ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

Drug Therapies for the Management of Sickle Cell Disease

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 11 Jun 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) afflicts millions of people worldwide but is referred to as an orphan disease in the United States. Over the past several decades, there has been an increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SCD and its complications. While most individuals with SCD in resource-rich countries survive into adulthood, the life expectancy of patients with SCD remains substantially shorter than for the general African-American population. SCD can be cured using hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and possibly gene therapy, but these treatment approaches are not available to most patients, the majority of whom reside in low- and middle-income countries. Until relatively recently, only one drug, hydroxyurea, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to ameliorate disease severity. Multiple other drugs (L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor) have recently been approved for the treatment of SCD, with several others at various stages of clinical testing. The availability of multiple agents to treat SCD raises questions related to the choice of appropriate drug therapy, combination of multiple agents, and affordability of recently approved products. The enthusiasm for new drug development provides opportunities to involve patients in low- and middle-income nations in the testing of potentially disease-modifying therapies and has the potential to contribute to capacity building in these environments. Demonstration that these agents, alone or in combination, can prevent or decrease end-organ damage would provide additional evidence for the role of drug therapies in improving outcomes in SCD.

Keywords

Sickle cell disease, Treatment, Novel Drugs, Drug Development, Clinical Trials

Introduction

Although referred to as an orphan disease in the United States (US), sickle cell disease (SCD) affects millions of individuals worldwide, with the vast majority residing in sub-Saharan Africa and India1. SCD is characterized by the presence of sickle hemoglobin (HbS), hemolytic anemia, vaso-occlusive complications, and cumulative end-organ damage. The mortality rate associated with SCD in sub-Saharan Africa remains high, with an estimated 50 to 90% of children dying before the age of 52. However, the majority of children with SCD in resource-rich countries live to adulthood35. Despite increased survival to adulthood, individuals with SCD in resource-rich nations continue to have a shorter life expectancy than the general population69. There has been substantial progress with the use of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as a curative therapy in SCD, and increasing evidence supports the curative potential of gene therapy and gene editing10,11. However, as these modalities are not available to the vast majority of patients, most of whom reside in resource-limited countries, the availability of drug therapies that are safe, effective, and affordable remains highly desirable.

This review will focus on approaches to develop drug therapies in SCD, ongoing and recently completed trials, and our perspective on the use of approved drugs.

Pathophysiology

The development of effective therapies for SCD depends on an adequate understanding of its pathophysiology. Although the pathophysiology of SCD is complex and involves multiple pathways, the primary event is due to the polymerization of HbS following deoxygenation12. The rate and extent of polymer formation depends on the degree and duration of HbS deoxygenation, presence of fetal hemoglobin (HbF), and the intracellular concentration of HbS. Clinical manifestations of SCD appear to be driven by two major pathophysiological processes: vaso-occlusion with ischemia-reperfusion injury and hemolytic anemia13. Vaso-occlusion occurs because of adhesive interactions of leukocytes and sickle RBCs with the endothelium causing microvascular obstruction and subsequent tissue ischemia13. These episodes of vascular obstruction are followed by the restoration of blood flow, which promotes further tissue injury by reperfusion. The inflammatory cascade resulting from ischemia-reperfusion is amplified by the activation of CD1d-restricted invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells14. The release of free plasma hemoglobin following intravascular hemolysis results in direct scavenging of nitric oxide (NO), as well as the generation of reactive oxygen species, powerful scavengers of NO15,16. NO is usually produced by the endothelium and regulates basal vasodilator tone as well as inhibits the activation of platelets and the coagulation system and the transcriptional expression of nuclear factor κB (NFκB)-dependent adhesion molecules, such as vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1, intercellular cell-adhesion molecule-1, and selectins17,18. HbS polymerization as well as its multiple downstream consequences, including endothelial cell injury, endothelial dysfunction, increased oxidant stress, inflammation, and coagulation and platelet activation, are therapeutic targets in SCD (Figure 1). SCD has been dichotomized into two overlapping sub-phenotypes: viscosity-vaso-occlusion (higher hemoglobin levels, possibly increased blood viscosity, and complications such as osteonecrosis, acute chest syndrome, and acute pain crisis) and hemolysis-endothelial dysfunction (increased hemolysis with lower hemoglobin levels and higher levels of hemolytic markers, including reticulocyte count and serum lactate dehydrogenase, and complications such as leg ulcers, priapism, stroke, and possibly pulmonary hypertension)19. While somewhat simplistic, this classification is useful to understand the pathobiology of disease complications and may provide guidance on the effects of therapies on disease-related complications. The pathophysiology of SCD has been reviewed more extensively elsewhere2022.

7339a6ba-6ba0-4c0f-99e7-49682be38706_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Potential targets of pharmacologic agents in sickle cell disease

HbF, hemoglobin F; NKT, natural killer T-cells; NO, nitric oxide; RBCs, red blood cells. Adapted with permission from Ataga KI and Stocker J. Br J Haematol, 2015.

