Keywords
Basidiomycets, Geastrum and Characterization
Basidiomycets, Geastrum and Characterization
The species of the genus Geastrum, classified under order Geastrales, is rare and the species are red listed (Piętka & Kujawa in 2012; Wojewoda et al., 2006). Although in the distant past they were recorded in several locations worldwide, sightings of this attractive earthstar in plains are now highly limited due to anthropogenic activity. Kirk et al. (2008) and Perez (2009) described 50 species of Geastrum in a dictionary of fungi. Zamora et al. (2014) described 100 to 120 species of Geastrum based on field and herbarium studies.
There have been many reports about the pluralistic distribution of Geastrum species in Western Ghats by Karun & Sridhar, 2014, in Central India by Verma et al. (2018) and in Tamil Nadu by Meenakshi & Selvam (2020). Geastrum species share morphology with Myriostoma species, as reported by Alexov et al. (2012); Esqueda (2009); Outcoumit et al. (2009) and Pawłowski & Adamska (2008).
Many mycologists classify Myriostoma in between Geastraceae and Astraeaceae. However, currently it is classified under Geastraceae (Dring, 1973; Sunhede, 1989). Using rDNA and other genetic markers, its molecular taxonomic position within Geastraceae was confirmed, and it is closely associated with the genus of Geastrum (Hosaka et al., 2006; Krüger et al., 2001).
These inedible fungi are widely distributed in Africa, Asia, North and South America, and Europe, where they grow in humus-rich forests. Geastrum are rather rare fungi; they have been characterized as critically endangered, red listed and threatened in many European countries like Poland, Montenegro, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland and Czech Republic (Wojewoda et al., 2006 and Piętka & Kujawa, 2012). Consistent and periodical surveys of macrofungi result in identification of new fungi. The present objective of this work is to report the Geastrum species found in the riverbank canal of Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India with an abnormal stoma development.
The specimens were collected from our college campus: Thiagarajar college, Teppakulam, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. The soil texture of the collection site is highly humus and moist, with shady regions provided by large trees in the nearby area. The collected specimens were photographed, subcultured in potato dextrose medium (pH 6.5) and preserved in formalin bottles (10%).
Collected specimens were dried using a glass desiccator and analysed morphologically and anatomically. Morphological characters were observed using a stereomicroscope (Labline, model number 3923061230; 20X & 40X with flat field) and measurements were taken with a ruler. Microscopic features (e.g., basidiospores, capillitium, hyphae of peridium) were studied under light microscopy at high magnification (40X). Lacto-phenol (0.1%) mixed with trypan blue was used to study the gleba. Microscopic images were taken using Camera Lucida (HLP-3 Model). Standard specimen identification described by Smith (1963) was followed for the anatomical and morphological features based microscopic examination.
The specimen (TMC 1001) has been deposited in the collection of Gasteroid fungi at the Department of Botany, Thiagarajar college, Teppakulam, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
The fruiting body size measures 40 mm in width by 20 mm in height, is solitary, and consists of an upper stalked spore case and radiating rays below (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The exoperidium has 10–12 rays, which are revolute, thin, united in the base and free at the tips, and triple layered, with a blackish brown mycelial layer (Figure 3). The tips curve towards the basal position. The peridium is bilayered. The endoperidium body spore case is greyish brown, up to 19 mm in diameter, with many stalks attached. The spore case opens by many pores through which spores escape.
The fungus has brown basidispores with a globose and verrucose structure. Brown eucapillitium threads are thin walled, straight, aseptate and up to 3μm in diameter. The exoperdium is composed of hyaline, aseptate to rarely septate, unbranched, thick walled, tightly packed hyphae, up to 4μm in diameter, wall thickness up to 1.7 μm. The endoperidium is unbranched, aseptate, brown in colour, with tightly packed hyphae measuring up to 3μm in diameter.
Although these fungi are cosmopolitan in distribution, due to the periodical environmental disruption nowadays, occurrence of these fungi is highly limited. According to Signalarter (2000) and Benkert (2003), the Geastrum species serve as indicators of specific habitats in need of conservation.
All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.
I grateful to our beloved management of Thiagarajar College for the permission to carry out this study. I deeply acknowledge to all my students of I-M.Sc., Botany for their valuable help during collection of this rare fungi.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No source data required
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Mushroom biology, Genetics and breeding, Production technology, etc.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Taxonomy, Sistematics, Mycology.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 05 Nov 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)