ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional athlete

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 08 Apr 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: The traditional treatment of soft tissue injuries consists of the RICE protocol – rest, ice, compression, and elevation, followed for up to 72 hours after a trauma. Although designed as an immediate therapy to reduce inflammation that occurs after an acute injury, the RICE protcol might not be the best way to promote healing due to limiting blood flow. Molecular hydrogen (H2) has recently been put forward as a possible adjuvant treatment in musculoskeletal medicine, yet limited data are available concerning its effectiveness as a first-aid intervention.
Case report: We report here a case of an elite professional athlete who suffered a grade II ankle sprain, and who subsequently received six sessions of ankle and foot hydrotherapy (e.g. 30-min at every four hours) with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water during the first 24 hours post-injury. The pain VAS self‐completed by the patient dropped from 50 points (moderate pain) at baseline (immediately after injury) to 20 points (mild pain) at 24-h follow-up. Ankle swelling dropped by 2.8% and dorsiflexion range of movement improved by 27.9% from baseline to follow-up, respectively.
Conclusions: Our case has indicated that an acute multi-session hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water might be a helpful treatment in terms of pain, swelling reduction and regaining range of motion after an ankle sprain.

Keywords

molecular hydrogen, ankle sprain, hydrotherapy

Introduction

Soft tissue injuries (STIs) remain among the most prevalent traumata in musculoskeletal medicine1. Sprains, strains and contusions are common STIs that often occur during sport and exercise activities2. STIs usually require immediate treatment to reduce inflammation, bleeding and damage within the injured tissue (e.g. muscle, tendon, ligaments, joint), with management options typically comprise a break from the activity that caused an injury, and different physical therapy procedures. Applying rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE) therapy is referred as a long standard first-aid treatment protocol for STIs3. However, insufficient evidence appears to be available to determine the relative effectiveness of RICE therapy for specific STIs4. In particular, RICE therapy might not be the best way to promote tissue healing due to limiting blood flow, and alternative methods and techniques are advocated to help manage STIs5. Among others, molecular hydrogen (H2) has recently been put forward as a possible adjuvant treatment in musculoskeletal medicine6. Addition of oral and topical H2 intervention to RICE protocol was effective to reduce inflammation and augment range-of-motion recovery in athletes who suffered a soft tissue injury7. However, no data are available concerning the effectiveness of hydrogen when applied as an individual first-aid intervention. This case report illustrates the efficacy and safety of acute multi-session hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional male athlete.

Case report

Patient information

We are reporting here the case of a 29 year old male Caucasian professional football athlete who suffered a sport-related ankle sprain in April 2019. The injury occurred during a regular exercise session on artificial turf as an inversion sprain accompanied by plantar flexion. The patient was immediately evaluated by a sports medicine specialist who confirmed the category and the degree of injury (grade II ankle sprain) by physical examination. The patient was an apparently healthy young men (age 29 years, weight 77.0 kg, height 184.0 cm, professional experience 11 years), with no history of ankle sprain (or other lower extremity injuries) in the past 6 months, and no cardiometabolic or other musculoskeletal disorders. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and study protocol approved by the local IRB at the FSPE Applied Bioenergetics Lab at the University of Novi Sad (A14-2019).

Clinical findings

At the initial examination immediately after the injury, right ankle was painful, swollen and warm, and had increased laxity on testing (Figure 1, Panel a). Self-completed visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was 50 points (moderate pain). Figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle joint swelling at the injured ankle revealed 56.5 cm, with weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT) showing 43.1 mm. The patient demonstrated a diminished ability to bear weight.

9ba1ff1a-b5bb-4e26-a80a-7507608e6853_figure1.gif

Figure 1.

An image of sprained ankle: (a) Immediately after the injury; (b) At 24-h follow-up after six 30-min sessions of hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water.

Hydrogen therapy

Hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water was used as an exclusive treatment (besides rest) with the main aim to reduce symptoms and signs of acute ankle sprain, and it was hoped to speed up the acute recovery. Super-saturated hydrogen-rich water was produced by putting a magnesium-producing formulation (10 g) into a 3-L stationary whirlpool with tap water of neutral temperature (20°C). Hydrogen was produced by a following reaction: Mg + H2O → H2 + Mg(OH)2, with concentration of hydrogen in a whirlpool ~ 8 ppm. The intervention was provided by HRW Natural Health Products Inc. (catalogue number 6-27843; New Westminster, BC, Canada). Throughout the 24 hours after the ankle sprain, the participant received six 30-min ankle baths (e.g. one hydrotherapy every 4 hours), with the first session given immediately after an initial examination (~ 60 min after the injury). During each session, the foot and ankle of injured leg were immersed in a stationary whirlpool. All hydrotherapies were formulated and supervised by a health care professional.

Follow-up and outcomes

At the 24-h follow-up examination (Figure 1, Panel b), VAS score for pain dropped to 20 points (mild pain), with ankle circumference decreased to 54.9 cm; WBLT improved to 55.0 mm. The patient reported no side effects of hydrogen intervention (e.g. pain, cramps, tingling, discoloration of skin, burning, itching, rash), as evaluated with open-ended questionnaire administered at the end of each session of hydrotherapy, and at 24-h follow-up.

