Keywords
Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy, genome, assembly, annotation
Toxicodendron radicans, Eastern Poison Ivy, genome, assembly, annotation
Eastern Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans, Anacardiaceae) is well known in the Eastern United States, Canada, Mexico and parts of China for causing contact dermatitis, an itchy and painful rash in most of the human population (Barceloux, 2008). The rash, along with accompanying blisters, is caused by urushiol, an oil compound in the plant's sap. Urushiol-induced allergic rashes are a Type IV hypersensitivity reaction (Kalish & Johnson, 1990). This type of reaction is a cell-mediated response and can take hours to days to produce symptoms (Williams et al., 1999). Approximately 15% of people have no allergic reaction to urushiol, but most people experience a reaction from between 5–12 days after exposure. Allergic reactions can increase in duration and severity after each incident (Bonnekoh et al., 2019).
Exposure to the urushiol in Toxicodendron radicans can cause hypersensitivity in related plants, such as mango, Mangifera indica (Yoo & Carius, 2019), and the Chinese Lacquer Tree, Toxicodendron vernicifluum. Consumer products made from the Chinese Lacquer Tree are manufactured by curing the urushiol-containing sap to a clear, hard, waterproof substance. Improperly cured products can cause contact dermatitis in urushiol-hypersensitive people several years after manufacture, and present an ongoing health challenge to lacquerware workers (Ma et al., 2012).
A complete genome sequence for this species will allow the insight into the evolution of the urushiol biosynthetic pathway.
A leaf from a single wild-collected Toxicodendron radicans plant was used as the source of genomic DNA. Extraction was performed on tissue from a single leaf using the Qiagen DNAeasy genomic extraction kit for plants, using the standard process. A paired-end sequencing library was constructed using the Illumina TruSeq kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The library was sequenced on an Illumina Hi-Seq platform in paired-end, 2 × 150bp format.
The resulting fastq files were trimmed of adapter/primer sequence and low-quality regions with Trimmomatic (v0.33) (Bolger et al., 2014). The trimmed sequence was assembled by SPAdes (v2.5) (Bankevich et al., 2012) followed by a finishing step using RagTag (v1.0.0) (Alonge, 2020) to make additional contig joins based on conserved regions in related plant species: Mangifera indica (mango, GCA_011075055) and Pistacia vera (pistachio, GCA_008641045). Default procedures were used for all assembly steps.
Annotation was performed using GeneMark-ES (v2.0) (Lomsadze et al., 2005). Annotation was performed fully de novo without a curated training set and default parameters.
The genome assembly yielded a total sequence length of 454,874,194 bp over 270,263 scaffolds with an N50 of 1,945,245. The GeneMark-ES annotation resulted in 42,021 genes.
Raw and assembled data is publicly available via GenBank:
Raw genome of Toxicodendron radican, Accession number SRR10325927: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR10325927
Assembly of Toxicodendron radican, Accession number GCA_009867345: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_009867345.1/
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Partly
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Genomics and Bioinformatics
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
No
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Genomics, Phylogenetics, Aging
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Partly
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Genetic diversity and phylogeography
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 20 Aug 20 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)