Keywords
Antibiotic resistance, Emerging pollutants, Risk assessment
Antibiotic resistance, Emerging pollutants, Risk assessment
For years, humankind has sought to mitigate the impacts produced by human development. Perhaps one of the most serious and unregulated problems in legislation is that of emerging pollutants (EP). According to Fernández et al. (2016)1 these are common-use chemical compounds of natural or synthetic origin, which, despite not being considered significant in terms of distribution and/or concentration, present a risk to the environment and human health. Within EPs, antibiotics make up a group that is becoming increasingly important and their presence in the environment has become a global public health problem. Concern surrounding the presence of antibiotics in bodies of water and the subsequent increase in bacterial resistance has led the WHO to publish a list of bacteria that have developed capacities for inhibiting widely-used antibiotics. Bacterial resistance according to Rodríguez, A. (2016)2 arises from the excessive and irrational use of antibiotics to treat infections that affect human beings’ bodies. This is due to an independent adaptive selection of the bacteria and the family of a specific strain as in the case of Staphylococcus aureus and its ability to inhibit conventional penicillin. This is not an isolated event; on the contrary, Cabrera, C. et al. (2007)3 maintain that by mutations in the chromosome of certain bacteria or by genetic exchange, bacteria can develop high innate resistance to antibiotics with several mechanisms between species of the same family or between different families. This study will explore the relationship that exists between bacterial resistance to antibiotics as a problem of emerging pollutants and public health for the inhabitants of Ecuador, taking area of residence as the reference.
In order to estimate the probability of an Ecuadorian contracting an antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection, one must consider the area where the person lives, the presence or absence of Escherichia coli in the main sources of water for human consumption in the country, and the antibiotic to be analysed (in this case ampicillin). The analysis was carried out considering the Bayes Theorem which, according to Marrero, D. (2014)4, is expressed as the conditional probability of a random event ‘A’ given another event ‘B’. Below is its formula, which takes into account that several events of A can be exclusive:
Where: P(Ai ) are the a priori probabilities.
P(B|Ai ) are the probabilities of B in hypothesis Ai.
P(Ai |B) are the a posteriori probabilities.
is the sum of the probabilities of B in the hypothesis Ai times the a priori probabilities.
Our analysis focuses on the occurrence of three events:
(i) the probability of consuming contaminated water, depending on the area where a person lives.
ii) the probability that a person who consumes contaminated water will contract an infection due to Escherichia coli.
iii) the probability that the contracted infection is resistant to antibiotics, using ampicillin as a reference.
In order to carry out this estimate, data published by the INEN according to Ecuadorians’ areas of residence has been taken as a reference. The data are shown in Table 1:
//Source: INEC, Population census (2010)5.
Area | Population | % |
---|---|---|
Urban | 9,090,786 | 63% |
Rural | 5,392,713 | 37% |
Total | 14,483,499 | 100% |
In the same way, the INEN provides information regarding water quality (shown in Table 2):
Source: INEC Survey (December, 2016)6.
Area | % of uncontaminated water consumption | % of contaminated water consumption |
---|---|---|
Urban | 84.6 | 15.4 |
Rural | 68.2 | 31.8 |
Total | 100 | 100 |
Thereafter, we applied the aforementioned Bayes Theorem to find out the probability that people living in urban or rural areas who consume drinking water may be contaminated with Escherichia coli. For this case:
P(Ai |B) is P(urban|contaminated water)
P(Ai ) is P(urban)&P(rural)
P(B|Ai ) is P(contaminated water|urban)&
P(contaminated water|rural)
By carrying out the same analysis for the rural population, one obtains a 54.81% probability that a person living in the rural area may consume contaminated water (Table 3).
Once the probability of a person drinking contaminated water is known, it is necessary to find out the probability of contracting an infection due to Escherichia coli by consuming contaminated water. According to Vila, J. et al.(2016)7, in a study of 33 people living in South America in urban and rural areas, there is a 9.1% and 12.2% respectively that they house the aforementioned bacteria.
Once the probability of contracting an E. coli infection due to contaminated water consumption is identified, it is necessary to find out how many of these infections are resistant to antibiotics, which in our case was ampicillin. Bianchi, V. et al., (2014)8, in a study conducted in the San Juan River in Argentina, showed that the average ampicillin-resistant UFC percentage in urban areas was 73.39% and for rural areas 92.85%. Using the Bayes Theorem for each of the cases described above, we obtained the following results:
This study shows that both urban and rural populations are exposed to an antibiotic-resistant infection. However, Ecuador’s rural population is more exposed because the water sources they use are not safe. This draws attention to the necessity of providing safe, clean drinking water to the entire population. Even so, the high standards of water quality that many Ecuadorian cities have does not completely eliminate the risk of contracting antibiotic-resistant infections, thus demonstrating that an urgent legislation reform is required in order to control the release of these types of pollutants into bodies of water.
Population and water quality data was obtained from the Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC), Population census (2010): http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/base-de-datos-censo-de-poblacion-y-vivienda/ and INEC, Survey (2016): http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/EMPLEO/2017/Indicadores%20ODS% 20Agua,%20Saneamiento%20e%20Higiene/ Presentacion_Agua_2017_05.pdf
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Plant nutrition
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 26 Mar 18 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)