ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report
Revised

Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
PUBLISHED 07 Oct 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is a crop macronutrient of major importance, which affects both plant growth and yield. In this paper we discuss the humus content (%) and various soluble N forms (NO3-, total N, nitrate-N, ammonium-N, and organic nitrogen) available in humus sand soil samples originating from the Pallag Experimental Station of Horticulture at the University of Debrecen, Hungary. We found 45.4% nitrate-N and 13.8% nitrite-N of total N content present in the soil. Considering the percentage distribution of soluble N forms present at the Pallag Experimental Station, we recommend using this soil in further pot experiments, given that this has optimal nutrient supply capacity. In addition, we examined possible statistical correlations between humus% and N forms.

Keywords

pot experiment, total N, nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, nutrient supply capacity

Revised Amendments from Version 1

In the second version of our manuscript we have made the following changes: 
 
We clarified the land-use type from where the samples originated, as requested by Yuhua, K. and Juhos, K.; we added the meanings of “control”, “greenhouse”, and “pollutant nitrogen” (i.e., nitrite) as suggested by Juhos, K. 
 
Regarding conclusions about the test soil suitable for use, there was a misunderstanding, so we tried to clarify in the text, as well; we meant that test soil could be used in pot experiments, according to its characteristics described in the study, which seemed to be confirmed by the total element contribution in test plant (tomato).  The latter is the topic of our forthcoming study (we do not present these results here). 
 
We clarified the soil-solution ratio. 
 
We agree with Juhos, K.’s comments that collecting soil samples from various depths is very important to better understand N transformation and mobility in soil. Nevertheless, in the present study we aimed to analyze whether this soil is suitable or not for tomato pot experiments. 
 
In addition, we updated Table 1 according to comments made by Juhos, K. and Yuhua, K. 
 
Regarding Yuhua, K.’s last comment: we found statistical correlation between humus% and ammonium-N (mg/kg) only, as stated at Results and Discussion. This is the reason why we did not display correlations between humus and other N forms. 
 
Equations E1 and E2 were revised and explained, as requested by Professor Agachi, S.

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is an essential element for plants, takes various forms in soil1, and is one of the most limiting nutrients for various crops24. Nitrogen is present in soils as inorganic nitrogen (nitrate, ammonium, and dinitrogen) and organic nitrogen (urea and amino acids)5.

Conversions between organic and mineral N forms are primarily affected by soil microorganisms, which enable conversion to forms that plants can uptake6. In addition, some pollutant N forms (e.g., nitrite) are present in soil, so nitrogen conversions may indirectly affect human health and load the environment1. For this reason, quantifying studies aim to better understand nitrogen form ratios in soil and contribute to reaching sustainable agriculture practice. Recently, Jakab published a similar study7 quantifying another vital element for plants, phosphorus, in soil from the same region.

Humus is a main fertility component of the soil, 65–75% of its structure being made up of organic matter8,9. We decided to include humus content in this N-related study as it represents a known indicator of soil quality10.

Calcium chloride (CaCl2)-soluble nitrogen forms are the most available N ions for assimilation by plants11,12. Therefore, we quantified all N forms in CaCl2 solution. Additionally, we determined nitrate-N via a potassium chloride (KCl)-based method.

The main objectives of our study were: (a) to map out all easily absorbed nitrogen forms for better understanding of available nutrient composition and (b) to determine the ratio of pollutant (nitrite) and absorbable (ammonium ion, nitrate) N forms in humus sand soil in pot experiments.

Methods

Randomized soil sampling, approx. 60 kg; 15 cores from control parcel (no fertilizer was applied, nor crop production, or land-use), was done at the Pallag Experimental Station of Horticulture at the University of Debrecen, Hungary on May 20, 2020, according to Hungarian national standard MSZ 08020213 from the -20 cm of topsoil using a vane. On other parcels (different from control parcels), orchards are being cultivated. Sampling point is located on a moderately hot and dry micro-region, the average annual temperature varies between 9.7-10.0 °C. The annual precipitation is of only 520–550 mm14. Next, samples were transferred for measurements to a greenhouse (where pots had been placed for pot experiments); the greenhouse was located at Department of Agriculture, at the University of Debrecen. To measure chemical parameters, samples were sieved through a 2 mm mesh.

