its function in the learning and memory deficits observed in AD patients. Mechanistically, GSK-3β is linked to tau hyperphosphorylation and β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, significant markers of AD pathogenesis. Furthermore, it modifies the oxidative stress response resultant to AD progression3.

Recent reports have started to build connections between GSK-3β and Nrf2 in AD pathology and propose prospective therapies. GSK-3β suppression in a mouse model of AD was found to increase nuclear Nrf2 and total glutathione-S transferase (GST), an Nrf2 transcriptional target, in cortex. Moreover, reduced oxidative stress biomarkers and tau phosphorylation were observed9. GSK-3β activation was also required for Aβ-induced axonal transport deficits detected in primary hippocampal neurons. Tau presence was necessary for this outcome, but intriguingly was Fyn-independent10. Fyn phosphorylates tau11 and Nrf2. The latter requires GSK-3β activation5; however, GSK-3β directly phosphorylates Nrf2 as well6. Irrespectively, Nrf2 is excluded from the nucleus as a result5,6. Potential associations between GSK-3β, Fyn, and Nrf2 were not demonstrated in this study10. Furthermore, the Fyn-independent nature of Aβ and tau in AD could underscore distinct mechanisms by which GSK-3β activation mediates disease advancement.

A new AD therapy, which simultaneously inhibits GSK-3β and induces Nrf2 has been proposed. Interestingly, therapeutic Nrf2 activation was found to be GSK-3β inhibition-independent in the in vitro AD model. However, the potentially distinct beneficial properties of GSK-3β inhibition and Nrf2 induction were not examined. Tested compounds exhibited enhanced neuroprotection and reduced oxidative stress12. Similar to the reports mentioned above, this study did not connect GSK-3β inhibited Nrf2 activation to GSK-3β activated tau hyperphosphorylation and Aβ deposition.

Current research on AD pathology has only just begun to elucidate a possible association between GSK-3β activation and the Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response. Existing data does not, however, clearly demonstrate that GSK-3β activation represses Nrf2 function in AD models. Theoretically, observed oxidative stress in AD could occur entirely independent of GSK-3β. Moreover, other stress response factors apart from Nrf2 might be involved.

Ischemia

GSK-3β has also emerged as a target in the treatment of brain ischemia. However, distinct from AD, recent studies have focused on GSK-3β regulation of Nrf2 in this disease state. Also unlike AD, an altered oxidative environment is the primary feature of brain ischemia, and not simply a secondary factor in the disease.

Existing evidence indicates GSK-3β inhibition enhances Nrf2 activity in the rat cerebral cortex following middle cerebral artery occlusion and reperfusion (MCAO/R). Interestingly, however, this brain ischemia model did not exhibit increased active GSK-3β and decreased nuclear Nrf2 simply as a consequence of MCAO/R. Furthermore, Nrf2 bound at the antioxidant response element (ARE) and subsequent target gene expression was only enhanced following MCAO/R in the presence of GSK-3β inhibitors13. These data potentially imply GSK-3β regulation of Nrf2 is not directly involved in brain ischemia. Moreover, this study did not demonstrate improvement in the rat cerebral cortex following MCAO/R resultant to GSK-3β inhibition and Nrf2 activation.

Another report, however, did validate a GSK-3β inhibitor in an acute ischemia rat model, displaying reduced infarct volume, brain edema, and neurological deficit. These improvements were correlated with increased total Nrf2 protein and heme-oxygenase. Curiously, however, recovery was only examined 24 hours post-MCAO14, whereas the article mentioned above showed GSK-3β inhibition effects as early as 6 hours post-MCAO13. The timescale by which GSK-3β inhibitors exhibit therapeutic properties in brain ischemia must be further examined.

Present knowledge does not indicate brain ischemia directly alters GSK-3β regulation of Nrf2. Active GSK-3β is not enhanced in ischemia models, and Nrf2 downregulated as a consequence. Intriguingly, however, GSK-3β inhibitors do render improvement in these models, although evidence that Nrf2 is involved in this response is minimal. Possibly, GSK-3β inhibitors act on another signaling pathway in which GSK-3β is involved.

Conclusion

The current body of evidence available to support a primary role for GSK-3β regulation of Nrf2 in neurological dysfunction and disease is incomplete. There is little to substantiate that this signaling axis is modulated differently under nervous system distress relative to a typical endogenous oxidative stress response. Moreover, the potentially distinct functions of GSK-3β and Nrf2 in cognitive disorders have not been linked to their possible combinatorial roles.

Polymorphisms in both the GSK-3β15 and Nrf216 gene promoter sequences have been associated with the onset of neurodegenerative diseases. There is no data, however, to validate that these polymorphisms impact the function of the GSK-3β and Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Future studies should focus on the distinctive functions for GSK-3β and Nrf2 in neurological dysfunction and disease. Based on these unique roles, potential links to their effects on each other should be formulated. Without these efforts, there is minimal evidence to substantiate a causative function for this signaling axis on cognitive disorder apart from an oxidative stress response.

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2018
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Culbreth M and Aschner M. GSK-3β, a double-edged sword in Nrf2 regulation: Implications for neurological dysfunction and disease [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1043 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15239.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2018
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Jul 2018
Alexey Tinkov, Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation;  RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation 
Approved
VIEWS 8
The manuscript provides interesting data on the role of GSK-3b-Nrf2 interplay in neurological diseases. Although the authors review the existing data in relation to Alzheimer's disease and ischemic stroke, the mechanism may play a significant role in other disorders. It ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Tinkov A. Reviewer Report For: GSK-3β, a double-edged sword in Nrf2 regulation: Implications for neurological dysfunction and disease [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1043 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16599.r35941)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 Jul 2018
Masatake Fujimura, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, National Institute for Minamata Disease, Minamata, Japan 
Approved
VIEWS 16
I am very interested in this report. This article was well written without any over discussion. Although the roles of GSK-3beta on neurological disease were well investigated for long time, that was not fully resolved at this time. Authors indicated ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Fujimura M. Reviewer Report For: GSK-3β, a double-edged sword in Nrf2 regulation: Implications for neurological dysfunction and disease [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1043 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16599.r35943)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2018
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.