ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Incidentally diagnosed hemangioma of the right atrioventricular groove in an athlete

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 01 Sep 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to illustrate a rare case of a pericardial hemangioma of the right atrioventricular groove of incidental discovery in a tennis player who presented with cough and dyspnea and was treated by surgical excision with a favorable outcome. We also report the role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and management of this pericardial tumor.

Keywords

Cavernous hemangioma, Cardiac tumors, Pericardium, Tamponade, Athletes

Introduction

Cardiac hemangioma is a rare benign tumor1 and pericardial localization is extremely rare24. It is usually asymptomatic, but it can be serious due to the risk of tamponade. We report the case of a pericardial hemangioma of the right atrioventricular groove in a young athletic patient who presented with cough and dyspnea and was diagnosed incidentally.

Case report

Patient information and initial presentation

A 31-year-old Caucasian female tennis player presented to the emergency department with dyspnea and dry cough for a few days. She had undergone surgery previously for a borderline ovarian tumor eight years ago. There was no history of cardiopulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, or other cardiovascular diseases. No abnormalities were found during the physical examination with no jugular venous distension.

Diagnostic assessment

A chest X-ray showed enlargement of the cardiac shadow suggestive of pericardial effusion (Figure 1). Transthoracic echocardiography confirmed a large circumferential pericardial effusion and showed a rounded, well defined pericardial hyperechoic lesion attached to the right atrioventricular groove. There was no right ventricular dysfunction.

fc076737-972e-4a08-971f-7e65a6a14618_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Chest X-ray shows a globular enlargement of the cardiac shadow.

A thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan was performed, which showed a large pericardial effusion and confirmed a pericardial mass with homogenous contrast enhancement within the right atrioventricular groove (Figure 2).

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the large pericardial effusion with a pedunculated ill-defined homogeneous hypointense mass on T1 and a hyperintense mass in the right atrioventricular groove with progressive enhancement after contrast administration on T2 (Figure 3).

fc076737-972e-4a08-971f-7e65a6a14618_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan with contrast: right atrioventricular groove mass with homogeneous enhancement (arrow).

fc076737-972e-4a08-971f-7e65a6a14618_figure3.gif

Figure 3.

Cardiac MRI four-chamber view cine steady state free precession (A), black blood T1 weighted without (B) and after gadolinium administration (C): Rounded well defined homogenous hyperintense T2 hypointense T1 mass in right atrioventricular groove with homogenous enhancement after contrast administration (arrow). Note large pericardial effusion (star).

A coronary angiography was performed, which showed tumor blush.

Intervention

The patient was referred to a cardiovascular surgery center to be operated on by an experienced cardiac surgeon. General anaesthesia was performed in supine position. Anaesthesia induction was performed by intravenous bolus of propofol (2mg/Kg), tracrium (0.5 mg/Kg) and fentanyl (2 mcg/Kg). Anaesthesia maintenance was performed by isoflurane 1.5% in oxygen and continuous intravenous infusion of tracrium (0.01 mg/Kg/min) and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hour). Surgery was initiated by a median sternotomy. Initial examination showed no extension of the mass into the cardiac chamber. A safety total excision of the mass was done using cutting diathermy. Vascular, pericardial and sternal sutures were performed by polypropylene, vicryl and wire, respectively. The anatomopathological examination of the mass revealed conjunctive tumor proliferation, vascular differentiated and concluded with a diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma. Post-procedural medication included antibiotic therapy with cefazolin (1 g intravenously, twice a day) for 48 hours, preventive anticoagulation by low molecular weight heparin (Enoxaparin 0.4 ml subcutaneously, once a day) and analgesic therapy by paracetamol (1 g intravenously, three times a day). Post-operative course was favorable and the patient was discharged after 72 hours.

Follow-up

Two months after surgery, the patient developed progressive dyspnea vomiting and precordial chest pain. CT scan found loculated left pleural effusion. Chest physiotherapy (one session a day) for two weeks and paracetamol (1 g orally, twice a day) for one week were prescribed with a favorable outcome. The patient remains well after two years of follow-up.

Discussion

Cardiac hemangiomas are rare benign vascular tumors and constitute only 2.8% of primary cardiac tumors1. Pericardial localization is extremely rare24. Histopathologically, hemangiomas are characterized by benign proliferation of the endothelial cell lining of the blood vessel with increasing vascularization5.

Pericardial hemangioma is mostly asymptomatic. Clinical symptoms depend on location, size, and anatomic extension of the tumor5. The most frequents symptoms are dyspnea, cardiac arrhythmia, murmurs, and heart failure. Tamponade due to pericardial effusion can also occur. Imaging is very useful for the diagnosis, localization, and extension of the tumor. CT scans with contrast can show enhancing foci at the arterial phase with diffuse or heterogeneous enhancement at the delayed phase. Small calcifications might be seen also6. Cardiac MRI is a superior tool with a better contrast resolution5. Hemangiomas have an intermediate T1 signal with the same intensity as myocardium and a high T2 signal7. The dynamic postcontrast acquisition shows nodular enhancement with progressive fill-in on delayed images8. Feeding vessel, tumor blush, and flow voids might be seen also1. The tumors are usually ill-defined with no local invasion. Differential diagnoses can be made with solid pericardial masses such as mesothelioma, sarcoma, lymphoma, or paraganglioma4. Surgical total excision is the treatment of choice for resectable tumors9. The use of radiotherapy, corticosteroids, and beta blockers have been reported in some cases1.

Conclusion

Pericardial hemangiomas are extremely rare benign vascular tumors whose prognosis depends on their location and size. Surgical excision constitutes the treatment of choice. Our case demonstrates the importance of cardiovascular MRI as a tool to evaluate the resectability of the tumor.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Sep 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Asma A, Maatouk M, Miladi A et al. Case Report: Incidentally diagnosed hemangioma of the right atrioventricular groove in an athlete [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1080 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24503.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 01 Sep 2020
Views
2
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 Jan 2021
Weikun Hu, Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 2
This manuscript reported a rare case of pericardial hemangioma in an athlete, which showed potential clinical significance.

I recommend indexing after a minor revision.
  • The histological result and image of the tumor should
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hu W. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Incidentally diagnosed hemangioma of the right atrioventricular groove in an athlete [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1080 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27029.r74537)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 07 Sep 2020
Jean-Nicolas Dacher, Department of Radiology, Normandie University, Rouen, France 
Approved
VIEWS 6
This is a nice case report of a rare condition that shows the importance of pre-operative imaging. I recommend indexing but a minor revision should be made regarding the description of MR findings.

In the "diagnostic assessment" ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Dacher JN. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Incidentally diagnosed hemangioma of the right atrioventricular groove in an athlete [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1080 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27029.r70789)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 10 Sep 2020
    Asma ACHOUR, Radiology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Monastir University of Medicine, Tunisia., Monastir, 5000, Tunisia
    10 Sep 2020
    Author Response
    Dear master and colleague,

    Thank you for the interest you have shown in our topic.

    I thank you for your relevant comments which will improve the quality of our manuscript.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 10 Sep 2020
    Asma ACHOUR, Radiology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Monastir University of Medicine, Tunisia., Monastir, 5000, Tunisia
    10 Sep 2020
    Author Response
    Dear master and colleague,

    Thank you for the interest you have shown in our topic.

    I thank you for your relevant comments which will improve the quality of our manuscript.
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Sep 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.