Keywords
Gynura procumbens, diabetes mellitus, fertility, proteomic, Sambung nyawa
Gynura procumbens, diabetes mellitus, fertility, proteomic, Sambung nyawa
Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that is often associated with male infertility, causing disruption to spermatogenesis, testicular impairment, and erectile and ejaculation dysfunction1. Disruption to spermatogenesis and testicular impairment in diabetic rats has been reported to cause low sperm quality2. Current medicine, such as metformin and other oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs, claimed to significantly reduced blood glucose level; however, they could not improve the fertility problems associated with diabetes3. Medicinal plants or herbs have been long used in traditional practice and can be considered as alternative treatments for some diseases. Gynura procumbens is one of the herbs that has shown potential for treating various diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cancer and, recently, fertility. A previous study demonstrated that G. procumbens had potential as anti-hyperglycaemic agent by lowering the blood glucose level of diabetes-induced male rats4. It is claimed that G. procumbens imitates the mechanism of action of insulin, increasing the glucose uptake into the skeletal muscle5. Additionally, G. procumbens extract has the ability to improve the fertility of diabetes-induced male rats3,6. To further elucidate the effect of G. procumbens aqueous extract (GPAE) on sperm quality, a proteomic analysis was performed to identify and quantify the differential expression of total sperm proteins after treatment with G. procumbens extract.
This research has obtained ethical approval from the Animal Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (FST/2013/MAHANEM/31-JAN./492-FEB.-2013-FEB.-2015). All efforts were made to ameliorate harm to animals, achieved by inducing to imitate diabetes conditions with streptozotocin (STZ) intravenously at a dose of 50 mg/kg bodyweight (BW) in all groups except the control normal group, which was left uninduced.
A total of 28 male Sprague Dawley rats aged eight weeks (120–200 g) were used in this study. All rats were proven fertile and provided by the Animal House of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. All animals were acclimatized for seven days, wherein their food pellet (Rat Chow, Barastoc, Ridley, Australia) and drink intakes were given ad libitum. The rats were kept in PVC cages at controlled room temperature with a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle.
G. procumbens were harvested from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia glass house (2.9300°N, 101.7774°E). The G. procumbens aqueous extract was prepared as described previously3. Briefly, the leaves part of G. procumbens were harvested and dried in the oven for 72 hours at 48°C. The dried leaves then were ground to dust and extracted for three hours at 60°C. The extract produced was in liquid form, later sent for freeze-drying and kept in 4°C for freshness.
Experimental methods and procedures were detailed as previously7. Briefly, male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study, which were randomly hand-picked and divided into four groups, with seven rats in each group. Randomization was performed in choosing the rats to avoid bias in the experiment. One group served as a normal untreated group (N), while the three other groups were induced with 50 mg/kg BW STZ intravenously for type 1 diabetes induction. The blood glucose level of each rats was measured after 72 hours of STZ induction. Rats with blood glucose level at 13 mmol/L and more were considered as diabetic and used in this study. These diabetic rats served as (i) diabetic-untreated (negative control), (ii) diabetic-metformin treated (positive control) (500 mg/kg BW) and (iii) diabetic-GPAE treated (450 mg/kg BW) groups. Treatment was given via oral gavage for 14 consecutive days after seven days of STZ induction at the Animal House, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. On the 15th day, all rats were euthanized by inhalation of diethyl ether for sperm protein analysis.
Sperm protein extraction was performed as described previously8. Briefly, sperm samples from each rat were collected separately from the caudal epididymis and minced in Biggers-Whitten-Whittingham medium (91.06 mM Sodium chloride, 4.78 mM Potassium chloride, 2.0 mM Calcium chloride, 1.17 mM potassium phosphate, 2.44 mM Magnesium sulphate, Sodium hydrogen carbonate, 0.25 mM Sodium pyruvate, 21.55 mM Sodium lactate, 5.55 mM glucose, and bovine serum albumin)9. Briefly, the samples were incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator for 30 minutes at 37°C, to allow the sperm to swim up. Sperm samples were then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was mixed with lysis buffer (7 M Urea, 2 M Thiourea, 4% 3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl)-dimethyl-ammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 0.8% Immobilized pH Gradient (IPG) buffer, 1 mM phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)). The samples were then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, added to 60 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and kept at 80°C until used. The concentration of sperm proteins was determined using the Bradford assay10.
