Keywords
cnidaria, sea anemones, microsatellites, primers, Aulactinia, Cribrinopsis
cnidaria, sea anemones, microsatellites, primers, Aulactinia, Cribrinopsis
Sea anemones are known to live in clonal or partially clonal populations (Bocharova, 2015; Bocharova 2016; Bocharova & Mugue, 2012). Data based on sequences of mitochondrial (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA and cytochrome oxidase III) and nuclear (18S rRNA and 28S rRNA) genes, which are successfully used in phylogenetic research, are not applicable to population genetics studies because of the high amount of monomorphic samples. Sometimes it is not evident that a population is clonal, for instance, in the parthenogenetic populations of Aulactinia stella (Verrill, 1864) in the White and the Barents Seas (Bocharova & Mugue, 2012; Bocharova, 2015). Representatives of other species can combine sexual and asexual (clonal) reproduction in response to environmental changes (Bocharova & Kozevich, 2011). For Cribrinopsis albopunctata Sanamyan et Sanamyan, 2006 there is no data about its asexual or parthenogenetic reproduction and populations of this species usually consist of males and females. Thus, these two species are characterized by different reproductive modes. The development of polymorphic microsatellite markers resulted in the design of 41 primer pairs, which were subsequently screened using DNA from both A. stella and C. albopunctata to assess primer utility in different species and populations of the same species.
For this research, sea anemone specimens were collected in Avachinsky Bay of Kamchatka Peninsula at the depths of 11–18 meters and identified in vivo. The total DNA was extracted from the samples, which were preserved in 96% ethanol, using the Wizard SV Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega) with previous desiccation and grinding. Extracted genomic DNA was exposed to fragmentation by Covaris S-Series (Covaris, USA) resulting in average distribution of fragment lengths of about 150–200 bp, which were additionally estimated by capillary electrophoresis (Nanofor-05, Syntol, Russia) with non-denaturing polymer and intercalating dye. DNA libraries were prepared by using TruSeq DNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA). Then the libraries were enriched for the repeat motifs (AAAC)6, (AATC)6, (ACAG)6, (ACCT)6, (ACTC)6, ACTG)6, (AAAT)8, (AACT)8, (AAGT)8, (AGAT)8 and screened according to the protocol described in Glenn & Schable (2005). The fragments containing hybridization of biotinylated oligonucleotides with tandem microsatellite repeats was separated by magnetic Streptavidin M-280 Dynabeads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). The enriched genomic DNA libraries were treated using Miseq Kit v2 for 300 cycles in the paired-end read mode (250 + 250 bp) for MiSeq next-generation sequencing (Illumina, USA).
Sequences obtained were analyzed for the repeat regions by NGS analysis tool Geneious 10.2.3, which also compared sequences to determine the existence of duplicates. This software was also used to create 41 primer pairs flanking the repeat regions of interest. Primers were named Act ## and numbered sequentially.
The total DNA from pedal disc tissues of five A. stella specimens and three C. albopunctata specimens was extracted by Wizard SV Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted DNA was amplified using the newly created primers. An amount of 50 ng of the extracted DNA was amplified in 20 µL reactions with 1x SmarNGTaq Buffer (Dialat Ltd., Russia), 25 µM of each of four deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 µM of each fluorescent labeled forward and unlabeled reverse primers, and 1 unit SmarNGTaq polymerase (Dialat Ltd., Russia). Amplification of all the microsatellite loci was performed by Touchdown PCR with the following conditions: 96°C for 3 minutes for initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles at 96°C for 10s, 62°C for 30s (with a 0.2°C decrease in the second step of each cycle), 72°C for 10s; 10 cycles at 96°C for 10s, 56°C (with a 0.2°C increase in the second step of each cycle) for 30s, 72°C for 10s; 20 cycles at 96°C for 10s, 56°C for 30s, 72°C for 10s; 72°C for 10 minutes; ending with a 4°C soak.
One µL of PCR product was added to 24 µL of deionized formamide Hi-Di (Applied Biosystems, USA) and 1 µL of Liz-labeled ladder SD-450 (Syntol, Russia) and denatured at 95°C for 3 minutes. Products were visualized in 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA) using POP7 gel polymer.
Analysis of the obtained chromatograms was performed by GenMapper Software (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Of the 41 primer pairs developed, 5 (12.2%) resulted in poor or no amplification in both A. stella and C. albopunctata. Almost half (56.1%) of the remaining loci successfully amplified was monomorphic in the two species. Finally, 13 primer pairs appeared to amplify polymorphic microsatellite loci at combined panels for the two species (Table 1).
The raw data is available:
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1171106 (Bocharova et al., 2018a). The dataset contains three files in different formats (*.scv, *.geneious,*.fasta) with primer sequences of all 41 STR loci for Aulactinia stella and Cribrinopsis albopunctata.
- http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1144120 (Bocharova et al., 2018b). The dataset includes *.fsa files (the Prism Genetic Analyzer 3500, Applied Biosystems) of pooled DNA PCR product of 13 STR polymorphic loci for Aulactinia stella and Cribrinopsis albopunctata.
This work is supported by Russian Fund for Basic Research 16-04-01685.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional support came from the Syntol Company (www.syntol.ru) due to help of Vera Ustinova and Julia Monakhova with DNA libraries preparation and MiSeq sequencing. Special thanks are given to Nadya and Karen Sanamyan (Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Geographical Institute, Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences) for collecting and identifying of these anemone samples.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for developing the new method (or application) clearly explained?
Yes
Is the description of the method technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details provided to allow replication of the method development and its use by others?
Yes
If any results are presented, are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions about the method and its performance adequately supported by the findings presented in the article?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the rationale for developing the new method (or application) clearly explained?
Yes
Is the description of the method technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details provided to allow replication of the method development and its use by others?
Yes
If any results are presented, are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions about the method and its performance adequately supported by the findings presented in the article?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the rationale for developing the new method (or application) clearly explained?
Yes
Is the description of the method technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details provided to allow replication of the method development and its use by others?
Yes
If any results are presented, are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions about the method and its performance adequately supported by the findings presented in the article?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 27 Feb 18 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)