Keywords
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, West Nile Virus, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Alzheimer’s Disease, inflammation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, neuroinflammation
This article is included in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) collection.
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, West Nile Virus, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Alzheimer’s Disease, inflammation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, neuroinflammation
There is much debate about how to best treat disorders that include an inflammatory component. For example, in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), inflammation is evidenced by the activation of microglia and astrocytes, the consequent over-expression of inflammatory cytokines and acute phase proteins in the brain, and by the presence of inflammatory markers in the blood1,2. Furthermore, in AD, some inflammatory proteins expressed in the brain, specifically α1-antichymotrypsin and apolipoprotein E (ApoE), especially ApoE4, clearly promote and, indeed, are necessary for amyloidogenesis that leads to cognitive decline in humans and/or animal models3,4. The finding that the introduction of pro-inflammatory molecules, such as lipopolysaccharide, into mouse models of AD exacerbated amyloid pathology and cognitive deficits also suggested that inflammation contributed essentially to the disease, possibly by a self-perpetuating feed-forward mechanism5. This idea was reinforced by the finding that people with rheumatoid arthiritis, who routinely take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) to control the swelling and inflammation in their joints, have a much lower risk of developing AD, which suggested that their NSAID use was protective against, and might be used to treat, AD6,7.
In the case of viral diseases, including West Nile Virus (WNV) encephalitis, bacterial and viral pneumonia, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV), the development of inflammation has been cited as evidence that an effective treatment should include anti-inflammatory drugs, including steroids8,9. Indeed, steroids have been used in some human patients with WNV infection10–13. In respiratory diseases, an overactive innate immune reaction, termed a ‘cytokine storm’ may arise and has been treated with high dose steroids. Furthermore, use of minocycline to suppress microglial activation and promote expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines reduces neuronal cytotoxicity and mortality in WNV-infected mice14,15. Minocycline, has also been suggested as a treatment for AD based on experiments in cell culture and animal models, but its effects were complex and resulting changes to the peripheral and CNS immune system remain unclear16,17.
Despite the logical and preclinical data-based arguments in favor of using anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of inflammation-associated disorders, clinical trials showed that NSAIDs were unsuccessful and potentially detrimental in AD and mild cognitive impairment participants7,18–20, and minocycline also failed in a recently-completed trial in participants with early AD21. In WNV and Japanese Encephalitis Virus infected mice, reducing microglia in the brain by blocking the receptor of Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (MCSF) with PLX56229 resulted in increased viral load and mortality, suggesting that microglia, traditionally considered to be an indication of a dangerous pro-inflammatory milieu may, in fact be beneficial in fighting the virus infection.
Such alternative, even opposing, views of the role of inflammation is particularly striking in recent discussions about treating COVID-19. For example, it is proposed that inflammation in COVID-19-associated SARS should be suppressed because the cytokine storm is thought to play a major role in the pulmonary damage that so greatly increases morbidity and mortality in SARS (also termed acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS), a feature of infection by both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-222. Recent studies report increased plasma levels of chemokines and cytokines, including CCL-2, CCL-3, RANTES, INFγ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, G-CSF, IP10, TNFα, and others, in severe cases of COVID-19 as compared to mild cases23,24, while decreased levels of lymphocytes are also commonly found in severe cases of SARS and COVID-19 patients25–30. Thus, it is unclear whether treatment with broad-acting immunosuppressant drugs to combat the increased cytokine and chemokine signaling would also exacerbate leukopenia, resulting in inhibited clearance of the virus and repair of tissue damage. Because no controlled trials using NSAIDs or steroids in COVID-19 patients have yet been reported, the CDC has taken a cautious stand, stating that “Currently, there are no data suggesting an association between COVID-19 clinical outcomes and NSAID use” and that “Corticosteroids have been widely used in hospitalized patients with severe illness in China31–34; however, the benefit of corticosteroid use cannot be determined based upon uncontrolled observational data. By contrast, patients with MERS-CoV or influenza who were given corticosteroids were more likely to have prolonged viral replication, receive mechanical ventilation, and have higher mortality35–39. Therefore, corticosteroids should be avoided unless indicated for other reasons, such as management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or septic shock.”40
As another, more targeted approach, it is suggested that inflammation may be best prevented or reduced by using specific monoclonal antibodies to block either the IL-6 receptor41–43 or the cytokine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)41,44. The hypothesis that blocking IL-6 or GM-CSF will be beneficial is based in part on the finding that IL-6 and GM-CSF and/or the cells that express them are increased in the blood of COVID-19 patients22,41 and on the beneficial results froma preliminary single-arm trial of an IL-6 receptor blocker, which reportedly lowered fever and improved oxygenation in COVID-19 patients43. Lowering IL-6 or other inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 patients is reasonable, but the timing may be critical as early treatment may be detrimental. A multi-arm study including both early and later stage patients is essential to determine the clinical relevance of such intervention30,42, especially for anti-IL-6 therapies, such as tocilizumab and sarilumab, as IL-6-mediated inflammation has been shown to play a critical role in effective cellular and humoral immunity against viral infections45–48. Thus, if anti-IL-6 therapies are used too early to treat patients with COVID-19, this strategy could potentially inhibit viral clearance and/or leave the patients susceptible to recurrent infection with SARS-CoV-2.
