Keywords
Al-kalakla, E. histolytica, H. nana, formal ether concentration technique, intestinal parasite, frequencies, Khartoum.
This article is included in the Global Public Health gateway.
Al-kalakla, E. histolytica, H. nana, formal ether concentration technique, intestinal parasite, frequencies, Khartoum.
We modified the aim and objective of the study in this version
In the Material and Methods section, the first subtitle changed from (Study Background) to (Study Area and Design).
In this version we have added that a negative result was obtained when we examined three slides without detecting internal parasite.
In this version we have amended the parasite stages which were detected by the technique used in this study.
In the Results section we edited the spelling mistake of word (occuarance) to the right (occurrence).
To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.
Intestinal parasites, particularly in tropical and subtropical areas, are a significant health issue1. Approximately 3.5 billion individuals are estimated to be impacted in developing nations and 450 million are sick as a consequence of these diseases, the majority being children2. Approximately one-quarter of the world's population is infected with intestinal parasites and about 80% of all deaths in developing nations are caused annually by infectious and parasitic illnesses3. There is a powerful correlation between the elevated incidence of these diseases and poverty, bad environmental health and insufficient health facilities3. Also involved is poor personal hygiene, an unsafe water supply and an absence of health education4. The transmission of intestinal parasites is based on characteristics of the parasite, actions of the individual and ecological and biological factors5. Transmission occurs by ingestion of contaminated fecal food or water, by hands contaminated with fecal matter coming into contact with the mouth or by skin penetration by larval stage of the parasite following direct contact with contaminated fecal soil6. Children of school-age are especially prone to symptoms, sometimes carrying a greater burden of parasites than adults7. Diagnosis is routinely performed using a microscope, with fecal samples prepared for microscopy by direct wet mounting or concentration methods. Although direct wet mounting has low sensitivity8,9, it is still used in low- and middle-income countries9. There are many methods to concentrate the stages of intestinal parasites; cysts, eggs and larvae can be analyzed as specimens using techniques such as formal ether sedimentation and flotation10. These techniques are better than direct wet mounting since they identify more parasites11.
This study is a cross-sectional study conducted in the locality of Al-Kalakla in the state of West Khartoum. This study was carried out between December 2016 and May 2017.
The study population was children at a primary school (Saeed primery boys school, Ebaid Khatiem primery boys school, the martyr Abdulsalam primary girls school and Ebaid Khatiem primery girls school), between the ages of 6 and 14. The purpose of the study was explained to the guardians, students and head of school and a total of 134 participants agreed to participate in this study, they were selected randomly. The children were split into three age groups (6–8, 9–11, 12–14 years) and the same number of male and female participants was selected (n=67 of each). A labeled, large-mouth stool container was given to each selected student for collection of fecal samples. Samples were collected during the school day, all samples were subjected to examine by direct smear examination, formal ether concentration technique and Saturated sugar flotation technique.
Wet preparation was achieved by blending a small part of the stool sample taken with a wooden applicator with a drop of normal saline on a slide. The sample was enclosed with a cover slip and systematically examined under a microscope using a 10X lens and elevated magnification 40X lens for further detail observation, after searching for three slides without detecting intestinal parasite, it was considered a negative result.
Approximately 1 g of feces from separate areas of the specimen was gathered and emulsified in glass beaker in 5 ml of formal saline. A further 5 ml were added and mixed from the same solution. The resulting suspension was strained through a strainer. The filtered sample was poured back into a centrifuge tube and an equal quantity of ether was added. The tube was shaken by hand for 1 min and then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. The upper three layers were removed and the sediment was transported to a slide covered with a cover slip and examined at 10X and 40X magnification under a light microscope.
Approximately 100 ml of saturated sugar solution (dextrose) was put into a glass measuring cup and approximately 1 g of stool sample was added. The fecal sample was blended with the saturated sugar solution for flotation. The fecal debris was filtered into another cup and the remaining fluid was drawn out. The preparation that was filtered was poured into a glass test tube. To the top of the tube was added fecal flotation solution. A cover slip was placed on the top of the tube. The pipe remained unchanged for 15 to 30 minutes and the covering glass was closely put on a slide and microscopically examined12.
E. histolytica, G. lamblia and Entamoeba coli were identified by presence of a cyst or trophozoite in the stool. Taenia spp., Schistosoma mansoni, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Hymenolepis nana were identified by presence of eggs of each helminth in the stool.
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 16). Using Chi square test, the significant obtained when P < 0.05. Data were presented in tables.
The sensitivity and specificity of each technique was calculated using the two formulae below:
Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from Committee of medical laboratory science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, ethical approval number (MLS – IEC – 08 – 16). Written informed consent for participation and publication of the data was obtained from the guardians of all participants included in this study.
Analysis showed that 48 of the 134 stool samples collected from participants were positive for gastrointestinal parasites in Al-kalakla locality, Khartoum state. This was an overall prevalence rate of 35.8%. Infection statuses of all participants, alongside the methods used to identify infection, are available as Underlying data13.
The research disclosed that in females the occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites was 38.8% while in males it was 32.8%. The difference in gender rates was found to be statistically insignificant (P=0.471; Table 1). Findings showed that age groups 6–8, 9–11 and 12–14 years had parasite prevalence rates of 26.4%, 36.3% and 53.8%, respectively. These variations in rates at P = 0.057 (Table 2) were statistically insignificant. The prevalence of different parasites was found as follows: E. histolytica (16.4%), H. nana (10.4%), E. coli (7.5%), A. lumbricoides (5.2%), S. mansoni (5.2%), G. lamblia (3.7%) and Taenia spp. (1.5%) (Table 3). The results showed that 28 (20.9%) were infected with single parasite and that there were 20 infected with more than one parasite (14.9%) (Table 4).
