Keywords
schoolchildren, adolescent, secondhand smoke exposure, depression, number of smokers
schoolchildren, adolescent, secondhand smoke exposure, depression, number of smokers
In Thailand, the prevalence of tobacco consumption among people aged 15 years old or above has decreased from 32.0% in 1991 to 19.1% in 2017; however, the prevalence of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in the home remains quite high, 32.7% in 20171. Exposure to SHS has been linked to several diseases including cancer and heart disease, especially in children and non-smokers2. Many strategies have been implemented to reduce non-smokers’ exposure to SHS, including legislation to prevent smoking in public places and health promotion3. Laws have been passed to ban smoking on public transport, in airports, in restaurants, and in schools; however, this legislation does not cover private places such as the home.
Home is a place where family members in a range of activities, and is a common location for exposure to SHS4–6. Most studies to date show that exposure to SHS is linked to depression, including SHS exposure occurring in the home7–11. Just one study found no such connection12. Limited data is presently available on the association between SHS exposure and depression in schoolchildren. We therefore conducted this study to investigate whether or not there is an association between SHS exposure and depressive symptoms in this population, and whether the number of smokers in children’s households affects this association.
This cross-sectional survey was conducted in nine schools located in northeast Thailand from August in 2018 to March in 2019.
We calculated the sample size for this survey as the following formula: in which α is 0.05; p is 0.232 that was reported from Leung L et al.13, q=1-0.232=0.768; d=0.035. In addition, we multiplied the total sample size with design effect 1.5. So, in total at least 900 participants were needed.
Schools were selected by simple random sampling from the list of schools provided by the Office of the Basic Education Commission (OBEC). We contacted nine schools to describe our study and invite them to participate in the study. In each school, students in grades 6 to 8 (13 to 15 years old), were asked to participate in the study. The rationale for using these grades was that students of this age group still mostly stay within their homes outside of school and therefore would be more likely to be exposed to SHS if a smoker was present in the household. The total number of students in grade 7 (Mattayomsuksa 1), grade 8 (Mattayomsuksa 2), and grade 9 (Mattayomsuksa 3) from the selected school was 2278. All were asked to complete the questionnaire by themselves following instructions from a research assistant. Students that were part of the same household as an existing participant or had any psychiatric disorders as identified by their teacher were excluded. After filling in the self-report questionnaire, students were asked to deliver questionnaires to their guardians to collect information on household variables. A guardian was defined as mother, father, or relation. They were asked to return these questionnaires to a teacher within 7 days. The questionnaire for student and parents are available as extended data14. A total of 1103 families completed the questionnaires, equating to a response rate of 48.4% (1103/2278). We excluded 4 cases because there was not reporting of SHS exposure, so a total of 1099 participants were analyzed. Participants provided written informed consent form to participate in this study. A consent form was provided to the children who then took them home for their parents/guardians to review. This included a consent form for the parent/guardian and assent form for the child to complete. The child then returned these to school.
Depressive symptoms were measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CESD) questionnaire. This questionnaire comprises of 20 questions and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, and was translated into the Thai language15. For each question, schoolchildren could respond never (0-score), rarely (1-score), often (2-score), or all the time (3-score). The scores for each question were summed, with totals ranging from 0 to 60. If the total scores of the CESD were more than 22, the schoolchildren were identified as having depressive symptoms16.
For exposure to SHS, the schoolchildren were asked “In the past 7 days, have you inhaled any tobacco smoke?” The available answers were “inhaled on 1–3 days”, “inhaled on 4–6 days”, “inhaled every day”, or “No”. Schoolchildren who reported “no” were classified as not having been exposed to SHS, and the others were classified as having been exposed to SHS. We also collected information on variables such as the number of years of school attended, household’s income per month, number of smokers in the home, school grade (grade 7, grade 8, and grade 9), perceived danger of exposure to SHS and third hand smoke, self-confidence in avoidance of SHS (scores ranged 0-20), SHS attitude (scores ranged 0-10), SHS knowledge (scores ranged 0-10), and place of exposure to SHS.
The association between variables and exposure to SHS were examined using Chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate. We also tested the effect of the number of smokers per household on the association between depressive symptom and exposure to SHS by using the Mantel-Haenszel Test. For multivariable analysis, we used multiple logistic regression for adjusting potential confounders. All data analysis was performed using R version 3.6.017.
The Mahasarakham University Research Ethics Board provided ethical approval for this study (Approval number:115/2018).
A total of 1099 subjects were included in the analysis. The prevalence of exposure to SHS was 58.2% (95%CI: 55.2, 61.1). In this study, 92.9% of guardians had attended 1–6 years of school, 85.2% of participants had a household income less than 10000 Thai Baht (THB; equivalent to 218.37 USD at time of publication), and 20.8% of households had more than one person who was a smoker. Most students were in 7th grade (39.8%), and 63.4% were female. Awareness of the harm caused by SHS exposure and third hand smoke exposure was 35.1% and 57.2%, respectively. The mean scores of self-confidence in avoidance of SHS was 12.7 (SD: 5.5). The mean scores of attitude and knowledge of secondhand smoke exposure were 27.5 (SD: 3.1) and 4.5 (SD: 1.3), respectively. The characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1 and full details for each participant available as underlying data14.