Drug therapies for sickle cell disease

Despite an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of SCD, available drug treatments remain limited. For many years, hydroxyurea was the only drug available to modify the severity of SCD23. However, there has been progress in the development of drug therapies with recent approvals of L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)2426. Based on our current understanding of SCD pathophysiology, there are multiple possible approaches to treating the disease and its complications, including inhibition of HbS polymerization and amelioration of multiple downstream sequelae of HbS polymerization.

Inhibition of sickle hemoglobin polymerization

Therapeutic approaches targeting HbS polymerization, including 1) blocking intermolecular contacts in the sickle fiber, 2) induction of HbF synthesis, 3) reduction of intracellular HbS concentration, 4) increase in oxygen affinity, and 5) reduction of the concentration of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate, have been described27. Table 1 lists ongoing studies of anti-sickling agents in SCD.

Table 1. Ongoing clinical trials of anti-sickling agents in sickle cell disease.

MechanismDrugSponsorNCT number
(study
acronym)
Clinical phase/statusInterventionNumber/ageObjective
HbF inductionNicotinamide vs. THU
and decitabine
EpiDestiny, Inc;
NIH; NHLBI
NCT04055818Phase I
Recruiting
Oral nicotinamide vs. THU
+ decitabine for 12 weeks
followed by combination for
a further 12 weeks
20/≥18 yearsCompare effect of oral nicotinamide
vs. THU-decitabine and in
combination on hemoglobin level at
week 12
Panobinostat
(LBH589)
Abdullah KutlarNCT01245179Phase I
Active, not
recruiting
Oral, for 12 weeks18/≥18 yearsEvaluate safety, HbF, F cells,
total hemoglobin, markers of
inflammation, QOL measures
MetforminBaylor College of
Medicine
NCT02981329
(FITMet)
Phase I
Recruiting
Hydroxyurea + metformin
vs. metformin
56/10–60 yearsChange in HbF or total hemoglobin,
QOL, RNA sequencing
Allosteric
modifier (to
the R-state)
Voxelotor (formerly
GBT440)
Global blood
therapeutics
NCT03943615
(expanded
access)
Approved for
marketing
Oral≥12 yearsTo provide early access to patients
without alternative treatment options
NCT04247594Phase II
Recruiting
Oral, open-label45/18–60 yearsDose escalation study to evaluate
safety and tolerability of doses,
1,500 mg to 3,000 mg daily
NCT02850406Phase IIa
Recruiting
Part A: single dose Part B:
24 weeks
Part C: 48 weeks
125/4–17 yearsPharmacokinetics, change in
hemoglobin, effect on hemolysis,
TCD velocity, safety
NCT03573882Phase III
Active, not
recruiting
Oral, daily179/≥12 yearsOpen-label extension study,
adverse events, frequency of SCD-
related complications
NCT04218084
(HOPE kids 2)
Phase III
Not yet
recruiting
Oral voxelotor vs. placebo224/2–14 yearsEvaluate effect on TCD in children
NCT04188509Phase III
Enrolling by
invitation
Oral, open-label50/4–18 yearsEvaluate safety and tolerability,
SCD-related complications
Allosteric
activator of
RBC pyruvate
kinase-R
AG-348 (Mitapivat
sulfate)
NHLBINCT04000165Phase I
Recruiting
Oral, with two dose
escalations after 2 weeks
25/≥18 yearsSafety and tolerability,
pharmacokinetics, and
pharmacodynamics
FT-4202Forma
therapeutics
NCT03815695Phase I
Recruiting
Single and multiple
ascending oral doses of
FT-4202 vs. placebo
130/12–60
years
Safety, pharmacokinetics,
pharmacodynamics
RBC ion
transport
channels
SCD-101InvenuxNCT02380079Phase Ib
Recruiting
Part A: open-label, dose-
escalation study
Part B: randomized,
placebo-controlled, cross-
over study
60/18–55 yearsSafety, change in hemoglobin,
markers of hemolysis, QOL
measures, functional capacity
Memantine
(NMDAR antagonist)
HaEmek
Medical Center,
Israel
NCT03247218Phase IIa/b
Recruiting
Oral, once daily for 1 year40/≥10yearsSafety, frequency of
hospitalizations, duration of
hospitalizations, analgesic use,
transfusion requirement, QOL
measures

HbF, fetal hemoglobin; QOL, quality of life; NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; NMDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; RBC, red blood cell; SCD, sickle cell disease; TCD, transcranial doppler; THU, tetrahydrouridine; VOC, vaso-occlusive crisis.

