Keywords
Carbon Pool, Climate Change, Climate Ecology, Tree Carbon Storage
Carbon Pool, Climate Change, Climate Ecology, Tree Carbon Storage
The potential for desert plant species to capture carbon (C) has not been well investigated, especially with the potential impact of enhanced greenhouse gas emissions. This was supported by leading investigators such as Lal and colleagues1, who stated that the contributions of soil organic C dynamics on CO2 as a greenhouse gas, and its strategic importance in mitigating enhanced atmospheric CO2 are not well accepted. Moreover, estimates of net ecosystem production in deserts are incompatible with recent net primary production and C pools in deserts2. The potential for desertified ecosystems to sequester C are still considerable3. But a significant part of C can be sequestered within a reasonable time frame3. Especially that estimates of soil organic carbon (SOC) pool in desert and semi-desert ecosystems, for instance, are in the order of 159-191 billion tons C. But the role of SOC on historic increase in atmospheric CO2 are not widely recognized3.
Li et al.4 studied soil carbon sequestration potential in semi-arid grasslands with significant offsets to increasing atmospheric CO2 levels may be achieved in addition to erosion control and improved wildlife habitat. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations continue to rise due to human activities. CO2 is a leading greenhouse gas, the levels of which are directly affected by anthropogenic activities. In forested ecosystems there is a ubiquitous initial increase in net primary productivity5, however, as these systems shunt more C belowground heterotrophic communities may increase activity, resulting in net soil C losses. Similarly, in grassland ecosystems C uptake may increase, which in turns leads to increased rates of C cycling belowground and speeds up the loss of C from the slowest cycling C pool6. There is a need for C storage in different pools, with long residence times or which transfer C from organic to inorganic forms. Arid and semi-arid regions, for instance, account for about 30% of the earth terrestrial surface7 and these important areas are expanding due to anthropogenic impact. However, these arid environments have been understudied, despite recent studies that have shown these environments may be sinks for atmospheric CO28. The stability of soil C is also affected by desertification processes9.
There is a strong need to study semi-arid shrublands and deserts, since studies have shown that they remove similar amounts of CO2 from the air as forests and grasslands10–13. These semi-arid lands have high CO2 uptake due to three main factors: 1) the expansion of shrubland vegetation, 2) the cryptobiotic crust communities and 3) the accumulation of C in soil carbonates. These mechanisms may increase C in both above and belowground C pools which may sequester C and retain it in pools with various mean residence times. It has been estimated that arid and semi-arid soils may remove as much as 5.1 g C/m2/year from the atmosphere14. Stanbery et al.15 examined variability in soil carbonate storage at the pedon-scale, quantified analytical and measurement error isn soil carbonate measurements and defined the amount of carbonate stored in gravelly vs. non-gravelly soils.
Other studies have shown that this accumulation of C in soils as carbonates can occur over a very short period of time16 and that the conditions that lead to increased soil carbonates may be controlled by vegetation and the availability of calcium and bicarbonate17. The use of native plant species has also been suggested to improve soil C sequestration18. Land management may affect future amounts of SOC in semi-arid areas thereby turning them from sources into sinks of C19. Encouraging sustainable land management practices can contribute to restoring soil organic C stocks and to creating new C sinks, leading to improved C sequestration potentials20. Additionally, land management may turn sources of SOC into sinks of C in semi-arid areas19.
The present work was intended to consequently contribute to assessing C pools in the hyper-arid ecosystems of the UAE, using biomass that affects C allocation in the belowground compartment. Of great interest was to determine which species present the greatest increases in belowground organic and inorganic C pools. Globally, soils store more than twice the amount of C than is present in the atmosphere and terrestrial biomass C pools, combined21. Soil organic C may also have a longer mean residence time than atmospheric CO2 (5 years) or terrestrial biomass C pools (9 years, globally averaged)22,23. Even more exciting is the ability of some arid ecosystems to take atmospheric C, fix it via photosynthesis, move that organic C belowground and eventually transform that organic C into inorganic C under relatively short time scales8. These arid ecosystems have not been well investigated and it is unclear which plant species possess the greatest ability to sequester C both below as well as above-ground. In the present study we measured C sequestration potentials of different soil/vegetation associations as affected by the dominant tree and shrub species. It is therefore aimed to accurately quantify the amount of C removed from the atmosphere and stored in above and belowground C pools of plants that are native to this hyperarid environment.
