ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report

Effect of herbicides on soil respiration: a case study conducted at Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 19 Nov 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

Measuring the effect of herbicides on the natural environment is essential to secure sustainable agriculture practices. Amount of carbon dioxide released by soil microorganisms (soil respiration) is one of the most important soil health indicators, known so far. In this paper we present a comprehensive quantifying study, in which we measured the effect of 14 herbicides on soil respiration over 16 years, from 1991 to 2017, at Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station. Investigated herbicides contained different active ingredients and were applied in various doses. It was found that 11 out of the examined 14 herbicides had a detrimental effect on soil respiration.

Keywords

CO2 emission, Chernozem, Herbicides, Látókép, Debrecen, soil respiration

Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an important greenhouse gas, which affects significantly global warming and climate change (Rastogi et al., 2002). Approximately 30% of the total CO2 emissions are released by agricultural activities. It is notable that agricultural CO2 emissions increased by 27% over two decades, from 1970 to 1990 (Lal, 2004).

Primary sources of soil CO2 emissions are root respiration and degrading of organics by soil microorganisms. Soil microbial activity mainly depends on soil properties, including soil temperature, organic matter and soil moisture content (Smith et al., 2003). Increasing scientific attention is focused on understanding the role of the soil microbial community (Bautista et al., 2017; Cho-Tiedje, 2000; Mátyás et al., 2018; Mátyás et al., 2020) and nutrient cycles (Jakab, 2020; Sándor et al., 2020). It has been documented that different cultivation technologies significantly impact soil microbiological activity (Sándor et al., 2020).

Different chemicals (such as fertilizers and/or herbicides) are utilized in agricultural technologies. Use of herbicides constitutes an integral part of crop production, and one should be aware that they cause a “secondary effect” on both soil life and so called “non-target” organisms (Kecskés, 1976). Sensitive organisms are killed after using herbicides, and their remains are easily decomposed by the surviving microorganisms (Cervelli et al., 1978). At present, the selection criteria for allowed chemicals is more rigorous and stricter than over past decades, and they are restricted to smaller concentrations (Inui et al., 2001). Soil microbes play a major role in maintaining soil quality (Mendes et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2008).

In this paper, we discuss carbon dioxide emission levels of chernozem soil at the Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station, where herbicides were applied to control the weeds. We compare results of carbon dioxide production in treated plots to untreated control parcels.

Methods

First, we conducted a literature review on types and doses (L-ha-1 or kg-ha-1) of herbicides (Molnár & Ocskó, 2000; Ocskó, 1991; Ocskó et al., 2017) that had been applied from 1991 to 2017 at Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station (47°33’ 55.36” N; 21°28’ 12.27” E). The type of soil is calcareous chernozem; according to the International Classification (WRB) it is designated as Calcic Endofluvic Chernozen (Endosceletic). Prior absolute control soil was measured; control soil did not receive any treatment or fertilizers.

Soil CO2 was measured in triplicate by NaOH absorption. Experiments were performed between 1991 and 2017. In 1991, 2000, 2008 and 2017 soil samples were obtained two weeks after the herbicide(s) was applied. For incubation, 10 g of soil was weighed and placed in a polyester bag (0.1 mm ø holes), from where CO2 could escape. One took 500 mL laboratory glassware in which 10 cm3 of 0.1 M NaOH solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was introduced to absorb the released carbon dioxide. Soil samples were hung above the NaOH solution, and the glass containers were sealed tightly. Since CO2 has a greater density than air, it sunk in the container, and was absorbed by the alkaline solution. After an incubation period of 7 days, the remaining alkali solution was back titrated with 0.1 M HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), in the presence of phenolphthalein, and then with methyl orange indicator. From the volume of equivalence one can calculate the amount of CO2 formed during soil respiration, according to Equation 1.

mg (CO2)· 10 g−1 · 7 day−1 = (C-S) · f(NaOH) · f(HCl) · 2.2 * dm            (1)

where, C: 0.1 M/ dm3 HCl loss for methyl orange indicator (Sigma-Aldrich, USA); S: 0.1 M dm3 HCl loss for phenolphthalein indicator (Sigma-Aldrich, USA); f: 0.1 mol dm-3 HCl and a 0.10 mol dm-3 NaOH factor; 2.2: titer (1 mL 0,1 mol dm-3 HCl equivalent 2.2 mg CO2); dm: multiplication factor for dry soil.

Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2003 (mean values and standard deviation). Two-factor variance analysis was performed to obtain the significant effect on measured parameters. Significant differences were accepted at the level 1%, but the evaluation was calculated by LSD 5% values, as widely accepted in agricultural research.