Induction of fetal hemoglobin. High levels of HbF ameliorate the severity of SCD8,28,29. Hydroxyurea strongly induces HbF30, although the mechanisms by which it does so are still unclear3033. Hydroxyurea improves erythrocyte deformability, lowers hemolysis, decreases circulating leukocytes and reticulocytes34, reduces adhesion receptor expression3538, and is an NO donor39,40. In two placebo-controlled, phase III trials, hydroxyurea significantly reduced the frequency of vaso-occlusive crises, acute chest syndrome, blood transfusion requirement, and hospitalizations in adults and children with SCD23,41. Treatment with low, fixed weight-based dosing of hydroxyurea (10 mg/kg daily) also decreased the frequency of SCD-related complications with low toxicity42,43. Hydroxyurea further ameliorates SCD morbidity by decreasing the risk of stroke and chronic kidney disease44,45 and may reduce mortality in SCD4649. Recent studies to optimize hydroxyurea therapy are exploring dose maximization via pharmacokinetics-based dosing5054. Despite its multiple benefits, a substantial number of patients on hydroxyurea may not obtain an adequate clinical response.

Inhibitors of epigenetic enzymes which repress γ-globin genes, including DNA methyltransferase (DNMT1), histone deacetylases, and lysine-specific demethylase (LSD-1), and γ-globin gene co-activator agonists are being evaluated in SCD. Decitabine (5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine), a DNA hypomethylating agent which depletes DNMT1, increased HbF and total hemoglobin levels at non-cytotoxic doses in patients who had no responses to hydroxyurea55. However, it has a very short plasma half-life and negligible oral bioavailability due to rapid inactivation by cytidine deaminase (CDA)55. The combination of escalating doses of oral decitabine and an oral CDA inhibitor, tetrahydrouridine (THU), was well tolerated, and the highest tested dose increased HbF, doubled F-cells by approximately 80% of total RBCs, increased total hemoglobin, and decreased biomarkers of hemolysis, coagulation activation, and inflammation56.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors increase HbF levels5763. Although treatment with intermittent doses of sodium butyrate produced sustained increases in HbF, F-cells, and total hemoglobin57, the orally available sodium dimethyl butyrate (HQK-1001) did not significantly increase HbF and appeared to result in more pain crisis compared with placebo63. A phase II study of the global HDAC inhibitor vorinostat was terminated early owing to poor accrual. Selective HDAC1/2 inhibition with ACY-957 increased HbF in vitro and represents a promising therapeutic approach with a better safety profile64. Based on the success of the LSD-1 inhibitors RN-1 and ORY-3001 in increasing HbF and F-cells in preclinical studies6567, INCB059872 was investigated (NCT03132324). However, this phase I study was terminated early for business reasons. Pomalidomide, a third-generation immunomodulatory drug, produced modest increases of HbF, augmented erythropoiesis, and preserved bone marrow function following 8 weeks of treatment in transgenic sickle mice68. Pomalidomide appeared to increase HbF and total hemoglobin only at the highest dose or with greater than 6 months of exposure69. The safety and efficacy of increasing the expression of γ-globin gene co-activators—FOXO3 agonist70 (metformin [NCT02983129]), nuclear factor-like 2 (Nrf2) agonist71 (dimethyl fumarate), and SIRT172—to augment HbF levels are being explored.

Allosteric modification of sickle hemoglobin to its high-oxygen affinity R-state. Voxelotor, recently approved under the FDA’s accelerated approval program, is an orally bioavailable small molecule which binds to α-globin chains of hemoglobin, increases hemoglobin oxygen affinity, and stabilizes the oxyhemoglobin state73. Early studies showed a reduction in markers of hemolysis, with a rapid rise in hemoglobin by day 1574. This response was not accompanied by worsening tissue hypoxia, based on serum erythropoietin levels and change in oxygen consumption (VO2 max), even in participants receiving daily doses of 1,000 mg for 28 days and 900 mg for at least 90 days. Furthermore, voxelotor has been shown to reduce blood viscosity in vitro75. In a multicenter, phase III study of patients 12 to 65 years of age, randomly assigned to once-daily oral voxelotor doses of 1,500 mg, 900 mg, or placebo, a significantly higher percentage of subjects on 1,500 mg had a hemoglobin response of 1.0 g/dL at 24 weeks compared with placebo76. In addition, subjects on the 1,500 mg dose saw significant reductions in indirect bilirubin and reticulocyte counts from baseline. A dose-dependent increase in hemoglobin following treatment with voxelotor was not accompanied by an increase in pain crisis rate. As this trial was not enriched for subjects with frequent pain crises, appropriately designed studies of patients with frequent pain episodes are needed to determine the effect of voxelotor on reducing such crises. Open-label extension studies to assess the long-term effects of voxelotor are ongoing.

5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural (5HMF, Aes-103) interacts allosterically with HbS, increasing oxygen affinity and decreasing HbS polymerization and RBC sickling during hypoxia. A phase I trial, with oral doses of up to 4,000 mg, showed no significant side effects77, but a phase II trial was terminated early because of unblinding of drug groups (NCT01987908). FT-4202, a novel selective activator of RBC pyruvate kinase, decreases intracellular 2,3-diphosphoglycerate levels, with a resulting increase in hemoglobin–oxygen affinity. It demonstrated a favorable safety profile in healthy individuals78 and is being investigated in a phase I study in SCD (NCT03815695).

