Keywords
childhood obesity, nutrition, children, London, evaluation
This article is included in the UCL Child Health gateway.
This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.
This article is included in the University College London collection.
childhood obesity, nutrition, children, London, evaluation
Obesity in childhood has a significant impact on an individual’s lifelong health and well-being. The associated risks of excess weight in childhood include an increased risk of becoming overweight as an adult, and of developing serious health conditions1. Although childhood obesity is considered as one of the most serious challenges of the 21st century, policy and research efforts have not been successful in halting the rise of overweight and obesity, resulting in almost a 20% rise in obese and overweight children in the UK over the past two decades2.
The UK government introduced its childhood obesity strategy ‘A Plan for Action’, in 20163. This plan acknowledged that ‘Long-term, sustainable change will only be achieved through early intervention and active engagement of communities, families, schools and individuals.’ One such effort is the Early Years Nutrition programme, a local strategy in a London borough (Newham). Newham has an ethnically diverse population and the third highest rate of childhood obesity amongst all London boroughs, which is increasing steadily4. In light of this, Newham’s Childhood Obesity Action Plan was introduced in 2017 to define the borough’s vision for addressing childhood obesity5. The current study aimed to assess the implementation of this programme through an evaluation of services offered in Newham's children's centres and provide recommendations for wider implementation of similar programmes.
All Newham's children's centres were invited to participate in this study (n=11). Our objectives were to conduct a service evaluation of what information about healthy eating (topics) is provided on display boards in early years settings against set standards by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. In addition, we aimed to determine what sessions the centres offer in their timetable for parents and whether centres are displaying the UNICEF’s ‘you are welcome to breastfeed here’ logo to promote breastfeeding6.
Data collection occurred from January 1, to March 31, 2018. Information about healthy eating topics was collected through photographs and field notes of the display boards of each of the centres, while information about parent sessions was collected from the centre staff and available information pamphlets at the centres.
Additionally, we assessed whether nutrition activities (both parent sessions and nutritional topics) of each centre complied with the maternal and child nutrition guidelines (PH11) from the NICE7. These guidelines set out the key recommendations for proper nutrition during pregnancy and for children under five years of age and highlight interventions aimed at optimising nutrition for children. The initiatives within Newham’s early years nutrition programme were identified by the research team and mapped/classified against the 22 NICE recommendations for maternal and child nutrition to determine where Newham’s offerings were compliant and to identify areas for improvement.
Since this study was a routine service evaluation, we used the Health Research Authority decision tool to confirm that Research Ethical Committee approval was not required8.
Out of the eleven centres in Newham, eight (72.7%) centres participated (Table 1). The three remaining centres failed to respond when approached to participate. Of the remainder, one was newly opened and therefore did not have display boards. Findings from assessing the display boards revealed that the most frequently displayed topics were related to generic health and wellbeing (4 centres, 50.0%), and breastfeeding (3, 37.5%) (Table 1).
Centres were assessed to see whether they displayed the UNICEF breastfeeding logo, what sessions and workshops were available to parents, and nutritional display board topics from January to March 2018.
On assessing the parent sessions offered, we observed that they were varied, with no single session topic widely offered across centres (Table 1). The most frequent sessions offered were oral health (4, 50.0%) and nutrition (3, 37.5%) workshops. Three centres (37.5%) did not offer any relevant sessions during this period.
All centres displayed the UNICEF breastfeeding logo.
Assessment of the centres’ display information revealed that the Early Year Nutrition programme is meeting the NICE recommendations for child nutrition, achieving all recommendations within the scope of this study (Table 2).
The display boards were designed to encourage parents to visit the centre and join discussions about health topics displayed. Existing research has demonstrated that training staff from children’s centre in delivering key evidence-based healthy eating and physical activity messages results in an increase in adoption of formal nutrition and physical activity policies within the early years setting9. It is also evident that, in addition to the adoption of such policies, staff training has resulted in key benefits for children, such as improved nutrition and increased energy levels10.
