ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Atypical Cornelia de Lange Syndrome: a case report

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 31 Jan 2014
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) (also called Bushy Syndrome or Amsterdam dwarfism), is a genetic disorder that can lead to several alterations. This disease affects both physical and psychical development. The various abnormalities include facial dysmorphia (arched eyebrows, synophrys, depressed nasal bridge, long philtrum, down-turned angles of the mouth), upper-extremity malformations, hirsutism, cardiac defects, and gastrointestinal alterations. The prevalence of this syndrome is approximately one per 15,000.  Ultrasound is not the perfect means to diagnose CdLS, however, many abnormalities can be detected prenatally by scrupulous image observation.
We report an atypical CdLS case characterized by increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester, normal kariotype, saddle nose, micrognathia with receding jaw, low set ears, facies senilis, arthrogryposis of the hands, absence of the Aranzio ductus venous, dilatation of gallbladder and bowel, a unique umbilical artery, increased volume of amniotic fluid, and intrauterine growth retardation ending with the interruption of pregnancy.

Introduction

Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) is a genetic disorder that can lead to several alterations. It affects both physical and psychical development. The several abnormalities include facial dysmorphia (arched eyebrows, synophrys, depressed nasal bridge, long philtrum, down-turned angles of the mouth), upper-extremity malformations, hirsutism, cardiac defects, and gastrointestinal alterations1. The prevalence of this syndrome is approximately one per 15,0002. Many markers have to be considered. Nuchal translucency (NT) measurement during the first trimester screening between 11 and 14 weeks gestation has now been clearly identified as a marker for aneuploidies and in particular for trisomy 21. Even in the absence of aneuploidy, increased fetal nuchal translucency has been shown to be a marker for fetal heart malformations and several other fetal defects linked to genetic syndromes when the measure exceeds the 95th percentile (3–5 mm)3. When conventional karyotyping is normal, enlarged NT is a strong marker for adverse pregnancy outcome, associated with miscarriage or intrauterine death). Unspecified genetic syndromes involving developmental delay may only emerge after birth and become evident after the first years of life. Several abnormalities have been reported in fetuses with enlarged NT: the majority are cardiac defects, diaphragmatic hernia, exomphalos, body stalk anomaly, skeletal defects, certain genetic syndromes (such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia), fetal akinesia, deformation sequence, Noonan syndrome, Smith-lemli-Opitz syndrome and spinal muscular atrophy4. The saddle nose, characterized by a markedly depressed bridge has been described in AIDS embryopathy, Christ-Siemans-Touraine syndrome, various deletion syndromes, fetal trimethadione syndrome, Laron-type dwarfism, leprechaunism, multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED) syndrome, relapsing polychondritis, thanatophoric dwarfism, Wegener’s granulomatosis, and various conditions that are further characterized by gargoyle-like facies. Micrognathia (mandible of insufficient size) is a malformation of the fetal face characterized by a small mandible. Micrognathia may be idiopathic but is more commonly associated with many different syndromes. Retrognathia (recession of the chin) is assessed through the measurement of the inferior facial angle, as defined on a mid-sagittal view. With routine ultrasound, the receded chin may be seen on a profile of the face. Yet, this diagnosis is often missed during a routine ultrasound examination. The mandible is known to grow significantly during the third trimester. If mandibular alteration is suspected, particular attention should be paid to the growth of the chin throughout the remainder of the pregnancy. Conditions associated with micrognathia include chromosomal abnormalities, neuromuscular abnormalities, single-gene disorders, and other syndromes. The prognosis of fetal micrognathia is poor, even in chromosomally normal fetuses. Frequent malformations associated with micrognathia are: Pierre Robin sequence (micrognathia, cleft palate, or both)5; Cerebrocostomandibular syndrome (diagnosed on the basis of micrognathia, a posterior cleft palate defect, and characteristic rib gap abnormalities); Cornelia de Lange syndrome, (underdeveloped chin with tetralogy of Fallot, intrauterine growth restriction, and an abnormal right hand)6; hypochondrogenesis type II and Caffey disease.

