Keywords
neuroblastoma, neurosphere, stem cell
This article is included in the UCL Child Health gateway.
This article is included in the University College London collection.
neuroblastoma, neurosphere, stem cell
Neuroblastoma is the most common extra-cranial solid tumor occurring in children, and the most commonly diagnosed cancer in children under the age of 1 year1. Tumors are thought to have embryological origin in the neural crest, arise within the sympathetic chain or adrenal gland, and are frequently metastatic2. The disease is strikingly heterogeneous with a range of clinical phenotypes, from spontaneous regression, including in cases with metastases, to aggressive disease with marked resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. New approaches to therapies supported by the availability of suitable tumor models that more closely resemble the human disease are essential for improving outcomes for this disease.
Established neuroblastoma cell lines have the advantage of being widely available, and enable comparison of research worldwide by their use as a common standard. However, cell lines are limited in their ability to reflect disease physiology due to adaptation to prolonged culturing conditions. Inevitable evolution and changes in transcriptional response occur during culturing, which vary between laboratories3,4, and may alter diverse cell behaviors such as drug response. The potential for proliferation of subclones with greater intrinsic capacity to survive in vitro may lead to loss of genetic variability within a cell line compared with polyclonal cancer populations in humans.
Increasingly it is recognized that in vivo mouse models of tumors, established in immunodeficient animals following minimal or no in vitro passaging (Patient-Derived Xenografts; PDX) is a valuable tool for evaluation of therapeutic agents. Whilst many PDX models have been established by immediate surgical implantation of freshly acquired tumor surgical samples, this is not always a practical approach. Neurospheres are spherical cellular clusters derived from neural stem cells, that develop under culture conditions of serum free media supplemented with growth factors5. Initially produced from adult CNS tissue, they were the first demonstration of proliferative capacity in the adult brain, and have since been derived from embryonic stem cells, and CNS tumor cells. Cancer stem cells have been identified in a range of malignancies6, and have been implicated in initiation and progression of solid tumors7, and development of resistance to therapy. Growth of neurospheres in stem cell media is hypothesized to enrich for cancer stem cells. Given the importance of cancer stem cells as a potential target for treatment options, and the advantages of primary cultures over standard cell lines, it is necessary to clarify and validate methods for culturing neurospheres from primary material in neuroblastoma.
It is therefore important to investigate avenues of utilizing shorter term primary cultures such as those established in stem cell media, based on the hypothesis that they may still remain representative of the driver genetic features of the original tumor stem cells, and have limited adaptive changes to tissue culturing conditions. Hence, we sought to establish neurosphere primary lines from neuroblastoma surgical samples, to determine the reproducibility of the technique, and to generate a resource for future research studies in therapeutics, genetics and stem cell biology. We found a high overall success rate (55%) of establishment from surgical samples.
The study had ethical review board approval (REC reference 14/WM/1253 “Establishing primary cultures and cell lines from pediatric cancers”) and samples were made available following informed consent. Patients were eligible if there was a known or suspected diagnosis of neuroblastoma. All samples were included based on known or suspected diagnosis of neuroblastoma without selection on clinical criteria. In some cases with insufficient material for culture, the transport fluid used for sample transfer (0.9% saline) was placed directly into culture.
Tru-cut needle biopsies or tissue from tumor resections from neuroblastoma patients were transferred directly from operating theatre to the hospital histopathology laboratory. Following sterile cut up and routine diagnostic processing including freezing of material for research, surplus material was evaluated by a consultant pathologist for tissue viability and made available for culture. Tissue was manually disaggregated in a 10cm tissue culture dish using a sterile scalpel. Tumors that dissociated readily in this way were placed immediately into stem cell media in 25cm2 flasks, 24 well plates or 12 well plates depending on the available tissue. Since it is not possible to perform an accurate cell count on the partially dissociated tumor, choice of culture container was based on estimation of size that would yield approximately 100% confluence, were the sample fully disaggregated. Where spare solid material was unavailable from a biopsy, up to 1ml of saline used to transport the sample to the histopathology laboratory was taken and added to 4ml of stem cell media in a 25cm2 flask. When more than 1ml of transit fluid was provided, it was centrifuged at 300G for 5 minutes and the pellet resuspended in stem cell media. Samples that were tougher to disaggregate were digested with Accutase (Thermofisher 00-4555-56) for up to 1 hour, or until obvious disaggregation was observed, and divided between wells of a multiwell plate based on the estimation of confluence as above.