In general, we recommend that the children’s centres should aim to offer more workshops, ideally a schedule with topics standardised across all boroughs to ensure consistency in the information delivered to parents. These sessions should also cater to specific age groups in children. Programmes targeted at families with children under age five that aim to promote healthy choices, have demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of improved health behaviours11. Furthermore, a previous study suggests that home-based interventions delivered to target families can reduce the Body Mass Index (BMI) status for children under the age of two12. Therefore, programmes aimed at increasing health visitor capacity to intervene around nutrition and obesity issues through increased parental engagement may be a potential method of reducing later childhood obesity in the UK. However, there is little longitudinal evidence about the role of the UK’s health visitors in reducing childhood obesity at older ages, and thus further research into their significance in preventing and reversing childhood obesity is required.
Although conducting parental interviews was not within the scope of our study, we recommend developing nutritional programmes that focus on building a bridge between community centres or service providers and parents, with a goal of improving communication about child nutrition and promotion of child health. This should include regular engagements with parents and young individuals in the community to educate them and gather essential feedback regarding the services and knowledge offered. Previous studies have proved the importance of service user feedbacks as these are pivotal in enforcing changes and improving the delivery of programmes13,14. A 2010 systematic review also concluded that parental engagement resulted in increased health-related behavioural change, with better outcomes associated with increased parental engagement compared to controls15. Furthermore, we recommend programme planners take a ‘participatory learning approach’ to intervention design, as there is evidence suggesting its benefits in communities for the success of such interventions16. This approach involves members from the community and increases the chances of adherence to promoted advice, as they are specifically developed with the community in question, thus making them socially and culturally acceptable16.
Displaying the UNICEF breastfeeding logo is a simple intervention to support UNICEF’s Baby Friendly Initiative and promote breastfeeding both in the children’s centre and in general by encouraging mothers and families to pursue this as a feeding choice. Since the Initiative was established, breastfeeding initiation rates have increased by 20%17 and there is evidence suggesting a correlation between breastfeeding and decreased risk of childhood obesity18. This is especially important as the UK has a relatively low breastfeeding rate, which is amongst the worst in Europe19. Currently there aren’t any studies exploring the strength of displaying breastfeeding logos, but given the benefits of breastfeeding, further research is warranted that looks at the impact of local supportive initiatives, and particularly if displaying such logos in public places can actually influence breastfeeding behaviour on a local level.
Overall, the Early Years Nutrition programme is meeting the NICE recommendations for child nutrition, with efforts to address all recommendations within the scope of this study (Table 2). These evidence-based guidelines highlight the key recommendations for optimal nutrition for children7 and should form the basis for the benchmarking of activities to monitor what services are available within the boroughs and assess if they meet NICE guidance.
Due to no response, some children’s centres were excluded from the study. It is possible that non-responders may have had poor adherence to guidelines and hence did not reply to our request. Private and voluntary settings providing similar services were not included. In addition, it was not possible to assess the nutritional quality of the food provided in the children’s centres. Furthermore, parental feedback on the Early Years Nutrition programme was not collected.
This evaluation indicates that the Early Years Nutrition programme is consistent with NICE guidelines, addressing all 18 relevant recommendations. However, there are several important key areas for development for programme planners delivering such services. These include improved staff training to ensure accuracy and standardisation of promoted information, consistency in sessions delivered to parents, not just within the borough, but within all similar services across the country and further exploring the role of health visitors in promoting nutritional and lifestyle changes to reduce childhood obesity. In addition, we suggest further engagement with parents and young people regarding the services offered, and the potential for applying the participatory approach to intervention design for the success of such programmes in communities. This may further strengthen delivery of the programmes, and contribute to their efficacy and further implementation of similar childhood obesity programmes in other settings.
1. Childhood obesity is rising;
2. Effective early interventions are key to prevent the rise of childhood obesity;
3. Targeting parental perceptions with appropriate knowledge around early nutrition acknowledging their cultural beliefs and practices is required;
4. Routine service evaluations of community health programmes are essential to improve programme delivery;
5. Improved staff training and increased community engagement is key for a successful programme
All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.
The authors would like to thank Newham Council and all participating children’s centres. Authors would also like to thank Yancy Jensen (Newham Council & UCL) and Roeann Osman (UCL) for their contributions to the manuscript.
All authors were involved in, at various stages, conception of the work and modification to the design. Individual lead responsibilities are listed in the Author roles section. All authors additionally contributed to revisions and the final draft, and gave approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Childhood obesity aetiology, prevention, treatment, consequences, diagnosis.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Obesity, childhood obesity, nutrition, dietetics
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 07 Jul 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)