Case report

We report a case of a healthy 31-year-old, gravida 2, para 1 at 30 weeks of gestation that was admitted to S. Bambino University Hospital in Catania for ultrasound examination.

Ultrasounds revealed nuchal edema, saddle nose, micrognathia with receding jaw, low set ears, facies senilis at 3D ultrasounds, arthrogryposis of the hands, absence of Aranzio ductus venous, dilation of gallbladder and bowel, single one umbilical artery, increased volume of amniotic fluid. Intrauterine growth retardation was associated as well. (Figure 1) Micrognathia was evident on midsagittal and 3D scan. The biparietal diameter was 68 mm, femur length 47 mm, suggesting fetal growth restriction. Pulsed Doppler sonography showed normal middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery pulsatility indices. The obstetric history revealed increased nuchal translucency thickness (NT) at 11 weeks (4 mm, > 95 centile). No genetic alterations were found at the amniocentesis carried out during 16th week of pregnancy (normal karyotype of 46, XX). Morphological ultrasound at 22 weeks of pregnancy was not able to detect the syndrome. A further ultrasound examination at 29 weeks (Figure 2) of pregnancy pointed out a fetal dimorphism and the pregnant woman asked for our consultation.

f48c5c69-b626-40ee-9101-fdae3f6d4f9c_figure1.gif

Figure 1. 30th week face profile with ultrasound.

f48c5c69-b626-40ee-9101-fdae3f6d4f9c_figure2.gif

Figure 2. 29thweek face aspect with 3D ultrasound.

Soon after, interruption of pregnancy occurred. The autopsy showed a foetus with a weight between the 5th and the 10th percentile and a dysmorphic syndrome with malformation features amenable to CdLS (Figure 3). The foetus had a typical dysmorphic face, hirsutism, rhizomelic limb, bilateral camptodactyly, single transverse palmar crease, proximal and very short inches with hypoplasia of 1st metacarpal and single phalanx, II-III membranous syndactyly of feet, right diaphragmatic hernia, bilateral cryptorchidism, microcephaly, numerous nodules of heterotopic cerebellar vermis, single umbilical artery and hypotrophic placenta devoid of inflammatory lesions.

f48c5c69-b626-40ee-9101-fdae3f6d4f9c_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Aspect of the new born (facies senilis).

Discussion and conclusion

CdLS is a multisystem malformation syndrome recognized primarily on the basis of the morphological characteristics (malformations of the cranial, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and skeletal systems)7. However, there is wide clinical variability of disorders, with milder phenotypes that may be difficult to ascertain on the basis of physical features. In certain cases the diagnosis may be missed when ultrasound examination is not performed accurately8. Criteria to detect CdLS are not standardized. The main alterations are as follows9:

  • Facial abnormalities (synophrys, long eyelashes, microcephaly, anteverted nostrils)

  • Cardiac defects (defects of ventricles or atria, aortic or pulmonary stenoses, tetralogy of Fallot, atrioventricular canal, single ventricle, aorto-pulmonary window, truncus arteriosus communis)

  • Abnormalities of upper limbs (ectrodactylia and monodactylism)

  • Gastrointestinal alterations (diaphragmatic hernia)

