Keywords
Hepatitis B virus (HBV); Disease-free equilibrium; Endermic equilibrium state; Stability analysis
This article is included in the Pathogens gateway.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV); Disease-free equilibrium; Endermic equilibrium state; Stability analysis
Hepatitis B (HB) is a potentially life-threatening liver infection caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV), which is a DNA virus classified in the virus family of Hepadnaviridae. The World Health Organization (WHO) in 1 reported that more than 0.25 billion people are living with HBV infection, most of which resulted in several deaths.
A vaccine against HB has been available since 1982, nevertheless there is still an increase in its transmission and spread. Key facts from 1 reveal that HBV can survive outside the human body for at least 7 days, and during this period HBV can still cause infection if it enters any unimmunized human body. Most HB carriers are asymptomatic during the acute infection phase, nonetheless some people experience acute illness that can last for several days with variations in the progression.
The use of mathematical models in scientific research has improved our understanding of contributing factors. Mathematical model of HBV has ranged from simple models2,3 to more complex models involving the contributions of controls (e.g. vaccines)4, and analysis of the impact of immigrant5.
Motivated by other HB studies, we use an infectious disease model to understand the impact of HB vaccination and treatment on the dynamics of HBV transmission and prevalence using an SEIR format.
A variety of mathematical models exist, such as the SIR, SIS, SIRS, and their variations; where S=Susceptible class, I=Infective class, and R=Recovered class. The model used in this study takes the form of SEIR based on ordinary differential equations, which shall be solved to obtain the disease-free equilibrium (DFE) state.
Table 1 lists the parameters used. Figure 1 shows a schematic presentation of the model.
We formulate the HB transmission model as follows:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
where M = immunized individuals, S = susceptible, L = latently infected/exposed, I = infectious individuals, and R = recovered.
Let E(M, S, L, I, R) be the equilibrium point of the system described by (1)–(6), At the equilibrium state, we have
i.e.,
cP – 𝜙M – βM = 0 (7)
cP – (ϕ + β)M = 0 (8)
(1 – c)P + ϕM + πR – kSI – βS = 0 (9)
(1 – c)P + ϕM + πR – (kI + β)S = 0 (10)
kSI – qL – μL – βL = 0 (11)
kSI – (q + μ + β)L = 0 (12)
μL – 𝜓I – ηI – βI = 0 (13)
μL – (𝜓 + η + β)I = 0 (14)
qL – 𝜓I – πR – βR = 0 (15)
qL + 𝜓I – (π + β)R = 0 (16)
In order to obtain the DFE state we solve equation (7)–equation (15) simultaneously.
Let Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) be TES of (1)–(6) of the model, ∃ no TES since the population cannot be extinct, so long as new babies are born into the population (i.e. cP ≠ 0 and (1 − c)P ≠ 0).
That is, Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) ≠ (0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
DFE state is the state of total eradication of disease. Let Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) be the DFE state. Suppose, both I and L must be zero. That is, for DFE state:
Io = Lo = 0 (17)
Substituting I − L = 0 into equation (7)–equation (11) and solving simultaneously we have:
From Equation (7):
cP − (ϕ + β)M = 0
From Equation (9)
From Equation (11)
qL + 𝜓I − (π + β)R = 0
⇒ (π + β)R = 0(since L = I = 0) (20)
⇒ Either (π + β) = 0 Or R = 0 (21)
Since π and β are positive constants, (π + β) ≠ 0.
Therefore, Ro = 0.
If R = 0, Equation (9) becomes
or
Therefore the DFE state of the model is
To determine the stability of the DFE state Eo, we examine the behavior of the model population near this equilibrium solution. Here, we determine condition(s) that must be met if the disease is to be totally eradicated.
Recall that the system of equations in this model at equilibrium state is:
cP – (ϕ + β)M = 0
(1 – c)P + ϕM + πR – (kI + β)S = 0
kSI – (q + μ + β)L = 0
μL – (𝜓 + β + η)I = 0 (23)
qL + 𝜓I – (π + β)R = 0
We now linearize the system of equations to get the Jacobian matrix J.
where
ω1 = −(ϕ + β), ω2 = −(kIo + β), ω3 = −(q + μ + β), ω4 = −(𝜓 + β + η), ω5 = −(π + β)
At the disease-free equilibrium, Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro), the Jacobian Matrix becomes
where
ω6 = −(𝜙 + β), ω7 = = −(q + μ + β), ω9 = = −(𝜓 + β + η), ω11 = (q + μ + β + λ) > −(π + β)
The characteristic equation |Jo − Iλ| = 0 is obtained from the Jacobian determinant with the Eigen values λi (i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
= (λ2 + (ϕ + 2β)λ + (ϕβ + β2))(– π – β – λ)[X] = 0 (26)
where
From Equation (26), either
(λ2 + (ϕ + 2β)λ + (ϕβ + β2))(– π – β – λ) = 0 (27)
or
From Equation (27), we deduce
λ1 = –(π + β) (29)
λ2 = –β (30)
and
λ3 = –(ϕ + β) (31)
Let
For the DFE to be asymptotically stable, trace(A) < 0 and det A > 0.
And the trace of A is
Trace(A) = –(q + μ + β + λ) – (𝜓 + β + η + λ)
Obviously, trace(A) < 0 since all the parameters q, t, β, 𝜓, β and η are positive.
For the determinant of A to be positive, we must have
or
From equation (29)–equation (31), λ1, λ2, λ3 of (25) all have negative real parts. We now establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for the remaining two Eigen values of (25) to have negative real part. The remaining two Eigen values of equation (25) will have negative real part if and only if det A > 0. i.e.
The Routh-Hurwitz theorem states that the equilibrium state will be asymptotically stable if and only if all the Eigen values of the characteristic equation |J − Iλ| = 0 have negative real part. Using this theorem we see that the DFE of this model will be asymptotically stable if and only if
or
The inequality (32) gives the condition, necessary and sufficient for the DFE state of the model to be stable (asymptotically). This means that the product of total contraction and total breakdown of latent class given by must be less than the total removal rate from both latent and infectious classes given by (q + µ + β + λ)(𝜓 + β + η).
Alternatively, the inequality (32) can also be expressed as
The inequality (33) also gives the condition necessary and sufficient for the stability of DFE state, thus sum of the rate of recovery of latently infected people, the rate at which latently infected individuals progress to active infection and the rate of natural death of individuals (in the population, i.e. total removal rate from the latent class) must have a lower bound given by
Presented in this paper is a mathematical model of the role of vaccination and treatment on HB transmission dynamics. The proportion dynamics of the classes is described using five differential equations. We conclude that the trivial equilibrium state Eo(Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) is unstable; this is the state where there is no individual in the population. The DFE state, Eo(Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro), was determined and its stability analysed using Routh-Hurwitz theorem.
All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for developing the new method (or application) clearly explained?
No
Is the description of the method technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details provided to allow replication of the method development and its use by others?
Yes
If any results are presented, are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No source data required
Are the conclusions about the method and its performance adequately supported by the findings presented in the article?
No
References
1. Djidjou Demasse R, Tewa JJ, Bowong S, Emvudu Y: Optimal control for an age-structured model for the transmission of hepatitis B.J Math Biol. 73 (2): 305-33 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Mathematical Biology.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 1 17 Aug 18 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)