Results and discussion

In 1991, three herbicides were applied, and even the basic doses were high. Results were compared to the control; CO2 production was significantly reduced at single doses and a further decrease was experienced at 2–3 times greater doses. Consequently, CO2 production declined gradually with increasing doses of herbicides. The smallest production was obtained at 3 times the dose of Anelda Plus 80 EC, its value being only 59% of the control (Table 1).

Table 1. Herbicides’ doses and soil respiration measured.

Herbicide doseInitial herbicide dose
(L ha-1)
1x2x3x
YearHerbicideSoil respiration (mg CO2
· 10 g-1 · (7 day)-1)
1991ControlNone23.5
Alirox 80 Ec5-8 22.8121.7518.37
Anelda Plus 80 EC5-920.1516.2513.91
Vernolate 80 EC6-818.3417.5515.91
2000ControlNone14.25
Dual 720 EC2.5 -3.511.3412.6711.56
Frontier 900 EC1.5-2.010.410.2110.14
Hungazin PK1.4-2.8*12.4310.119.36
Dual Gold 960 EC1.4-1.610.5210.3710.21
Proponit 8720 EC1.5-2.512.411.7110.54
Acenit 880 EC2.0-2.69.229.579.17
2008ControlNone15.47
Merlin SC0.16-0.2015.4115.3815.49
Wig EC3.5-4.512.8613.2711.46
2017ControlNone19.18
Adengo0.40-0.4419.4219.4719.44
Capreno0.25-0.3018.8719.1618.96
Figaro TF2.0-5.017.9417.7216.3

* kg ha-1 (quantity given in different units)

In 2000, six different active ingredients were used, and their effect examined. Much lower doses were applied, half and one third of the ones used in 1991. As compared to the control, soil respiration decreased significantly in all treated plots, after laboratory incubation. The lowest results were obtained with Acenit 880 EC; when 3x dose was used, only the 64% of the control being achieved.

In 2008, a significant decrease was found for the treated soil relative to the control. In the treatment with triple dose, only 74% of the control was measured. The herbicides used in 2008 are no longer authorized, as they were withdrawn from the market.

In 2017, three herbicides were examined. Out of them, Figaro TF, which contained glyphosate agent, was no longer authorized. When this herbicide was applied, CO2 production decreased significantly. Carbon dioxide production did not change considerably in Andengo and Capreno treatments; there was a slight increase in treatments with Andengo and decrease in treatments with Capreno.

Conclusions

We can conclude that CO2 production decreased significantly in the soil for 11 out of the 14 herbicides. With two herbicides, Merlin SC (izoxaflutol) and Capreno (Isoxadifen-ethyl, tembotrione), there was no significant change of treated soils relative to the untreated soil, and there was only one herbicide Adengo (Bayer, Germany), which increased soil respiration slightly, but not significantly. The main sources of CO2-emissions from soil is the respiration of plant roots and of the microbial community. Therefore, a significant decrease of CO2 emission indicates a change in these parameters. One can recommend for use those chemicals, which do not cause major changes in the microbial community and do not affect life conditions of other live organisms.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Supporting data CO2 soil respiration, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13125290.v1 (Dama Research Center Limited, 2020).

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Nov 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Sándor Z, Kincses I, Tállai M et al. Effect of herbicides on soil respiration: a case study conducted at Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1348 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27057.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 19 Nov 2020
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 26 Feb 2021
Istvan Fekete, Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Nyíregyháza, Nyíregyháza, Hungary 
Approved
VIEWS 7
"Primary sources of soil CO2 emissions are root respiration and degrading of organics by soil microorganisms."
  •  the above sentence needs some citatioms: e.g  Béni et al. 2017
    Beni Áron; Kate, Lajtha ; János, Kozma ;
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Fekete I. Reviewer Report For: Effect of herbicides on soil respiration: a case study conducted at Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1348 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29886.r76811)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 07 Jan 2021
Fa-Jun Chen, Department of Entomology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 10
In this manuscript, the authors carried out experiments to study the effect of herbicides on soil respiration. In this study, they measured the effect of 14 herbicides on soil respiration over 16 years, from 1991 to 2017, at Debrecen-Látókép Plant ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Chen FJ. Reviewer Report For: Effect of herbicides on soil respiration: a case study conducted at Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1348 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29886.r75106)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Dec 2020
Sahar El-Nahrawy, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Soil,Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt 
Alaa El-Dien Omara, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Soil,Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt 
Approved
VIEWS 10
The authors provided greater clarity on the controls for their study, which measured the effect of 14 herbicides on soil respiration over 16 years from 1991 to 2017, and this study is highly interesting and readers will be intrigued by ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
El-Nahrawy S and Omara AED. Reviewer Report For: Effect of herbicides on soil respiration: a case study conducted at Debrecen-Látókép Plant Cultivation Experimental Station [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 9:1348 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29886.r75105)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Nov 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.