Gender | Number examined | Number positive | Prevalence (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Males | 67 | 22 | 32.8 |
Females | 67 | 26 | 38.8 |
Total | 134 | 48 | 35.8 |
Age group (years) | Number examined | Number positive | Prevalence (%) |
---|---|---|---|
6–8 | 53 | 14 | 26.4 |
9–11 | 55 | 20 | 36.3 |
12–14 | 26 | 14 | 53.8 |
Parasite | Number examined | Number positive | Prevalence (%) |
---|---|---|---|
E. histolytica | 134 | 22 | 16.4 |
H. nana | 134 | 14 | 10.4 |
E. coli | 134 | 10 | 7.5 |
A. lumbricoides | 134 | 7 | 5.2 |
S. mansonia | 134 | 7 | 5.2 |
G. lamblia | 134 | 5 | 3.7 |
Taenia spp. | 134 | 2 | 1.5 |
The frequency of gastrointestinal parasites by various parasitological methods was as follows: 35.8% by formal concentration method, 17.9% by the wet preparation method and 16.4% by the saturated sugar flotation method. A comparison between the detection rate of each method found that detection rates were significantly different (P = 0.000; Table 5).
Assuming that the formal ether concentration technique was the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the wet preparation technique was 50% and 100% respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of the saturated sugar flotation technique was 45% and 100%, respectively (Table 6).
It was evident from the results that the overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites among children's schools (Saeed primery boys school, Ebaid Khatiem primery boys school, the martyr Abdulsalam primary girls school and Ebaid Khatiem primery girls school), in Al-kalakla was high (35.8%) and was found to be higher than the rate reported by Muhajir et al. (2017) in Alkalakal (30%)14. Nevertheless, our rate was found to be lower than that reported by Gabbad and Elawad (2014) in Elengaz, Sudan (64.4%)15. The study found that females had a slightly higher occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites (38.8%) than males (32.8%). This finding was not aligned with Muhajir et al. (2017) in Al-kalakla, which found higher rates of infection in males (16.5%) compared to females (13.5%)14.
The highest prevalence rate (53.8%) among the 12–14 age group was reported in this study. This rate did not agree with that of Magambo et al. in Southern Sudan, who reported the most affected age group was those 6–10 years16. The higher occurrence of gastrointestinal parasite may be due to student’s hygiene and lack of adequate water cycle in these schools.
The findings of this study indicated that the common gastrointestinal parasites in children's schools were E. histolytica (16.4%), H. nana (10.4%), E. coli (7.5%), A. lumbricoids (5.2%), S. mansoni (5.2%), G. Lamblia (3.7%) and Taenia spp. (1.5%), while Muhajir et al. reported E. histolytica the most common gastrointestinal parasites in Al-kalakla (15.5%), G. lamblia (12.5%), H. nana (1.5%) and S. mansoni (0.5%)14. However, Gabbad and Elawad in Elengaz, Sudan, revealed that G. lamblia was the predominant gastrointestinal parasite (33.4%), followed by H. nana (26.4%), T. saginata (8.6%), Enterobius vermicularis (6.2%), S. mansoni (4.4%) and E. histolytics (3.6 %)15.
As far as the detection levels for the three methods used were concerned, it was evident that the best detection rate (35.8%) was recorded for the formal ether concentration method and the lowest rate (16.4%) was recorded for the saturated sugar flotation method, while the wet preparation method showed a detection rate of 17.9%. Our results on formal ether were not in agreement with Eisa in Keryab Village, Sudan, who reported a 90% detection rate17. However, the detection rate reported in our study was lower than the detection rate reported by Eman (44%)18.
The study found that the detection rate for wet preparation (17.9%) was lower than the detection rate reported by Eman (41.4%) in Southern Sudan18. Furthermore, detection rate for saturated sugar flotation technique (16.4%) was lower than the detection rate for Duria in Khartoum, Sudan, reported (58.6%)18.
Surprisingly, the findings showed a sensitivity of 50% and a high specificity (100%) of the wet preparation method and a sensitivity of 45% and a high specificity (100%) of the saturated sugar flotation method. This could probably be attributed to severe intestinal parasite infections among subjects studied in this study.
From the outcomes, it can be concluded that gastrointestinal parasites are common among children's schools in Al-kalakla, Khartoum state. Furthermore, prevalence rate was significantly greater among females, the highest rates of infection were recorded in the 12–14-years age group and, lastly, the formal ether concentration method showed the highest sensitivity level for the identification of distinct gastrointestinal parasites.
Figshare: Hala and Ahmed file.sav. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9804869.v113.
This project contains the following underlying data:
Hala and Ahmed file.sav (parasites detected in stool samples for each child, with method used to detect them)
Data dictionary (2).docx
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
We would like to express our immense gratitude and appreciation to the department of parasitology and medical entomology staff of Sudan University of Science and Technology, also to the school manager and the all participant in this study.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Infectious diseases (including parasitic diseases), antimicrobial resistance, and medical education
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Infectious diseases (including parasitic diseases), antimicrobial resistance, and medical education
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 3 (revision) 07 Sep 20 |
||
Version 2 (revision) 26 Nov 19 |
read | read |
Version 1 04 Oct 19 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)