https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1115998.1
Document
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Download
metrics
VIEWS
753
 
downloads
170
CITE
How to cite this document:
Martone M, Goscinski W, Das S et al. Call for community review of the Brain Imaging Data Structure – a standard for organizing and describing MRI data sets  [version 1; not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1368 (document) (https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1115998.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.
Policy document

Call for community review of the Brain Imaging Data Structure – a standard for organizing and describing MRI data sets 

Maryann Martone1, Wojtek Goscinski2, Samir Das3, Yoko Yamaguchi4, Eric Tatt Wei Ho5, Trygve Leergaard6, Jeanette Hellgren-Kotaleski7, Thomas Wachtler8, David Kennedy9, Mathew Abrams10
Author Affiliations
  • Metrics
  • 753 Views
  • 170 Downloads
 
Part of the gateway
Published 31 Aug 2018

Policy document

Call for community review of the Brain Imaging Data Structure – a standard for organizing and describing MRI data sets 

[version 1; not peer reviewed]

Maryann Martone1, Wojtek Goscinski2, Samir Das3, Yoko Yamaguchi4, Eric Tatt Wei Ho5, Trygve Leergaard6, Jeanette Hellgren-Kotaleski7, Thomas Wachtler8, David Kennedy9, Mathew Abrams10
Author Affiliations
1 UCSD, San Diego, USA
2 Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
3 McGill University, Montreal, Canada
4 RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan
5 Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia
6 University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
7 KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
8 Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
9 University of Massachusetts, Worchester, USA
10 INCF, Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract
Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed

Keywords
standard, brain imaging, community review, MRI, data structure, endorsement
Comments
5 Comments
Mathew Abrams
$comment.userAffiliation.renderToString()
23 Nov 2018
This standard has been endorsed by INCF
Mathew Abrams
$comment.userAffiliation.renderToString()
03 Oct 2018
From Chris Gorgolewski: "No, there isn't a metadata standard from psychological experiments that BIDS metadata conforms to; but I would love to learn about relevant standards used in psychological sciences."
Competing Interests
None
Alexander von Lautz
$comment.userAffiliation.renderToString()
28 Sep 2018
A question with regards to FAIR criteria, point 7: Is there a metadata standard from psychological experiments that BIDS metadata conforms to?
Competing Interests
No competing interests.
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski
$comment.userAffiliation.renderToString()
10 Sep 2018
There is one more relevant publication describing how MEG data is covered by BIDS: https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata2018110
Competing Interests
I am one of the BIDS stewards.
Jean-Baptiste Poline
$comment.userAffiliation.renderToString()
03 Sep 2018
An endorsement by INCF is more than deserved for the BIDS standard.
Competing Interests
I am participating to the BIDS efforts and some of the BIDS working groups
 
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.