This study site covered various land forms covering various areas across the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Table 1 list the location of the study plots, including geographical coordinates. The soil/vegetation features of each plot is also indicated. Figure 1 also overlays the location of the study sites.
A total of of 30 sites were visited in this study between May and September 2015. Sites represented diffrent land forms as described in Table 1 A site consisted of 10 × 10 m plots. Tree, shrub and herbaceous (if present) dimensions were assessed.
Aboveground plant samples were collected from leaves and stems. Samples were dried to estimate C content following the method reported previously24.
The amount of litter collected within three separate quadrats (10 × 10 cm), from underneath each plant, was weighed to estimate litter fall per unit area. The samples were then air dried, ground to 20 mesh in a Wiley mill, and oven-dried at 50°C for 48 h. Subsamples were used to determine moisture content (at abut 105°C for 48 h), ash content (500°C for 12 h) and total C fraction composition.
Soil cores were taken from each plant, within 0.5m of the plant main stem/trunk. Soil samples were dried for total C. Analyses were done using a Thermo Scientific Flash 2000 Combustion CHNS/O Analyzer. The amount of soil organic C (SOC) was determined.
Woody species were collected and kept in the herbarium of Biology Departmnet, UAE University. Following the methods described by 26, the diameter at breast height (DBH) was measured for all tree species. While the basal diameter (BD) was measured for all shrubs within the sampling areas. Sampling plots were selected across the 22 sites measuring 10 × 10 m.
Published allometric equations27 were adopted to assess carbon stocks in tree and shrub species. The fresh biomass for trees and shrubs was estimated using the following equations:
While the above equations estimate fresh weight, a 0.6 constant was used to estimate dry weight and 0.5 to estimate carbon content28. Root carbon was estimated using 0.2 reduction factor29. Tons per hectare are the units used hereafter.
Mountain valleys sequestered the highest C in the phytomass compartment with an average of 3.6 tons per hectare (Table 2), of which 1.32 tons per hectare were as aboveground tree biomass. The soil carbon compartment for this landform was 1.08 tons per hectare. Sand plains, had the smallest average sequestration potentials of 1.61 tons per hectare.
The proportions of carbon sequestration was highest in the soil compartment within sand plains (i.e. 49.1%). Soil carbon sequestration was lowest for plains with an average of 28.3%.
For tree species’ contributions to C sequestration, mountain valleys had the highest contributions of 1.32 and 0.26 tons per hectare as shoot and root phytomass; respectively (Figure 2). The lowest contribution from trees was observed in Sabkhas with average of 0.58 and 0.12 tons per hectare in shoots and roots, respectively.
Prosopis cineraria, Acacia tortilis and Zyzyphus spinachristi were the three dominant trees species recorded (Figure 3). The highest contribution was from Z. spinachristi with an average of 1.73 tons per hectare of sequestered C. The proportions were 83.2% and 16.7% as contributions from shoots and roots, respectively. Prosopis cineraria contributed the least in C sequestration with averages of 0.64 ton per hectare and 0.13 ton/ha as shoot and root components; respectively. Raw results are available as Underlying data30.
Shrubs species contributions to C sequestration is summarized in Figure 4. The introduced Prosopis juliflora had by far the highest average contribution of 3.47 tons of C per hectare. Most of which is in the above ground parts (83.3%) with the remaining C allocated belowground (i.e. 0.58 tons per hectare). An average C sequestration of 0.89 tons per hectare was estimated for Arthrochnemum macrostachyum and 0.76 tons per hectare for Haloxylon salicornicum. Both species are important in the saline soils of the UAE; about 83% and 84% of the Carbon is in the shoot system of each shrub, respectively. Halopeplis perfoliata, however, contributed the least C to the desert systems of the UAE. An average C sequestration of about 0.04 tons per hectare was estimated for this halophyte species common in salt marshes.
The percent litter content from various plant sources is summarized in Table 3. The average C content of litter from A. tortilis was the highest at about 49%. Litter from S. imbricata and A. macrostachyum had average C content of 48.8% and 47.7%, respectively. The lowest C levels were measured in P. juliflora litter , at about 36.5%.