As an alternative to treatment approaches designed to block pro-inflammatory cytokine responses, we suggest that COVID-19-associated SARS may be better prevented or treated by instead increasing the activation and numbers of macrophages and microglia, in particular by increasing the levels of GM-CSF. This innate immune system stimulant has been approved by the FDA as recombinant human GM-CSF (rHuGM-CSF/sargramostim/Leukine®) for almost 30 years as a therapy to increase white blood cell numbers by stimulating the division and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells49. Approved indications for such treatment include reducing the incidence of severe and life-threatening infections after chemotherapy, accelerating myeloid reconstitution following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and treating cases of acute radiation syndrome. The finding of low white blood cell counts in patients with COVID-1923 suggests that the ability of GM-CSF to increase select leukocyte populations, particularly phagocytes, may be of therapeutic value in COVID-19, especially given GM-CSF’s ability to treat life-threatening infections, and as data from Wuhan, China have shown that half of all COVID-19 patients who died had evidence of secondary infections50. This concept is further supported by a previous study that found that the endogenous levels of GM-CSF were significantly higher in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with ARDS due to trauma or sepsis who survived compared to those who died51, in contrast to the potential deleterious effects of GM-CSF that were inferred from the study cited above41.
These results suggest to us that GM-CSF may be beneficial in the treatment of WNV infection and the inflammation that results, and by implication, other viral infections, potentially including COVID-19. In preliminary experiments, we have found that GM-CSF treatment improves survival in mice infected by footpad injection with the TX02 strain of WNV, from approximately 35% in untreated animals to 80% survival in mice treated with GM-CSF starting the day after viral inoculation (p=0.0034) (Clarke, Potter, Boyd, Tyler, manuscript in preparation). These findings are particularly important, as there are currently no effective treatments for WNV encephalitis, and the long safety history of rHuGM CSF/sargramostim in treating leukopenia and preventing life-threatening infections suggests that these preliminary findings, if confirmed, could quickly be translated into human trials.
Furthermore, the potential benefit of GM-CSF as a pulmonary therapy has been shown directly in several other animal models in which GM-CSF treatment was able to both protect against and treat bacterial and viral pneumonias52–61, which, like COVID-19, induce a cytokine storm that can lead to respiratory distress and multi-organ failure. Notably, some of these studies showed that inhaled GM-CSF was particularly efficacious57,58. Inhaled GM-CSF has also been used successfully in humans off-label as a treatment for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis62–65, and successfully as compassionate treatment for pneumonia-associated ARDS66.
The recent report that injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) reverses clinical and peripheral manifestations of COVID-1967 and the fact that GM-CSF is well known to stimulate the mobilization of MSCs from the bone marrow68–70 provide further support for the argument that GM-CSF administration may effectively treat COVID-19.