A total of 100 µg of the sperm protein samples from each group were used for one-dimensional SDS-PAGE. Protein samples were loaded onto 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels and run for eight minutes or until all the proteins stacked up in the resolving gel. The gel was then cut for trypsin digestion using the in-gel trypsin digestion method11. For this purpose, excised protein bands were treated with DTT for one hour at 57 °C to reduce the disulphide bridges, followed by Iodoacetamide for another hour at room temperature in the dark for alkylation purposes, as previously described11. Gels were rehydrated with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and dehydrated with acetonitrile for three times, respectively. Enzymatic digestion was performed by incubating samples with trypsin for 30 minutes at 4 °C in a 1: 50 (w/w) ratio. The digestion products were then incubated with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate for overnight at 37 °C. Digested peptides were sent for liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for protein identification and quantification.
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed as described in Kamaruzaman et al.7. Briefly, the peptide samples were analysed using a liquid chromatography (LC) system (UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano, Dionex) coupled to a Linear Trap Quadropole (LTQ) Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Bremen, Germany). A total of 1.0 µL of digested samples from each group were injected into a reverse phase column (15 cm × 75 µm internal diameter, particle size of 2 µm, 100 Å, C18 PepMap column) and eluted at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The elution mobile phase composition was 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). The eluted peptides were separated in 5–40% solvent B for 91 minutes, 95% solvent B for 2 minutes, 95% solvent B for 6 minutes and back to 5% solvent B for 2 minutes. Data were acquired in data dependent mode. Full scan spectra in the range of 310–1800 m/z were acquired. The automatic gain control (AGC) was targeted at 4.0 × 105 with a maximum injection time of 50 ms and 3 seconds in top speed mode, where precursors were selected with a maximum cycle time of 3 seconds. Precursors with an assigned monoisotopic m/z and a charge between 2 and 7 were further analysed. All precursors were filtered using a 20 second dynamic exclusion window with an intensity threshold of 5000. The MS/MS spectra analyses were performed using rapid scan rate and collision-induced dissociation (CID), with normalized collision energy (NCE) set to 30% and high energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD) at 28%, a 1.6 m/z isolation window, AGC targeted at 1.0 × 102 and a maximum injection time of 250 ms.
Data processing was conducted according to previous studies12,13. Raw files for each biological replicate were analysed together using the MaxQuant software (version 1.5.3.30)14. The derived peak list was searched using the Andromeda search algorithm embedded in the MaxQuant workflow. The protein sequence database used for protein identification analysis was the Rattus norvegicus database, obtained from Uniprot database (proteome ID: UP000002494, accessed on February 2016). The MaxQuant parameters were set as enzyme trypsin and allowed up to two miss cleavages. The peptide length was set minimally up to seven amino acids. The spectra search included carbamidomethylation of cysteine as a fixed modification and oxidation of methionine was set as a variable modification. Since no labelling was performed, multiplicity was set to one. Peptide spectrum match (PSM) and protein identification were filtered using a target-decoy approach with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1 %. The second peptide feature was enabled. The label-free quantification (LFQ) of protein was done using the MaxLFQ algorithm integrated in MaxQuant. Other MaxQuant settings were set as default. All resulting information was reported in the “proteinGroups” output file (proteinGroups.txt in the combined file), containing the full list of identified and quantified proteins. This file has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium15 via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011373.
The data were further analysed for protein quantification using Perseus software (version 1.5.4.1)16. The hits to the reverse database, contaminants and proteins identified with modified peptides were eliminated. Then, the LFQ intensity ratios were transformed by log2. Missing values were imputed by drawing random numbers from a normal distribution to stimulate signals from low abundance proteins, using the default parameters described previously12. The value of log2 (LFQ ratios) for each sample were averaged and statistically analysed as per Kamaruzaman et al.7. In short, data were displayed as mean ± standard error of mean. The statistical analysis for protein LFQ intensities were compared using Perseus software (version 1.5.4.1) (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05).
