Keywords
Melatonin, stability, solubility, dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO, glycofurol, propylene glycol
Melatonin, stability, solubility, dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO, glycofurol, propylene glycol
Oral melatonin has poor oral bioavailability (DeMuro et al., 2000; Di et al., 1997; Harpsøe et al., 2015; Lane & Moss, 1985). So, if high local doses of melatonin are wanted, other routes of administration might be advantageous, e.g. intravesical, vaginal, rectal, and pulmonal. A liquid solution of melatonin is required for these routes of administration. Since melatonin has poor solubility and stability in aqueous solutions (Hamed et al., 1991), we wanted to investigate alternative solvents. Possible solvents include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycofurol, and propylene glycol. DMSO is used as a solvent for intravesical administration of drugs used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases of the bladder (Petrou et al., 2009; Shirley et al., 1978). Glycofurol is considered non-toxic and is used as a solvent in various intravenous formulations (Crowther et al., 1997). Propylene glycol is used extensively in cosmetic products and has been considered safe in this application (Fiume et al., 2012).
The aim of this study was to investigate the solubility of melatonin in glycofurol and propylene glycol formulations, as well as the stability of melatonin in glycofurol and DMSO formulations.
Two experiments were performed: a solubility and a stability experiment.
Two formulations were prepared, one containing 20% w/w glycofurol in type 1 purified (MilliQ) water and the other 20% w/w propylene glycol in purified water. From each formulation, 2 x 1 ml was transferred to separate Eppendorf tubes (1.5 ml). Melatonin was added to each Eppendorf tube in larger quantity than the anticipated aqueous solubility. The Eppendorf tubes were agitated by means of end-over-end rotation overnight. Prior to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, each sample was filtered (0.45 µm Q-Max RR syringe filters).
For the stability experiment, the following formulations were prepared:
a) 20% w/w glycofurol in MilliQ water containing 10 mg/g melatonin (glycofurol, 1.5 g; MilliQ water, 6 g; melatonin, 75 mg).
b) 20% w/w glycofurol and 40% w/w DMSO in MilliQ water containing 10 mg/g melatonin (Glycofurol, 1.5 g; DMSO, 3 g; MilliQ water, 3 g; melatonin, 75 mg).
c) 50% DMSO in MilliQ water containing 1 mg/g melatonin (DMSO, 3.75 g; MilliQ water, 3.75 g; melatonin, 7.5 mg).
All formulations were prepared by dissolving the relevant amount of melatonin in the organic solvents. Subsequently, the organic solution was added to the relevant volume of MilliQ water. Each formulation was portioned into 12 Eppendorf tubes. These were stored in a heating cabinet at 25°C for up to 45 days. Three Eppendorf tubes from each formulation were taken for analysis at Day 10, 17, 31 and 45. The amount of melatonin in each formulation was determined immediately after preparation (Day 0). Prior to HPLC analysis, the samples were diluted 40 times in acetonitrile. Settings for the HPLC are listed available as Extended data (Zetner, 2020).
The solubility of melatonin in the prepared 20% w/w propylene glycol and 20% w/w glycofurol formulations is shown in Table 1. The solubility of melatonin in propylene glycol was only 3.6–3.8 mg/ml, while it was 10.5–11.1 mg/ml in glycofurol.
Solvent | Melatonin concentration (mg/ml) |
---|---|
Propylene glycol 20% | 3.8 3.6 |
Glycofurol 20% | 11.1 10.5 |
The results of the melatonin measurements from Day 0 to 45 are shown in Table 2. Melatonin was stable at 25°C for 45 days in all three formulations. None of the melatonin concentrations in the formulations varied considerably from the original concentration. However, when inspecting the HPLC chromatograms of all three products, two peaks were identified in the 20% glycofurol w/w solution at 7.9 and 8.3 minutes. These two peaks were not present in the chromatograms of either solution containing DMSO. All output results are available as Underlying data (Zetner, 2020).