Here we measured the potentials of C pools in different land forms (soil/vegetation associations) as affected by the dominant tree and shrub species. Plant characteristics regulate soil carbon storage through the outcomes of C assimilation and its storage belowground31. Changes in ecosystem soil C may be in response to a variety of management as well as environmental factors32. It therefore aimed to accurately quantify the amount of C removed from the atmosphere and stored in above and belowground C pools of plants that are native to the UAE arid environment. The C stored in aboveground components constitutes one-third of that in soils33. However, this differs from ecosystem to ecosystem as a relationship between soil C and climate have been reported, especially the positive impact of precipitation34. Mountain valleys sequestered the highest C in the phytomass compartment, with an average of 3.6 tons per hectare. It may be because of the limited anthropogenic impact on such ecosystems in the UAE. Human intrusions, such as that in relation to degradation, added to the further depletion of soil C3.
Desertification, degradation of soil and vegetation because of anthropogenic factors, among others, affect close to 4 billion ha globally35. The rate of desertification is estimated at 5.8 million ha per year35. Here it was the case for gravel plains, which was the most affected soil/vegetation association in the UAE. Unwanted plant species, which were indicators of overgrazing, were most abundant in such plains36. The proportions of carbon sequestration was highest in the soil compartment within sand plains (i.e. 49.1%). Soil carbon sequestration was lowest for gravel plains, with an average of 28.3%. At the species level, the highest contribution was from Z. spina christi, with an average of 1.73 tons per hectare of sequestered C. A different Ziziphus was reported to sequester 24 Mg/Ha37. For the introduced P. juliflora, we reported by far the highest average contribution of tons of C per hectare, most of which is in the aboveground part. It is important to note that such introduced species are widespread and still occupying more areas in the UAE. In semi-arid areas to which Prosopis and Acacia are adapted, 6.2109 Mg of carbon would be sequestered. Litter is an important aspect in the dynamics of soil C pools. Biological and physical processes play critical functions in litter decomposition38. In this study, we report that the average C content of litter from A. tortilis was the highest at about 49%. A large accumulation of C in the litter layer was reported in a forest ecosystem39. Land management also plays important roles in litter accumulation. Higher litter accumulation was reported when the land management was appropriate40.
In short, some land forms, such as mountain valleys, were shown to sequester more C than others, which constitutes a good reason to improve their conditions and minimise anthropogenic impacts. Focusing future identification of protected areas can be a practical option to improve these types of soil associations. Few shrub/tree species were also reported to have high potentials for C sequestration in the hyper-arid environment of the UAE. Species such P. juliflora are an example of floral species that accumulate large amounts of soil C. Such species, despite its negative invasive features, may be a good candidate to re-vegetate many of the marginal lands in the UAE.
Figshare: Soil Carbon. https://doi.org/10.6084/ m9.figshare.828143030.
This project contains SOILCarbon.zip, which contains the following underlying data:
PlantC.csv (detailing the plant carbon weight, where ’Before + C’ represents the weight of the plant and crucible before heating and ’After + C’ represents the weight of the plant and crucible after heating).
PlantSamples.csv (detailing the weight of plant samples before and after heating).
ShrubDim.csv (detailing the dimension of the assessed shrubs, where ’basal’ refers to the length of the stem, the lefthand ’crown’ refers to the length of the crown of the shrub and the righthand ’crown’ refers to the width of the crown).
SoilC.csv (detailing the soil carbon weight; for ’kind of sample’, ’in’ refers to soil taken from next to the plant and ’out’ refers to soil taken from the same site but away from the plant).
TreeDim.csv (Detailing the dimensions of the tree).
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
This project was funded by the National Research Foundation - UAE (Fund No. 21S095-U-IRCA 2014).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors are therefore grateful for the NRF funding and the UAEU support in making this project a successful collaboration. The support from our collaborators: the Environmental Agency Abu Dhabi and the Algonquin College - Ottawa, Canada is much appreciated. The help from Shaijal Ppuoyole and Abdul-Rasheed Palakot is also much appreciated.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Peer review at F1000Research is author-driven. Currently no reviewers are being invited.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)