All Research Articles

141-160 of 223 ARTICLES
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13760.2
Correspondence metrics
Revised
Improving the biomedical research literature: insights from authors’ editors can help journal editors define and refine their core competencies
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Joy Burrough-Boenisch; Na Luo
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 21 Feb 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10032.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
How messages about behavioral genetics research can impact on genetic attribution beliefs
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers Brian M. Donovan; Kostas Kampourakis; Matteo Farinella; Fabien Medvecky
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12502.1
Review metrics
Recent progress on the molecular pharmacology of propofol
[version 1; peer review: 4 approved]
Peer Reviewers Gustav Akk; Tim G. Hales; Eintrei Christina; Stuart A. Forman
  • Funder
  • NIH
PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12496.3
Research Article metrics
Revised
The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Yaso Kunaratnam; Adrian Barnett
  • Funder
  • Department for International Development, UK Government
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 16 Jan 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12462.1
Research Article metrics
A comparison of physical activity and nutrition in young women with and without primary dysmenorrhea
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Narjes Bahri; Mark Jones; Zeinab Hamzehgardeshi
PUBLISHED 16 Jan 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13482.1
Research Note metrics
Improving communication for interdisciplinary teams working on storage of digital information in DNA
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Robert Grass; Jeffrey R. Sampson
  • Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • European Bioinformatics Institute
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
PUBLISHED 10 Jan 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
Review metrics
Revised
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers David Moher; Virginia Barbour
  • Funder
  • Horizon 2020
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13060.1
Opinion Article metrics
Amending published articles: time to rethink retractions and corrections?
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Lex Bouter; C.K. Gunsalus
PUBLISHED 06 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12673.2
Research Note metrics
Revised
A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Laurie A. Tomlinson;  Robin E. Champieux
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 06 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12715.1
Opinion Article metrics
Make researchers revisit past publications to improve reproducibility
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Georgios Pampalakis; Edward W. Randell; Morley D.  Hollenberg; Jake Cosme
PUBLISHED 21 Sep 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
Systematic Review metrics
Revised
What is open peer review? A systematic review
[version 2; peer review: 4 approved]
Peer Reviewers Richard Walker; Theodora Bloom; Bahar Mehmani; Emily Ford
  • Funder
  • European Commission
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 31 Aug 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12404.1
Research Article metrics
Exploring Vietnamese co-authorship patterns in social sciences with basic network measures of 2008-2017 Scopus data
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Tuyen Quang Tran; Donaldine E . Samson; Ly Thi Tran
PUBLISHED 24 Aug 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11661.1
Research Note metrics
Women as editors-in-chief of environmental science journals
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Karin Amrein; Emilio Bruna
PUBLISHED 21 Jul 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9453.2
Method Article metrics
Revised
Method-centered digital communities on protocols.io for fast-paced scientific innovation
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers David D. Dunigan and Irina Agarkova; Lawrence Patrick Kane
  • Funder
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Jun 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11415.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
We can shift academic culture through publishing choices
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Björn Brembs; Anthony Dart; Chris H.J. Hartgerink
  • Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Isaac Newton Trust
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 09 Jun 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11408.1
Opinion Article metrics
On the origin of nonequivalent states: How we can talk about preprints
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Todd Carpenter
PUBLISHED 02 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11334.1
Review metrics
Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Michael Lauer; Lenny Teytelman
PUBLISHED 02 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10422.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Building the infrastructure to make science metrics more scientific
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers David J. Currie; Maria Nedeva; Ivan Oransky and Alison Abritis
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 07 Apr 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10570.2
Research Note metrics
Revised
Engaging high school students in neuroscience research -through an e-internship program
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Christine F. Hohmann; Byron C. Jones; Jennifer A. Ufnar
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Mar 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10860.1
Opinion Article metrics
Reframing the science and policy of nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol – conclusions of the ALICE RAP Project
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Richard L. Bell; Freya Vander Laenen and Nick Verhaeghe
  • Funder
  • Seventh Framework Programme
PUBLISHED 17 Mar 2017
141-160 of 223 ARTICLES
Articles
We publish a wide range of article types in science, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities, with no editorial biases.
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.