Disaggregated cells and tumor fragments were placed into standard serum free neurosphere culture media (Stem Cell Media, SCM) composed of DMEM/F12 (Sigma-Aldrich D8437),° 1% B27 (Gibco 17504044) with 20ng/ml EGF (Sigma Aldrich #E9644) and 20ng/ml FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor, Peprotech 100 – 18B) in the presence of penicillin and streptomycin antibiotics. Cells were propagated at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cultures were inspected twice a week for cell density and presence of neurospheres, and split 1:2 to 1:5 depending on cell density and speed of growth. Cultures were frozen in serum free DMEM/F12 media with 10% DMSO at approximately 107 cells per ml.
A total of 14 randomly selected representative primary cultures were analyzed by flow cytometry. To produce a single cell suspension necessary for this, cells growing as a monolayer were detached with Accutase (Thermofisher) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, while neurospheres were disaggregated with Accutase and the mechanical force of gentle pipetting. Surviving cells, re-suspended into single cell suspension, were stained in FACS tubes using saturating amounts (1–5ul of stock) of antibody in 100ul PBS using the following panel of directly conjugated monoclonal antibodies all from Biolegend: GD2-PE (357304, RRID: AB_2561885), CD56-APC/Cy7 (318332, RRID: AB_10896424), CD45-BV711 (304049, RRID: AB_2563465) controlled for nonspecific staining using isotype-matched labelled polyclonal antibodies. The stained primary culture cells were incubated on ice with antibody mix for 30 minutes and then washed with PBS and centrifuged at 300G for 5 minutes. Data was collected with the BD LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data analysis used FlowJo software (v8.8.3).
The gating strategy excluded dead cells by a live/dead stain using DAPI. To exclude leukocytes that may be present from blood in the original sample, the resulting live population was gated on CD45 negative and CD56 positive cells, the latter a standard marker for neuroblastoma. This gated cell population of CD45-ve/CD56+ve cells was then examined for expression of GD2, also ubiquitously expressed on neuroblastoma.
Chi-squared tests were used to determine significance of association of categorical variables; for example successful versus non successful expansion correlated with pre versus post chemotherapy. Data were tabulated and tests of significance were performed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and GraphPad Prism v6.0
Between October 2014 to end of 2016, tumor biopsies or resections of 67 consecutive neuroblastoma samples from 52 patients treated at Great Ormond Street Hospital London were systematically evaluated for their ability to establish primary neurosphere lines. Of these, 39 were primary needle biopsies and 28 were surgical resections of which 24 were post chemotherapy resections and 4 were primary (treatment-naïve) resections.
The success in terms of establishment of cultures was determined by the ability of cultures to produce discrete visible neurospheres. All cultures derived from neuroblastoma samples were observed to grow as a mixture of phenotypes including neurospheres, single suspension cells, and as monolayer, although often one of the three growth patterns was predominant. Cases could be dichotomized into those that formed spheres within the first 14 days of establishment and then went on to form long term successful cultures, and those that never formed spheres and were classified as “unsuccessful cultures”. The overall success rate, as thus defined, was 55%. It appeared that successful establishment of neurospheres could be made from chemotherapy-naïve primary tumors and post chemotherapy surgical samples, as well as primary needle biopsies. Successful establishment of lines is summarized in Table 1. Of 43 chemotherapy-naive samples (39 biopsies and 4 surgical excisions), 29 (67%) were successfully established, whereas for the post-chemotherapy surgical samples success rate was 8 out of 24 (33%), which is significantly inferior (Chi Sq p=<0.008) (see underlying data8). This suggests that the protocol, if applied to optimally procured tissue, would have a success rate over 65%.
Of the chemotherapy-naïve surgical excisions, 2 of these 4 were from recurrences.