The oxygen delivery therapeutic agents sanguinate (pegylated bovine carboxyhemoglobin) and MP4CO (pegylated human carboxyhemoglobin) are dual transfer agents which release carbon monoxide when delivering oxygen to hypoxic tissues. They stabilize HbS in its R-state and appear to exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic activity by induction of Nrf2 and heme oxygenase-179,80. Sanguinate had an acceptable safety profile81,82. A phase II study evaluating its efficacy during acute pain crisis was recently completed (NCT02411708).

Increase red blood cell hydration. The inverse relationship between HbS concentration and delay time suggests that even small decreases in intracellular HbS might be beneficial83. Senicapoc selectively blocks the calcium-activated, potassium efflux (Gardos) channel and improves anemia and hemolysis in SCD84,85. Despite improvements in anemia and hemolysis, a phase III trial showed no significant decrease in the rate of pain crises compared to placebo84. Similarly, studies of agents that block the potassium-chloride co-transport channel showed no clinical benefits8688. SCD101, a botanical drug with an unclear anti-sickling mechanism which might involve dilution of HbS by affecting the RBC membrane, was well tolerated in a phase Ib study, with a decrease in chronic pain and fatigue and improvement in leg ulcers89.

Targeting downstream sequelae of sickle hemoglobin polymerization

Antioxidant therapy. Agents that upregulate antioxidant and/or reactive oxygen species scavenging processes have been evaluated in SCD. Glutamine, a conditionally essential amino acid, is a precursor for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) and improves NAD redox potential. In a randomized, multicenter trial of 230 patients with HbSS or HbSβ0-thalassemia, L-glutamine significantly reduced the number of pain crises, hospitalizations, cumulative hospital days, and frequency of acute chest syndrome compared with placebo90. However, the effect size of L-glutamine in reducing pain crises was relatively small, with only a 25% reduction in the median number of pain crises. L-glutamine was well tolerated, although low-grade nausea, non-cardiac chest pain, fatigue, and musculoskeletal pain occurred more frequently than with placebo. Despite some concerns related to the high dropout rate in the trial (36% L-glutamine arm; 24% placebo arm), L-glutamine was approved by the FDA to reduce the acute complications of SCD in patients 5 years and older24.

In an open-label pilot trial of oral N-acetylcysteine (NAC), treatment with either 1,200 mg or 2,400 mg daily for 6 weeks increased whole blood glutathione levels and decreased erythrocyte outer membrane phosphatidylserine exposure, plasma levels of advanced glycation products, and cell-free hemoglobin in both groups91. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of NAC at 600 mg twice daily for 6 months did not decrease the rate of SCD-related pain days per patient year, vaso-occlusive crises, hospital admission days, number of admissions, or days with home analgesic use compared with placebo92. The safety and efficacy of NAC, administered at a higher dose during pain crisis, is being explored in a phase I/II study (NCT01800526) (Table 2).

Table 2. Ongoing clinical trials of anti-adhesion agents and antioxidants in sickle cell disease.

MechanismDrugSponsorNCT number
(study
acronym)
Clinical phase/statusInterventionNumber/ageObjective
P-selectin
antagonist
CrizanlizumabNovartis
Pharmaceuticals
NCT03264989
(SOLACE-
adults)
Phase II
Active,
not recruiting
IV infusion, open-label 57/16–70 yearsPharmacokinetics,
pharmacodynamics, safety, and
efficacy
NCT03814746
(STAND)
Phase III
Recruiting
IV infusion every 2 weeks for
1st month and then monthly
for 1 year
240/≥12 yearsCompare efficacy and safety of 5
mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg doses
with placebo
NCT04053764
(STEADFAST)
Phase II
Recruiting
IV infusion every 2 weeks for
1st month and then every 4
weeks for 51 weeks + SoC vs.
SoC alone
170/≥16 yearsEvaluating effect on kidney
function (albumin-creatinine ratio,
protein-creatinine ratio, estimated
glomerular filtration rate)
NCT03938454
(SPARTAN)
Phase II
Recruiting
IV infusion every 2 weeks for
1st month and then every 4
weeks x 51 weeks
56/≥16 yearsEvaluate efficacy in priapism,
uncomplicated VOC events
NCT03474965Phase II
Recruiting
IV infusion every 2 weeks for
1st month and then every 4
weeks
100/6 months–<18
years
Evaluate pharmacokinetics,
pharmacodynamics, safety, and
effect on VOC events
Blockade of fcγrIII
receptors
IVIG Albert Einstein
College of
Medicine
NCT01757418Phase I–II
Recruiting
Single dose of IVIG vs.
placebo given within 24 hours
of hospitalization
94/12–65 yearsLength of VOC, total opioid
use, time to end of VOC, in vitro
adhesion studies
Antioxidant
(increased
glutathione)
NACBloodworksNCT01800526Phase I/II
Enrolling by
invitation
IV or oral, NAC

Part 1: two doses of IV
infusion over 8 hours 4 weeks
apart or oral
NAC for 4 weeks

Part 2 (during VOC): IV
infusion every 6 hours for 5
days
20/≥18 yearsEvaluate effect on vWF activity,
measures of hemolysis and
oxidation In Part 2, evaluate
efficacy during VOC

IV, intravenous; IVIG, intravenous gammaglobulin; NAC, N-acetylcysteine; SoC, standard of care; VOC, vaso-occlusive crisis; vWF activity, von Willebrand factor activity.