We determined soil moisture content gravimetrically, according to Klimes-Szmik15, drying the soil samples at 105°C for 24 h and weighing the mass loss. To evaluate texture, Arany-type plasticity index was measured, using the methodology recommended by Hungarian national standard MSZ-08 0206/1-7816; briefly from a burette distilled water is added to 100g sample until soil reaches the upper limit of its water holding capacity. Soil pH was determined in 1 mol L-1 KCl solution (soil/water = 1.0/2.5 wt./wt.), according to Buzás17 using a glass electrode (Model Seven2Go Advanced Single-Channel Portable pH Meter, Mettler, Toledo. We first determined organic-C%. content with potassium dichromate, according to Székely18, and than we calculated humus% from organic-C% according to: the Hungarian standard MSZ-08 0210-7719 (E2); briefly, 10 mL K-dichromate was added to 1.0 g of soil sample (solution/soil=10/1) in a 300 mL Erlenmeyer flask, then 0.10 g Ag2SO4 aqueous solution was added, boiled for 5 minutes, cooled to room temperature, and titrated with 0.2 N Mohr's salt solution. Ferroin was used was the indicator, given that its color change is reversible, pronounced, and fast. We calculated C% according to Equation (E1):

C%=a0.0006100b(E1)

where a is the volume difference (Mohr’s salt solution loss) between blank and soil sample titration (expressed in mL), multiplied by the Mohr-salt factor (which is 0.0006) and b represents the weight of the soil sample (g), multipled with 100 to convert results to percentage.

Next, humus% was calculated according to Equation (E2):

Humus(%)=C(%)1.724(E2)

Where C(%) is organic-Carbon (expressed in percentage), 1.724 is a multiplication factor which was determined by the Hungarian standard MSZ-08 0210-77 based on a number of experimental results; it was concluded that Humus(%) values can be calculated from organic-C% with high reliability.

All measurements of soluble N forms in soil were conducted according to Hungarian standard MSZ 20135:199920; briefly, to determine KCl-NO3 (mg/kg) content, the sample was prepared with 1 mol L-1 KCl of soil solution (74.5g KCl were added to 1 L distilled water21. Spectra were recorded with a Model PU 8610 UV/VIS kinetics spectrophotometer by Pye Unicam (Cambridge, GB). For assessing total soluble nitrogen (UV degraded) content, soil samples were extracted with 0.01 mol L-1 CaCl2 solution. Soil samples were mixed with sodium tetraborate buffer, then oxidized with excess K2S2O8 and passed into an ultraviolet digester. Nitrate was reduced on a cadmium-copper column and then converted to a colored azo compound via the Griess-Ilosvay reaction; dissolving 0.50 g of sulfanilic acid and 0.05 g of 1-naphthylamine in 150 mL of dilute acetic acid. A colored solution was obtained, which was analyzed by visible photometry at 540 nm (SKALAR photometry (San Plus Analyser, S.F.A.S).

We determined CaCl2-ammonium-N (mg/kg) using a modified Berthelot reaction-based method in which ammonia was initially converted to monochloramine and then to 5-aminosalicylate, according to Buzás17 using 1% EDTA solution and 1 ml 0.06 N NaOH. After oxidation, a green color complex was obtained, with a maximum light absorption at 660 nm. Nitrate-N was determined as described above for the measurement of N content (after reduction, conversion to azo dye, and photometric measurement at 540 nm). All soluble forms were detected by SKALAR photometry (San Plus Analyser, S.F.A.S) in a segmented continuous flow (SCF) system. Finally, we calculated nitrite-N (mg/kg) using Equation (E3), proposed by Buzás17:

OrganicN=TotalNammoniumN(nitrateN+nitrite)(E3)

To better understand the correlation between humus% (Y) and N-forms (X), we carried out two different tests (i) the Pearson test to establish the relation between the variance (Y) and covariance (XY); and (ii) the Kendall test to verify whether the two variables may be regarded as statistically dependent. All statistical analysis was performed with R Statistical Software 3.5.1 (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Soil pH was slightly acidic: pH (KCl) 5.5. As KA = 30, according to Arany the soil is considered humus sand18. For these samples, 1.4 % humus content was found, which represents a reasonable value for a sand soil18. Nitrate content was determined using two methods: KCl-NO3 (12.66 mg/kg) and CaCl2-NO3 (13.53 mg/kg), and the average value of nitrate content (12.48 mg/kg) served for the calculation of percentages in Figure 1.

