Keywords
apical periodontitis, calcium hydroxide, antibiotic paste, intra-canal medication, postoperative pain
This article is included in the All trials matter collection.
apical periodontitis, calcium hydroxide, antibiotic paste, intra-canal medication, postoperative pain
Pain is the main symptom in many medical and dental conditions that can significantly alter the person’s general functioning1. Post-endodontic pain remains a serious problem facing the dental profession. It may occur as a result of several factors, including chemical, mechanical or bacterial irritation to the periapical tissues2. It has been suggested that the presence of bacteria as a result of failure to properly disinfect the root canal is the major cause of pain3. Many studies have found a direct relationship between root canal infection and the level of pain after endodontic treatment4. Thus, endodontic treatment is primarily focused on utmost elimination of these bacteria. Antibacterial intra-canal medicaments have been advocated in efforts to kill any bacteria surviving after chemico-mechanical preparation.
Several intra-canal medications have been used, including calcium hydroxide which is the most widely used intra-canal medication. It is characterized by its initial bactericidal, bacteriostatic effect and its high pH5. It has been suggested that calcium hydroxide has pain preventive characteristics due to its antibacterial action or tissue altering effects. Moreover, it controls inflammation and has repair potential6. However, there is no clear evidence of its effect on post-endodontic pain7. Other studies found that calcium hydroxide was not very effective in decreasing post-treatment pain when used alone8,9.
Double antibiotic paste is a mixture of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, which is used as intra-canal medication for disinfection of necrotic teeth. It has been reported to be effective at reducing bacterial counts in the infected root canals10. When commonly used medicaments fail in eliminating the symptoms, then antibiotic paste can be used for treatment of teeth with large periapical lesions11.
The objectives of the present study were to test the null hypothesis of whether the use of double antibiotic paste will be more effective in reduction of pain than calcium hydroxide, or if this paste will have disadvantages and complaints more than the traditional method used.
The article has been written in concordance with CONSORT guidelines (Supplementary File 1).
The study design is a parallel randomized controlled trial with allocation ratio 1:1 and a Superiority Framework. The study was conducted in the duration between March 2016 and March 2017. The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt (approval number 15918). The nature of this study, and associated risks were fully explained to the patients and informed consent forms were signed before initial treatment.
Based on a previous study by Ehrmann et al. (2003), a medium effect size of approximately 0.25 is expected. A total sample size of 24 patients will be sufficient to detect an effect size of 0.25, a power of 80%, and a significance level of 5%. This number has been increased to a total sample size of 28, to adjust for using nonparametric tests. The number is again increased to a total sample size of 36 (18 in each of the two groups) to allow for losses of around 25%. Sample size was calculated using G*Power program (University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). Minimal clinical difference 3.5 and 4.5 at 24 hrs and 48 hrs respectively.
In total, 36 participants were included in the study with maxillary or mandibular non-vital single rooted premolar teeth showing tenderness to percussion.
Exclusion criteria: pregnant women, patients who had received antibiotic treatment during the last 3 months, patients having more than one tooth requiring root canal treatment, teeth with periodontal probing depth >4mm, teeth that couldn't be isolated with a rubber dam, teeth with previous root canal treatment, or teeth with fluctuant facial swelling where emergency management should include incision and drainage.
Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (n=18/group) according to the intra-canal medication used, using a computer generated random number table at the Center of Evidence-based Dentistry (EBD), Cairo University. The assistant supervisor generated the random sequence and assigned the participants to the intervention or control groups.
Experimental group: double antibiotic paste (DAP); control group: calcium hydroxide paste (CH). All clinical procedures were performed by a single endodontist.
All patients accepted two-visit root canal treatment. Preoperative pain was recorded before any intervention.
First visit: Teeth were anaesthetized using nerve block or infiltration technique by local anesthesia (Articaine HCI 4% & Adrenaline 1:100,000) and properly isolated with rubber dam. After access cavity preparation, the working length was checked using apex locator and confirmed by a radiograph. The root canals were prepared using rotary Race files (Fkg Dentaire, Switzerland) along with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation. The canals were dried and filled with intra-canal medication plugged into the canal by using Lentulo spiral according to the randomly selected group (DAP group - combination of 500 mg ciprofloxacin and 500 mg metronidazole ground then mixed with saline to obtain creamy consistency; CH group). The access cavities were properly filled with glass ionomer to ensure proper sealing with no leakage of any oral fluids inside the root canal, which might disturb the action of the intra-canal medication.
Patients were instructed to record their postoperative pain level (see below) after 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours.
Second visit: After 7 days, all the patients returned the pain charts and the root canals were obturated using lateral condensation technique and resin-based root canal sealer.
Primary outcome measure is postoperative pain.