Anti-adhesive therapy. Agents targeting adhesion of blood cells to the endothelium have been investigated in SCD. Crizanlizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-P-selectin antibody, was recently approved for use in patients 16 years and older for the prevention of vaso-occlusive crises25 based on results of a randomized, double-blind, phase II study which evaluated the benefit of 2.5 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg doses versus placebo. Significantly lower median crisis rate, longer median times to first and second crises, and lower median rate of uncomplicated crises per year were observed with high-dose crizanlizumab compared with placebo following a 52-week treatment period93. Multiple other studies of crizanlizumab are ongoing (Table 2).

Purified poloxamer 188, a nonionic block copolymer surfactant with hemorheologic and antithrombotic properties, was previously shown to significantly decrease the duration of pain episodes, especially in children and patients on hydroxyurea94. However, a more recent phase III study in children and adults reported no significant effect of purified poloxamer 188 (vepoloxamer or MST-188) on duration of vaso-occlusive crises compared with placebo95. Rivipansel sodium (formerly GMI-1070) is a small-molecule pan-selectin inhibitor that binds to E-, P-, and L-selectin96. In a randomized, double-blind, adaptive, phase II trial, treatment with rivipansel during pain crisis produced a significant reduction in the mean cumulative intravenous opioid analgesic use compared to placebo97. However, despite the promising phase II trial results, the recently completed multicenter phase III RESET trial failed to meet its primary (time to readiness for discharge) and key secondary (time to discharge, cumulative intravenous opioid utilization, and time to discontinuation of intravenous opioids) efficacy endpoints98.

Heparins inhibit adhesive interactions via P-selectin99,100. Tinzaparin, a low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin, at therapeutic dose reportedly decreased the number of hospital days, the number of days with pain crisis, and the number of days with the most severe pain scores compared with placebo101. Sevuparin, a derivative of LMW heparin, which retains the P-selectin-binding domain of heparin but largely lacks anticoagulant properties, binds to P- and L-selectins, thrombospondin, fibronectin, and von Willebrand factor, inhibits the adhesion of sickle RBCs to stimulated cultured endothelial cells in vitro, and prevents vaso-occlusion with normalization of blood flow in a mouse model of vaso-occlusion102. A recently completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that, although safe, sevuparin did not significantly reduce the time to resolution of vaso-occlusive crisis103. A phase II feasibility study of therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin (NCT02098993) was recently terminated for poor enrollment, but a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of tinzaparin in acute chest syndrome is ongoing (NCT02580773).

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) binds to FcγRIII receptors, inhibits neutrophil adhesion to the endothelium, reduces RBC capture by leukocytes, and reduces Mac-1 activity due to recruitment of Src homology 2-containing tyrosine phosphatase-1104. IVIG was tolerated at doses of up to 800 mg/kg during acute vaso-occlusive crises and decreased Mac-1 function from baseline105. A phase II clinical trial of IVIG during acute pain episodes is ongoing (NCT01757418).

Anti-inflammatory agents. Multiple approaches to downregulate inflammatory pathways have been evaluated. Initial clinical responses with the use of steroids for pain crisis and acute chest syndrome were followed by “rebound” pain episodes and re-admissions after treatment discontinuation106,107. Inhaled corticosteroids did not significantly reduce the morbidity of acute chest syndrome in a retrospective cohort study108, but inhaled mometasone significantly reduced daily pain diary scores and levels of soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 over the 16-week treatment period in another single-center, placebo-controlled trial109.

The activation of iNKT cells is downregulated by the activation of adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR)110. Regadenoson, a partially selective A2AR agonist, was reportedly safe but did not decrease length of hospital stay, total opioid use, or pain scores compared to placebo during pain crises111,112. In addition, there were no significant differences between regadenoson and placebo regarding the number of patients exhibiting a greater than 30% reduction in activated iNKT cells. The anti-iNKT cell monoclonal antibody NKTT120 resulted in rapid, specific, and continuous iNKT cell depletion in a single-ascending-dose study113, but further studies are required to determine its long-term safety and efficacy.

Statins have benefits independent of their cholesterol-lowering effect. In a pilot study, simvastatin was well tolerated, increased levels of NO metabolites, and decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 levels114. Daily treatment with simvastatin for 3 months significantly reduced pain crises, oral analgesic use, and levels of high-sensitivity CRP, soluble E-selectin, soluble ICAM-1, soluble ICAM-3, and VEGF115, providing supporting data for conduct of a placebo-controlled trial. Atorvastatin was well tolerated in a pilot study but did not improve endothelial function or decrease albuminuria116.

