ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Method Article

Mathematical model and analysis of hepatitis B virus transmission dynamics

[version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 17 Aug 2018
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Pathogens gateway.

Abstract

Hepatitis B is a liver infection induced by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). In this paper, the dynamics involved in the transmission of HBV is mathematically formulated with considerations of different populations of individuals. The role of HBV vaccination of new born babies and the treatment of infected individuals in controlling the transmission are factored into the model. The model in this study is based on the standard SEIR model.

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus (HBV); Disease-free equilibrium; Endermic equilibrium state; Stability analysis

Introduction

Hepatitis B (HB) is a potentially life-threatening liver infection caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV), which is a DNA virus classified in the virus family of Hepadnaviridae. The World Health Organization (WHO) in 1 reported that more than 0.25 billion people are living with HBV infection, most of which resulted in several deaths.

A vaccine against HB has been available since 1982, nevertheless there is still an increase in its transmission and spread. Key facts from 1 reveal that HBV can survive outside the human body for at least 7 days, and during this period HBV can still cause infection if it enters any unimmunized human body. Most HB carriers are asymptomatic during the acute infection phase, nonetheless some people experience acute illness that can last for several days with variations in the progression.

The use of mathematical models in scientific research has improved our understanding of contributing factors. Mathematical model of HBV has ranged from simple models2,3 to more complex models involving the contributions of controls (e.g. vaccines)4, and analysis of the impact of immigrant5.

Motivated by other HB studies, we use an infectious disease model to understand the impact of HB vaccination and treatment on the dynamics of HBV transmission and prevalence using an SEIR format.

Methods

Mathematical model

A variety of mathematical models exist, such as the SIR, SIS, SIRS, and their variations; where S=Susceptible class, I=Infective class, and R=Recovered class. The model used in this study takes the form of SEIR based on ordinary differential equations, which shall be solved to obtain the disease-free equilibrium (DFE) state.

Governing equations

Table 1 lists the parameters used. Figure 1 shows a schematic presentation of the model.

Table 1. Parameter table.

Par.Description
ϕrate of expiration of vaccine efficacy
krate of conversion from S to L
µrate of conversion from L to I
𝜓rate of conversion from I to R
πrate of conversion from R to S
ηHB-induced mortality
βnatural mortality
Ppopulation of new births
cPimmunized new births
Ntotal population size
6902f962-006a-4086-9b6b-62d5444a8ceb_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Schematic presentation of the model.

We formulate the HB transmission model as follows:

dM(t)dt=cPϕΜ(t)βM(t)                                                                                                                                                           (1)

dS(t)dt=(1c)P+ϕM(t)+πR(t)(kI(t)+β)S(t)                                                                                                                    (2)

dL(t)dt=kS(t)I(t)qL(t)μL(t)βL(t)                                                                                                                                      (3)

dI(t)dt=μL(t)ψI(t)ηI(t)βI(t)                                                                                                                                              (4)

dR(t)dt=qL(t)ψI(t)πR(t)βR(t)                                                                                                                                           (5)

N(t)=M(t)+S(t)+L(t)+I(t)+R(t)                                                                                                                                        (6)

where M = immunized individuals, S = susceptible, L = latently infected/exposed, I = infectious individuals, and R = recovered.

Equilibrium solutions

Let E(M, S, L, I, R) be the equilibrium point of the system described by (1)–(6), At the equilibrium state, we have

dMdt=dSdt=dLdt=dIdt=dRdt=0.

i.e.,

                                                                                                                                                              cP – 𝜙MβM = 0                 (7)

                                                                                                                                                              cP – (ϕ + β)M = 0                  (8)

                                                                                                                                     (1 – c)P + ϕM + πRkSIβS = 0                 (9)

                                                                                                                                    (1 – c)P + ϕM + πR – (kI + β)S = 0               (10)

                                                                                                                                                       kSIqLμLβL = 0                (11)

                                                                                                                                                         kSI – (q + μ + β)L = 0               (12)

                                                                                                                                                           μL – 𝜓IηIβI = 0               (13)

                                                                                                                                                          μL – (𝜓 + η + β)I = 0                (14)

                                                                                                                                                         qL – 𝜓IπRβR = 0               (15)

                                                                                                                                                         qL + 𝜓I – (π + β)R = 0               (16)

In order to obtain the DFE state we solve equation (7)equation (15) simultaneously.

Existence of a trivial equilibrium state (TES)

Let Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) be TES of (1)–(6) of the model, ∃ no TES since the population cannot be extinct, so long as new babies are born into the population (i.e. cP ≠ 0 and (1 − c)P ≠ 0).

That is, Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) ≠ (0, 0, 0, 0, 0)

DFE state

DFE state is the state of total eradication of disease. Let Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) be the DFE state. Suppose, both I and L must be zero. That is, for DFE state:

                                                                                                                      Io = Lo = 0                                                                   (17)

Substituting I − L = 0 into equation (7)equation (11) and solving simultaneously we have:

From Equation (7):

                                                                                                                                      cP − (ϕ + β)M = 0

                                                                                                                                    Mo=cPϕ+β(18)

From Equation (9)

                                                                                                                 (1c)P+ϕcPϕ+β+πRβS=0(19)

From Equation (11)

                                                                                                                                   qL + 𝜓I − (π + β)R = 0

                                                                                                                    ⇒ (π + β)R = 0(since L = I = 0)                                      (20)

                                                                                                                     ⇒ Either (π + β) = 0 Or R = 0                                        (21)

Since π and β are positive constants, (π + β) 0.

Therefore, Ro = 0.