  • Musculoskeletal malformations

  • Intrauterine growth retardation

Ultrasound detection of eyelashes is considered a clue for prenatal diagnosis of CdLS, but it can be missed in clinical practice10. CdLS is considered a cohesinopathy. Mutations in cohesin, or its regulators, cause a spectrum of human developmental syndromes. Cohesinopathy disorders include both CdLS and Roberts Syndrome. The discovery of novel roles for chromatid cohesion proteins in regulating gene expression led to the idea that cohesinopathies are caused by dysregulation of multiple genes downstream of mutations in cohesion proteins. Consistent with this idea, there is an altered expression of developmental genes and an incomplete overlap among dysregulated genes in different components of the cohesion apparatus11. CdLS is considered a dominantly inherited congenital malformation disorder, caused by mutations in the cohesin-loading protein NIPBL for nearly 60% of individuals. In humans, the multisubunit complex cohesin is made up of SMC1, SMC3, RAD21 and a STAG protein. These form a ring structure that is proposed to encircle sister chromatids to mediate sister chromatid cohesion; it also has a key role in genetic regulation. In CdLS cell lines an altered transcription with either NIPBL or HDAC8 mutations has been found12. The proteins produced from mutated genes interfere in the foetal development. Within cells, these proteins help regulate the structure and organization of chromosomes and are involved in the repair of damaged DNA. They also regulate the activity of certain genes in the developing limbs, face, and other parts of the body. Researchers are looking for additional changes in the NIPBL, SMC1A and SMC3 genes, as well as mutations in other genes, that may be responsible for this condition. The majority of cases result from new gene mutations and occur in people with no history of familiarity. CdLS can be prenatally diagnosed in a family with a known mutation in a CdLS gene. The characteristic ultrasonographic profile may allow for prenatal diagnosis of CdLS in subsequent pregnancies for couples with a prior child with CdLS in whom a mutation has not been identified or when there are unexplained signs of fetal abnormality during pregnancy, such as oligo- or polyhydramnios, a low maternal serum PAPP-A level and/or increased NT, fetal growth retardation, or structural anomalies consistent with CdLS13. In some cases the diagnosis is made prenatally in other cases the syndrome is diagnosed after childbirth.

The diagnosis is seldom in doubt when there is a major longitudinal deficiency defect of the upper limb, severe prenatal and postnatal growth retardation, and severe mental retardation. Features used to make the correct diagnosis include penciled and arched eyebrows, a high set/short anteverted nose, a long flat philtrum, a thin upper lip, downturned corners of the mouth, and micrognathia. Characteristics that are misleading include full or flat brows, a prominent nasal bridge or bulbous tip, and/or a normal or prominent chin. As genetic and biochemical tests are unreliable at present, antenatal detection depends upon identification of some aspects of the phenotype in the fetus using ultrasound imaging14,15. When the syndrome is not recognized during pregnancy, the newborn may survive with a low quality of life and, thus, medical team could become involved in surgical procedures16. Each malformation causes an impact in the psychological sphere of both the individual and the family17,18. Finally, last but not the least, the failure of an early diagnosis may lead to medical-legal issues19.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 31 Jan 2014
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Leanza V, Rubbino G and Leanza G. Atypical Cornelia de Lange Syndrome: a case report [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2014, 3:33 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3-33.v1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 31 Jan 2014
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Apr 2014
Laird Jackson, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 16
I agree with the report and comments of Dr Jinglian Liu, who has also reviewed this article. The case report is interesting in its detail of the prenatal ultrasound examination and observations, but completely fails its responsibility to connect those observations ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Jackson L. Reviewer Report For: Atypical Cornelia de Lange Syndrome: a case report [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2014, 3:33 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.1212.r4483)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
30
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Feb 2014
Jinglan Liu, Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 30
This manuscript describes a fetus with clinical features suggestive of Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS).

My comments are as follows:
  1. Data from mutational testing on known CdLS genes (NIPBL, SMC1A, SMC3, RAD21, and HDAC8) would be important for this case.  The article
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Liu J. Reviewer Report For: Atypical Cornelia de Lange Syndrome: a case report [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2014, 3:33 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.1212.r3450)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 01 Sep 2014
    vito leanza, Surgery Department, Obstetrics and Gynecologic Unit “Ospedale Santo Bambino”, Catania University, Catania, Italy
    01 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    1. “Data from mutational testing on known CdLS genes (NIPBL, SMC1A, SMC3, RAD21, and HDAC8) would be important for this case. The article published by Clark et al. (2012) which was
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 01 Sep 2014
    vito leanza, Surgery Department, Obstetrics and Gynecologic Unit “Ospedale Santo Bambino”, Catania University, Catania, Italy
    01 Sep 2014
    Author Response
    1. “Data from mutational testing on known CdLS genes (NIPBL, SMC1A, SMC3, RAD21, and HDAC8) would be important for this case. The article published by Clark et al. (2012) which was
    ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 31 Jan 2014
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.