https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1113839.1
Slides
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Download
metrics
VIEWS
161
 
downloads
14
CITE
How to cite these slides:
Haendel M. How open is open? An evaluation rubric for public knowledgebases [version 1; not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2017, 6:379 (slides) (https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1113839.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.

How open is open? An evaluation rubric for public knowledgebases

Author Affiliations
  • Metrics
  • 161 Views
  • 14 Downloads
 
Browse by related subjects
Published 29 Mar 2017

How open is open? An evaluation rubric for public knowledgebases

[version 1; not peer reviewed]

Author Affiliations
1 Oregon Health and Science University, USA
Presented at
10th International Biocuration Conference 2017
Abstract
Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed

Keywords
Open science, FAIR data, data repository evaluation, standards, ontologies, biocuration
Comments
0 Comments
 
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.