ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report

Verhulst-Pearl growth model versus Malthusian growth model for in vitro evaluation of lead removal in wastewater by Photobacterium sp

[version 1; peer review: peer review discontinued]
PUBLISHED 25 Apr 2018
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
PEER REVIEW DISCONTINUED

Abstract

Mathematical modeling of microbial populations has a long history of application in the fields of ecology and environmental remediation. In the present study, the Verhulst-Pearl growth model and the Malthusian growth model were used to model and understand the kinetics of Photobacterium sp exposed to lead. The results show that goodness of fit of the Verhulst-Pearl growth model was better that the Malthusian growth model. Therefore, the Verhulst-Pearl growth model is considered the best option for proving useful and reliable information about Photobacterium sp kinetics growth in vitro.

Keywords

Photobacterium sp, Lead, Pb, Verhulst-Pearl growth model, Malthusian growth model

Introduction

It is well-known that some genera of bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, Ferroxidans, Ralstonia, Acidobacillus13, have very interesting capacities as heavy metal remediating agents, since they are capable of extracting metals from solid substrates or transform them into harmless forms. Furthermore, bacteria can be used as bio absorbents for the recovery of metals and for the treatment of industrial effluents4,5. For this reason, the application of these technologies and research for continuous improvements is necessary.

In a previous study, the application of Photobacterium sp to remove lead from wastewater was shown to be possible6. However, understanding the behavior of this strain within the experimental conditions was not studied. Particularly, computational modeling of the growth kinetics that aims to extract information about interactions between bacteria, nutrients and in this case the pollutant (lead; Pb) could be useful. For this reason, the present study intends to analyze growth of Photobacterium sp using two well-known mathematical models, the Verhulst-Pearl growth model and the Malthusian growth model7. These models have a long history of application in the fields of ecology, environmental remediation and industrial fermentation8.

Methods

The study uses kinetics data collected from the previous study in Quito-Ecuador, which studied the application of Photobacterium sp to remove lead from wastewater6. Briefly in the previous experiments, Photobacterium sp was exposed to two concentrations of Pb (20–100 ppm) in a general growth broth. The experiments were performed in times ranging between 0 and 86 hours, under a controlled temperature (25°C) and unsupervised at room temperature, ranging 5–23°C6 at Quito-Ecuador.

Malthusian growth model

This model is often referred to as the mathematical exponential law (MEL). It is extensively adopted in the fields of agronomy, ecology or microbiology. The MEL is therefore seldom referred to as the Malthusian Law, which is a widely accepted view to study Malthusian growth in ecology and microbiology.

The following equation was applied to the kinetics data in the present study:

        Pt = Poekt

Where, P(t) is the population in a time, Po is the initial population, k is the specific growth rate and t is the time in hours.

Verhulst-Pearl growth model

For values of t in the domain of real numbers, the S-shaped curve is denoted by the model below. The initial stage of growth is approximately stationary and subsequent is nearly exponential; then, as saturation begins, the growth slows, and at maturity, growth stops as shown:

The following equation was applied to the kinetics data in the present study:

Pt=Po+A1+ekm(tt0)

Where, P(t) is the population in a time, Po is the initial population, km is the maximum growth rate and t is the time in hours. t0 represents the time to achieve the middle of the growth and A represents the carrying capacity of the broth tested.

Data analysis

All fittings were performed with sigmaplot 10, using minimum least squares, evaluating the goodness of fit using adjusted R-squared.

Results

Fitting a bacteria growth model aims to understand its kinetics. In Table 1 it is evident that Verhulst-Pearl model has a good performance since a R-squared > 0.90, which is considered as acceptable to model bacteria kinetics curves5,9. In these fitted curves, it is noticeable that room temperature parameters differed drastically from 25°C in carrying capacity (A) and middle time (to) to achieve middle biomass concentration. Therefore, these parameters suggest that 25°C controlled temperature increases the performance in both Pb concentrations. Room temperature seems to reduce the growth considering that Quito-Ecuador is located at 2800 m.a.s.l. Moreover, this model explains the reduction in maximum growth ratio due to the increase of Pb concentration. This effect is present at both temperature conditions (Figure 1).

Table 1. Results of modeling data with Verhulst-Pearl growth model.

Temp=temperature, Pb=lead concentration in ppm.

TempLead (ppm)AtokmPoR-Sq
25°C206.8E+08330.1416.0E+070.987
25°C1007.0E+08410.0818.8E+060.975
Room205.2E+08640.1131.1E+080.916
Room1005.5E+08620.0851.4E+080.909
c1be3c84-2133-4264-b93f-21d282248923_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Modeling data with Verhulst-Pearl growth model.

(A) 25°C, 20ppm lead; (B) Room temperature, 20ppm lead; (C) 25°C, 100ppm lead; and (D) Room temperature, 100ppm lead.

Table 2 shows that the Malthusian growth model had an unacceptable goodness of fit, R-squared < 0.90 for all fitted curves. Therefore, this is considered as an unacceptable model for the bacteria kinetics curves tested. In these fitted curves, it is difficult see differences in temperature and Pb concentration. However, this model provides information about variations in growth ratio (Figure 2). It would be difficult to extend analysis since this model does not fit as well as the Verhulst-Pearl growth model.

Table 2. Results of modeling data with Malthusian growth model.

TempLead (ppm)PokmR-Sq
25°C202.33E+080.0160.718
25°C1001.27E+080.0220.866
Room207.22E+070.0250.886
Room1001.05E+080.0210.892
c1be3c84-2133-4264-b93f-21d282248923_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Modeling data with Malthusian growth model.

(A) 25°C, 20ppm lead; (B) Room temperature, 20ppm lead; (C) 25°C, 100ppm lead; and (D) Room temperature, 100ppm lead.

Dataset 1.Kinetics data obtained in Ramirez-Cando et al.6.
Uploaded with permission of all the authors.

Conclusions

Analysing the goodness of fit reveals that the Verhulst-Pearl growth model is the best option to model the kinetics of Photobacterium sp instead of the Malthusian growth model, at least in this particular case. Photobacterium sp is also suitable to remove lead from water as shown in Ramirez-Cando et al.6. The Malthusian model has no manner to estimate Carrying capacity since parameters in the model are developed to explain only the exponential growth phase. Moreover, parameters determined by Verhulst-Pearl growth model are very important in design further research and scaling to preindustrial process in microbiology as well as Monods model10.

Data availability

Dataset 1: Kinetics data obtained in Ramirez-Cando et al.6. Uploaded with permission of all the authors.11

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 25 Apr 2018
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Ramirez-Cando LJ, Alvarez-Mendoza CI and Gutierrez-Salazar P. Verhulst-Pearl growth model versus Malthusian growth model for in vitro evaluation of lead removal in wastewater by Photobacterium sp [version 1; peer review: peer review discontinued]. F1000Research 2018, 7:491 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14420.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Peer review discontinued

Peer review at F1000Research is author-driven. Currently no reviewers are being invited. What does this mean?

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 25 Apr 2018
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.