ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Malignant Thymoma And Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis

[version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 16 Dec 2019
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is present in 50% of thymomas and is rarely associated with thymic carcinoma. We present the case of a 49-year-old woman with malignant thymoma, treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy, and a late seronegative MG diagnosis. This case reports the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of the potential correlation of malignant and benign diseases.

Keywords

Seronegative myasthenia gravis, malignant thymoma, tomotherapy, paraneoplastic disorder.

Introduction

Malignant thymoma is a rare epithelial neoplasm and accounts for 30% of anterior mediastinal tumors. The highest incidence is in the 7th decade of life and is more common in men. About one-third of patients are asymptomatic at diagnosis, which is commonly found as incidentaloma. Of the symptomatic patients, 60% presents with a parathymic syndrome manifestation and 40% has symptoms relating to impingement by intrathoracic mass13. Myasthenia Gravis (MG) has the highest incidence among the parathymic syndromes and occurs in 50% of patients with thymoma. Of patients with MG, 15% have a thymoma and 60% will have thymic lymphoid hyperplasia1,4. As an autoimmune disorder, 85% of these patients have autoantibodies directed against postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Thymectomy is the main treatment modality and complete resection is an important prognostic factor, with locoregional relapse reduction and possible resolution of MG symptoms. If high risk factors are present, radiotherapy should be considered as adjuvant treatment1.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old caucasian woman, businesswoman, without important medical history, presented with fatigue and occasional dyspnea in May 2016. A computed tomography (CT) scan was performed and showed a pre-vascular mass in the anterior mediastinum with 7 centimeters of axial axis with features of a malignant thymoma. A 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography integrated with computer tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) showed a hypermetabolic mediastinal mass, suggestive of high-grade neoplasia. The remaining diagnostic investigation was normal, without alterations of autoantibodies directed against postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), thyroid hormones, β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) and α-fetoprotein. The patient underwent incomplete surgical resection due to tumor adherence to the brachiocephalic venous trunk. The histological study revealed a WHO type B1 in IIA stage of Modified Masaoka. The patient was referred for adjuvant radiotherapy and received 54Gy (1.8Gy/fraction) over the tumor bed and a total of 60 Gy (2Gy/fraction) in 30 fractions over residual tumor, by tomotherapy (Figure 1). During treatment the patient maintained an excellent general status, without relevant toxicity. One year after radiotherapy, the patient revealed severe worsening of fatigue with muscle weakness in the upper limbs, dysphagia and right diplopia. Since AChR antibodies were negative, fibromyalgia was considered. Due to maintenance of suspected MG, she started pyridostigmine 180 mg per day and presented fatigue improvement, but poor tolerance. Currently in the 33rd month of clinical control, the patient is medicated with deflazacort 6 mg, fluoxetine 20 mg, alprazolam 0.5 mg, trazodone 100 mg and maintains a stable symptomatic condition with no signs of disease recurrence (Figure 2). Surveillance continues through chest CT every 6 months and regular evaluation in radiation oncology, pneumology, psychiatry, neurology and neuro-ophthalmology.

137ed798-9012-401d-94bf-cbe8cf7ef65e_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Isodose curves distribution of treatment plan: axial, coronal and sagittal views of PTVs 60Gy and 54Gy.

137ed798-9012-401d-94bf-cbe8cf7ef65e_figure2.gif

Figure 2. CT scan demonstrating mediastinal tissue densification compatible with postoperative fibro-residual changes, with no evidence of signs of disease recurrence.

Discussion

Paraneoplastic neurological degenerations (PND’s) affects 1 in 10,000 patients with cancer4. MG is included and is often associated with pathological abnormalities of the thymus. Given the incidence, when a diagnosis of thymoma is suspected, further investigation should be undertaken to exclude MG1. A problem of seronegative MG has been the lack of a gold standard in its diagnosis and, it is known that, the proportion of these patients varies from 5% to 30% among studies5. Seronegative MG has been reported in a few cases of benign thymoma and in only one case of malignant thymoma6. It should be noted that autoantibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) are present in about 10% of the all cases of MG and in 30% of AChR seronegative MG7. In our case, the diagnosis of MG was supported on clinical and pharmacological basis. We should be aware that, besides autoantibodies against AChR, other antibodies can be associated with this disease, including autoantibodies against MuSK and lipoprotein-related protein 4 (LRP4), however these were not tested. Additionally, new assays could improve the sensitivity in antibody detection7.

Generally, the highest incidence of malignant thymoma is in the 7th decade of life, but for patients with MG, the peak of incidence is in the 4th decade, as observed in this case1.

The differential diagnosis allowed the exclusion of neuroendocrine, germinative, hematologic and pulmonary tumors, which is crucial for the treatment plan. Surgery is the main treatment for malignant thymoma and 85% of stage II tumors are resectable. Complete resection is an important prognostic factor. In these patients, thymectomy can also be considered as an effective treatment for MG with symptomatic improvement in 50% of cases. This response seems to be associated with high AChR activity1. The efficacy of thymectomy in the treatment of MG is noted in the MGTX trial, showing that local control allows less dependence on immunosuppressive medication and less exacerbations requiring hospitalization8.

Adjuvant RT is associated with better disease free-survival (DFS) with an impact on the overall survival of stage II and III tumors with a positive margin1. In this case, with incomplete resection, RT is considered to be mandatory for satisfactory local control. Advanced RT techniques, such as tomotherapy, that allows the combination of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), with helical radiation deposition, can provide high tumor control rates and a satisfactory toxicity profile1.

In our case, the patient showed worsening of neurological symptoms after the thymectomy and adjuvant RT. At that moment, fibromyalgia was considered in the absence of autoantibodies against AChR. Characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue and sleep disorder, fibromyalgia is more frequent in women, especially if other autoimmune disorders are present. MG is a differential diagnosis of fibromyalgia, as it is associated with post-exercise and generalized fatigue but not coupled with widespread pain, a symptom that our patient did not present9,10.

Some studies report the importance of assuring clinical stability with immunosuppression prior to surgery in order to prevent rapid perioperative deterioration7. Given the late diagnosis, our patient only started corticotherapy after thymectomy and the systemic progression of the immunological disease.

It is possible that, in this case, the early diagnosis with initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, especially before surgery, could have changed the course of the disease1,8.

In conclusion, given the impact of an earlier diagnosis of MG on quality of life, when thymoma is suspected, seronegativity should prompt further investigated rather than result in MG exclusion.

Patient consent

Obtained.

License

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 16 Dec 2019
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Sousa C, Cruz M, Neto A et al. Case Report: Malignant Thymoma And Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2019, 8:2110 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21393.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 16 Dec 2019
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Oct 2021
Y Muralidhar Reddy, Institute of Neurological Sciences, CARE Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 8
The authors described an interesting case of a middle-aged woman who developed seronegative myasthenia gravis following the partial resection and radiotherapy of malignant thymoma. These are my comments about this paper. 
  1. Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis in
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Reddy YM. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Malignant Thymoma And Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2019, 8:2110 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.23563.r94308)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 Oct 2021
Nguyen Minh Duc, Department of Radiology, Ha Noi Medical University, Ha Noi, Vietnam 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 8
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
The case’s history and progression had enough information.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Duc NM. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Malignant Thymoma And Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2019, 8:2110 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.23563.r94313)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Dec 2019
Bruno Fionda, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 12
The authors presented a very interesting care report about malignant thymoma and seronegative myasthenia gravis.
The case is presented with sufficient clinical details and the discussion included highlights the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Fionda B. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Malignant Thymoma And Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2019, 8:2110 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.23563.r57996)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 16 Dec 2019
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.