If R = 0, Equation (9) becomes

(1c)P+ϕcPϕ+ββS=0

So=(ϕ+β)(1c)P+ϕcPβ(ϕ+β)

or

                                                                                                                                  So=ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)(22)

Therefore the DFE state of the model is

Eo(Mo,So,Lo,Io,Ro)=(cPϕ+β),(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β),0,0,0)

Stability analysis of the DFE state

To determine the stability of the DFE state Eo, we examine the behavior of the model population near this equilibrium solution. Here, we determine condition(s) that must be met if the disease is to be totally eradicated.

Recall that the system of equations in this model at equilibrium state is:

                                                                                                                                                      cP – (ϕ + β)M = 0

                                                                                                                            (1 – c)P + ϕM + πR – (kI + β)S = 0

                                                                                                                                                 kSI – (q + μ + β)L = 0

                                                                                                                                                  μL – (𝜓 + β + η)I = 0                        (23)

                                                                                                                                                qL + 𝜓I – (π + β)R = 0

We now linearize the system of equations to get the Jacobian matrix J.

                                                                                                                        J=[ω1ϕ0000ω2kΙο0000ω3μq0kSokSoω4ψ0π00ω5](24)

where

ω1 = −(ϕ + β), ω2 = −(kIo + β), ω3 = −(q + μ + β), ω4 = −(𝜓 + β + η), ω5 = −(π + β)

At the disease-free equilibrium, Eo (Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro), the Jacobian Matrix becomes

                                                                                                                       J=[ω6ϕ0000βkΙο0000ω8μq0ω7ω9ω10ψ0π00ω11](25)

where

ω6 = −(𝜙 + β), ω7 = k(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β),ω8= −(q + μ + β), ω9 = k(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β),ω10 = −(𝜓 + β + η), ω11 = (q + μ + β + λ) > −(π + β)

The characteristic equation |JoIλ| = 0 is obtained from the Jacobian determinant with the Eigen values λi (i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

                                                                                             = (λ2 + (ϕ + 2β)λ + (ϕβ + β2))(– πβλ)[X] = 0                              (26)

where

[X]=[(q+μ+β)λμk(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)(ψ+β+η)λ]

From Equation (26), either

                                                                                                  (λ2 + (ϕ + 2β)λ + (ϕβ + β2))(– πβλ) = 0                                 (27)

or

                                                                                                     [(q+μ+β)λμk(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)(ψ+β+η)λ]=0(28)

From Equation (27), we deduce

                                                                                                                                λ1 = –(π + β)                                                     (29)

                                                                                                                                λ2 = –β                                                             (30)

                                                                                                                                and

                                                                                                                                λ3 = –(ϕ + β)                                                    (31)

Let

A=[(q+μ+β)λμk(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)(ψ+β+η)λ]=0

For the DFE to be asymptotically stable, trace(A) < 0 and det A > 0.

detA=(q+μ+β+λ)(ψ+β+η+λ)kμ(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)

And the trace of A is

                                                                                                                                Trace(A) = –(q + μ + β + λ) – (𝜓 + β + η + λ)

Obviously, trace(A) < 0 since all the parameters q, t, β, 𝜓, β and η are positive.

For the determinant of A to be positive, we must have

(q+μ+β+λ)(ψ+β+η)kμ(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)>0

or

(q+μ+β+λ)(ψ+β+η)>kμ(ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)(32)

From equation (29)equation (31), λ1, λ2, λ3 of (25) all have negative real parts. We now establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for the remaining two Eigen values of (25) to have negative real part. The remaining two Eigen values of equation (25) will have negative real part if and only if det A > 0. i.e.

(q+μ+β+λ)(ψ+β+η)>kμ((ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β))

The Routh-Hurwitz theorem states that the equilibrium state will be asymptotically stable if and only if all the Eigen values of the characteristic equation |JIλ| = 0 have negative real part. Using this theorem we see that the DFE of this model will be asymptotically stable if and only if

(q+μ+β+λ)(ψ+β+η)>kμ((ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β))

or

kμ((ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β))<(q+μ+β+λ)(ψ+β+η)(33)

The inequality (32) gives the condition, necessary and sufficient for the DFE state of the model to be stable (asymptotically). This means that the product of total contraction and total breakdown of latent class given by kμ((ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)) must be less than the total removal rate from both latent and infectious classes given by (q + µ + β + λ)(𝜓 + β + η).

Alternatively, the inequality (32) can also be expressed as

(q+μ+β+λ)>kμ((ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)(ψ+β+η))(34)

The inequality (33) also gives the condition necessary and sufficient for the stability of DFE state, thus sum of the rate of recovery of latently infected people, the rate at which latently infected individuals progress to active infection and the rate of natural death of individuals (in the population, i.e. total removal rate from the latent class) must have a lower bound given by

kμ((ϕ+βcβ)Pβ(ϕ+β)(ψ+β+η))

Conclusion

Presented in this paper is a mathematical model of the role of vaccination and treatment on HB transmission dynamics. The proportion dynamics of the classes is described using five differential equations. We conclude that the trivial equilibrium state Eo(Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro) is unstable; this is the state where there is no individual in the population. The DFE state, Eo(Mo, So, Lo, Io, Ro), was determined and its stability analysed using Routh-Hurwitz theorem.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 17 Aug 2018
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Emerenini BO and Inyama SC. Mathematical model and analysis of hepatitis B virus transmission dynamics [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1312 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15557.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 17 Aug 2018
Views
40
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Sep 2019
Ramsès Djidjou Demasse, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), Marseille, France 
Not Approved
VIEWS 40
Summary. Authors proposed a compartmental SEIR model for the spread of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV). Attention is given to formulated with considerations of different populations of individuals the role of HBV vaccination of new born babies and the treatment of ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Djidjou Demasse R. Reviewer Report For: Mathematical model and analysis of hepatitis B virus transmission dynamics [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1312 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16970.r52026)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 17 Aug 2018
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.