The dataset is composed of raw and processed LC-MS/MS data for the proteome profiling of rat sperm. Samples were collected from the caudal epididymis of four different groups of rats; normal-untreated, diabetic-untreated (negative control), diabetic-metformin treated (positive control) and lastly, diabetic-GPAE treated. LC-MS/MS, followed by MaxQuant and Perseus analyses, were carried out to identify and quantify the total sperm proteins (Table 1).
Subject area | Reproductive Biology |
More specific area | Proteomics of rat sperm |
Type of data | Raw and processed data |
How data was acquired | Experiments performed using LC system (UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano, Dionex) coupled to an LTQ Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) |
Data format | Raw, processed |
Experimental factors | Male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 8 weeks (120–200 g) were randomly divided into four groups. One group served as normal untreated group while three other groups were induced with STZ (50 mg/kg). These three groups were divided into; (i) diabetic-untreated group (negative control), (ii) diabetic metformin-treated group (positive control) and (iii) diabetic-GPAE-treated group (450 mg/kg). |
Experimental features | Rat sperm proteome description and relative quantification. Extracted proteins were run on SDS-PAGE before being reduced, alkylated and tryptic digested. The peptide samples were then subjected to LC-MS/MS for protein profiling and analysed using MaxQuant and Perseus software. |
Data source location | UKM, Bangi, Malaysia (2.9300°N, 101.7774°E) |
Data accessibility | The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium15 via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011373. |
Related research article | K.A. Kamaruzaman, W.M. Aizat & M.M. Noor, Gynura procumbens Improved Fertility of Diabetic Rats: Preliminary Study of Sperm Proteomic. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med. (2018) 1-131. |
Protein identification revealed 473 proteins, and using a stringent search in MaxQuant software (including filtering contaminants and hits to decoy database), a total of 88 proteins were found in all groups. Identified proteins were later quantified using MaxQuant and Perseus software. This information revealed the effect of G. procumbens on the male diabetic rat reproductive system, specifically on the sperm proteins that are involved in fertilization.
The elucidation of sperm proteins using high-throughput proteomics techniques is still rather limited, especially in complementary medicine studies. Most of the previous studies17,18, especially those involving herbal extract treatments on murine model organisms, mainly utilized a 2D gel-based approach, which is far less sensitive than shotgun proteomics19. Most of these studies identified only around 200–300 proteins, which may not profile the entirety of the sperm proteome. This shortcoming may be due to the low throughput of the gel technique, as well as the inability to visualize low-abundance proteins16.
On the other hand, shotgun proteomics mainly relies on the acquisition of peptide identities from digested total protein samples using an LC-MS/MS approach. In this study, 2411 peptides were found, which corresponds to 473 proteins. The high number of identified proteins suggests the applicability and sensitivity of shotgun proteomics, as compared to the more conventional 2D gel approach. Hence, shotgun proteomics, particularly using LC-MS/MS Orbitrap, can be considered as an effective strategy for producing a comprehensive proteome profiling of rat sperm, especially regarding GPAE treatment. Additionally, this dataset can be used as a primary guide for the characterisation of protein biomarkers for sperm quality and fertility in male rats.
Dataset on ProteomeXchange, Accession number PXD01133: https://identifiers.org/px/PXD011373
Rattus norvegicus reference proteome was obtained from Uniprot, Proteome ID UP000002494: https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000002494.
This research has been funded by Economic Transformation Programme Research Fund (ETP-2013-080) and a Research University Grant (GUP-2016-056).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Male reproduction.
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Partly
References
1. Kamaruzaman KA, Aizat WM, Mat Noor M: Gynura procumbens Improved Fertility of Diabetic Rats: Preliminary Study of Sperm Proteomic.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018; 2018: 9201539 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Proteomics, Transcriptomics, Metabolomics, Microbiome.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 11 Jun 19 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)