It is also relevant that the unusually rapid onset of COVID-19-associated SARS after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus may be due to infection and inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), including in the brain stem, which could contribute to respiratory failure, and neurological symptoms have been reported in COVID-19 patients, such as hypogeusia, hyposmia, neuralgia, dizziness, headache, ataxia, epilepsy, and others71–77. Additionally, in studies of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, the presence of viral neuroinvasion has been identified in both animal studies78,79 and in post-mortem human brain samples80,81. Significantly, GM-CSF can easily cross the blood-brain barrier82, and our work with GM-CSF in both animals and humans indicates that it can ameliorate CNS disorders of various kinds that include an inflammatory component. For example, GM-CSF/sargramostim treatment is associated with improved cognition in:1) mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease83, which has since been replicated by others84, 2) a mouse model of Down syndrome (Ahmed, Boyd, Potter et al., manuscript in preparation), 3) aged wild-type control mice83 and (Ahmed, Boyd, Potter et al., manuscript in preparation), which has also been replicated by others85, 4) a retrospective study of leukemia patients after immune system chemoablation and HCT, who acquire chemotherapy-associated cognitive impairment86, and 5) mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease participants, based on one measure, the Mini-Mental State Exam (recombinant human GM-CSF/sargramostim, five days/week for three weeks (Potter, Woodcock, Boyd et al., NCT01409915; manuscript submitted), all of which are CNS disorders. These findings are relevant to COVID-19 because all of these disorders induce inflammation1,8,9 and yet still benefit from treatment with GM-CSF, which increases, rather than decreases, the number and activation of microglia, the resident phagocytes of the CNS that are often cited as indicators of a dangerous pro-inflammatory milieu that must be suppressed to achieve successful treatment. Additionally, we have found that GM-CSF treatment reverses astrogliosis, which is also associated with CNS disorders and has been reported to be reversed by GM-CSF treatment that ameliorates spinal cord injury and inhibits glial scar formation87,88. Furthermore, multiple studies have shown that there is a very high prevalence of cognitive impairment in ARDS survivors, from between 70–100% at hospital discharge, to 46–80% at one year, and persisting in 20% at five years89–91, which strongly argues for extended treatment with GM-CSF/sargramostim, given its ability to improve cognition in several animal models and reverse cognitive impairment associated with chemotherapy and neurodegeneration.
Because GM-CSF/Sargramostim has been safely and routinely used as a subcutaneous injection treatment and, off-label, as an inhalation treatment, we suggest that this long-FDA-approved drug should be tested for its ability to improve recovery in COVID-19 patients and/or after resolution of infection in severe ARDS survivors to ameliorate potential cognitive deficits. Although compassionate use is possible, it is more important that, either, or a combination, of these two routes of administration in a randomized, pilot trial be used to properly assess the possibility that the innate immune system stimulant, GM-CSF, may reduce morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, as the studies discussed above suggest. Indeed, while an earlier version of this manuscript was being reviewed, a trial of sargramostim in COVID-19 patients with ARDS was announced in Europe using both inhaled/nebulized and/or injected administrations92. We hope that sites in the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere will be invited to join that study, and welcome comments and data at: https://medschool.cuanschutz.edu/GMCSF-COVID
If GM-CSF/sargramostim proves to be beneficial as a treatment for COVID 19, the fact that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services maintains a stock of rHuGM-CSF/sargramostim to be used in the event of a nuclear accident may provide short-term resources93.
No data is associated with this article.
We thank Dr. Marc Moss and Dr. Noah Johnson for helpful discussions and Dr. Heidi Chial for editing the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the topic of the opinion article discussed accurately in the context of the current literature?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Mechanisms of infectious and noninfectious inflammatory syndromes of the lung, surfactant protein immune functions, GM-CSF in pulmonary homeostasis
Is the topic of the opinion article discussed accurately in the context of the current literature?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
Partly
Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?
Partly
References
1. Eikelenboom P, Hack CE, Rozemuller JM, Stam FC: Complement activation in amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's dementia.Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1989; 56 (4): 259-62 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the topic of the opinion article discussed accurately in the context of the current literature?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Pulmonary innate immunity
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 11 May 20 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
https://www.partnertx.com/sarpac-clinical-trial-of-leukine-sargramostim-rhu-gm-csf-in-hospitalized-covid-19-patients-meets-primary-endpoint-of-significant-improvement-in-lung-function/
https://www.partnertx.com/sarpac-clinical-trial-of-leukine-sargramostim-rhu-gm-csf-in-hospitalized-covid-19-patients-meets-primary-endpoint-of-significant-improvement-in-lung-function/
https://www.partnertx.com/sarpac-clinical-trial-of-leukine-sargramostim-rhu-gm-csf-in-hospitalized-covid-19-patients-meets-primary-endpoint-of-significant-improvement-in-lung-function/