Long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA [n-3]) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA [n-6]) provide benefit to individuals with chronic inflammatory disorders. In a randomized, single-center study, daily omega-3 administered in capsule form significantly lowered the occurrence of vaso-occlusive events, severe anemia, blood transfusion requirements, and school absence compared with placebo117. More recently, a randomized, placebo-controlled study of different doses of SC411, a novel DHA ethyl ester formulation with high DHA bioavailability, found it was well tolerated, with significant reductions in d-dimer and E-selectin and an increase in hemoglobin118. SC411 also significantly reduced electronic diary-recorded pain episodes, analgesic use at home, and days absent from school but did not significantly lower pain crises in the pooled active groups compared to placebo.

Preliminary results suggest that the monoclonal anti-IL1β antibody canakinumab (ACZ885) is well tolerated and not associated with major side effects in SCD119.

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies. With abundant evidence that SCD is a hypercoagulable state21, combined with data that coagulation and platelet activation may play roles in disease pathophysiology120124, multiple studies have evaluated the effects of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in SCD. Although treatment with the LMW heparin tinzaparin produced more rapid resolution of pain crisis and shorter duration of hospitalization than placebo101, it is uncertain whether the reported beneficial effects were a result of its anticoagulant or anti-adhesive effects. The results of a pilot study of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban in SCD are awaited (NCT02072668).

Multiple relatively small studies of aspirin have reported modest benefit at best125127, although one study reported an increase in oxygen affinity, hemoglobin level, and RBC lifespan126. A pilot study of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide showed that it was safe during acute pain episodes but did not reduce the time to resolution of such episodes128. Ticlopidine, a P2Y12 ADP-receptor antagonist, reportedly decreased the number of pain episodes, mean duration of pain episodes, and severity of such episodes129. However, a more recent phase III trial of prasugrel, a newer generation P2Y12 receptor blocker, showed no significant reduction of the frequency of pain episodes in children with SCD130. Ticagrelor, a reversible P2Y12 receptor blocker, was well tolerated in children131 and young adults132 but had no beneficial effects on pain. A phase III study to determine the efficacy of ticagrelor in reducing vaso-occlusive crises in children is ongoing133 (Table 3).

Table 3. Ongoing clinical trials of anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, anti-inflammatory agents, and nitric oxide-related drugs in sickle cell disease

MechanismDrugSponsorNCT number
(study acronym)
Clinical phase/
status
InterventionNumber/ageObjective
Anticoagulant,
anti-adhesive (P-
selectin blocker)
Tinzaparin
(low-molecular-weight
heparin)
Assistance Publique
–Hopitaux de Paris,
LEO pharma
NCT02580773
(TASC)
Phase III
Unknown status
Subcutaneous therapeutic vs.
prophylactic dose for 7 days
200/≥18 years
Time to ACS resolution, bleeding
events, hospital mortality
AntiplateletTicagrelorAstraZenecaNCT03615924
(HESTIA3)
Phase III
Active, not recruiting
Oral ticagrelor vs. placebo for
at least 12 months
193/2–17 yearsEvaluate efficacy in decreasing VOC,
acute chest syndrome, duration of
VOC, QOL measures
Antithrombotic,
anti-inflammatory
DefibrotideNew York Medical
College
NCT03805581Phase II RecruitingIntravenous, every 6 hours
during ACS event for
maximum of 7 days
20/2–40 yearsSafety (allergic reaction, bleeding),
improvement in clinical signs of ACS
Anti-inflammatoryMometasoneJeffery GlassbergNCT03758950
(IMPROVE2)
Phase II
Recruiting
Inhaled, one puff daily vs.
placebo for 48 weeks
80/≥18 yearsChange in soluble VCAM-1,
hemoglobin, markers of hemolysis,
leukocyte count, QOL measures
Canakinumab
(anti-IL1β antibody)
NovartisNCT02961218Phase II
Active, not recruiting
Subcutaneous, monthly for 6
months vs. placebo, followed
by 6-month open-label
extension
49/8–20 yearsReduction of average daily pain, days
missed from school, blood counts,
pharmacokinetics, hs-CRP, measures
of hemolysis
Docosahexaenoic acid
and eicosapentaenoic
acid
Thomas Jefferson
University
NCT01202812Phase II
Not yet recruiting
Oral, daily for 6 months vs.
placebo
48/10–19 yearsDecrease inflammatory biomarkers,
QOL
Docosahexaenoic acid
(SC411)
Micelle BioPharmaNCT02973360
(SCOT study)
Phase II
Active, not recruiting
Oral for 8 weeks vs. placebo
followed by 49-month open-
label extension
68/5–17 yearsSafety, pharmacokinetics, effect on
VOC
Omega-3-fatty acidSultan Qaboos
University
NCT02525107Phase III
Recruitment status
unknown
Oral, daily for 52 weeks vs.
placebo
280/13–70 yearsEffect on VOC, duration of
hospitalization, RBC membrane fatty
acid profile
Rifaximin (antibiotic,
decrease aged
neutrophils)
New York Medical
College
NCT03719729Phase II
Recruiting
Oral, twice daily for 1 year20/18–70 yearsSafety, frequency of hospitalizations for
VOCs, duration of hospitalizations, RBC
transfusions, QOL measures


