https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1113984.1
Slides
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Download
metrics
VIEWS
151
 
downloads
74
CITE
How to cite these slides:
Fest E and Besemer H. Agricultural science: three bibliometric systems compared [version 1; not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2017, 6:561 (slides) (https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1113984.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.

Agricultural science: three bibliometric systems compared

Author Affiliations
  • Metrics
  • 151 Views
  • 74 Downloads
Browse by related subjects
Published 25 Apr 2017

Agricultural science: three bibliometric systems compared

[version 1; not peer reviewed]

Author Affiliations
1 University of Wageningen, The Netherlands
Presented at
Interest Group on Agricultural Data (IGAD) Pre‐Meeting of the Research Data Alliance (RDA) 9th Plenary in Barcelona 2017
Abstract
Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed

Keywords
IGAD, RDA, bibliometric system, agricultural science, agriculture, bibliometric tools, metrics
Comments
0 Comments
 
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.