ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

Recent advances in understanding and managing postoperative respiratory problems

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 18 Feb 2019
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Postoperative respiratory complications increase healthcare utilization (e.g. hospital length of stay, unplanned admission to intensive care or high-dependency units, and hospital readmission), mortality, and adverse discharge to a nursing home. Furthermore, they are associated with significant costs. Center-specific treatment guidelines may reduce risks and can be guided by a local champion with multidisciplinary involvement. Patients should be risk-stratified before surgery and offered anesthetic choices (such as regional anesthesia). It is established that laparoscopic surgery improves respiratory outcomes over open surgery but requires tailored anesthesia/ventilation strategies (positive end-expiratory pressure utilization and low inflation pressure). Interventions to optimize treatment include judicious use of intensive care, moderately restrictive fluid therapy, and appropriate neuromuscular blockade with adequate reversal. Patients’ ventilatory drive should be kept within a normal range wherever possible. High-dose opioids should be avoided, while volatile anesthetics appear to be lung protective. Tracheal extubation should occur in the reverse Trendelenburg position, and postoperative continuous positive airway pressure helps prevent airway collapse. In combination, all of these interventions facilitate early mobilization.

Keywords

respiration, hypoxia, hypercapnia, ventilation

Introduction

Postoperative respiratory complications commonly occur, with an incidence of up to approximately 10% in general surgery14 (even higher with thoracic surgery5). Complications include post-extubation hypoxemia, reintubation, acute respiratory failure, pulmonary edema, pneumonia, and atelectasis. These increase hospital length of stay, unplanned ICU admissions, hospital readmissions, mortality, and costs611. For example, respiratory failure after abdominal surgery can increase 30-day mortality 10-fold6.

Pathophysiology

Pathologically, we can characterize respiratory complications as being due to respiratory muscle dysfunction or as a primary airway disease. The latter can in turn be subdivided into upper airway-related complications, such as reintubation of an obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patient, or pulmonary complications, such as pulmonary edema.

Both respiratory muscle dysfunction and airway disease can develop as a consequence of an imbalance in ventilatory drive. Both increases and decreases in ventilatory drive are potentially harmful and may, for example, increase the risk of aspiration by negatively affecting the interaction between breathing and swallowing (Figure 1). Sedation due to opioid and anxiolytic therapy commonly leads to upper airway dysfunction, resulting in insufficient respiration (hypopnea/apnea), but also affects the breathing–swallowing coordination and pharyngeal muscle strength, both of which contribute to pharyngeal dysfunction and increased risk of aspiration12. In turn, an increase in respiratory drive (e.g. during hypercapnic respiratory failure) can lead to high transpulmonary pressure during inspiration, which increases lung stress. Supplementation of inhaled carbon dioxide was shown to reverse upper airway collapsibility induced by propofol13, but excessive hypercapnia increases the likelihood of pathological swallowing14. Thus, perioperative physicians need to balance their interventions to keep ventilatory drive within normal limits. Upper airway collapse can lead to desaturation, atelectasis, and respiratory failure. Patency of the upper airway depends on competing dilating versus collapsing forces15,16. The former includes the pharyngeal dilator muscles (genioglossus and tensor palatini) and caudal traction on the airway from lung expansion (which can be improved by positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]). Sedatives, opioids, or even delirium can decrease airway dilator muscle tone. Dilating forces are influenced by atelectasis or the inevitable supine position of surgery. In contrast, collapsing forces include external pressure from surrounding soft tissue, which is increased in the presence of edema, obesity, blood clots, and tumors or in the supine position.

d9216310-16d4-44cb-aac8-c5dc26209865_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Effects of respiratory drive on perioperative respiratory complication risk.

Changes in respiratory drive play a key role in the development of postoperative respiratory complications. Both increases and decreases in respiratory drive are potentially harmful and can affect the risk of aspiration. In addition, an increase in respiratory drive, for example during hypercapnic respiratory failure, can lead to high transpulmonary pressure during inspiration, which increases lung stress. Sedation commonly leads to upper airway dysfunction, resulting in insufficient respiration (hypopnea/apnea) but also affects the breathing–swallowing coordination and pharyngeal muscle strength, both of which contribute to pharyngeal dysfunction and increased risk of aspiration12. Supplementation of inhaled carbon dioxide was shown to reverse upper airway collapsibility induced by propofol13, but excessive hypercapnia increases the likelihood of pathological swallowing14. Thus, perioperative physicians need to balance their interventions to keep ventilator drive within normal limits. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Remarkably, perhaps, significant postoperative pulmonary edema is reported in up to 1–2% of patients9, and causes include negative pressure pulmonary edema, fluid shifts, and, rarely, neurogenic edema in acute hypertension or after cerebral injury17.