A pain chart using numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to record the patients’ pain level. The NRS (0–10 scale) consists of a line anchored by two extremes “No pain” and “the worst pain”. Patients were asked to choose the mark that represented their level of pain from 0 to 10. Pain level was assigned as follow: 0, “no pain”; 1–3, “mild pain”; 4–6, “moderate pain”; 7-10, “severe pain”.
The study was double-blinded (the participants and the assessor). Participants did not know which group they were treated with; they chose a folded paper inside an opaque envelope which contained the numbers of each random sequence for both groups. The assessor, who assessed all outcome data, did not know which group the participants were related to.
Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The level of pain was described as median and range. Pain score was compared between the two groups using Mann-Whitney U test. Friedman test was performed to test the significance between the 4-time periods within each group. Chi square test was used to compare qualitative pain score. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. All tests were two tailed.
In total, 36 patients were included in this study; Table 1 shows their baseline characteristics. A CONSORT flow diagram can be found in Supplementary File 2.
ns=non-significant.
Age | ||
---|---|---|
CH group | DAP group | |
Mean | 39.94 | 33.72 |
SD | 13.24 | 12.72 |
t-test | 1.44 | |
P-value | 0.1598ns | |
Gender | ||
Male, n (%) | 2 (11.1) | 8 (44.4) |
Female, n (%) | 16 (88.9) | 10 (55.6) |
X2 test | 3.462 | |
P-value | 0.062ns |
The overall highest incidence of pain values in both groups was at 6 hours postoperatively, whereas the lowest incidence of pain values was at 48 hours postoperatively with no statistically significant difference between them. The DAP group showed lower postoperative pain values at 12 and 24 hours compared with the CH group, but with no statistical significance difference (Table 2).
ns = not significant.
Pain | Preoperative pain | Postoperative pain (hours) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups | 6 | 12 | 24 | 48 | |||
Calcium hydroxide paste | Median | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
Min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Max | 10 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | ||
Mean rank | 2.89 | 4.14 | 3.39 | 2.50 | 2.08 | ||
Double antibiotic paste | Median | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | |
Min | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Max | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 10 | ||
Mean rank | 3.58 | 4.06 | 2.78 | 2.44 | 2.14 | ||
P-value (P<0.05) | 0.403ns | 0.395ns | 0.053ns | 0.510ns | 0.435ns |
Effective control over the intra-canal microbial load before root canal obturation is a key element that increases the success rate of endodontic treatment12. Necrotic pulp with periapical periodontitis was selected for assessment of postoperative pain, as the highest frequency of postoperative pain occurred in patients with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis4,13 that harbored large number of bacteria due to its polymicobial nature as reported in previous studies14–18. In the present study, pain was recorded using a numerical rating scale (NRS), which is considered a consensus-based, standardized assessment method and reports better compliance compared to other scales19. The literature shows that the NRS provides sufficient distinctive power for chronic pain patients for describing their pain intensity20. As well, it was preferred by the majority of patients in different regions21,22. In the present study, the Rotary Race system was chosen for root canal preparation, owing to the fact that rotary NiTi instruments result in minimal debris extrusion compared to hand instrumentation23, which in turn would result in less postoperative pain. This was attributed to their rotary action, as well as copious irrigation associated with these instruments24.
In the present study, in patients with necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis, the use of double antibiotic paste showed no difference regarding postoperative pain compared to CH. DAP showed lesser postoperative pain at 12 and 24 hours than the CH group but this didn’t reach a level of statistical significance. This might be attributed to the combined spectrum of antimicrobial activity and synergetic or additive action of antibiotics found in DAP. In accordance with the results of this study, Pai et al.25 reported no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between calcium hydroxide and triple antibiotic paste (TAP), although TAP was more effective that calcium hydroxide but this was not statistically insignificant. As reported in other studies7–9,26,27, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between calcium hydroxide paste and no intra-canal medication. In contrast, some studies counteracted our findings28,29, suggesting that CH had pain-preventive properties because of its antimicrobial as well as its tissue-altering effects. These properties could be referred to the chemical, physical, and antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide due to the diffusion of its hydroxyl (OH−) ions produced from ionization in aqueous solution, which leads to a highly alkaline environment. This is not conducive for the survival of microorganisms inside root canals3,30, and most of the microorganisms cannot sustain that high a pH (15.5).
The use of intra-canal medication for 7 days in necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis was efficient in reducing postoperative pain regardless of the type of intra-canal medication used.
F1000Research: Dataset 1. Datasheet containing patients age, gender, and pain score for all time points for both the CH and DAP groups., https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.16820.d22435931
Supplementary File 1: CONSORT checklist.
Supplementary File 2: CONSORT flow diagram.
Supplementary File 3: Trial protocol.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: endodontics, endodontic microbiology, endotoxins
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Endodontics, intracanal medication, obturation, rotary endodontic files
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 08 Nov 18 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)