Keywords
Iron, total iron in soil, Hyperalic Alisol, Amazonian rainforest, Ecuador
This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.
Iron, total iron in soil, Hyperalic Alisol, Amazonian rainforest, Ecuador
Total iron concentration of soils mainly depends on pH (Colombo et al., 2014; Jelic et al., 2010) and moisture content; and is also affected by root respiration, soil microbial activity, leaching, and erosion (Spectrum Analytic, Inc. 2020). Given that iron deficiency is a regular problem for various crops, it is essential to determine the total iron content of soils (Mengel et al., 2001), particularly in orchards (Simon & Szilágyi, 2003).
In a highly cited review paper, Bünemann et al., (2018) identify the most frequently used soil quality indicators under agricultural land use: organic matter, pH, available phosphate, and water storage. Soil quality evaluation should specify targeted soil threats, functions, and ecosystem services. The authors of the review recommend developing increasingly interactive assessment tools.
Recently, several studies have been undertaken on the effects on soil quality exerted by various minerals contained in the soil, such as ammonium lactate-soluble potassium and phosphorus content (Jakab, 2020; Li et al., 2020). Also investigated was the impact of various soil cultivation methods on some microbial soil properties (Beni et al., 2017; Sándor et al., 2020; Sándor, 2020; Veres et al., 2015).
In this article, we report the variations with altitude of the total iron content measured in intact soil in the Amazonian rainforest (in an uncultivated and uninhabited area). Considering that orchards are the most sensitive to iron deficiency, our results are aimed to support local farmers, when they select new areas for fruit plantations. An intact area was chosen as the control for soil samples, which will serve as the reference for future studies initiated in the nearby agricultural region.
A total of 15 soil samples were collected from three altitude levels: 420, 1000, and 1600 m.a.s.l. (meters above sea level) near Tena, Ecuador, on December 10, 2019, from the upper layer (top 20 cm) of Hyperalic Alisol (Ultisols in US Soil Taxonomy) soil (Table 1).
We measured pH in distilled water for soil/water ratio of 1:25 (w/w) using a glass electrode (Model Seven2Go Advanced Single-Channel Portable pH Meter, Mettler, Toledo). Soil moisture content was determined gravimetrically; drying the soil samples at 105°C for 24 h and weighing the mass loss. We measured allophane using 10.0 ± 0.5 g soil/water (1:2, w/w), soil/water plus 20. mL 1.0 M NaF, soil/water (1:2.5, w/w) + 25 mL 1.0 M NaF, soil/water (1:2.5, w/w) + 25 mL 0.50 M NaF, as described by Singla et al. (2018).
We determined total iron (all ionic forms) according to modified Blakemore 1981 method described in Singla et al., 2018. Briefly, 50 mL of ammonium oxalate monohydrate (Spectrum Chemical) (0.20 M, pH 3) was added to 1 gram of soil sample. The mixture was shaken with a Model NB-101M Medium Orbital Shaker (N-Biotek, Inc.) in orbital mode, for 4.5 h at 150 rpms. In total 12 hours later, samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 3500 rpm (using Hermle Z400, Hermle, AG, Germany). Double filtration was performed (Whatman no42 filter). A calibration curve was determined from the extracted solution (oxalate ammonium acid 0.20 M) according to Singla et al. (2018). The solution was measured with a Model 240Z Atomic Absorption Furnace Spectrophotometer (Agilent) at a wavelength of 392 nm and with a slit width of 0.2 nm.
Examined soil samples in the chosen area were strongly or moderately acidic, with pH values in the range from pH 4.95 ± 0.05 to pH 5.95 ± 0.05 (Table 1). We did not find any meaningful correlation between altitude and pH values, or between pH and total iron content. Moisture content is the highest at 1600 m.a.s.l. Allophane was detected in all samples, which supports the volcanic nature of the sampling area (Fieldes & Perrot, 1986) (Table 1).
Total iron content significantly decreases (R2=0.966) at lower altitudes (Figure 1). No significant changes in pH were found, and we can explain this by the following:
(i) vegetation at lower lying areas receive less light, so it absorbs a greater quantity of iron ions; so far, there is no relevant literature data on the effect of light intensity on the iron uptake of plants (Borowski, 2013).
(ii) there is a greater concentration of iron-reducing bacteria in the lower lying areas, which seems to be verified by a prior study (Fiedler et al., 2007). This finding is, however, unusual, because such bacteria are typically present in sea water (Bae et al., 2001) and paddy soils (Singla & Inubushi, 2013), rather than in Hyperalic Alisol soils.
High moisture content of the soil and organic matter accumulated on the soil surface can make air circulation difficult, hence, anaerobic conditions can develop in lower lying areas.
Our results (from 400 m.a.s.l. to 1000 m.a.s.l.) are comparable with a prior study performed in the same region (Singla et al., 2018), in which the authors report a decrease in iron content for lower laying areas. The main difference between our assessment relative Singla and colleagues’ results is that they observed a radical decrease in iron content above 1000 m.a.s.l., while we found greater iron concentrations at this altitude. Our results are comparable in magnitude to other study findings (Fageria & Stone, 2008) carried out in South American Hyperalic Alisol soils in which high iron content was found at depths of 0–20 cm.
Total iron content significantly decreases (R2=0.966) at lower altitudes. Genomics studies could detect possible iron consuming bacterial strains. For future studies, we recommend that in addition to Fe2+ and Fe3+ content one should determine calcium, microbial biomass, and microbial activity. Altogether, this approach would enable a better understanding of iron mobility and dynamics of iron uptake in the area.
Figshare: Raw data for "Differences in total iron content at various altitudes of Amazonian Andes soil in Ecuador", https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11833554.v2 (Guananga, 2020).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Soil Microbiology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Soil biology, soil chemistry
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 20 Feb 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)