More common than edema is atelectasis, and its pathophysiology starts minutes after induction18. A reduced regional transpulmonary pressure in dependent lung areas is accentuated by inflammation induced by surgery, bacterial translocation, chest wall restriction, and cephalad diaphragm displacement by surgical retraction. This extends postoperatively, such that a restrictive pattern worsens respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. Pain, high inflation driving pressures, and inflammation all contribute.

Ventilator-induced lung injury has multiple causes. In addition to barotrauma, reduced lung compliance in unrecruited areas causes overinflation of aerated lung tissue in nondependent areas with subsequent “volutrauma”. Cyclical effects lead to “atelectotrauma”. As mentioned above, the release of local proinflammatory mediators also contributes to lung injury “biotrauma”19,20.

Recommendations for patient management

Modifiable perioperative factors in patient management are shown in Table 1. All the aforementioned pathophysiological processes make the optimization of ventilation as a protective strategy logical. What is really important, though, is preoperative screening and patient selection. The Score for Prediction of Postoperative Respiratory Complications (SPORC) is useful in this regard, as it relates the probability of re-intubation to ASA score, emergency surgery, heart failure, and pulmonary disease21. However, SPORC does not include factors such as smoking. Smoking is associated with increased risk of postoperative respiratory complications, and smoking cessation before surgery has been shown to decrease adverse respiratory events22,23.

Table 1. Perioperative factors associated with postoperative respiratory complications (PRCs).

FactorMain findingsDefinition of PRCCohortReference
Case management
Open vs.
laparoscopic
surgery
Laparoscopy reduced PRCsPulmonary infection, ARDS,
symptomatic pleural effusion,
respiratory insufficiency,
pulmonary embolism
1,214 patients undergoing
major hepatectomy
Fuks et al.30
General vs.
regional
anesthesia
Neuraxial anesthesia reduced
mortality and PRCs
Pulmonary embolism, pneumonia,
respiratory depression
9,559 patients undergoing
surgery with or without
epidural or spinal anesthesia
(systematic review)
Rodgers et al.31
Ventilation
Protective
ventilation
Intraoperative protective
ventilation was associated with
lower risk of PRCs
Respiratory failure, reintubation,
pulmonary edema, pneumonia
69,265 non-cardiac surgical
patients undergoing general
anesthesia with endotracheal
intubation
Ladha et al.28
Case-
specific
PEEP
Reduced risk of PRCs and
hospital length of stay with
PEEP ≥5 cm H2O in abdominal
surgical, but not craniotomy,
patients
Respiratory failure, reintubation,
pulmonary edema, pneumonia
5,915 major abdominal
surgical patients and 5,063
craniotomy patients
de Jong et al.29
FiO2High intraoperative FiO2 was
dose-dependently associated
with PRCs and mortality
Respiratory failure, reintubation,
pulmonary edema, pneumonia
73,922 mechanically ventilated
non-cardiac surgical patients
Staehr-Rye et al.32
Pharmacological factors
Volatile
anesthetics
Higher doses of inhalational
anesthetics were associated
with lower risk of PRCs, reduced
mortality, and reduced costs
Respiratory failure, reintubation,
pulmonary edema, pneumonia
124,497 non-cardiac surgical
patients undergoing general
anesthesia with endotracheal
intubation
Grabitz et al.33
NMBAsPostoperative residual
block (TOF ratio <0.7) after
pancuronium administration was
a risk factor for PRCs
Pneumonic infiltrations or
atelectasis on chest X-ray
691 patients undergoing
abdominal, orthopedic, or
gynecological surgery under
general anesthesia
Berg et al.34
Intermediate-acting NMBA use
was associated with increased
risk of PRCs
SpO2 <90% with a decrease after
extubation of >3%, reintubation
18,579 patients undergoing
surgical anesthesia with NMBA
use and 18,579 matched
reference patients
Grosse-Sundrup
et al.35
NMBA use (and neostigmine
reversal) was dose-dependently
associated with PRCs
Respiratory failure, reintubation,
pulmonary edema, pneumonia
48,499 non-cardiac surgical
cases with NMBA use
McLean et al.36
NMBA use was associated with
increased risk of PRCs
Respiratory failure, pulmonary
infection, pulmonary infiltrates,
atelectasis, aspiration
pneumonitis, bronchospasm,
pulmonary edema
22,803 non-cardiac surgical
patients undergoing general
anesthesia
Kirmeier et al.37
Fluid
management
Liberal fluid administration was
associated with PRCs
Respiratory failure, reintubation,
pulmonary edema, pneumonia
(secondary outcome)
92,094 non-cardiac surgical
patients undergoing general
anesthesia with endotracheal
intubation
Shin et al.38
Liberal fluid administration had
a higher risk of pneumonia and
pulmonary edema; goal-directed
therapy had a lower risk of
pneumonia
Respiratory failure, pulmonary
edema, pneumonia, and pleural
effusion (secondary outcome)
5,021 surgical patients
enrolled in 35 RCTs (meta-
analysis)
Corcoran et al.39
OpioidsHigh intraoperative opioid dose
was associated with increased
readmission rate but not PRCs
Respiratory failure, reintubation,
pulmonary edema, pneumonia
(secondary outcome)
74,748 surgical patients
undergoing general anesthesia
Grabitz et al.40
Most events occurred within 24
hours after surgery and were
preventable in most cases
Respiratory depression357 acute pain claimsLee et al.41
Opioids and sedatives are
independent and additive
predictors of the outcome
Cardiopulmonary and
respiratory arrest
6,771,882 surgical inpatient
discharges
Izrailtyan et al.42

ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; NMBA, neuromuscular blocking agent; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation; RCT, randomized controlled trial; TOF, train of four.

The method of anesthesia induction can be preventative for postoperative complications. Keeping a patient as upright as possible during induction may help optimize mask ventilation and also help during extubation. This approach may prevent atelectasis, which may be especially important in patients with OSA24,25.

After intubation, lung-protective mechanical ventilation aims to maintain lung recruitment by keeping transpulmonary pressures within the optimal (linear) part of the local pressure–volume curve. Results from ICU patients suggest reduced morbidity and mortality in the setting of acute lung injury26,27. Typically, a PEEP of at least 5 cm H2O and a median plateau pressure of 16 cm H2O appear to be the most beneficial28. However, protective effects of PEEP may be very procedure specific, as a PEEP of approximately 5 cm H2O in major abdominal surgery is beneficial, whereas this is not matched by effects of the same level of PEEP in neurosurgery29. Also, PEEP must be patient specific: those with poor chest wall compliance need higher levels of PEEP43. Although high FiO2 is used to maintain oxygenation, it may also worsen pulmonary function, probably by promoting atelectasis32.

Interestingly, it has been found that an increased average minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthetics, including nitrous oxide, improves 30-day mortality and the risk of pulmonary complications33. The adverse influence of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is now well established, especially when associated with inadequate reversal3437,44,45. Monitoring of NMBAs along with reversal guided by neuromuscular transmission is now mandatory according to minimum monitoring guidelines in the UK46. The choice of reversal agent remains controversial; while sugammadex was shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative residual paralysis compared with neostigmine in one randomized controlled trial47, a recent multicenter observational study (POPULAR trial) found no association between the reversal agent used and postoperative respiratory complications37.

With regard to fluid administration, it is the most-restrictive and the most-liberal strategies that have been associated with respiratory complications, whereas moderate regimens appear to be optimal38,39,48. Pain is an adverse factor for respiratory complications, but very high doses of opioids are also potentially harmful40. Neuraxial blockade may reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality in subpopulations31,49, and laparoscopic surgery, which may contribute to better analgesia, further appears beneficial30. Good pain relief also promotes early mobilization, which shortens patients’ length of stay50. Monitoring is important in the detection of early signs of respiratory complications and the decision to admit and observe a patient in the ICU as opposed to the PACU51.

Conclusions

There is a considerable literature base supporting the individual results highlighted above. What is emerging is the need for the development and implementation of center-specific guidelines, based on algorithms, coupled with key performance indicators developed by multidisciplinary teams (Figure 2). This can form the basis of a continuous quality improvement program. An important driver in achieving this goal is a local champion or “facilitator”, who can lead the integration of the needed processes.

d9216310-16d4-44cb-aac8-c5dc26209865_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Integration of multilevel guidelines for the prevention of postoperative respiratory complications (PRCs).

In a multidisciplinary approach, center-specific guidelines, algorithms, and performance indicators should be developed. Their implementation (red solid arrows) can be facilitated by a local “champion”. Factors concerning the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period need to be addressed, as each can have an impact on outcomes. Periodic review and assessment of processes and outcomes (green dotted arrows) will ensure continuous improvement. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; ICU, intensive care unit; NMBA, neuromuscular blocking agent.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Feb 2019
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Eikermann M, Santer P, Ramachandran SK and Pandit J. Recent advances in understanding and managing postoperative respiratory problems [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):197 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16687.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 18 Feb 2019
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Feb 2019
Mehmet Haberal, Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Haberal M. Reviewer Report For: Recent advances in understanding and managing postoperative respiratory problems [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):197 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18240.r44289)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
0
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Feb 2019
Albert Dahan, Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 
Approved
VIEWS 0
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Dahan A. Reviewer Report For: Recent advances in understanding and managing postoperative respiratory problems [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):197 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.18240.r44290)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Feb 2019
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.