Keywords
Intussusception, Bowel obstruction, Abdominal pain
Intussusception, Bowel obstruction, Abdominal pain
Generally, there were a few minor changes required in the whole manuscript. In the legend part of Figure 1, we corrected ‘bowl’ with bowel. We should emphasise that due to shortage of diagnostic equipment, MRI or CT scans or even histological analyses were not done. It would have made it much easier.
To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.
Intussusception is commonly defined as telescoping of a proximal part of an intestinal loop towards the distal part of the loop1–6. The incidence of intussusception is 1–3 cases per 1,000,000 population per year2,7. The condition is more frequent in children than in adults1. Patients present sometimes with nonspecific symptoms8,9. The majority of patients come to hospital with abdominal pain and vomiting9. As these are unspecific symptoms, diagnosis of intussusception could be missed or even delayed before one would entertain intussusception as a cause of abdominal pain10. The unspecific presentation makes it difficult to define clearly the diagnosis before surgical operations1,11. Ordinarily, half of these cases are diagnosed in theater12. Helpful diagnostic tests include plain abdominal film13,14, abdominal CT scan15 and ultrasound16. Operative procedures to reduce the intestine is the treatment modality of intussusception1,17. In this paper we present a patient with intussusception with nonspecific symptoms who presented to Orotta National Referral Hospital, and emphasize the importance of early CT scan for quick and definitive diagnosis.
A 38-year-old female patient presented to Orotta National Referral Hospital, Asmara, Eritrea, in May 2017 with abdominal pain and vomiting of 3-month duration. The pain was diffuse, intermittent and more on the periumbilical area. She only vomited after ingesting food, otherwise she does not. There is no history of abdominal distension and she was passing gas. Her condition gradually worsened from time to time. There was no history of fever, no bloody vomiting, and no history of jaundice or urinary complaints. There was no known family history of intestinal obstruction.
On physical examination, the patient appeared sick and emaciated, although vital signs where within normal limits. She had slightly pale conjunctiva and dry mucosa. She had good air entry on both lungs with normal heart sound. There was diffuse tenderness on the abdomen but more on the epigastric region. There was no guarding or rebound tenderness. There was no any palpable mass on the abdomen until 1 day before the operation, when a large suprapubic mass was detected. Bowel sounds were present.
Laboratory findings showed that complete blood count was within the normal limit. Hemoglobin of 10 g/dl (normal range, 12–16 g/dl), white blood cell count of 7×103/µl (normal range, 5–10 × 103/μl), platelet count of 350×103/µl (normal range, 150–400 × 103/μl). Urinalysis reveled no abnormal finding and blood chemistry values were aspartate transaminase levels of 57 U/l serum (normal range, 8–48 U/L), alanine aminotransferase level of 43 U/l (normal range, 7–55 U/l), amylase of 191 U/l (normal range, 23–85 U/l). Several plain abdominal x-rays were done with no pertinent findings. The last time plain abdominal x-ray was done showed a distended small intestine and with multiple “air-fluid levels”. Ultrasound of the abdomen depicted pockets of fluid collections. No abnormality was observed upon gastroscopic study (mild duodenal ulcer with excessive bile reflux). CT scan and MRI were not available.
Despite the diagnostic challenges, several differential diagnoses were entertained, such as chronic peptic ulcer disease cholecystitis acute pancreatitis and partial intestinal obstruction and was managed conservatively. The patient was being treated as case of peptic ulcer disease before her surgical operation and was taking amoxicillin 1g twice daily and metronidazole 500mg twice daily for 10 days.
At 1 day before surgery, an abdominal mass was felt during repeated physical examination. Non-operative reduction using hydrostatic or pneumatic pressure by enema was not attempted. Surgical intervention was decided and performed 2 weeks after initial presentation, with an impression of small intestine obstruction secondary to malignancy. The patient was kept nothing per mouth (NPO) and was given normal saline intravenous fluid, broad-spectrum ceftriaxone (1 g intravenous twice a day) and metronidazole (500 mg intravenous three times a day). She was also given hydrocortisone (100 mg intravenous three times a day for 3 days). The patient was also administered 2 units of blood were before surgery. During laparotomy a large mass of 20×20 cm was identified in mid jejunum and a leading tumor had caused intussusception and coiling of the small intestine (Figure 1 and Figure 2). During laparotomy, intussusception reduction was attempted manually but the large intestine was too greatly looped, tangled and edematous to be reduced so resection was decided. Around 1 meter of the bowel was resected, and anastomosis was done in two layers. A biopsy of the leading tumor later showed it to be a simple hemangioma of the small intestine. In her postoperative management, she was kept NPO for 3 days and took intravenous fluids. Ceftriaxone and metronidazole were continued for 10 days. On her second day postoperatively, abdominal auscultation revealed the start of bowel sounds. She was discharged 2 weeks after surgery and was appointed to come for her follow-up after a month. In her follow up visit full remission was confirmed.
The preoperative diagnosis of intussusception remains challenging as the patients usually have nonspecific symptoms during their presentation to medical facilities11. CT scans aid diagnosis considerably and usually shows a “bull’s-eye” sign18,19. Early in her presentation, the patient did not have signs of intestinal obstruction, but because of her persistent vomiting and epigastric pain other diagnoses were suggested. The diagnosis was greatly delayed partly because of diagnostic constraints. The temporary unavailability of the only CT scanner in the whole country made it difficult for early and accurate diagnosis. Looking at the importance of CT scan and MRI in the diagnosis of many medical and surgical conditions, it is highly recommended that the Eritrean Ministry of Health should import several additional CT scans or MRIs for a successful diagnosis and management of such health conditions. It is recommended as well to use CT scan as early as possible when a patient is suffering from a long-standing abdominal pain and vomiting.
No data is associated with this article.
Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Gastrointestinal surgery
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Partly
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
References
1. Marino F, Lobascio P, Martines G, Di Franco AD, et al.: Double jejunal intussusception in an adult with chronic subileus due to a giant lipoma: a case report.Chir Ital. 57 (2): 239-42 PubMed AbstractCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: General surgery
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Partly
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Gastrointestinal surgery
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 21 Apr 21 |
read | |
Version 1 14 Jan 19 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)