Due to the impossibility of counting cells both at the start of culturing and following establishment of spheres, it is not possible to plot growth curves. However, the range of time from initial seeding to establishment of a confluent 75cm2 flask is approximately 2 to 10 weeks showing the marked heterogeneity of growth rates.
In order to determine that these were neuroblastoma cells, 14 representative samples were analyzed by flow cytometry. Cells from primary cultures were assessed for expression of the pan leucocyte marker CD45, which neuroblastoma cells do not express, and for ubiquitously expressed NBL markers CD56 and GD2. Of the samples tested, 79% exhibited this characteristic neuroblastoma staining pattern. We found that the neurosphere cultures showed a very bright and homogeneous staining for both NBL markers (Figure 1)
A) representative flow cytometric staining for two independent cultures (excision culture 3544 (upper) and biopsy culture 4669 (lower) following gating on live cells. B) graphical representation of the staining pattern in 14 evaluated samples; positivity was categorized into dim, medium and bright based on MFI and scored as 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
We were interested in whether it is possible to establish neuroblastoma lines when using very small amounts of tissue. In cases with insufficient tissue to culture, 1ml of transportation fluid was put directly into 4ml stem cell media (SCM) in a 25cm2 tissue culture flask, testing the hypothesis that small amounts of residual tumor cells within the transport media would be able to establish. Where transport fluid provided was more than 1ml, this was centrifuged and the pellet resuspended in SCM. Cultures established from transit fluid had a comparable success rate to those established from solid tissue samples (9 out of 15= 55% versus 25 out of 39 =64% for biopsies: Chi Sq p=0.78).
To perform a further unbiased comparison, eight patients had neurospheres cultured from the same biopsy with separate culturing of the solid tissue and surgical transit fluid. In three there was no successful growth, in three there was concordance of growth from the two sources, and in two there was success from solid tissue but not transit fluid; there were no cases with success of transit fluid but failure from solid tissue. Therefore transit fluid appears a less reliable source of material but a useful adjunct in the context of scarce material.
In addition to growth as neurospheres, primary cultures established in SCM were observed to grow as adherent monolayers, single cell suspensions, or mixtures of all three growth patterns. Moreover, there is marked heterogeneity in the size of neuropheres both within and between samples. It is not possible to quantify this heterogeneity, but all the NBL SCM lines contained some elements of adherent, single cell suspension and neurospheres. SCM derived from gliomas can be grown as adherent cultures by coating culture flasks with laminin and so we were interested in whether neuroblastoma primary cultures could also adopt this phenotype. We did not attempt initial establishment in laminin in any cases. In our hands, when established or establishing SCM lines were transferred to laminin, the degree of attachment increased markedly, with outgrowth of adherent spheres and associated adherent cells growing out as a monolayer. In some cases where growth in suspension appeared slow, the change to laminin appeared to accelerate growth. Because of the impossibility of counting cells in neuropheres without majorly disrupting them, it was not possibly to quantify these aspects of altered growth in laminin. On return of laminin cultured cells to non-coated flasks, they reverted to predominant suspension growth pattern.
Patient characteristics and ability to establish neurospheres is shown in Table 2. The number of male samples were 37 out of 67. The ability to establish neurospheres did not vary depending on gender (59% vs 50%). Biopsies which demonstrated only undifferentiated neuroblastoma had a higher but non-significant success rate in establishing neurospheres than those which showed any evidence of differentiation or post chemotherapy changes (60% vs 45%). Age, stage, MYCN amplification and the presence of segmental chromosomal aberrations were all non significant in terms of neurosphere success rate (Table 2).
There were no significant associations with neurosphere establishment (Chi-square). L1, L2, M or MS stage disease at diagnosis used the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System.
Six patients had two samples collected at different time points during treatment. For four of them there was no concordance for success between the timepoints whereas two patients (one success and one failure) the different timepoints were concordant. Therefore we failed to find any evidence that patient-specific factors govern success rate.
Here we present data from a series of 67 samples diagnosed with neuroblastoma, from which tumor tissue or surgical transit fluid was obtained and used to culture tumor spheres under conditions commonly used in the culture of neural stem cells6. Tumor spheres were subsequently dissociated and assessed by flow cytometry for presence of neuroblastoma markers GD2 and CD56, to show that cells and tumor spheres grown in culture retain the characteristic markers the cells of their tissue of origin. These cells may then be used as targets in vitro for drug development, or for engraftment in vivo for the development of patient-derived xenograft models that better reflect the heterogeneity of this disease.
