Keywords
molecular hydrogen, ankle sprain, hydrotherapy
molecular hydrogen, ankle sprain, hydrotherapy
Soft tissue injuries (STIs) remain among the most prevalent traumata in musculoskeletal medicine1. Sprains, strains and contusions are common STIs that often occur during sport and exercise activities2. STIs usually require immediate treatment to reduce inflammation, bleeding and damage within the injured tissue (e.g. muscle, tendon, ligaments, joint), with management options typically comprise a break from the activity that caused an injury, and different physical therapy procedures. Applying rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE) therapy is referred as a long standard first-aid treatment protocol for STIs3. However, insufficient evidence appears to be available to determine the relative effectiveness of RICE therapy for specific STIs4. In particular, RICE therapy might not be the best way to promote tissue healing due to limiting blood flow, and alternative methods and techniques are advocated to help manage STIs5. Among others, molecular hydrogen (H2) has recently been put forward as a possible adjuvant treatment in musculoskeletal medicine6. Addition of oral and topical H2 intervention to RICE protocol was effective to reduce inflammation and augment range-of-motion recovery in athletes who suffered a soft tissue injury7. However, no data are available concerning the effectiveness of hydrogen when applied as an individual first-aid intervention. This case report illustrates the efficacy and safety of acute multi-session hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional male athlete.
We are reporting here the case of a 29 year old male Caucasian professional football athlete who suffered a sport-related ankle sprain in April 2019. The injury occurred during a regular exercise session on artificial turf as an inversion sprain accompanied by plantar flexion. The patient was immediately evaluated by a sports medicine specialist who confirmed the category and the degree of injury (grade II ankle sprain) by physical examination. The patient was an apparently healthy young men (age 29 years, weight 77.0 kg, height 184.0 cm, professional experience 11 years), with no history of ankle sprain (or other lower extremity injuries) in the past 6 months, and no cardiometabolic or other musculoskeletal disorders. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and study protocol approved by the local IRB at the FSPE Applied Bioenergetics Lab at the University of Novi Sad (A14-2019).
At the initial examination immediately after the injury, right ankle was painful, swollen and warm, and had increased laxity on testing (Figure 1, Panel a). Self-completed visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was 50 points (moderate pain). Figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle joint swelling at the injured ankle revealed 56.5 cm, with weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT) showing 43.1 mm. The patient demonstrated a diminished ability to bear weight.
Hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water was used as an exclusive treatment (besides rest) with the main aim to reduce symptoms and signs of acute ankle sprain, and it was hoped to speed up the acute recovery. Super-saturated hydrogen-rich water was produced by putting a magnesium-producing formulation (10 g) into a 3-L stationary whirlpool with tap water of neutral temperature (20°C). Hydrogen was produced by a following reaction: Mg + H2O → H2 + Mg(OH)2, with concentration of hydrogen in a whirlpool ~ 8 ppm. The intervention was provided by HRW Natural Health Products Inc. (catalogue number 6-27843; New Westminster, BC, Canada). Throughout the 24 hours after the ankle sprain, the participant received six 30-min ankle baths (e.g. one hydrotherapy every 4 hours), with the first session given immediately after an initial examination (~ 60 min after the injury). During each session, the foot and ankle of injured leg were immersed in a stationary whirlpool. All hydrotherapies were formulated and supervised by a health care professional.
At the 24-h follow-up examination (Figure 1, Panel b), VAS score for pain dropped to 20 points (mild pain), with ankle circumference decreased to 54.9 cm; WBLT improved to 55.0 mm. The patient reported no side effects of hydrogen intervention (e.g. pain, cramps, tingling, discoloration of skin, burning, itching, rash), as evaluated with open-ended questionnaire administered at the end of each session of hydrotherapy, and at 24-h follow-up.
This case report suggests the beneficial effects of hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water as a possible treatment to decrease pain and swelling in a professional athlete with moderate-degree ankle sprain. A number of recent animal and human studies evaluated the efficacy of H2 in musculoskeletal medicine. H2 appears to be effective in tackling disuse muscle atrophy in rats8, Duchenne muscular dystrophy in mice9, bone loss induced by modeled microgravity10 or ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats11, and mitigate disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis12. For acute injuries, hydrogen-rich saline (1 ml/100 g) seems to be beneficial in attenuating muscle damage in a rat model of skeletal muscle injury induced by 3-h tourniquet occlusion and 4-h reperfusion13. Our group reported advantageous effects of 2-week administration of topical and oral H2 (added to the RICE therapy) on plasma viscosity and functional recovery in a randomized controlled trial with professional athletes who suffered STIs7. In this case report, we found that acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water might be beneficial when used as the exclussive first-aid treatment in specific STIs, such as ankle sprain. H2 positively affected STI-induced signs and symptoms at 24-h follow up perhaps due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects14. Due to its small size and higher-grade diffusibility6, topical hydrogen could be easily transported to hard-to-reach tissues, including areas of injury that are often characterized by low drug penetrability15. Specifically, H2 might prevent (or offset) the generation of toxic compounds that occur after initial injury due to subsequent cell damage and tissue hypoxia, often referred as a secondary injury16.
This professional athlete received a rather intensive treatment, with H2 hydrotherapy applied in several recurrent episodes throughout the first 24 hours post-injury, a pattern that might be highly applicable to an athlete looking for an accelerated and efficacious strategy in STIs management and recovery3. This treatment dynamics appear to be comparable to the traditional acute RICE protocol for STIs medical care in terms of frequency (e.g. number of sessions per day) and duration of intervention (e.g. length of individual session)4. On the other hand, acute H2 hydrotherapy may be superior to RICE protocol due to improved blood flow (as implied here by a decreased swelling at follow-up), while the ice component of RICE reduces blood flow to the injured area and delays healing5. To confirm this hypothesis, future case series should compare two interventions in a double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled design, by evaluating peripheral circulation at the site of injury.
Due to the fact that hydrogen in water tends to evaporate over time17, hydrogen-rich water for every session was prepared fresh and administered for 30 min. A report have shown that gaseous hydrogen remains detained in water exposed to air for up to 2 hours before its concentration drops below a therapeutical level (e.g. < 1 ppm)18. The super-saturated hydrogen-rich water used here (8 ppm) perhaps provides an advantage of supraphysiological dosages of H2 administered in a time-optimized manner. However, how H2 concentration changes during the session of hydrotherapy remains unknown. Despite that, topical H2 hydrotherapy yielded no side effects in our patient, confirming an affirmative safety record for H2 reported by others [for review see Ref. 16].
Several limitations must be considered when the study findings are interpreted. First, we report a relatively short period of the intervention and post-injury assessment (e.g. 24 hours) while no medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of topical hydrogen were evaluated. Second, only limited compendium of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed, while no biomarkers of tissue injury or inflammation were employed, and a possible mechanism of hydrogen action remains unknown. Finally, it remains open to question how topical H2 positively affects the acute recovery of other STIs with different location, etiology and severity.
Even though our results are based on a single-patient report, our case has indicated that an acute multi-session hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water might be a safe and helpful treatment in terms of pain, swelling reduction, and regaining the range of motion after an ankle sprain. We suggest a closer monitoring of the efficacy and safety of topical H2 therapy use in different musculoskeletal injuries on a larger similar case series.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report, including any associated images.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Exercise Physiology
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neurology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 08 Apr 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)