244496dd-66dd-4bea-a163-81662764b441_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Percentage distribution of the soluble forms of nitrogen present in soil.

Average ammonium-N was 6.8 mg/kg, which represents 24.7% of the total-N content. In addition, 3.8 mg/kg of nitrite-N (pollutant nitrogen form) was assessed and found to be one order of magnitude less than the nitrate-N content, as expected for well-ventilated sand soil. Organic-N of 4.4 mg/kg contributed by 16.1% to the total nitrogen content of soil (Table 1).

Table 1. Average values of humus%, and soluble N forms.

Humus %N forms (mg/kg)
Nitrate-NAmmonium-NNitrite-NOrganic-NTotal-N
ID123456
avg Result1.412.56.83.84.427.5
SD0.150.0750.02derived
parameter
0.150.05

Considering all forms of N under study, the results of correlation analysis evidenced that only the ammonium-N form was in strong correlation with humus%, with r ≈ 0.97 and T ≈ 0.99 (Figure 2).

244496dd-66dd-4bea-a163-81662764b441_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Correlation between humus% and ammonium-N (mg/kg).

These promising initial results call for additional experiments to confirm the strong correlation between these two variables. Total-N also showed a good correlation with humus%; however, it was not as strong as that found between humus% and ammonium-N.

Conclusions

Our results reveal that the ratio of nitrate-N and nitrite-N (which is determined mostly by soil oxidation-reduction conditions) is optimal in sand soil samples originating from the Pallag Experimental Station of Horticulture at the University of Debrecen, Hungary. Based on the percentage distribution of soluble N forms present at Pallag Experimental Station, authors recommend using this soil in further pot experiments, given the soil’s optimal nutrient supply capacity21.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Supporting data - N forms and Humus% in Sand soil, Nyírség. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12581303.v322

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 28 Jul 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Kincses I, Melendez JR, Ramírez-Cando L et al. Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:781 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25260.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 07 Oct 2020
Revised
Views
3
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Oct 2020
Yuhua Kong, College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China 
Approved
VIEWS 3
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kong Y. Reviewer Report For: Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:781 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29978.r72580)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
3
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Oct 2020
Katalin Juhos, Department of Agro-Environmental Studies, Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary 
Approved
VIEWS 3
I have no further ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Juhos K. Reviewer Report For: Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:781 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29978.r72581)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 07 Oct 2020
Paul S. Agachi, Department of Chemical, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana 
Approved
VIEWS 4
Agree with the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Agachi PS. Reviewer Report For: Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:781 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29978.r72582)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 28 Jul 2020
Views
5
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 Sep 2020
Paul S. Agachi, Department of Chemical, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 5
The paper deals with the assessment of the appropriation of the sandy Pallag soil for raising crops, due to the humus and Nitrogen content. The ratio of nitrate-N and nitrite-N recommends the soil for crops. 

The importance of ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Agachi PS. Reviewer Report For: Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:781 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27875.r71958)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Sep 2020
Yuhua Kong, College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 12
  • The purpose and significance of the study are not very clear and lack of novelty.    
     
  • The basic information of sampling site is not mentioned, like land-use type, the mean annual precipitation
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kong Y. Reviewer Report For: Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:781 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27875.r70069)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Aug 2020
Katalin Juhos, Department of Agro-Environmental Studies, Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 16
The purpose of the manuscript is not entirely clear:
  • Exactly what land-use type the samples come from (what do control and greenhouse mean? I don't see the comparison in the results section.)
     
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Juhos K. Reviewer Report For: Soluble nitrogen forms in sand soil of Pallag: a quantitative report [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:781 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.27875.r69180)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 28 Jul 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.