Although well established that it is possible to use SCM to propagate stem cells in the form of neurospheres from a number of different cancer types9, the literature is sparse in regards to their evaluation in neuroblastoma. We have therefore systematically evaluated success rate and shown that with simple culturing techniques it is possible to establish primary lines which retain the characteristic immunophenotypic features of neuroblastic tumors. Further studies will be required to establish the success rate of formation of tumors, for example in xenograft models. Moreover, it will be interesting to study the ability of these cells to differentiate into neuroblasts in vitro, for example by transfer to normal growth media with serum, as well as the mutational drift compared to the original tumor if any.
It would be advantageous to have a method of establishment of primary cell culture which reproducibly leads to cell expansion. Even if the expanded cells represent a subclone that are adapted to in vitro conditions (for example cancer stem cell expansion in stem cell media), this still represents an advantage over methods such as establishment of cell lines in normal growth media with serum, that typically go through a crisis phase before establishment of an emergent line that is presumably highly evolved for adaptation to tissue culture conditions, and therefore less likely to represent the in vivo tumor. Conventional two-dimensional monolayer models have been useful in understanding many of the characteristics of neuroblastoma cell biology, but in addition to the concerns about genetic evolution to adapt to typical cell culture conditions, they do not accurately reflect the multicellular physiology of tumors in vivo or how the tumor microenvironment is developed. Neither adherent monolayer cultures nor neurospheres are physiological, and occur only during in vitro culturing conditions, however the latter may offer some advantages as a research tool. Although neurospheres do not have the architecture and vasculature of in vivo tumors, their three-dimensional structure may have advantages of cell monolayers in terms of better representing aspects of three-dimensional tumors such as central hypoxia and drug penetrance. Future studies on neurosphere permeability and response to therapeutics might be of interest to evaluate their role as an in vitro tumor model.
The establishment of neurospheres comprised of primary neural stem cells has also been frequently used and there exist a variety of methods for their establishment6. However, the sphere culture model is limited by its sensitivity to culture technique including sensitivity to alterations in media or cell density, or frequent passaging and dissociation5,10. In our hands the neuroblastoma SCM cultures do show this sensitivity to changes in environmental conditions but retain the capacity to recover from stress if left alone in normal SCM growth conditions. Due to the long-term nature of their propagation, meticulous attention to sterility is needed to prevent the outbreak of microbial contamination.
While neurospheres represent a straightforward approach for maintaining cancer cells in culture, and whilst they are a potentially useful tool for cancer stem cell investigations, further studies are needed to determine how useful they will be in developing biological or therapeutics models for basic or translational research. Our demonstration of high success rate of their establishment using a uniformly applied protocol is a valuable contribution to the field for identifying an alternate and reproducible approach to expanding the reagents available for neuroblastoma research.
The study had ethical review board approval (REC reference 14/WM/1253 “Establishing primary cultures and cell lines from pediatric cancers”) and all patient samples were collected with written full consent
Open Science Framework: Primary neuroblastoma cultures database. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/T2RFB8
This project contains the following underlying data:
FACS data (folder containing output FACS files for different cases)
Flow Cases - reference table.docx (Reference table for FACS output files)
Full data sheet no identifiers.xlsx (spreadsheet of sample characteristics)
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
This work was supported by the Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity [Leadership award to JA and W1134, VS0118, W1029 and W1076], GOSH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Research in Childhood Cancer, Great Ormond Street Hospital Histopathology Department, and the Wellcome Trust through a Clinician Scientist Fellowship.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Pediatric oncologist (physician-scientist); translational research focusing on genetic analyses of neuroblastoma and other high risk pediatric cancers
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neuroblastoma
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Paediatric Haematologist & Oncologist, translational research in neuroblastoma & personalised medicine
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neuroblastoma and children's cancer in general. Palliative care, statistics.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Version 1 10 Jun 19 |
read | read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)