Increased NO
production


Arginine


Emory University
NCT02447874Phase I/II
Enrolling by invitation
Intravenous, three times a day
for maximum of 7 days
21/7–21 yearsPharmacokinetics, NO metabolites
NCT02536170Phase II
Recruiting
Intravenous, three times
a day through duration of
hospitalization
114/3–21 yearsEffect on VOC, including total
parenteral opioid use, length of hospital
stay, resolution of VOC
VasodilatorOlinciguat (IW-1701)
(soluble guanylate
cyclase stimulator)
Cyclerion
therapeutics
NCT03285178Phase II
Recruiting
Oral, daily 12 weeks vs.
placebo
88/16–70 yearsSafety and tolerability,
pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics
Riociguat (soluble
guanylate cyclase
stimulator)
Mark GladwinNCT02633397Phase II
Recruiting
Oral, three times daily for 12
weeks
100/≥18 yearsSafety, changes in pain intensity,
SCD-related complications, functional
capacity, blood pressure, plasma
NT-proBNP, changes in laboratory
measures, TRV
IMR-687 (selective
phosphodiesterase-9
inhibitor)
ImaraNCT03401112Phase IIa
Recruiting
Oral, daily for 24 weeks vs.
placebo
70/18–55 yearsSafety, pharmacokinetics
NCT04053803
Phase II
Enrolling by invitation
Oral, daily for 49 months,
open-label extension
70/≥18 years
Safety, change in hemoglobin, HbF,
soluble adhesion markers, renal and
cardiac function, QOL
Ambrisentan
(endothelin receptor A
antagonist)
Augusta UniversityNCT02712346Phase I
Active, not recruiting
Oral, once daily for 12 weeks26/18–65 yearsSafety and tolerability,
microalbuminuria/proteinuria,
TRV, inflammatory markers, pain
questionnaire

ACS, acute chest syndrome; HbF, fetal hemoglobin; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; NO, nitric oxide; NT-proBNP, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide; QOL, quality of life; TRV, echocardiography-derived tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; VOC, vaso-occlusive crisis; vWF, von Willebrand factor.

Nitric oxide and related agents. With the role of hemolysis in NO scavenging and subsequent endothelial dysfunction, NO and related agents may be beneficial in SCD134. Inhaled NO did not improve time to resolution of pain crisis, length of hospitalization, opioid usage, or rate of acute chest syndrome compared with placebo135. In another study, inhaled NO did not reduce the rate of treatment failure in adult patients with mild to moderate acute chest syndrome136. However, L-arginine, an NO precursor, significantly decreased total parenteral opioid use and pain scores at discharge compared to placebo in children, although there was no difference in length of hospital stay137. Furthermore, supplementation of adult patients on hydroxyurea with oral arginine significantly increased the level of NO metabolites and reduced the frequency of pain crises versus placebo following 4 months of treatment138. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor which increases NO-mediated effects by inhibiting the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), was associated with more frequent serious adverse events, predominantly hospitalization for pain, compared with placebo139. No evidence of a treatment effect of sildenafil was seen on evaluated study outcomes. Studies of soluble guanylate cycle stimulators, riociguat (NCT02633397) and olinciguat/IW-1701 (NCT03285178), and the phosphodiesterase-9 inhibitor IMR-687 (NCT03401112; NCT04053803) are ongoing (Table 3).

Summary

Recent advances in drug development for SCD raise important issues related to the use and availability of these agents. With limited availability of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and gene therapy, especially in low- and middle-income countries, the number of recently approved drugs offers hope for further improved outcomes in SCD. Choice of initial drug therapy may be guided by a patient’s clinical sub-phenotype as well as the cost of the drug (Table 4). Patients with frequent vaso-occlusive complications (acute pain episodes, acute chest syndrome) may benefit from hydroxyurea, L-glutamine, and crizanlizumab, while those with increased hemolytic anemia (or quite possibly complications related to hemolytic anemia) may benefit from hydroxyurea and voxelotor. However, more studies are required before definite recommendations can be made regarding the effect of voxelotor on SCD-related complications. As with other chronic disease conditions, it is important to consider the cost of the drug when deciding on initial therapy. Hydroxyurea is much cheaper than L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor and is likely more cost effective as initial therapy for vaso-occlusive complications and hemolytic anemia. However, with the complex pathophysiology of SCD and the limited clinical efficacy of available pharmacological therapies, it is unlikely that a single drug will ameliorate all SCD-related complications. As such, the availability of multiple drugs offers an opportunity for combination therapy based on different mechanisms of action and non-overlapping side effect profiles. Although more studies are required to evaluate the effect of combinations of these drugs, all of the recently approved agents were tested in combination with hydroxyurea. These studies showed benefit whether or not participants received concomitant hydroxyurea, with no increased toxicity. Despite potential benefits, combination therapy involving the use of multiple drugs increases the likelihood of decreased medication adherence owing to polypharmacy. Like in other chronic diseases, however, this problem may be somewhat ameliorated by the development of pills that contain more than one active drug.