In Table 1, information is presented on the association between participant risk factors and SHS exposure. The results show there was a statistically significant association between SHS exposure and the number of smokers per household (P value: < 0.001), gender (P value: 0.004), awareness of the harm caused by third hand smoke exposure (P value: 0.046), and self-confidence in avoidance of SHS exposure (P value < 0.001). A statistically significant association was not detected between SHS exposure and relation of the parent/guardian to the school child (P value: 0.957), the number of years attended in school (P value: 0.540), household income per month (P value: 0.342), school grade placement (P value: 0.565), perception about the harm of eSHS (P value:0.778), SHS attitude (P value:0.636), and SHS knowledge (P value:0.513). In Table 2, we present results from the multiple logistic regression model to control for confounder factors. Our analysis shows that schoolchildren with an abnormal CESD state are 1.8 times more likely to have been exposed to SHS (95%CI: 1.3, 2.5; P value <0.001) than those with a normal CESD state, with adjustment made for the number of years of school attended, household income per month, perception about the harm caused by SHS exposure, perception about the harm caused by third hand smoke exposure, SHS attitude, SHS knowledge, and self-confidence in avoidance of SHS exposure.
We also investigated the effect of the number of smokers per household. In households with no smokers, schoolchildren who reported depressive symptoms were 1.8 times (95%CI: 1.0, 3.1) more likely to exposed to SHS than those who were not. In households with one smoker, schoolchildren who had depressive symptoms were 1.9 times (95%CI: 1.1, 3.3) more likely to exposed to SHS. Lastly, in households with two or more smokers, schoolchildren who reported depressive symptoms were 1.7 times (95%CI: 0.8, 3.6) more likely to be exposed to SHS than those who reported no depressive symptoms (Table 3). The results of the Mantel-Haenszel test show there was no statistically significant difference between the number of smokers per household and the association between SHS exposure and depression symptoms.
This study shows there is a high prevalence of SHS exposure in schoolchildren in northeast Thailand, and a statistically significant association between SHS exposure and depressive symptoms in these children. The number of smokers per household did not affect this association.
The prevalence of SHS exposure in this study was 58.2%, a higher rate than a comparable study in the US where exposure was 48%18, and a study in lower-middle-income countries where exposure was 55.9%19. The prevalence of tobacco use in Thailand has declined gradually, but the prevalence of SHS exposure is still quite high1. This may be due to non-smokers not being aware of the harms of SHS exposure or to smokers continuing to smoke in locations near non-smokers.
When a univariate analysis was performed to test the association between different factors and SHS exposure, and SHS exposure and depressive symptoms, several statistically significant associations were identified. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we also showed that schoolchildren exposed to SHS tend to have more depressive symptoms than unexposed children. This finding is similar to several previous studies7,20–22, except one conducted in the Netherlands12. Possible reasons for the disparity include differences in sample population and depressive symptom measurement. Previous studies that detected an association between SHS exposure and depressive symptoms used a predominantly adolescent population7,20–22, while the study that did not used an adult population. It may be that children and adolescents who are exposed to SHS are not in a position to move away from the smoker, and depressive symptoms are stimulated. Adults, by comparison, have greater autonomy and can more readily avoid SHS exposure.
Our study also investigated whether the number of smokers in a household affects the association between SHS exposure and depression. No interactive effect was detected. The association between SHS exposure and depression might be of equal magnitude regardless of the number of household smokers. Very few studies consider the interaction between known risk factors and the association between SHS exposure and depression. Our assumption was that, if there are more smokers in a household, there would be a greater chance of SHS exposure and depression.
This study has two major strengths. It is the first study to examine how the number of smokers per household affects the association between SHS exposure and depressive symptoms. Also, the sample size was large, so the findings should be more accurate than smaller-sized studies. Set against these two strengths are the following three limitations. Firstly, the schoolchildren were selected from northeast Thailand, and may not be representative of schoolchildren nationally. Secondly, a cross-sectional study design was used, so we cannot conclude there is a causal relationship between SHS exposure and depressive symptoms. Finally, the survey relied on self-reports, so there may be recall bias with regard to history of exposure.
In this study, we observed the association between SHS exposure and depressive symptoms. However, the number of smokers per household did not affect this association.
Harvard Dataverse: Secondhand smoke: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/I7KCVH14
This project contains the following underlying data:
- datashsfandcesd1000research.tab (data secondhand smoke and cesd – not that Grade 1, 2 and 3 correspond with grade 7 (Mattayomsuksa 1), grade 8 (Mattayomsuksa 2), and grade 9 (Mattayomsuksa 3))
Harvard Dataverse: Secondhand smoke: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/I7KCVH14
This project contains the following extended data:
- parent_questionaire_eng.pdf (parent questionnaire English)
- parent_questionaire_thai.pdf (parent questionnaire Thai)
- student_questionaire_eng.pdf (student questionnaire English)
- student_questionaire_thai.pdf (student questionnaire Thai)
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
We thank school staff for assistance with data collection, and Dr. Tim Cushnie for assistance with manuscript presentation.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Epidemiology, health policy or program evaluation
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS: Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.Saudi J Anaesth. 2017; 11 (Suppl 1): S80-S89 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: public health, pulmonology, health social study
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Public health, NCD, TB
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Biostatistics.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Version 1 21 Sep 20 |
read | read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)