Formulation | 20% glycofurol | 20% glycofurol/ 40% DMSO | 50% DMSO | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominal concentration | 10 mg/ml | 10 mg/ml | 1 mg/ml | ||||||
Measured concentration (mg/ml) | |||||||||
Day 0 | 10.5 | 10.6 | -* | 11.4 | 11.3 | -* | 1.2 | 1.2 | -* |
Day 10 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Day 17 | 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 11.3 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Day 31 | 11.4 | 11.1 | 11.0 | 11.8 | 12.4 | 12.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Day 45 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 10.6 | 11.3 | 11.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
The solubility of melatonin was nearly three times higher in the glycofurol formulation than in the propylene glycol formulation. A concentration of 10 mg/ml was achieved in the glycofurol formulation. Melatonin concentrations were stable for 45 days in all three formulations of the stability experiment; however, two unidentified peaks were present in the glycofurol solution (Figure 1).
Profiles shown are of melatonin 10 mg/mL in 20% (w/w) glycofurol, 10 mg/mL in 20% w/w glycofurol and 40% w/w dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 1 mg/g 50% DMSO stored for 45 days at 25°C.
Previous studies of melatonin stability in aqueous solutions have documented varying results. One study demonstrated stable melatonin concentrations of 100–113 µg/ml in a solution consisting of 5% ethanol and 95% isotonic saline for at least 6 months. The solution was created in sterile conditions and kept in sterile vacuum tubes, protected from light, at room temperature, 4°C, and -70°C (Cavallo & Hassan, 1995). Interestingly, another study investigated the stability of melatonin at 50 µg/ml dissolved in a phosphate buffer at pH 1.2, 2, 4, 7.4, 7, 10, and 12. This showed that up to 30% of the melatonin degraded over 21 days at all pH ranges. These samples were kept at 20°C and 37°C (Daya et al., 2001). This makes it difficult to draw conclusions about whether melatonin is stable in aqueous solutions, but it seems that melatonin dissolved in aqueous solutions is unreliable to use for clinical trials. Furthermore, the concentrations in these studies might be too small to be relevant in a clinical setting compared with the 10 mg/g achieved in the glycofurol formulation in the present study.
To our knowledge, this is the first trial investigating the solubility and stability of melatonin dissolved in DMSO, glycofurol, and propylene glycol. Study limitations were present since we only had data for 45 days, and solely at 25°C. Also, we did not make a comparison to melatonin in an aqueous solution.
Since our experiments were performed, propylene glycol has received the dubious honor of being named the American Contact Dermatitis Society's ‘Allergen of the Year 2018’ (Jacob et al., 2018). Adding this to the low solubility of melatonin in propylene glycol makes it hard to recommend using propylene glycol as a solvent for melatonin in clinical settings.
Both formulations containing DMSO demonstrated sufficient stability. The solution containing only glycofurol showed two unidentified peaks in the chromatogram at 45 days. Therefore, it can be speculated that these two peaks represent degradation products of melatonin. However, further studies aimed at identifying these two peaks are needed before they can be named as degradation products of melatonin. Both glycofurol and DMSO provide practical and relatively cheap ways of storing melatonin in a liquid solution. The stability of the DMSO formulations is good enough for them to be used for pharmacokinetic and safety trials in humans. If the formulations are to be used commercially in the long term, a longer stability experiment will have to be performed to determine a clinically relevant shelf life and requirements for storage temperatures.
The solubility of melatonin in propylene glycol was low, but melatonin was easily soluble in glycofurol. Glycofurol alone demonstrated sufficient stability, but also showed two unidentified peaks in the chromatogram. Both glycofurol/DMSO, and DMSO alone demonstrated a sufficient stability for melatonin solutions over 45 days at room temperature.
Open Science Framework: Solubility and stability of melatonin in propylene glycol, glycofurol, and dimethyl sulfoxide. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N9Y7V (Zetner, 2020).
This project contains the following underlying data:
Open Science Framework: Solubility and stability of melatonin in propylene glycol, glycofurol, and dimethyl sulfoxide. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N9Y7V (Zetner, 2020).
This project contains the following extended data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
References
1. Filali S, Bergamelli C, Lamine Tall M, Salmon D, et al.: Formulation, stability testing, and analytical characterization of melatonin-based preparation for clinical trial.J Pharm Anal. 2017; 7 (4): 237-243 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: pharmaceutical technology, physicochemical characteristics, melatonin
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Rawls WF, Cox L, Rovner ES: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as intravesical therapy for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: A review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2017; 36 (7): 1677-1684 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Nanotechnology; pharmaceutical formula development; biochemistry and toxicology; pharmaceutical technology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 05 Feb 20 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)