Table 4. Summary characteristics of FDA-approved drugs for sickle cell disease.

HydroxyureaL-GlutamineCrizanlizumabVoxelotor
Age (years)≥2 ≥5≥16 ≥12
Genotypes HbSS, HbSβ0 thalassemiaAll genotypes (only
studied in HbSS, HbSβ0
thalassemia)
All genotypesAll genotypes
Mechanism of actionMultiple, but primarily by
increasing HbF production
Uncertain, but thought
to reduce NAD redox
potential, possible
decrease in cell
adhesion
Anti P-selectin inhibitor
(decreases adhesion
of WBCs and RBCs to
endothelium)
Decreases HbS
polymerization by
increasing Hb–oxygen
affinity
Route of administrationOral (capsules/tablets)Oral (powder)IntravenousOral (tablets)
Clinical effects
of therapy
Decreased frequency of VOC,
decreased frequency of ACS,
decreased hospitalization,
decreased RBC transfusion
requirement, decreased stroke risk
Decreased frequency
of VOC, decreased
frequency of
ACS, decreased
hospitalization
Decreased frequency
of VOC
Increased hemoglobin
Effect size for primary
endpoint (% change
and IRR)
44% decrease in VOC per year
(median from 4.5 to 2.5), IRR =
0.56
25% decrease in VOC in
48 weeks (median from
4 to 3), IRR = 0.75
45% decrease in crisis
rate per year (median
from 3 to 1.6), IRR =
0.55
5.5-fold increase in the
hemoglobin responders
(9% to 59%) at 24
weeks, incidence
proportion ratio = 6.6*
Common toxicitiesMyelosuppression, skin
hyperpigmentation, nail
discoloration, teratogenicity,
decreased sperm counts, nausea
and vomiting
Constipation, nausea,
headaches, abdominal
pain
Nausea, arthralgiaHeadache, diarrhea,
nausea
PharmacokineticsExcreted via kidneys Adjust dose
for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2
Use with caution with
hepatic and renal
impairment, but no
recommended dose
adjustment
No dosage
adjustments in
manufacturer labeling
for renal and hepatic
impairment (not tested
in ESRD)
No dosage adjustment
for renal impairment,
but not yet studied in
ESRD requiring dialysis
Dose reduction for
severe liver disease
(Child Pugh class C)
Cost$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

ACS, acute chest syndrome; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; Hb, hemoglobin; HbF, fetal hemoglobin; HbS, sickle hemoglobin; IRR, incidence rate ratio; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; RBC, red blood cell; VOC, vaso-occlusive crisis; WBC, white blood cell.

* Patients treated with 1,500 mg of voxelotor had 6.6 times increased proportion of hemoglobin responders (>1 g/dL increase from baseline at 24 weeks)

It is particularly important that ongoing trials of novel drugs for SCD involve individuals in resource-limited countries where the burden of disease is high. This offers patients access to potentially disease-modifying therapies but, perhaps equally as important, contributes substantially to capacity building by improving local infrastructure, strengthening health systems, involving local leaders as collaborators, and training local providers. Furthermore, trials of novel agents in sub-Saharan Africa provide data on the effects of these therapies in a setting with fewer resources and unique challenges, including a high prevalence of malnutrition and infections such as malaria. With the high cost of recently approved agents, mechanisms to ensure affordable access to these drugs should be established. A situation where novel agents are tested in resource-limited countries but patients in these countries are unable to afford such drugs following approval is unacceptable. Finally, studies evaluating the effects of recently approved drugs on organ damage are needed. Demonstration that these agents prevent or decrease end-organ damage would provide additional evidence for the role of drug therapies in improving outcomes in SCD.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 11 Jun 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Rai P and Ataga KI. Drug Therapies for the Management of Sickle Cell Disease [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9(F1000 Faculty Rev):592 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22433.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 11 Jun 2020
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 Jun 2020
Yogen Saunthararajah, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 1
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Saunthararajah Y. Reviewer Report For: Drug Therapies for the Management of Sickle Cell Disease [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9(F1000 Faculty Rev):592 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.24752.r64619)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 Jun 2020
Daniel E. Bauer, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;  Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA;  Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 1
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Bauer DE. Reviewer Report For: Drug Therapies for the Management of Sickle Cell Disease [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9(F1000 Faculty Rev):592 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.24752.r64620)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 11 Jun 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.