Discussion

This case report suggests the beneficial effects of hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water as a possible treatment to decrease pain and swelling in a professional athlete with moderate-degree ankle sprain. A number of recent animal and human studies evaluated the efficacy of H2 in musculoskeletal medicine. H2 appears to be effective in tackling disuse muscle atrophy in rats8, Duchenne muscular dystrophy in mice9, bone loss induced by modeled microgravity10 or ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats11, and mitigate disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis12. For acute injuries, hydrogen-rich saline (1 ml/100 g) seems to be beneficial in attenuating muscle damage in a rat model of skeletal muscle injury induced by 3-h tourniquet occlusion and 4-h reperfusion13. Our group reported advantageous effects of 2-week administration of topical and oral H2 (added to the RICE therapy) on plasma viscosity and functional recovery in a randomized controlled trial with professional athletes who suffered STIs7. In this case report, we found that acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water might be beneficial when used as the exclussive first-aid treatment in specific STIs, such as ankle sprain. H2 positively affected STI-induced signs and symptoms at 24-h follow up perhaps due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects14. Due to its small size and higher-grade diffusibility6, topical hydrogen could be easily transported to hard-to-reach tissues, including areas of injury that are often characterized by low drug penetrability15. Specifically, H2 might prevent (or offset) the generation of toxic compounds that occur after initial injury due to subsequent cell damage and tissue hypoxia, often referred as a secondary injury16.

This professional athlete received a rather intensive treatment, with H2 hydrotherapy applied in several recurrent episodes throughout the first 24 hours post-injury, a pattern that might be highly applicable to an athlete looking for an accelerated and efficacious strategy in STIs management and recovery3. This treatment dynamics appear to be comparable to the traditional acute RICE protocol for STIs medical care in terms of frequency (e.g. number of sessions per day) and duration of intervention (e.g. length of individual session)4. On the other hand, acute H2 hydrotherapy may be superior to RICE protocol due to improved blood flow (as implied here by a decreased swelling at follow-up), while the ice component of RICE reduces blood flow to the injured area and delays healing5. To confirm this hypothesis, future case series should compare two interventions in a double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled design, by evaluating peripheral circulation at the site of injury.

Due to the fact that hydrogen in water tends to evaporate over time17, hydrogen-rich water for every session was prepared fresh and administered for 30 min. A report have shown that gaseous hydrogen remains detained in water exposed to air for up to 2 hours before its concentration drops below a therapeutical level (e.g. < 1 ppm)18. The super-saturated hydrogen-rich water used here (8 ppm) perhaps provides an advantage of supraphysiological dosages of H2 administered in a time-optimized manner. However, how H2 concentration changes during the session of hydrotherapy remains unknown. Despite that, topical H2 hydrotherapy yielded no side effects in our patient, confirming an affirmative safety record for H2 reported by others [for review see Ref. 16].

Several limitations must be considered when the study findings are interpreted. First, we report a relatively short period of the intervention and post-injury assessment (e.g. 24 hours) while no medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of topical hydrogen were evaluated. Second, only limited compendium of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed, while no biomarkers of tissue injury or inflammation were employed, and a possible mechanism of hydrogen action remains unknown. Finally, it remains open to question how topical H2 positively affects the acute recovery of other STIs with different location, etiology and severity.

Conclusions

Even though our results are based on a single-patient report, our case has indicated that an acute multi-session hydrotherapy with hydrogen-rich water might be a safe and helpful treatment in terms of pain, swelling reduction, and regaining the range of motion after an ankle sprain. We suggest a closer monitoring of the efficacy and safety of topical H2 therapy use in different musculoskeletal injuries on a larger similar case series.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report, including any associated images.

Data availability

Underlying data

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 08 Apr 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Javorac D, Stajer V and Ostojic S. Case Report: Acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional athlete [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:245 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22850.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 08 Apr 2020
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Apr 2020
Cheong Hwa Ooi, Lifestyle Science Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, Malaysia 
Approved
VIEWS 11
The authors of this case report argue that there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of RICE therapy for specific soft tissue injuries. Hence, further development of the intervention for soft tissue injuries is warranted. With that, they presented a case ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ooi CH. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional athlete [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:245 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.25228.r62120)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 30 Apr 2020
    Sergej Ostojic, FSPE Applied Bioenergetics Lab, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
    30 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Thank you for your valuable comments and notes.

    We confirmed that the right ankle was injured yet we depicted here a mirror image.

    Also, the intensive hydrogen treatment ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 30 Apr 2020
    Sergej Ostojic, FSPE Applied Bioenergetics Lab, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
    30 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Thank you for your valuable comments and notes.

    We confirmed that the right ankle was injured yet we depicted here a mirror image.

    Also, the intensive hydrogen treatment ... Continue reading
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 21 Apr 2020
Steven R. Brenner, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 16
I thought there was good documentation of the injury including physical examination, photographs and pain scales.
 
The application of hydrogen water as treatment with reference to schedule and treatment application was well documented and should be repeatable.
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Brenner SR. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Acute hydrotherapy with super-saturated hydrogen-rich water for ankle sprain in a professional athlete [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:245 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.25228.r62119)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 30 Apr 2020
    Sergej Ostojic, FSPE Applied Bioenergetics Lab, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
    30 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comment.

    We haven't been able to evaluate post-injury recovery in terms of return to athletic competition due to the nature of this study, However, this ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 30 Apr 2020
    Sergej Ostojic, FSPE Applied Bioenergetics Lab, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
    30 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comment.

    We haven't been able to evaluate post-injury recovery in terms of return to athletic competition due to the nature of this study, However, this ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 08 Apr 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.